Find a flaw friends.

>>29515713
>no hooves

>>29515713
Scitwi exists and we still don't have Aria and Sonata.

File: Great and Powerful Shiggy.png (241KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 600x600px

>>29515713
>Dash
>Purple Mary Sue 3.0
Not even Trixie could salvage this one, OP
kys

>>29515713
A series dissolved into a pitiful colorful cashgrab.

File: IMG_5433.jpg (2MB, 3508x4961px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3508x4961px

>>29515716

>>29515722
Anon, this is clearly EqG, not FiM

File: IMG_5435.jpg (3MB, 3508x4961px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3508x4961px

>>29515716
eat shit

so RD works at a burger joint? fitting I guess

i'm willing to bet
>EQG special 1: movie theater with juniper montage
>EQG special 2: M7's jobs with sunset's sushi truck and this
>EQG special 3: bringing starlight into the group, forming the humane 8 in the actual series

File: IMG_5434.jpg (3MB, 3836x4178px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3836x4178px

>>29515716
(You)

>>29515731
>>29515736
>>29515741
Samecuck

>>29515716
Translation
>no fur
You don't have to lie to kick it

>>29515771
What?

>>29515713
Besides the shit personality, and her idolization by beta boys that just want some skank to mistreat them?
Not much. Looks cute. That blond one was at least twice as cute though.

>>29515781
Ponies have fur
Everyone knows this

>>29515713
It says EQD.

>>29515809
Not really. The correct term is coat. Anyways that has nothing to do with >no hooves

>>29515837
Only furfags like hooves

>>29515837
Well if you wanna be like that
Pigs have hooves
By your logic they are included in your >no hooves

>>29515840
Wut

File: anthro shit.jpg (98KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1280x720px

>>29515771
You can use the most contrived mental gymnastic you can imagine, but it won't change the fact that you're the one who likes anthro shit.
Pony >>> human >>>>>>> whatever the fuck this is

>>29515926
>You can use the most contrived mental gymnastic you can imagine
Pot calling the kettle black: the post
Ayy lamo

>>29515963
>no u
Great comeback, would come back again/10.

>>29515969
It's not a no u
If it applies triggered furfag.

Also minotaurs, sheep, cows, deer, discord and tirek have hooves and a couple of those examples are more anthro than eqg lol

>>29515982
I don't know how many horsefuckers like Iron Will or Tirek, but >>29515926 is the fucking main character of your shitty spin-off and "it" is anthro as fuck, I'm not really sure if it's comparable at all.

Also >lol
Hi Facebook.

File: Iron_Will_ID.png (251KB, 491x624px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 491x624px

>>29515989
There's that mental gymnastics

Quick question
Do they have hooves?
You're grasping at straws lol
>Hi Facebook
Hi non-argument lol

>>29515713
>Trixie
Holy shit, I might just.

>>29515713
>female
>find a flaw
Impossible.

>>29516043
That's literally a fallacy. You're trying to imply that I said that hooves make anything good. But >no hooves only means that if something has no hooves, it's shit.
p has no hooves → p is shit
Using the modus tollendo tollens, the only thing you can say is, if p is not shit, you can be sure that it has hooves, nothing else.

This is equivalent to "if someone cuts your head off, you die". It's true. And you can be sure that if you're not dead, no one has cut your head off yet. But it doesn't mean that you won't die ever if no one cuts your head off. Learn 2 logic, pls.

>>29516095
>can't answer the question
>goes on emotional rant
Oh he mad lol

>>29516095
>Learn 2 logic
But they do have hooves
What's the problem?

>>29516101
>>29516107
>I can't argue with propositional logic so I'll keep on using formal fallacies to pretend I'm right
Alrighty then.

File: Tirek_ID_S4E26.png (221KB, 462x720px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 462x720px

>>29516117
>I can't argue with propositional logic so I'll keep on using formal fallacies to pretend I'm right
You can't answer a simple question and get buttmad about it lol

Do your eyes not work lol

>>29516117
Anon, they have hooves
You dont need propositional logic to figure that out.

