Was this his worst look?

>>70405424
His current look

>>>/fa/

>>70405432
David Bowie is not music related? Fuck off. You don't belong here. You are the type of people ruining /mu/.

File: MCIce.jpg (8KB, 202x249px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 202x249px

>>70405424
No, he looks fine there. His 90s looks were pretty good.

...1987, however...

>>70405424
He looks like a villain from a cyberpunk movie.

File: the_ugliest_decade.jpg (73KB, 736x441px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 736x441px

>>70405424
Yes.

The 90's was everyone's worst look.

>>70405446
David Bowie is a fucking musician, faggot. Do you know what artist discussion is?

>>70405476
Not true, by the way

>>70405424
trying so hard to be hip and in, riding another wave, just like he did throughout his entire career

>>70405510
Oh but it's painfully true.

>>70405489
>worst look
>look meaning appearance
>appearance includes style

>>>/fa/

>>70405532
For the record, those people all look cooler than ANYONE today

And the best part is they're not even trying. that's the best kind of cool. and that's part of what makes them look cool

I'm sorry that effortless cool is lost on the younger generations who didn't grow up in the mid/late 90s when it was a thing

>>70405554
>david bowie
>bowie as in the musician
>musician as in one with characteristics
>characteristics such as a style

I can play by your same rules, faggot. It's all artist discussion. Now fuck off back to >>>/pol/

File: thin white duke.jpg (114KB, 1129x1000px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1129x1000px

>>70405424
I don't know but this is his best

>>70405579
I was born in the 80's kid. I remember the 90's very well and it was a terrible, dreary decade.
This recent 90's nostalgia seriously confounds me.

>>70405647
Definitely.

>>70405613
>i've lost the argument
>i'll redirect them to pol

>>>/mu/

>>70405688
>I have no response to what the anon actually said so I'll just ignore that entire part and say he lost the argument

>>70405688
>>70405704
now fuck.

>>70405688
>lost argument

Projecting much?

>>70405424
u got it right OP

>>70405668
>kid
Haha. Let me tell you a little bit about myself. I was born in 1991. I'm no kid, pal, and I know a thing or two about the 90s. And your description and attitude towards them tells me one of two things. You're lying. Or you are a typical 80s kid and so your bias has blinded you to the truth. I'm sorry that your decade is no longer in style, thank God - last thing I want to see is shoulder pads, ridiculous hairstyles, bad cartoons, and terrible music. The 90s are back in again with its superior sense of style, music, cartoons, toys, and pop culture, so you'd better get used to it. Who knows, maybe in a few decades the 80s will be back in again... but don't count on it. Just do me one favor. Don't take your anger over that out on the 90s. It just makes you look like a sore loser.

>>70405788
What did he mean by this

File: ffs.png (154KB, 581x578px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 581x578px

>>70405788
>it's not a copypasta

>>70405704
>im gonna act like my argument had substance despite the fact that I made it by slapping my dick on the keyboard

>>>/pol/

>>70405439
damn...

>>70405827
It has to be. It is way to autistic sperglord to be original

>>70405830
It's not an argument. It's a simple fact that it's artist discussion. Now respond to that.

Also, you have to keep in mind that this is not just a random post of "hey, is this the worst look of this musician?" You are ignoring the fact that this is David Bowie, whose fashion and music is inseparable. Each album he took a persona and integrated that into the music, which was indicated by a style.

This is artist discussion. Get over it.

>>70405893
no results in google or the archive

File: labyrinth.jpg (85KB, 1000x651px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1000x651px

probably this lol

>>70405668
>I was born in the 80's
my condolences

File: inumpressed Jaff.jpg (195KB, 1600x1693px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1600x1693px

>>70405788
>born in 1991
>was no more than 9 in 2000

Yeah pal, you sure experienced the full zeitgeist of the 90's alright as you shat your diapers.

is that chris jericho

>>70405788
Billy Corgan's the only one who looks even remotely decent and it's ruined by the ugly striped pattern on his suit

>I was born in 1991
what the fuck is this shit btw? You gotta be born in 81 or earlier to have fully experience that shit, kiddo

>>70406063
I barely remember them, but I vividly remember the ugliness of the mid-late 90's.

I wouldn't wish it on anyone.

>>70405468
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.

>>70405827
it is now :^)

>>70405476

Dave Grohl looks sharp as fuck desu.

File: where am i.png (169KB, 358x465px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 358x465px

>>70405788

>>70405918
artist =/= music

>>>/trash/

>>70406386
suck =/= my =/= dick

>>>/now/

>>70405788
You type like a redditor

>>70406386
Lol, did you even read the rules of this board? Artist discussion is essential to this board.

>>70406386
>artist =/= music
Yeah it doesn't but that's not what /mu/ is solely about. Read the rules, faggot.

>Discuss music, artists, and instruments here. All images should relate to the topic at hand.

>>70406185
>ugliness
You mean style.

The 80's and current 80's revival trend reign supreme in terms of kitsch and ugly.

>>70405807
That's a fucking genuinely cool fit what are you on about

>>70405579
Those people are trying extremely hard to look cool dude it was not effortless at all

>>70407010
The 80's revival was in the 00's, and yes it ugly. It celebrated all the worst aspects of the decade.

The current 90's revival has been in full swing everywhere since 2012.

