Why are all the mlp reveiwers such sh*t?

File: 1487443299899.gif (490KB, 510x420px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 510x420px

>>29513075
>sh*t
Instantly dropped

>>29513075
dwk?

>>29513075
Because everyone wants to be the next Nostalgia Critic.

File: bruh.jpg (85KB, 553x674px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 553x674px

>>29513075
>sh*t

>>>/out/

>>29513086
>dwk
>review

He's more of a drunk and stoned recapper. Or re-writer, when the episode is shit.

>>29513148
But isn't that what RLM is?

The analysis community is the only part of this fandom I can stomach (even though Sturgeon's Law still applies).

File: 1170097__safe_screencap_meme_edit_exploitable+meme_wat_edited+screencap_flutter+brutter_spoiler-colon-s06e11_mannequin.png (254KB, 435x426px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 435x426px

>>29513075
>"""reviewers"""
>ever

>>29513159
I have no idea as to what an RLM is in the first place.

I just want to laugh at funny shit, not listen to some autists alternately suck dick or vomit bile.

>>29513075
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y36UT2tOvkI
>When the analyst community was awesome.

>>29513075
Drowning in Horseshoes was this.

>>29513075
Horseshoes was probably the closest thing you're gonna get.

Reviewers that are self-aware and completely in on the joke that what they're doing is pissing their life away reviewing a fucking cartoon are few and far between. Most people that attain even the slightest bit of horsefame become very full of themselves and allow their egos to grow to irresponsible sizes.

They wear a mask of sincerity and humility but they're all the same. They're all hack frauds.

>>29513352
>Antony C
Wait, is this guy actually good? The only thing of his I've watched is a video about copyright, which was 20 minutes of memes and semi-coherent rambling. It was pretty obvious that he had no clue what he was talking about on that topic at least.