It's not a fallacy either
They have hooves
You can very easily look and see it
get over it

>>29516121
>>29516131
Yes, they have hooves. So do satyrs. How exactly does the existence of ungulate abominations affect the fact that non ungulate are shit, which was the point of the original post?

>>29516157
>Yes, they have hooves.
Finally you admit it lol
>So do satyrs.
They aren't canon like the others lol
>How exactly does the existence of ungulate abominations affect the fact that non ungulate are shit, which was the point of the original post?
The part where >no hooves was brought up and examples of hooves was given lol

Loving this buttmad though

>>29516164
But neither Iron Will nor Tirek are more anthro than the Equestria Girls when they pony up, your examples are still shit.

>>29516157
Nice examples of trivial objection, anon

>>29516178
>I want people to reply to my logical fallacies like if they were real arguments
Uh huh.

>>29516175
>But neither Iron Will nor Tirek are more anthro than the Equestria Girls when they pony up
Go look up anthro and get back to me lol
They are very much classic anthro
>your examples are still shit.
What this guy >>29516178 said lol

>>29516182
Elaborate how it's a logical fallacy?
They have hooves.
They look more anthro than teenage girls with pony ears.

You attempting damage control isn't helping

>>29516192
>They look more anthro than teenage girls with pony ears.
Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder.jpg

>>29516195
>a non-argument dismissal
>avoiding the question
>more damage control
wew

Here let me help you
>>>/trash/7714737
Examples of anthro
Your move

>>29516200
Yeah, I'm not visiting your thread, buddy.

>>29516210
Sounds like you got called out on your bullshit.
Damage control is most unbecoming

Noticed you are still avoiding the question too

>>29516213
>accuses other people of liking anthro without evidences
>shills an anthro thread himself
Nice lack of self awareness, faggot.

File: 3c0.jpg (188KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 650x650px

>>29516221
>keeps avoiding the question
>when proved wrong accused of shilling
>more damage control
>resorts to shitposting
And you accuse others of what you're guilty of

Sad to be honest

>>29516238
>my logical fallacies won't work and I need to defend my anthro shit, time to post maymays
Welp.

>>29516251
See>>29516192
You know the question you keep avoiding

I like how you resorted to shitposting after being called out on your bullshit

>>29516258
See >>29516095. You know your captious question to avoid the original topic is the only bullshit here. But keep on posting memes to defend your anthro shit, I don't expect anything less.

>>29516276
That doesn't explain anything
It's a question begging epithet and trivial objection.

They have hooves
They are classic anthro
A example of classic anthro was even given and you dismissed it with shitposting
My eyes work
that other guy that got you buttmad with his "lol" saw it.

Keep grasping at straws and using damage control
Maybe you'll have a argument

>>29516288
>if I change the topic of the discussion it means that I win
Yeah, sure, why not. Go on, kiddo.

>>29516292
>posts "no hooves"
>gets example of "hooves"
>resorts to a question begging epithet and trivial objection
>when proved wrong resorts to shitposting as a form of damage control
>Accuse others of what he's guilty of
You wanna keep digging that hole?

>>29516307
>you said that you don't like creatures without hooves, that obviously means that you like Iron Will
F L A W L E S S logic, anon.

>>29516311
>Gets mad his "no hooves" con contains every hoofed creature
>Damage controls when attempts to put words in others mouth
>complains about logic
Point out where I said you like Iron will
I'll wait

>>29516320
>I'm not saying that you like him, I'm saying that he exists, despite the fact that his existence doesn't change absolutely anything about the ponies themselves, it's just that I like to throw facts at random
Yeah, seems about right.

>>29515982
Cows and sheep are anthro now? Are you high?
Tired has the body of a horse and is more in tune with a classical Greek creature. Same as iron will. People don't think as those as anthro, they're more on the bestial side.
On the other hand people do think the pony up or the mini designs as anthro. Here on 4chan the staff seems to think as such seeing as people have received no anthro warnings over EqG ponied up fan art. Other websites do too. TVtropes calls the ponied up form "anthroponies" and even the wiki calls it anthro. Not everyone see it as teenage girls with pony ears when you factor the style plus the pony coloration which seems to launch it into people's anthtoradar.
There is no way in hell those designs are less anthro than fucking sheep and cows. The ponied up designs fit the anthro threshold of pony and human traits more than any of those examples.

