Is anyone here getting the new Civic Type R?

File: supra-green-1.jpg (67KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 750x422px

>>17256245
I'll pass

>>17256245
Piece of shit literally looks like it was designed by a 13 year old boy. Honda has always been pretty meh in the design department but this is a new low. Straight up boy racer extraordinaire.

>>17256291
I think it looks cool

File: Honda-Civic_Mugen_Si_Sedan_Prototype-2007-1600-03.jpg (201KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1600x1200px

No thanks.

>>17256303
If you are a fan of gamer mouses, then yeah.

>>17256245
Is anyone here about to drop 40k on a Civic? no.. i highly doubt it. any civic fans would rather get a used civic and modify it and anyone who has 40k to burn will probably try to go for Camaros, Stangs, used WRX STIs, used EVOs or used Ms.

Focus RS (this car's main rival) has more hype behind it and you'd probably likely see someone who owns that on /o/ than This. plus AWD vs FWD will be more likely to draw past STI and EVO buyers.

prime example of the above>>17256313

File: Razer Firefly.png (223KB, 940x573px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 940x573px

>>17256326
Actually I am

File: 1495583129520.jpg (924KB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

924KB, 2560x1920px

>>17256331
based razer br/o/

>>17256331
>>17256354
>underage confirmed

>>17256414
>honda trying to sell a 40k vehicle to underaged kids
y tho

>>17256245
I am thinking about checking it out.
Haven't owned honda in Long time and I miss it. I am hoping type r is what everybody says it is.
Only problem is dealer mark ups and not able to test drive them.
I am ready to move on to new amg or m cars, 40k price mark does seem high for civic...

>>17256245
/o/ is poorfag center. Shitboxes reign supreme here. By simply having a ecoboost mustang, you're better off than most of /o/.

File: IMG_0401.jpg (249KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1024x680px

>he doesn't know an STI exists

>>17256530
It's inferior in every way. Yeah I know it exists I just don't know why anyone would ever choose one over the Type R. It's like saying who needs that 70 inch flatscreen when you could have a 22 inch CRT.

>>17256539

>inferior in every way
>literally 100% more driven wheels

Chose one

>>17256245
no

>>17256604
Only 50% more my dude.

>>17256604
>>17256530
the STi is slower you cuck

>>17256769

How

2 powered wheels on the civic
2 more on the STI.

2 + 100% of 2 = 4 wheel drive.

50% of two would be 1+2 or 3 wheels

>>17256245
Yes, but only when it depreciates to under half of it's MSRP. Until then I can wait.
>>17256254
Provided they give us a manual transmission and it cost under 40k.
>>17256769
>that new math

>>17256786
But it's not.

>>17256849
post an STi faster than this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OMOBmAkTdI

>>17256807
2 wheels is 50% of 4 wheels, are you fucking retarded or what

>>17256893
thats not what he said you fucking idiot

>>17256912
2 is 50% of 4. Adding 2 wheels to 2 wheels is an additional 50%

File: 1491708287649.jpg (131KB, 959x599px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 959x599px

>>17256921
>2+2=4 ya dingus!

>>17256921

What

Adding 2 to 2 is adding 100% to 2.

2 is 100% of 2.

Therefore a car with 4 wheel drive has 100% more driven wheels than a car with 2 wheel drive.

If a car has 50% more powered wheels than a two wheel drive car, it would have 3 powered wheels. Because 50% of 2 is 1. 1+2 = 3.

>>17256949
>literally taking time to explain mathematics to a 4chan poster
Kek

>>17256949
>what is 50% of 4?

File: IMG_0544.jpg (55KB, 500x461px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x461px

>>17256976

Why are you being this way

What is your end game

>>17256949
It's adding 50% to 2 because 2 is 50% of 4. You can even plug it into your calculator, add 50% to 2 and the answer is 4

>>17256921
>>17256976
>>17256994


you fucking idiot

File: 1494578348582.jpg (25KB, 700x312px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 700x312px

>>17256994
>>17256976

This niggers

4(0.5)=2

>Mathematical god confirmed

>>17256254
How sad would you be if the new Supra was slower than the Civic Type-R on the burgerking?

>>17257019
I wouldn't care at all if it then lost in a same driver test.

>>17257019
Does the new supra use the 2JZ? Please tell me they're using the 2JZ.

File: 1489836358306.png (77KB, 278x200px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 278x200px

>>17257019
I would kms then I would kill you next

File: 1471918436808.gif (2MB, 325x235px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x235px

>>17257025
The engine is from BMW lol

>>17257025
Are you asking if they use a discontinued engine or are you asking if they are going to bring back a packaging problem? the answer to both is "no". if any straight six is going in there it'll likely be BMW's and you sure as fuck don't want that. id rather a Toyota V6 built up with the characteristics of their 2JZ (i.e being able to handle meme levels of horsepower with boost)

>>17257038
Only the 4 bangers

>>17257025
Are you a fucking retard or is this bait

>>17256921
okay so 1.0 is 100%, 0.5 is 50%

2 wheels plus 2 wheels is four wheels

2 + 2 = 4

2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added

if we added only 50% more wheels

2 + 2(0.5) = 3

>>17256769
>>17256807

Why does a simple reference to math cause this much autism?

