/script>
Why does the /lit/ janitors censor any thread about right-wing literature?
I'm just asking. No ban on snek, plz.
>>9923039
They don't. /lit/ right wingers are reporting your lower quality threads. Read Plato
>>9923049
Heidegger has a better approach to metaphysics.
>>9923039
>right-wing
>literature
>>9923055
And retarded comments like that about political science is exactly why you'd not be allowed a vote by Plato. Heidegger is concerned at best with politics with a small p.
only gay homos make meta threads so your other thread was probably pure faggotry as well
>>9923039
Because we don't need fifty Culture of Critique threads at once, anon.
>>9923066
> assumes everything is about political science
> assume /lit/ is /pol/
fucking litlet. Go back to r/politics.
>>9923039
They dont, is your piece of shit threads that are reported by right-wingers.
Leave, ree
>>9923074
>>8ch
go postmeta somewhere else. Your attempt at being hoity toity can't even be identified under metaphysics or be studied with the most advanced epistemology.
>>9923039
Because /lit/ is a functional meritocracy and you're as shit as YA
>>9923083
>anon thinks good rhetoric is using jargon while calling the other guy hoitytoity
>after bringing up Heidegger
so I know you read about as much philosophy as your average stoner philosopher, who were you trying to showboat with an ollie for?
>>9923090
>after bringing up Heidegger
>thinks good rhetorics goes with sophistry
Easy on the fallacies, bugs.
>>9923100
Heidegger gave lectures on rhetorics and sophistry in Plato, btw. You might want to read some of the shit you like the big words of, kid. It'd make you less godawfully boring.
because jewish shills kvetch and mass report like it's going out of style. freedom of speech and meritocracy ideas are western/white concepts and jews amd jewish institutions (licra, splc so on) are the main people opposing it here and in society as a whole.
>>9923120
m8 if /lit/ were jewish we'd be published