>>29515722
>the toy commercial franchise released more toys
Where have you been?

>>29516373
>You called me out on my bullshit
>So I'm just gonna assume you said I liked him because it will make me right
>Even though he was used as an example of hooves and had nothing to do with liking him
>I'm gonna keep damage controlling
Yeah seems about right

>>29516391
>Cows and sheep are anthro now?
Not that guy but key words
"a couple of those examples are more anthro than eqg"
He then posted iron will and tirek

>>29516425
>"he was used as an example of hooves and had nothing to do with liking him"
An example of hooves for what purpose?

>>29515926
>the Equestria Girls are literally anthro when they pony up

>>29515982
>b-but Iron Will exists! HA! I WON!

K. Well. I can't argue with "I'll reply random shit to pretend I'm right"

>>29516445
He also fucking mentioned sheep and cows what the fuck. And ponied up are more anthro than tirek and iron will. Learn the context of anthro.

>>29516451
>An example of hooves for what purpose?
To show its under the "hooves" label
Did you not look through this very thread?

>>29516451
>K. Well. I can't argue with "I'll reply random shit to pretend I'm right"
You saying he doesn't have hooves?
K

>>29516462
I think what he was saying is when people post >no hooves that all those creatures he mentioned have hooves

>>29516473
So, let me get this straight. All the main characters in your franchise are anthro.

But you think that this one secondary character who appears in three (3) episodes, and this other character who appears in one (1) episode are anthro too. And for some reason, you think that's somehow relevant.

Cool.

>>29516485
>I literally can't read
Well, you should try and learn.

>>29516462
>Ponied up are more anthro than tirek and iron will
That's like saying Japanese cat girls are anthro when all they have are cat ears and tail
Go to /b/ or /trash/ for examples of real anthro
>>>/b/
>>>/trash/

>>29516489
Being a main character, minor character or background character doesn't matter.

What matters is if they have hooves or not.

Do they have hooves?
Do they not have hooves?

>>29516495
At least you admit you can't read
Acceptance is the first step to recovery

>>29516511
>What matters is if they have hooves or not.
No. The post was "the Equestria Girls are anthro". If your rebuttal is "there are secondary characters with hooves who are anthro too", your rebuttal is shit and it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the Equestria Girls are anthro. But if moving goalposts makes you happy, stay deluded.

>>29516501
Cat girls are human except for the ears. Like I told knightsavant when he went to /QA/ to complain about EqG ponied up fan art counting as anthro the ponied up forms are pony colored. The style of the EqG plus the ears and pony coloration push it into that anthro territory, it's not cat girl tier. Imagine drawing a cat girl that has the same color as the ears, I bet people would label it as anthro. Anyways your cat girl defense doesn't mean shit because the mods responded to knightsavant by telling him to shut the fuck up.
Anthro is NOT a absolute style but a style with different degrees of human and animal traits and none of those examples you listed fall under that threshold. Sheep and cows are fucking animals. Tirek and Iron Will are too bestial.

>>29516535
>The post was "the Equestria Girls are anthro"
Nice try with the topic change
But this very thread says otherwise

The post was >no hooves
And it went from there

If they have hooves the its acceptable according if they do not then it's not acceptable according to >no hooves

>>29516553
>If they have hooves the its acceptable according if they do not then it's not acceptable according to >no hooves
Point out where I said that.
I'll wait.

File: Rarity's_magic_leaks_outside_the_band_room_EG3.png (928KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 1280x720px

>>29516542
You're spitting hairs
I'll prove you wrong right now
Anthro is banned on almost every board except for /b/ and /trash/

So if I post eqg's and dont get banned then it's not anthro.

It's Doug skin girls with pony ears

>>29516559
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it?
Point out where I said you said that
I'll wait

>>29516577
>I'll discard your post which claims that Equestria Girls are anthro using other people's opinions which are completely unrelated to the topic, but since they're not your opinions you can't defend them
Wow, nice move.

