go to whatever classic literature you're reading. bring back the stupidest review
>the double
>>9946483
you are a psychopath. please get help.
Fucking women, always embarrassing themselves.
>>9946464
>feminist reads book critiquing male entitlement, insensitivity, and self-centered-ness
>complains about the male characters being entitled, insensitive, and self-centered
pottery
>>9946464
search any version of the holy bible and look at the one star reviews, always a hoot
>>9946599
>"heh... i bet this showed the DRUMPFTARDS!!!"
>>9946594
>>9946599
this one was supposedly written by a man, I've honestly rarely read an ironic negative review of the bible by a woman, they don't tip that hard
>>9946615
you quoted the wrong guy my amerifat friend
>>9946625
shitty bait man
>>9946594
>the Bible is one book
>>9946464
she has a point though
In a thread near this one people are discussing Tolstoy's review of Shakespeare.
Should he be ridiculed like these people for trying to review a classic or he gets a pass since he was an established writer?
Should works of literature that have historic significance (or any other kind) even be reviewed for something other than that influence?
/mu/ here. Since I'm into noise, does that make her(?) critique valid? I'm enjoying the book so far though
>>9946464
the double is absolute shite though
>>9946679
He gets a pass since he wasn't a dumb cunt.
>>9946545
this actually makes me sad.
she thinks franny is portrayed as an incomprehensible female cliche.
and i feel she is like the bf of franny in the book. someone too stupid and selfcentered to even listen.
i thought someone can makes a Little self reflection after read a book like that. but... the world is too subtle.
It's completely redundant posting any of these if you don't know what book they're reviewing
>>9946696
>I'm into noise
That has literally nothing to do with anything in your post you insufferable pseud
>>9946464
>>9946513
Wasn't he basically raped for years?
>>9946716
an even better one
>that one guy who writes all his reviews in Spanish
>>9946696
I don't get it, what didn't he like about it?
And why all the emphasis on 'getting' it, it's a pretty simple and straight forward book.
>>9946625
Ok you're a super ironic dude.
I'm sorry that so many dumb reviews on goodreads are written by women and that in these kind of threads people start talking shit about the gentle sex
>>9946464
What is with these faggy threads? You are succumbing to group think just as you mock people who read YA and genre fiction. They may be classics but that doesn't mean everyone has to enjoy them and give 5 star reviews just because someone said its a classic.
>>9946724
No Fucking way.
>>9946754
Are you retarded, the point is to look at their terrible reading comprehension and weak arguments, and then feel better about ourselves.
No one gives a shit if someone said "not my cup of tea."
>>9946708
>redundant
>>9946545
What book?
>>9946724
Why these people act like characters are people they have to live with?
I like answered prayers even if I hate the main protagonist
>>9946754
He never implied that everyone had to enjoy them. All that was mentioned is simply the fact that these "reviewers" give barely any structural construtive criticism by not finishing the book, not understanding the viewpoints, and fail to analyze the book throughly before making judgements and critique.
>>9946754
>someone uses wayyyyyyyyyyy seriously in a review of a classic novel, let alone any novel.
you don't have to think every classic is fantastic, but please attempt to put forward your thoughts and opinions in a comprehensible way, and not like a six year old.
>crime and punishment
>>9946742
I think the reviewer was just being super contrarian
>everyone else likes this book so obviously I have to call it overrated and stupid
>>9946791
better one
>i don't like it because it makes me a bit sad
>>9946724
What a crazy bint. All the intelligence of a diplodocus.
>>9946808
>avid reader
Better version - look up the five star ratings on the worst books out there
>The Fault in Our Stars
>>9946861
>filename
Heh.
>>9946708
That's not what redundant means.
>>9946773
Franny and Zooey
JD Salinger's second-best, first being Nine Stories.
blumb
Not a goodreads review but I think this meets your criterion.
>>9946511
>>9946483
Please stop falseflagging.
>>9947177
it's probably a self-hating women who's testosterone pills are giving her some sort of roid rage
>>9946464
I do appreciate the sincerity of this one. The acknowledgement that it isn't necessarily the novel that is bad, but didn't speak to the individual and is unwilling to put the effort in due to that.
I am SURE that this person allocates their time extremely well
>>9946808
>>9946791
I can't bring myself to read this shit.
>>9947120
for some reason, that post made my dick hard when I imagined that it was carlie who wrote it and that my massive Nietzschean shaft was being shoved down her angelic christian throat as she gagged and choked
>>9946791
Reading that turned me into a misogynist.
guyz opn ur eyez! i'ts litrally 1894!!1!!
compulsory
This one got me.
>Scarlet Letter
>>9949167
The body was overwhelmed and rejected it. Bookshelves: will-try-again-later is optimistic at least.
>>9946808
This might be the worst thing I've ever read
Why are there so many retarded Americans
>>9946564
>implying beautiful and the damned isn't genuinely worth one star
>>9946594
>apparently, every sperm is, in fact, "sacred".
Divine Comedy, by Italy's Main Homeboy
>>9950837
I can see how someone could complain about translating the musicality from Italian away when it's put into English, but this is so dumb. It's quite obvious who is talking throughout, I have the Signet version though.
Do women think people in books are actually real and the things really happen?
>>9946724
what book?