>>17257065
>2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added
Your own calculation says you added 200% you idiot.

>okay so 1.0 is 100%, 0.5 is 50%
Then you multiplied 1.0 by 2. 200%.

>>17257055
Just wishful thinking

>>17257038
Well fuck

>>17257065
>2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added
Literally what the fuck is this?

The car already has 4 wheels to begin with. With AWD vs RWD you are simply adding power to the other 2 wheels which is the other 50% of the 4/2. The other guys are right, the original guy in >>17256604 phrased that statement incorrectly. It's 50% more of the 4 wheels being "driven"

>what u want pham?
i took geometry in high school
>say no mo

ITT: a nigger that can't into math
Seriously, what the actual fuck.
>inb4 hurr I was just p-pretending, you j-just got b-baited

>>17256245
It's a good looking car

I'm sure it's a fine car, but the styling of it kills any interest I have for it.

File: 1263274078409.jpg (18KB, 366x380px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 366x380px

>>17256604
>>17256769
>>17256807
>>17256828
>>17256893
>>17256912
>>17256921
>>17256930
>>17256949
>>17256976
>>17256994
>>17257016
>>17257065
>>17257076
>>17257110
>/o/ tries their hand at basic mathematics

>>17256245
>spending $40k on anything with FWD

>>17256442
>honda trying to sell a 40k vehicle to parents of underaged kids

>>17256245
looking into it
dealerships around me are saying it's gonna be first come first served. also heard price is gonna be just under 40k. if the stars align, i'll pick it up

>>17256254
that shit is fucking ugly

>>17258483
you won't get it this year. I already checked all the near by honda dealerships.
expect them to treat this car like limited edition enzo. Unless you don't mind paying 60k for civic.

>>17258539
yeah if the price ends up being crazy like that i'll just buy a new bike instead. i gave a couple dealerships my number so i'll see what ends up happening but i'm not expecting anything

>>17256245
No, you missed be 18 to post

>>17258558
there is actually few people on forum, who had msrp deal in the writing and dealerships turned around and say they want the markup.
If you can wait, just look at the focus RS, most dealerships are taking off markups, and some of them are discounting them.
First year type r is going to be crazy

File: nick-young-confused-face-300x256_nqlyaa.jpg (25KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x512px

>>17257041
>wanting a V6 to act like an i6

Is it 100 or 50 % more wheels?

Im gonna wait a year until base R comes out , should also put it around $33k before mark up, current touring package should be 36k pre mark up
those prices are currency conversion from uk BUT could be wrong

>>17256893
Holy fuck you are retarded. The civic has 2 drive wheels. 100% of driven wheels on the civic is 2. By adding 100% more drive wheels, which is 2, you will have 4 drive wheels.

For 40k (the same amount of money you'd spend on the Civic Type R) you could take a 3k Civic and put all of the mods on the "simple mods list" and have money to spare.

>>17256604
But that's not a benefit here you mong.

These aren't 500bhp cars, but 300bhp ones and you sure as hell don't need AWD for that.

If anything the STI is heavier and has greater power loss than the Civic.

And of course, it's slower.

And mind you, that's against a FWD!

All wheel drive has it's place but don't think of it as more than what it is.

>>17257038
so an inline 6
good

>>17258819
Yeah but you'd still be driving a 3k civic

>>17258159
SCREEN CAP THISSHIT

>>17258837
You arent even comparing cars in the same class...

>>17256331
I remember when I was 15 too

>>17256354
Razer everything is shit. Get a fucking Ducky or Filco or something.

>>17257019
I'm not a bus cuck.

>>17257025
The BMW version is using one of their straight sixes, if not the S55 it'll be the an M tuned version of the B58.

The Toyota version (the new Supra) will be using a V6, likely from their GR engine family. If they were smart they'd offer a V8 trim, but that might compete with RC-F sales.

im screenshotting these retarded math attempts

Can someone post a full screenshot with all the math fuck ups

>>17261149
working on it

File: o tries maths.png (424KB, 1585x3743px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 1585x3743px

retardedness now captured forever

>>17261485
>honda fanbois do math

>>17261501
are you the sti fag who started it all?

>>17256604
Isn't it 200% more driven wheels?

>2wd is 100%
>4wd is 200% of 2wd

>>17261518
No, I'm just a concerned user

>>17256921
Kek

>>17256245
ITT /o/ can't in-between drive wheels and wheels.

>>17261553
nono dont start again retards!