File: 1471888438133.png (223KB, 1046x409px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1046x409px

>>29516568
They don't ban for sfw anthro. They either warn you or delete it. And you're downplaying their pony traits. It's not Doug skin, it's fucking pony coloration. They're colored after ponies and giving the characters pony ears just makes it more anthro.
I'm not the idiot claiming cows and sheep are more anthro mon ami.

>>29515716
FPBP. Why even bother.

>>29516591
Pot calling the kettle much?
You got caught in your own ignorance then attempted to play it off.

You said, that I said, you said something.
I asked you to show me where I said that.
You respond with damage control

Nice move indeed

>>29516599
>They don't ban for sfw anthro.
Prove me wrong and post sfw anthro
Because despite what you think.
It is a bannable offence if it isn't on /b/ or /trash/

>>29516623
I'm not gonna post it but what does it matter? You want me to post screencap of people being warned over violating the no anthro rule over ponied up fan art? It's pretty obvious that just because you don't see it that way doesn't make it troo. That faggot knightsavant was saying the same shit that it's cat girl tier. It didn't stick because it isn't and the staff even agrees.
Plus where does it say it's a bannable offense? Some rules are less severe than others

>>29516608
>"the Equestria Girls are not anthro because some people (not you) like Iron Will and I think he's anthro. I didn't say that you like him, therefore you can't prove me wrong, thus Equestria Girls are not anthro"
Absolutely amazing, Anon.

File: 1367319__suggestive_artist-colon-annon_pinkie+pie_rainbow+dash_bimbo_breasts_cashier_cash+register_cleavage_fast+food_food_grand+theft+auto_gta+san+and.png (835KB, 1600x1443px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1600x1443px

>>29515737
its already happening

>>29516644
>how dare you countiue the "everything with hooves is acceptable" when "no hooves" is posted
>Maybe if I change the topic you'll overlook the original post >>29515716
so I won't look stupid
>And maybe you i can avoid pointing out where I said, you said, I said something
Amazing indeed, anon

>>29516639
>I'm not gonna post it but what does it matter?
The part where you said it's acceptable to post sfw anthro then contradict yourself by saying people got warned for posting sfw anthro.

>>29516680
Nigger I never said it's acceptable. I said you get warnings or deletion over it.
I said that mods don't ban for posting sfw anthro. Rule 5 is more lax about the punishment.

>>29515713
there is twilight sparkle life size mechanical toy, that sing, move and talk to you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3qm_qSZbzE

>>29516691
>I said you get warnings or deletion over it.
>I said that mods don't ban for posting sfw anthro.
Post sfw anthro in /jp/, /a/ or /pol/ and post results

>>29516662
>">no hooves" means "everything with hooves is acceptable"
Didn't say say to your mom that pregnant women shouldn't drink alcohol?

>>29516709
No need for projection
Pls point out where I said you said that
I'll wait

Also
>">no hooves" means "everything with hooves is acceptable
Elaborate how that isn't a doublethink

>>29516724
>Elaborate how that isn't a doublethink
>>29516095

>>29516731
See>>29516288
You're feelings are not a argument

>>29516744
*your*
>>29516731
By the way that's Cognitive dissonance

File: 1471381659142.png (172KB, 895x597px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 895x597px

>>29516702
Nigger notice how I mentioned rule 5. Notice in this screencap the rule violation is MLP rule 5. GR3 violations are a lot more strict and probably result in a ban. Rule 5 violations are more lax. And this is the picture that broke the rule.
http://pre04.deviantart.net/3d97/th/pre/f/2016/100/d/5/secret_of_everfree_by_uotapo-d9ye1fd.jpg
Notice that it's a ponied up picture. It just shows your inane line of thinking of sayimg dumbshit like sheep and cows are anthro to be completely inane.
Obviously you're in the wrong here regarding what's anthro fren.

>>29516764
Nigger I asked you to prove me wrong by posting on /a/, /jp/ or /pol/

You scared or something?

