UGUUGHGHH

Yeah, it's infuriating that the car with the worlds greatest price:performance ratio is built like a fucking bunker.

>>14670043
Yea dude, and the SS they had was like $45,000 i think, whereas the Mustang GT was $37,000 iirc. But the SS had magnetic ride and some other shit (idk if the GT does, I thought that was on the GT350). But it still seemed a bit much for an ugly fucking car. I'd be surprised if they keep up the same sales numbers as previous years.

And the GT actually felt roomy for what it was and didn't have windows that LITERALLY came up to my cheek like on the camaro.

Trying to hard to keep with the styling of the past few Camaros while trying to compete with the the styling of the new mustang. Its just not happening.

>>14670029

I actually liked the look of the 5th gen when it first came out. very clean and not to angry. i wish the Alpha platform was out then because we would've had this (5th gen look) matched with that (6th gen) performance.

They initially didn't want to use the Sigma platform because it was too heavy so basically this is the Camaro the camaro engineers wanted to build (performance-wise) but was held back by the lack of platform choices until now.

Unfortunately the era of super progressive car design has left a sour taste in a lot of people's mouth regarding cars they use to like.

File: 32948924893.jpg (1MB, 3645x1786px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3645x1786px

>>14670087
Forgot pic

>>14670091
Honestly, i didnt like these when they came out, but ive started to like the look of em recently, especially after seeing the 2016 model, these look great by comparison.

Good thing Americans are obsessed with black/murdered out cars so most of the car's lines will be hidden.

File: 2015-09-30_17-20-39.jpg (379KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1280x853px

>>14670087
The 5th gen is fine. It's got aggressive styling, but it isn't "angry" looking. I'd say it looks determined. The 6th gen on the otherhand just looks downright furious, and overstyled, exaggerating all the traits of the previous gen.

>>14670111
my biggest complaint is what they did with the back window/back window lines. Making the change from coming to a point in the back to making it a lopsided square, and the roof line towards the back seems to be more bulging

>>14670172
oops meant back window/roof line

>>14670107
Better than Europeans and their obsession with getting murdered by blacks in their cars.

File: 1440627708577.jpg (7KB, 250x224px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x224px

>>14670195

>>14670211
Fuck off >>>/int/

File: 1443168603561.gif (906KB, 325x203px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 325x203px

>>14670238
Hello Mr. Nofun

>>14670080
The Mustang interior and body design is so much better than the Camero. The magnetic ride in the Camero however, is pretty awesome apparently.

You are correct in that Ford only has magnetic ride control on the GT350.

>>14670238
Hit a bit too close to home lad?

>>14670273
Yee I thought the interior of the GT was pretty nice, wasn't too fancy but seemed like was pretty quality. I thought it was comfy. I was super dissapointed they didn't bring a GT350 this year

What madman would buy a new camaro over a new mustang?

>>14670318
a bench racer