>>17261553
fwd is 50% of the wheels
awd is 50% more = 100%

>>17258159
WHAT ACTUALLY IS THE ANSWER
everyone is making good arguments for their maths

>>17261553
>you have $2
>I say let me borrow 100% of what you have
>you give me $2
>we now have $4 total

>>17261592
lol please be a troll and not a complete moron.

>>17261602
It's OK if you don't know either anon.

>>17261592
100% of driven wheels x2 = 200% driven wheels or 100% more driven wheels

50% of the wheels are driven + another 50% is 100% of wheels driven

both are correct

this is litterally primary school shit

>>17261618
>doesn't know what 100% of 2 is. It's 2. Ergo 4 drive wheels. Ergo 100% more drive wheels. It's the most basic of basic math.

>2 drive wheels
>x100%
>=2
>2(original) + 2 (the x100%)
>=4
>4 drive wheels is literally 100% more than 2 drive wheels.

>>17261622
So, 50%, 100% and 200% are all correct.

OK got it.

>>17261631
Nuh-uh
See >>17261622
We're all correct, numbnuts.

>>17261646
>too stupid to understand the difference between DRIVE wheels and wheels

KYS. They are two completely different statements. The math is the same.

File: shelby.jpg (143KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1024x768px

>Buying a new underpowered JDM shitbox for the same price as a low-mileage 5 year old Shelby with twice the horsepower

Oh shit faggot what are you doing?!

>>17261679
>it has twice the horsepower at the same price!

but it's twice as boring.

>>17261679
>no jdm market for parts
into the trash it goes

>>17256245
my mom says civics are for girls now

>>17261640
yes you sarcastic retard they are correct

wait so if 2+2=4 then how does 4x 50% =4?

Did I stumble into a WAT mathematics class?

>>17261981
Some people literally don't understand that 2 is 50% of 4

>>17261992
>2 is not 100% of 2

also someone pls screencap this

>>17256245
If I can fit in it, yeah

File: image.jpg (174KB, 1010x810px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1010x810px

>mfw came into the thread for info and bantz
>got presented with math instead

is wing delete an option?

>>17262115
But that's the best part. That's like taking the skin off of fried chicken

>>17257023
>same driver test
this has many flaws dumbass. most of the flaws should be so obvious that i don't need to mention them. the cars should be tested by the car companies' respective test drivers who are familiar with their respective cars.

>>17256354
>razer chiclet keyboard
Unironically kill yourself, you didn't even get a good razer product

The common misconception is that you can add a percentage without any other information:
>50% • 4 = 2
Is correct, but
>2 + 100% = 4
is misleading, and should instead be written as:
>2 + 100% • 2 = 4
or:
>2 • 200% = 4
When you add 15% tax to something, you are actually multiplying it by 115%, or 1.15. To get from 2 wheels to four, you need to add another 100% of the original wheel count, which is equivalent to multiplying it by 200%.

Inversely, saying:
>4 - 50% = 2
is misleading, and should instead be written as:
>4 - 4 • 50%
or:
>4 • 50%
Whether you use the "multiply by 200%" or the "divide by 50%" maths doesn't really matter, as long as you constantly use the same system.

Also a 4x4 doesn't have 16 wheels, what's up with that?

>>17262154
go to >>>/g/mkg even they will admit that chiclet keyboards have redeeming qualities like being good for typing speed and gaming because of the shorter actuation distance

>>17256604
>100% more driven wheels
this is correct. the other car has 2 driven wheels. this car has 4 driven wheels which is 100% more than 2.

>>17262249
4 is 50% more than 2.

2 is 50% of 4. 50% + 50% = 100%. 2 + 2 = 4. You're adding 50%. Seriously /o/ is so retarded when it comes to math

>>17262258
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=50%25+more+than+2

File: o btfo.png (24KB, 731x485px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 731x485px

>>17262263
Give it up bud

File: Capture.png (36KB, 676x541px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 676x541px

>>17262275

>>17262258
4 is 4*50% more than 2, but 2*100% more than 2.

If you want to increase your 2 wheels by 50%, then that 50% will be assumed to be relative to the aforementioned 2 wheels, and so will create 3 wheels.

If you want to decrease your 4 wheels by 50%, then that 50% will be assumed to be relative to the aforementioned 4 wheels, and so will create 2 wheels.

Percent is a fraction of something that has to be specified, otherwise it will be assumed to be a fraction of the most relevant mentioned quantity. It's not hard.

Could buy 4 Corvettes that are all faster and ironically smaller than the new Civic type R for the same price. I'm not retarded or poor enough to finance a wrx clone.

>>17262308
In addition, if you do simply add "2 + 50%" without specifying what the 50% is of, then you can interpret that as "2 + 0.5" and it will be perfectly valid by any guidelines of mathematics, just not by the english language. This discrepancy is why >>17262275 and >>17262282 are different.

>>17256245
I think a better question would be, can anyone on /o/ afford a Civic Type R? I assumed most of us drove shitboxes because that's really all we can afford.