>>29516752
>the post literally says "Equestria Girls are anthro"
>he thinks that saying "Iron Will is anthro too" is remotely relevant to the point
>he resorts to insults when people refuse to play along
You're so cute, Anon. But it doesn't change the fact that your franchise is anthro shit.

>>29515713
everyone ´s gonna buy that dash and custimze that hat into a maga hat

calling it now

>>29516775
No because those places are irrelevant. We're discussing what counts as anthro. I gave you examples of how EqG ponied up counts as that here on the board you're posting on. The conversation is regarding MLP material. Posting anything on those boards is meaningless.

>>29516794
>No because those places are irrelevant
More like, you'd get proven wrong and get banned for posting sfw anthro there

>>29516807
How would I be proven wrong? When I was talking deletion and warnings I was talking about the context of this board. That's why I mentioned /mlp/ rule 5 and not global rule 3.
So instead of admitting you're wrong you try to shift the conversation to something it was never meant to be about.
My claims were that EqG ponied up is more anthro than what you listed and that it does count as anthro. Which I have provided proof that it does.
My second claim is that sfw anthro that violates rule 5 of this board results in a warning or deletion. Which might not be true but all the examples I see result in warnings or deletion of posts.

>>29516779
>ignores the first part of the post saying he's using a question begging epithet and trivial objection
>focuses on the second part which is in response to the posts arguing with the other post
>he uses a pot calling the kettle black idiom when his insult is reversed on him
Its really cute how you can't prove it and instead question dodge when asked to prove yourself right.

wew

>>29516832
>he still pretends that posts that intentionally try to change the subject of the discussion deserve honest replies
lad

>>29516822
>How would I be proven wrong? When I was talking deletion and warnings I was talking about the context of this board. That's why I mentioned /mlp/ rule 5 and not global rule 3.
Did you forget you were responding to global rule 3 when I said you would get banned if anthro is posted on any board but /b/ and /trash/?
You're moving the goalposts when you ignored that and said you'll only get warned and the image deleted on /mlp/

>>29516845
>he still dismisses the original topic to take the heat off himself and uses damage control so he hopes it'll the other poster will ignore his cognitive dissonance

lad indeed

>>29516858
>he actually believes that someone is going to buy that "Iron Will is anthro!" was the original topic
The delusion is real.

>>29516846
Global rule 3 isn't used here when it comes to anthro senpai. We have the ponies only - no anthro rule instead. Rule 5, like I said. Plus I don't see why you would bring it up lad. Posting EqG ponied up or any type of MLP art will result in a GR15 violation as that takes priority if you post that outside of here so I'm not sure why bring it up when trying to say ponied up doesn't count as anthro. The examples I posted are more important since that happened in this board so that defense is pretty week famalan

What if this was just sodiav shitposting so well to derail the whole thread so anons couldnt engage in discussion about him? Although improbable, if that was the case, I'd be genuinely impressed.

Unfortunately it was about 2-4 autists flinging 'ghetti.

I dont know about this. This is one of those "you have the right to be a dick, but should you" ethical questions. Can easily be argued either way.

>>29516869
>He's still ignoring the original post reply to "no hooves" and how all hooves would be covered under the "hooves" label
>he's "merely pretending" to be retarded and keeps harping on the "iron will is anthro" even though that was way after the original topic
>the delusion is real
I'm glad you admit you're delusional

Anyone with eyes and a working brain can see that >no hooves was the first post that started everything

>>29516885
>Anyone with eyes and a working brain can see that >no hooves was the first post that started everything
And ">no hooves" means "everything with hooves is acceptable", right. No, wait, it doesn't, because no one said that ever. But whatever makes you happy f a m.

>>29516880
>Global rule 3 isn't used here when it comes to anthro senpai.
You willfully just ignore how my post was a reference to global rule 3 and you ignored that and instead moved the goalposts?

Your original post says nothing about /mlp/ until later

>>29516891
>And ">no hooves" means "everything with hooves is acceptable", right.
Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing

>No, wait, it doesn't, because no one said that ever. But whatever makes you happy f a m.
Without using your feelings or your cognitive dissonance
Explain how that's not doublethink

I know I'm asking a lot from you to not use a question begging epithet and trivial objection.