>>9946464
>>9946861
Intentional "quirky" run-on sentences should result in a caning
>>9946483
peopel who use the word "woman" as an adjective are subhuman
necro
>>9946861
>harshness of reality
>probably refuses to acknowledge radical Islamist terrorism
heh....
lol what a fucking IDIOT
>>9953272
Well look at that... arabic people use those jewish parentheses too. And like ten times more than the average /pol/ user.
>>9953288
Pseud, the post.
>>9953288
He's right you know
>>9950753
That's no American.
Reason why women and/or people left of center shouldn't read books.
Strong wymen outsmarts white male author.
Maybe not the stupidest, but the top rated review.
>>9953767
At least she's fat, and thus will be dead soon.
You can tell he's smart because he used the word "sisyphean"
Women were a mistake.
I love ones that try to use lots of complex words to sound smart but this one will do nicely.
>>9949167
Didn't 'the Cheshire cat' used to be a namefag on /x/ or /lit/?
>>9946464
At least she was polite enough to apologize for being a pleb.
>>9953838
it's probably just a kid
>>9946483
>>9946513
>>9946599
Samefag. The broken English is embarrassing.
>>9953776
> "he is not joking" such certainty this guy
> "scoring a cameo in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure"
> "Plato is stupid"
what did he mean by this?
>>9953846
Probably, but I, when I first read the book when I was about 12, and many other younger people understood the book and the reason to send Boxer to the knacker's.
LOL Midwesterners during the Great Depression absolutely BTFO!
I can't tell if this one is a joke or not. If it isn't, I don't see how this person doesn't understand what Orwell meant when he called it "A Fairy Story".
>>9946696
They're sort of right. I mean, it's a perfect book but if you're reading for plot then already most books will not be as enjoyable as they should be.
>>9949167
> even 260 pages of Moby Dick
Who the fuck thinks this is a brag
>>9946642
>da bibel was written by MEN, T W O T H O U S A N D yrs ago!!
>>9953864
Pretty clearly a humorous/satirical post.
>>9953330
(((arabic)))
>>9953864
>I can't tell if this is a joke
Congratulations, you have autism
>>9953864
Surely, you jest.
>>9954337
Which book?
>>9950891
i said, what book?
>>9946791
>Missing the point this much
What's sad is that these are people that actually read these books. The general populace won't ever pick up C&P. Honestly, just end it all and start over...we've fallen too far.
>>9949167
>LITERALLY PUKING
holy shit this is gold.
>>9954337
I've seen this review before... Was it a Pynchon book or something? Houllebecq?
>>9953776
>Western Philosophy is solely represented by Plato
How fucking dumb do you have to be to believe this?
>>9953864
Animal Farm does not deserve any more stars that that, tbf
>>9953330
That's not arabic you idiot
0wo whats this
>>9954678
>>9954699
>women
>>9954699
>look up this book
>end up on a wikipedia for pederasts (https://www.boywiki.org/en/Main_Page)
never change, /lit/
>>9954829
Check this out. Is this an official thing or can anyone contribute to the blog section?
https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2013/07/15/nick-richardson/eton-life/
>>9946483
How autistic do you have to be to spend all day false flagging on a literature board.
http://b00kstorebabe.blogspot.com/2017/03/review-black-witch-by-laurie-forest.html
She wrote an 8.7K word review on her personal blog as well...
>>9954491
Footnotes
To
Plato
>>9949167
>A thrill ride.
>So good you'll literally puke!
>>9949167
>and even 260 pages of Moby Dick
>>9955032
When will plebs learn that not liking a protagonist or not relating to them isn't sufficient grounds for good criticism.
>>9946483
oh sweetie no.
>>9950891
Stoner, John Williams.
>>9955352
But the author is normalizing the protagonist so that readers can emphasize with her.
>>9955032
Can someone tell me also what the term "Coded" means in regards to writing?
>>9946594
Theres literally like 2 or 3 passages in the whole damn book that are homophobic.
The Jews having their head up their asses of perceived racial superiority is much more prominent, and they reeeeally worked out for their favor in the modern day lmao
>>9946696
>people only pretended to like this book to look smart to others!!!!1
Why are people like this? Go read The Fault in our Stars and leave us in peace.
>>9953766
>white people who advocate the killing of whitey
You should lead by example, Melissa.
Can we talk about, what are we doing with Western Women? Are they obsolete? Or outright destructive?
Book is Ada or Ardor
>>9949167
>when you're so plebeian a book makes you hurl
>>9957355
>understanding they're essentially the same thing
*brain expands into infinity*
>>9955032
>623 likes
>>9954813
This girl is just fucking retarded, you should read her reviews of Frankenstein and The Turn of the Screw
>>9946733
>That people who write their reviews in their native langue
>>9958531
>>9958531
.
>>9946808
>cant take negative themes in books
FUCKING CHRIST
GO READ YA ALL DAY PIECE OF SHIT
>>9950994
This is accurate though.
1
>>9958574
2
>>9958574
>>9953766
funny you talk of leftists and how they shouldn't read when right-wingers don't read at all and are proud of their "anti-intellectualism"/ignorance
>>9957355
>reads a dystopian novel as utopian
Tell me this is a joke.
>tfw my review got posted itt
>>9949167
>Dante's Inferno
>>9958879
>He reviews books on goodreads
Anon I...