>>70406039
oops meant "his best is probably this lol"

>>70405807
That's his best look.
>>70405788
>1991
kek

File: YOU_FUCKING_CREEP_GET_OUT_REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE_EEEEEEEEE_EEEEE.png (449KB, 478x449px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 478x449px

>>70407010
The 1980's was a top-tier decade you fucking 90's-pleb.

>>70407324
2010s 90s revival is an early 90s revival which were indestinguishible from the 80s.

>>70407446
Enjoy your latex suits and hair metal.

>>70407215
>>70407422
Woops, I didn't mean to that it was worse when I posted it. I was just looking through his looks and found that and had to share 'cause I really like it.

>>70405788
i'm no kid, pal, i was born in 1999 so i'm pretty much a 90s kid, kiddo

>>70407446
>hip-hop and electronic music don't get good until the end of the decade
>new wave and post-punk are a shell of what they were in the late 70's
>all the rock greats of the past turn to shitty new wave
>all that's left is punk and shitty metal
it's also the first decade in which capitalist agendas started to trump true creative effort

80's a shit pham

>>70405918
>post thread about fashion
>say it's about music
Why do people do this?

>>70407824
>it's also the first decade in which capitalist agendas started to trump true creative effort
lol

File: IMG_0010.jpg (49KB, 286x252px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 286x252px

The 60's were obviously the best years of fashion, my dudes.

>>70407873
>straw manning this hard
what you should have said is:

>post thread about the fashion of a MUSICIAN, who happens to be very famous for his fashion and constant style changes and whose music is inseparable to said styles


also you said this:

>say it's about music

No I did not say that. What I said if you actually have reading comprehension is that it is /mu/-related, which you would realize if you read the fucking rules of this origami board, you onanist.

>>70407324
>The current 90's revival has been in full swing everywhere since 2012.
Where's my big beat revival then?

File: 1484520103942.png (9KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 800x800px

>>70406432
How would you know this?

>>70407960
>whose music is inseparable from said styles
Untrue, btw. I like Bowie's MUSIC but don't give a damn about what he wears or how he portrays himself.

>>70406301
cocaine is a helluva drug

>>70408065
>I don't see any connection between the two so there isn't any

>>70407960
Also, stop telling me what to type

>>70406180
>what the fuck is this shit btw? You gotta be born in 81 or earlier to have fully experience that shit, kiddo
Nah. By then you're too old to experience it properly. There's nothing like experiencing a decade as a child, through unfiltered, innocent eyes. It's the only true way.

>>70408081
I will once you stop spewing straw mans

>>70408080
You said it's inseparable. I separate it. Your point is moot.

>>70407873
>I don't know what artist discussion is
Anon, just stop already. You're embarrassing yourself.

>>70408095
It's not about the artist, it's about the fashion

>>70408096
>I don't see any connection between the two so there isn't any and hence it shouldn't be posted on /mu/
Get your head out of your own ass

>>70408105
Do you *really* know who the fuck David Bowie is?

Do you know what the fuck artist discussion is?

What is artist discussion. Respond to this.

>>70408130
Discussion about an artist. The point of artist discussion is to focus on the artist. This thread is just a bunch of >>>/fa/ kids posting pictures of outfits that he wore at some point or another and saying "wow isn't that a WACKY outfit xdd!?"

>>70408120
My point is it doesn't have to be connected. That anon said they're INSEPARABLE and I disagree.

File: ziggy.jpg (26KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 460x276px

This is probably an unpopular opinion but I never really liked the Ziggy Stardust look. The music was great on the Ziggy album but I'm not crazy about Diamond Dogs.

>>70408182
And we are focusing on the artist: David Bowie. Artist discussion encompasses all aspects of an artist. You can't argue with that and yet you are trying to.

>>70408192
I doubt that anon really meant that it was objective. It's poor word choice but the point still stands. You said the "point is moot." No it is not unless the point completely went over your head. The idea of them being objectively inseparable is moot but that's not the point.

Remember what I said to you

>and hence it shouldn't be posted on /mu/

That's your problem.

>"My point is it doesn't have to be connected."

Yes, and your point is irrelevant because OP's thread deserves to exist regardless of whether it applies to you or not. Yet again, get your head out of your own ass.

File: Never Let Me Down.jpg (990KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 1500x1500px

Is this worth listening to?

OP here. I have work in the morning so I'm going to bed. If you can't understand what artist discussion is then that's on you, not me.

>>70408263
Only the song "Time Will Crawl" is worth it.

>>70405424
he was really good looking even at 69 so he never really had a "worst" look. he always looked good

>>70408263
Yeah, just make sure to give it some time to grow on you. The second pressing with the readjusted tracklist is slightly better.

>>70408196
Diamond Dogs always felt like it had a strong beginning and end, but fell flat in the middle. Half the time I listened to it I never even got to the end.

>>70405424

>tfw his worst look is still better than your best look

>>70406039
>Goblin King Bowie

unironically good songs in that movie

>>70409839
labyrinth ost is his best album

>>70405489
>bowie ever being musically relevant
>not all about image

>>70409989
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ9BHGX58vQ

Bowie was so perfect for that role. In a film including muppets too.

>>70406301
holy shit

>if i wasn't born then or know nothing about something it automatically becomes worse than what i know

>>70405647
Came here to post this.