File: 1484836353497.jpg (22KB, 383x357px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 383x357px

>it's another "faggots argue over nothing" episode

>>29516894
Nigger please. Your post said something about not being banned. Guess what's the only place on 4chan where you won't get banned for posting MLP? Here and /trash/ and you ruled out /trash/. So you were obviously talking about /mlp/. Either that or you're high as fuck

>>29516910
>Explain how dismissing anything without hooves doesn't mean that you like everything with hooves

"Hey, I don't want onion on my burger."
>"Got it."
"What the fuck is this?"
>"Rocks. You said that you don't like onions, and onions aren't rocks, therefore you like rocks. Enjoy, and please come back."

>>29516891
>no hooves" means "everything with hooves is acceptable", right.
doesn't it imply everything without hooves is unacceptable?

>>29516928
>muh questionable analogy
Ground control to major wew

>>29516930
">no hooves" == "everything without hooves is unacceptable" =/= "everything with hooves is acceptable"

>>29516934
>oh fug he replied using the exact same fallacy I'm using, let's post memes again
ebin

>>29516926
>Your post said something about not being banned.
Wrong
>posting anthro is only allowed on /b/ and /trash/
>It's a bannable offence

>Guess what's the only place on 4chan where you won't get banned for posting MLP?
This has nothing to do with anthro and is a red herring to divert attention away from anthro being bannable under global rule 3
>Here and /trash/ and you ruled out /trash/.
>So you were obviously talking about /mlp/.
Nice use of post hoc ergo propter hoc

>>29516942
>oh fug he replied using the exact same fallacy I'm using, let's post memes again
There's that damage control again
Elaborate how my post is a questionable analogy.
When they in fact have hooves?
You went from onion to rock
Big difference

>muh memes
>ebin
And that pot calling the kettle black idiom wew

>>29516975
Again what is context you dumb cuck. We were discussing EqG you dumb muddafucka and you brought up posting EqG on other boards to prove its not anthro since it's banned outside of b and teash. Which is stupid because GR15 is a thing. So I was just assuming you were talking about here because I was thinking you can't be this stupid or maybe you're a newfag. I guess I was wrong.

>>29516991
Interesting. I used a formal fallacy, but you don't see it. In your opinion it was only a "questionable analogy".
"You said that you don't like onions, and onions aren't rocks, therefore you like rocks" is not a fallacy.
So you have no fucking idea what you're talking about and you just spout random words, got it.

>>29517010
>Again what is context you dumb cuck.
Something you have trouble with apparently
>We were discussing EqG you dumb muddafucka
We were discussing whether they are anthro or not
>and you brought up posting EqG on other boards to prove its not anthro since it's banned outside of b and teash.
It's always in /qa/ and [s4s] too
>Which is stupid because GR15 is a thing.
Kinda like how global rule 3 is a thing
Weird
>So I was just assuming you were talking about here because I was thinking you can't be this stupid or maybe you're a newfag. I guess I was wrong.
You shouldn't make assumptions
This would have been avoided if you were straight forward instead

>>29517033
>Interesting. I used a formal fallacy, but you don't see it. In your opinion it was only a "questionable analogy".
>muh fallacy fallacy
Glad you admit you have no argument and instead tried to use fallacies to prove yourself right.
Sad to be honest

>"You said that you don't like onions, and onions aren't rocks, therefore you like rocks" is not a fallacy.
Point out where I said any of that
I'll wait

>So you have no fucking idea what you're talking about and you just spout random words, got it.
another pot calling the kettle black idiom?
This much projection isn't healthy

By the way
I'd look up what they mean before jumping to conclusions like you are doing

>>29517033
>I used a formal fallacy
An argument that is formally fallacious is always considered wrong.
Ayy

File: 1331809431178.gif (2MB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x300px

>>29517083
>Point out where I said any of that
You son of a bitch, I kekked. Well played.

>>29517083
>You said that you don't like onions, and onions aren't rocks, therefore you like rocks
M-Muad?