Why do we even like the pones? Half of them are obnoxious little shits that need to get laid. Can you help me with this /mlp/?
>>27983283
>that need to get laid
That's what we're here for buddy.
>>27983283
>thumbnail
>DURRRRR
delete /b/ threads
>>27983283
Because they represent archytpical young women who have yet to succumb to the decay of modern society. This isn't a show about the conflicts of millenials with nearly identical intrests who go out every weekend to get smashed and fuck strangers, it's a show about the conflicts of ponies who have long-term goals and aspirations. They represent something that we as 21st century males typically can't find: women our age who haven't given themselves over to our current lifestyle of overindulgance, pettyness, and excess.
TL;DR They're better than real women
>>27983283
Are you retarded OP?
We like pones because they're cute, and the show has geeky references we enjoy. That's it. It's that simple.
>>27983420
>and the show has geeky references we enjoy.
Literally the most cancerous brony talking point.
>>27983437
salty
>>27983437
Your Autism has gotten to your head.
You've deluded yourself into thinking there is a more profound reason. It's okay, Anon. It's okay that it's just a show, and that 2D waifus aren't real.
>>27983443
Not salty, just pointing out blatant faggotry.
People who have to justify their enjoyment of the show by "muh Big Lebowski horses" are gay as fuck.
>>27983455
Speak for yourself, famm.
The references in the show are the worst element of it, except for maybe Twilight's wings and these two retards.
>>27983474
You are literally fucking retarded.
>>27983474
>figuratively boys...
So where is puppy dog tails?
>>27983474
>>27983466
So many flavors, and you chose "Salty Faggot"?
>>27983489
no u
>>27983507
wtf i hate the show now
>>27983502
Why are you repeating yourself?
It doesn't make you any less wrong, you know.
>>27983443
>>27983502
He may be a salty faggot, but I's got a faggot of salties.
>>27983510
I never said that I hated the show, famm, I just hate the references.
Fans who get all giddy when Discord hides in a cardboard box are gayer than your dad.
>>27983283
Because I'm an obnoxious little shit that need to get laid.
See? I have something in common with them.But seriously, it's because they're cute.
And I don't have actual friends.
They're the closest things I've got to friends.Apart from you guys.
>>27983527
Probably sitting at his computer, fapping to Doctor Whooves gay fanfiction.
>>27983527
must be a pretty good refrence. i don't get it though.
They're cute and as close to being perfect as possible without it being boring. Also I want to fug them, with plenty of cuddles thrown in.
>>27983399
Don't you have a school to shoot up or something?
>>>/r9k/
>>27983437
>>27983455
>>27983474
Let's establish two things.
1) Watching the show for the references is completely retarded, there's a lot more to enjoy about it than that, and the references are so fleeting that if they're the main reason you like the show, you'll be miserable like 70+% of the time you spend watching it.
2) The references are usually a good bit of harmless fun, and they're never very intrusive, so getting butthurt over the fact that they're in the show and claiming that they're the worst part of it is even more retarded than championing as the show's best aspect.
>>27983550
Metal Gear Solid, brah, and it was a really bad reference.
I kinda like the Star Wars ending from the season 2 opener though, since it's more of an homage than a dumb reference.
Go cry about it on /qa/, faggot.
>>27983443
>salty
>>>/reddonychandaily/
>>27983568
Sometimes they're pretty damn intrusive though, like that Shining bit from the Smooze episode.
That added nothing to the episode, it just distracted from the plot, and ruined the pacing. It's lazy and it's lame, and people who hail it as good writing just because it acknowledges the adult fans, are even lamer.
>>27983604
SALTY
A
L
T
Y
>>27983539I love you too Anon.Also Bughorse a best.
>>27983539
>>27983812I love both of you. Bughorse also not a best, Lyra a best
>>27983782
It's good to see when an anon learns a new word.
As for myself, I like the little references here and there, it just adds a bit to the rewatch factor (if you manage to avoid others to spoil these details).
If you can't get yourself trough it, well... make a favor and keep it for yourself.
>Salty fan with autism cries about references
Kek, what a faggot
>>27983612
It made complete sense in the context in which it was presented, and a person who didn't know the reference wouldn't have noticed it was there. It didn't distract from the main plot of the epiosde because it directly related to it, and as pacing goes, it just showed that everyone was failing to notice what was going wrong with the Smooze because they were distracted with Discord's attempt at comedy.
How is there anything remotely wrong with that? It seems to me you're complaining about a reference for what it was, not for how it was done.
