how would their conversation go?

A shared silence in mutual recognition of their fraudulence.

Schopenhauer is cranky.
Nietzsche is tsun-tsun.
You know. Just like usual.

>>9739481
Kek

>>9739466
in german

>lmao you fucking fraud

File: 21769232.jpg (164KB, 1500x1012px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1500x1012px

>>9739466
Like this

>>9740127
On the right the thumb should be severed.

>>9739466

sucketh my cock

>>9740683
>>>/b/

Nietzsche would let fly all his ideas about life-affirmation and criticize Schops' latent Christianity. Schops would rightly be unable to understand how any ethical system could exclude compassion and they would get nowhere. Until they start shitting on women together.

>"I opened the door for her and she didn't even have sex with me."
>"What a cunt."

>>9740127
Nietzsche
Was
Not
A
Nihilist

>>9741454
he was, you're just not operating under the one true definition of nihilism, which is the rejection of values as being intrinsic properties, "nothing has value in itself" is not the same as "nothing has value"

File: nihilists.jpg (120KB, 750x539px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 750x539px

>>9739466

>>9741467
>the one true definition of nihilism
Is that your definition? What you're discribing is not Nietzsche's definition of nihilism.

>>9741467
Nietzsche rejects things in themselves in general, so it doesn't make sense to construe him as a nihilist -- for him, there's nothing in itself to lack intrinsic value.

>Life sucks
>Only if you make it mm8
>Woah man...

>>9739466
Erotically violent.

>>9739481
*flatulence