Prove me wrong.

>>9716802
Dunno about 100 years, but not a horrible choice.

T.S. Eliot is though. Every work after The Wasteland was in reaction to The Wasteland.

>>9716802
he isn't literary.
there's a reason that there's a /mu/ and a /lit/.
consider it proven.
OP btfo.

>>9716837
>he isn't literary
you might actually be a dummy

>>9716847
yeah, i'm sure everyone is scrambling to the local barnes and noble to get a copy of his Tarantula.
oh fuckin please. he's a singer/songwriter. like toby keith.
>>>/mu/

>>9716856
see

visions of johanna
desolation row

>>9716861
see

red solo cup
as good as i once was

>>9716856
>The Norton Anthology includes him, but he's not literature
>The Nobel committee chose him, but he's not literature
>I know better than legions of well-read people
>He plays music, so he can't possibly be reciting poetry

>>9716873
now you're getting it.
go back to /mu/.

>>9716878
I am the /lit/ person here u dum/b/y.

>>9716884
>he puts up a toby keith tier musician up as the central literary figure of the past 100 years
>he thinks he's /lit/
have i got news for you.

why you gotta diss toby keith on the fourth of july dude?

>>9716902
hey, i love toby keith, he's a great MUSICIAN. i don't put shit on pedestals where it doesn't belong.

next thing OP the faggot is going to start spouting is that kanye west is an inseperable part of the western canon.

>>9716916
As OP I humbly request you get out of my head

Bob Dylan's songs are "hymns" of the day, consisting of melodies and verse of mediocre workmanship that its public considers comforting + inspiring because it expresses already ingrained assumptions about life.