>>27983940
It's very noticable, and it does distract. All of the sudden everything is quiet, there's ominous music in the background, all kinds of weird zooms and slow-motion effects are used, and it sticks out like a sore thumb. If I had never seen The Shining, I would still have felt that this was a weirdly awkward part of the episode.
>it just showed that everyone was failing to notice what was going wrong with the Smooze because they were distracted with Discord's attempt at comedy.
But that's completely arbitrary, and it seems to be just shoehorned in to justify the reference. There are so many more organic ways to convey the Smooze sneaking up on the ponies than to cut away to a distracting nod to a movie that really has no relevance to the plot whatsoever.
It's pointless at best, corrosive at worst.
>>27984089
Your taste is not objective and your opinions are not intelligent. You present no interesting argument and are generally a salty faggot.
where the fuck did i put my fedora?
>>27984138
You really need to learn some new insults.
Your bait game is almost as pathetic as your life.
>>27984196
RARIBURN
>>27984196
>Your bait game is almost as pathetic as your life
Making wild assumptions about someone you don't even know the name of is a sign that you know he's right and refuse to admit it, so you resort to petty insults. You know nothing about this person, it's not even a good use of Ad Hom. Perhaps you're projecting your own insecurities onto him.
Faggot.
>>27984313
>All of this damage control
>>27984326
Nice deflecting, dipshit. You have no valid counterargument, so you chose to turn attention somewhere else, hoping that I will take the bait and forget about the topic at hand.
>>27984313
>You know nothing about this person, it's not even a good use of Ad Hom
That's because it's not an argument, it's an insult.
>Making wild assumptions about someone you don't even know the name of is a sign that you know he's right and refuse to admit it
I know that he posts on /mlp/. That's all I need to know.
>Perhaps you're projecting your own insecurities onto him.
Now you're just projecting your insecurities on me.
How is this pony related again.
>>27984358
Not even the same anon that rariburned you.
Why are you letting the salty faggot bait you?
He's just a salty faggot.
>>27984379
A discussion on the value of pop culture references in the show was sparked early in the thread, but then it got derailed by some fourteen year old who just learned a new internet word on reddit.
>>27984384
Not even the anon that got "burned", I was just pointing out his intense faggotry.
>>27984377
>I know that he posts on /mlp/. That's all I need to know.
You assume incorrectly. Like the other Anon said, your opinion is not objective. You can scream at the top of your lungs all day that the sky is green, but that doesn't make you right.
>Now you're just projecting your insecurities on me.
Tu quoque. Responding to criticism by trying to turn criticism back on someone. Logically fallacy, and deflection of biblical proportions.
>>27984518
>I-I wasn't him I s-swear
underage twitch faggot btfo
>>27983283
I liked the show when Faust worked on it because Faust is great and everything she makes is good.
Now I just barely give a semblance of a shit, I liked flutterbutter episode but I haven't bothered with most of this season
>>27984518
>You assume incorrectly. Like the other Anon said, your opinion is not objective. You can scream at the top of your lungs all day that the sky is green, but that doesn't make you right.
I see no reason to believe that I'm incorrect. And pulling the "thads juss ur opinoin" card is the most basic bitch inane statement on the internet. We all know this, it's implicit. Only a fool would think that this is a valuable statement.
>Tu quoque. Responding to criticism by trying to turn criticism back on someone. Logically fallacy, and deflection of biblical proportions.
See, that would work if I were making an argument.
But I wasn't. It was an insult.
>>27984558
Not underage. Not the same poster. Stop trying desperately to change the topic and adress my arguments using logic and reasoning.
Hey fellow bronies! Just pointing out that I am
>>27984626
this guy above, brohoof <3 desu senpai /)
>>27984626
>adress my arguments using logic and reasoning.
Of course nobody here likes any of these technicolor horses, well except for Best Pony they're alright
>>27984666
Nice trips, Satan.
(\
>>27984625
>I see no reason to believe that I'm incorrect.
You're litterally so stupid as to assume you are correct without a shred of concise evidence and cannot comprehend the fact that perhaps you are wrong? I am not saying that you are wrong. Perhaps you hit the nail on the head and he's a greasy NEET. Perhaps this person is actually successful and genuinly enjoys his life. The world may never know, and I can tell for a fact that both you and I do not know.
>hurr durr I'm not arguing
But you are. Arguments are simply defined a conflict of opposing views. Unless we have both been agreeing that you are a flaming homosexual this whole time, there is a legitimate argument going on here.
