What are some good compact cameras you guys could recommend?

>>2698974
Your cell phone.
Ricoh GR
The gear thread

Theres a compact camera general, ask there

>>2698974
There's the GR, but if you can't afford that, you can try getting the Samsung EX2F which has an f/1.4 lens AND a fully articulated screen, as well as manual controls in video mode, though it is at the cost of a much smaller sensor

File: drawer.jpg (3MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3648px

>>2698974

i'm using the sony rx100 mii and it's optimal for my needs and price range.

inb4 dust

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-RX100M2
Camera Software	RawTherapee
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:09:11 19:16:39
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	-3.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	10.40 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: panasonic_lumix_lf1-23780487-frntl.jpg (54KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x500px

If you want really compact camera with manual controls and an evf, then I would suggest the Panasonic LF1

File: dkamera_Vergleichstest_Sony_Cybershot_DSC_RX100_III_vs_Panasonic_Lumix_DMC_GM5_06.jpg (83KB, 573x382px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 573x382px

Panasonic GM5 with 20mm f/1.7 lens

>>2699648
yo thanks dude this camera looks really fun

Lumix LX100

>>2699657
I can sell you one. Not much used :)

Noone going to mention the Olympus Pen series? Or for the most compact Pentax Q?

>>2699651
900 dollars...

>>2698974
FFS, POST IN THE GEAR THREAD YOU NEWFAGGOT. REEE

>>2699715
If you don't need the viewfinder or the hot-shoe you can get a GM1 or a GF7 which are a similar size and have the same IQ for a lot less. Also OP didn't mention a budget.

>>2699750
>REE
>>>/r9k/

>>2699635
Can confirm with RX100M3. Nothing better for pocketable videotography.

>>2699887
>not m4
clearly doesn't know shit about gear.

File: normies.jpg (131KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 900x900px

>>2699790
just fuck off!!!

>>2699965
I have no need for 4K video. Full sensor 1080 XAVC-S readout is more than enough for me, as well as 120FPS slowmo. No real changes for photos, even with the BSI sensor. I've also been using the M3 for over a year already.

>>2699887
>>2699965
Lumix LX100 is better

>>2699995
>12megapickle cropped out of a 16megapickle

>>2700022
So what
Bigger sensor, better IQ, better video, better controls

>>2700023
Individual sensor size is what's important, not overall size.

>>2699995
Not pocketable

>>2699661
why are you trying to sell it though? :^)

>>2700283
Personally I don't like the really small pocketable cameras, I find them to be too small to be used comfortably, also when they're in your pocket they're exposed to dust and other shit

>>2700316
then why are you in this thread you turbo-autist? go back to your MF/LF/FF thread where you belong.

>>2700322
Kill yourself

>>2699757
But who buys a point and shoot for 900 dollars? Aside from its light and compact size, whats the value? Why would someone get this over something like an a6000 which is just a slightly bit bigger yet top notch.

>>2700359
For one thing, the a6000 is incredibly noisy whereas this is literally as quiet as a mouse.

You might not notice the need for this if you are in the city but if you wanna take a pic while on a calm street in a small-ish town... with the a6000 you better not mind everybody in a 30m radius turning their heads towards you.

File: 11535790_798793597167_8739875187078744147_n.jpg (85KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 960x720px

>>2700359
>a6000 which is just a slightly bit bigger

People who say this obviously don't own/use both an a6000 & a compact.

>>2702569
>people who don't use sd card readers.

>>2702569
>1/1.7"
bigger than shit but still small.

>some f4 voigtlander
does it purple cast?
should have gotten a sony 20 2.8

>>2702738
it's obviously a macbook air with 1 usb port.
hahaha kek.

>>2702738
It's a USB charger.

>>2702741
>should have gotten a sony 20 2.8

Because that would've worked great on my M mount bodies.

>>2702738
lol ur just butthurt. every new mac has a built in card reader

What's the Canon equivalent of a GR?

>>2702792
eos m + 22mm f/2

>>2703805
i have this.
lens is sharp wide open.
get a stick on rubber grip and hotshoe grip.
you won't be taking fast action but you can use small aperture, spray and pray.

also get a sandisk 48MB/s sd card. it will max out the card writer.

>>2698974

Having good results with Olympus TG-4; tough; waterproof; captures in RAW; has tele and macro lens add-ons