Perhaps I'm hitting my head against a brick wall trying to make you understand just what exactly makes you a cock-wrangling faggot.
>>27983443
>lebuttmad
>>27984759
Shoo, shoo tripfag
>>27983283
>Light Hearted
>Generous
>Cute
Basically, better than human women.
>>27984626
>adress my arguments using logic and reasoning.
>>27984676
>>27984785
>haha who needs logic when I can be irrational and unable to form a coherent argument
>haha what a fucking nerd
>>27984626
>adress my arguments using logic and reasoning.
>>27984824
>he argues nonsense using 'logic and reasoning' on the my little pony board on a chinese sweatshop forum
>>27984841
>>27984854
>>27984824
>>27984676
>not sucking my dick
>2016
HA.
Cucks.
>>27984741
Hume states that causality can never be truly observed, so nothing in life can be truly known. However, this would cripple all human endeavor, so he argues that in day-to-day life, making assumptions about future events based on past experience, is the only sane way to conduct your life, as well as a society at large.
Thus, based on past experience, I can conclude that the majority of the posters on this image board are social pariahs, and following the basic implications of Bayes' Theorem, this generality can safely be applied on an individual level, since it has a fairly small margin of error.
Also, you're really salty.
>>27984878
>trip
Thanks for the easy filter
>>27984884
>filtering
>being this much of a faggot
>>27984918
>willfully eating shit
wew lad
>>27984934
>>27984939
>getting in the sewerage of the internet
>not eating shit
Are you one of those faggots who believes that this is a "hidden gem of the internet for the best of mankind"
>>27984881
>I can conclude that the majority of the posters on this image board are social pariahs
There are certainly plenty of autists on this board, I can't argue with that, but I've also observed that there are also a fair number of posters who report having jobs, wives, social hobbies, and so on. From my experience, I conclude that it is- more or less -split 50/50 down the line. Maybe I'm biased because I have a job and friends and like to think that enough people on here do as well.
>>27983399
>our age
The fillies are better, too.
>>27983568
>posting Elliot ironically
fuck off normie scum
>>27983283
>Half of them are obnoxious little shits
You know, you don't have to watch the show if you don't want to.
>>27984999
kys normie
>>27985062
>kys
>normie
Back to your containment site >>>/reddit/
>>27985062
Drink bleach welfare queen
>>27985079
>>27985090
fuck you, you normie pieces of shit. one day your retribution will come and we'll be the ones to have the last laugh
I'll be waiting
>>27985160
You can't fund a revolution on foodstamps, Anon
>>27985160
dumb frogposter I thought I told you to go back to >>>/r/eddit
Is this the worst thread on this board?
>>27985246
No that's NRDT.
>>27985246
No thats reserved for glimglam/nyx/shimmer threads. The trinity of shitposting autism
>>27985270
Don't talk shit about my waifu.
>>27985340
>monster high waifu
>generic anime girl #12131
>>27985340
Your waifu is shit
>>27985350
She's not generic! She used to be bad then felt bad about it and is good now! That's never happened before!
Mods, this is shitposting, too
It just doesn't have it in the title like the thread you just nuked.
>>27984881
>using Bayes theorem this incorrectly
And you had the audacity to call that other anon underage?
>>27983283
>obnoxious little shits that need to get laid
So you can see why /mlp/ would sympathise.
>>27983399
>have yet to succumb to the decay of modern society
Modern(TM) society is actually the sociological equivalent of a cancer patient ear death.
Read Fate of Empires.
It's abnormal for humans to unleash ther sexuality, and when they do, their brains get damaged and thir minds fall to materialism
I like that science proves ancient mores right
>>27986404
You can totally apply Bayes' theorem to that scenario.
Let's say that the portion of the population who are NEETS or social pariahs is P(n) and the probability of anon being a regular poster on /mlp/ is P(m).
We have to find P(n|m)
A very small part of the population are regular posters on /mlp/. We can estimate P(m) to 0.00001.
We set P(n) to 0.05 based on current unemployment statistics.
Only a small portion of the NEET population is on /mlp/, so we can estimate P(m|n) is 0.0002.
Thus Bayes' Theorem says:
P(n|m) = P(n)P(m|n)/P(m) = 0.05*0.0002/0.00001 = 1
Anon is 100% likely to be a NEET or social pariah, meaning it's fair to assume that he is one.I just pulled that out of my ass.
>>27985350
>carebears waifu
>generic furry #9000