What are some Right-Wing/Reactionary intellectuals and which

>>8351385
Perhaps something by the Nouvelle Droite. I've been meaning to get my hands on some books by them

>>8351385
Hobbes - Leviathan
Burke - whatever you feel like reading of his, there isn't much

>>8351385
I take it you're not from the states if you're assembling your left wing reading list from uni curricula. In the US you can get an economics degree without having read a word of Marx. Unless you study anthropology or sociology here, you're not going to encounter much leftist literature at all. Keynes and Rawls are considered leftists in the US.

>>8351406
I am from Yurop, yes, but I used US universities. In Yale for example, you almost inevitably have to learn Marx for your degree in English.

You can actually look it up yourself, the course is online in video form.

File: index.png (1MB, 1080x809px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x809px

Bump. Pls halp

Julius Evola
Nick land

Eliot Rodger

Hegel

>>8351406
>In the US you can get an economics degree without having read a word of Marx
You say that as if its a problem.

>>8351385
At what point do old progressive works become right-wing/reactionary? Or don't they ever?

File: Alfred%20Rosenberg%203[1].jpg (212KB, 589x679px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 589x679px

Alfred Rosenberg wrote a very long, very detailed book about the worldview and philosophy of National Socialism

>>8351385
who is this winter sphincter

>>8351617
Anna Tulip

>>8351385
As it has a start and metaphysics are important to conservative thought, especially aristotelian, I'll start with
Plato, Republic, Laws, Symposium, Trial and Death trilogy.
Aristotle, Politics, Ethics, Categories, Metaphysics, De Anima
St Augustine, Political Writings, Confessions
Aquinas, Selected Writings and Political Writings
Chesterton, Heretics and Orthodoxy
Hannah Arendt, On Revolution, Human Condition
Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue, Whose Justice? Which Rationality
Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, The Servile State, The French Revolution

>>8351385
Anyone else notice these alt-right shitposters always post using pictures of qt girls or frogs? It just further confirms my theory that being a neo reactionary is for insecure weak men who need some form of faux masculinity to cling to.

T.S. Eliot, de Maistre, Louis Bonald, Russell Kirk.

Ludovici is the far-right /lit/ meme author, try him.

>>8351423
Marx is quite typical in the humanities because of historiography.

Marx is also more typical at top universities for social sciences like Econ because PPE, tho I don't believe it's typically core.

>>8351804
It seems we have this thread daily. Can't they use the archive?

>>8351605
Everything after the French Revolution is progressive basically.

>>8351948
>Burke
>Not reactionary

come on now

>>8351959
Well, not everything, but it's a good rule of thumb.

>>8351907
I think they view it as a war of attrition. Shitpost their garbage ideology enough and they think we will eventually start eating from the trash can so to speak.

The time and effort these people put into this is ridiculous. The gnawing need for acceptance, the unending desire for everyone to be as repulsive as they are. It creeps me the fuck out. No wonder women won't touch them.

>>8351959
Nah, Burke emphasised that states need to be able to gradually reform in order to survive.

>>8351990
Which was a reaction to the French Revolution, and intended to prevent significant amounts of social change. He gave birth to One Nation Conservatism after all, but I do see where you're coming from

>>8351990
That doesn't mean the changes have to be left wing.

File: 1452870035069.jpg (313KB, 1050x1400px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1050x1400px

>>8351990
I guess it depends on the type of reform. It's probably still reactionary if it's not trying to move towards some form democracy/egalitarianism.

>>8352025
>*form of

>>8351984
> No wonder women won't touch them.

Why do radical progressives always attempt to shame people over their sex lives? Why do they think "lol u virgin" is a legitimate critique? Is it just because they place too much power in the hands of women and so sex to them becomes some kind of sacrament dispensed from the holy hands of womankind?

>>8352079
lol u a virgin

File: 1452678758549.jpg (134KB, 1071x1600px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1071x1600px

>>8352079
People are wired to value women over men. Because of this men's usefulness is judged by how desirable they are to women. Unfortunate, but true.

>>8352102
>wired

File: 1453497875423.jpg (290KB, 685x960px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 685x960px

>>8352122
"Wired' being a simplistic term for "evolutionarily predisposed". Come on Anon, we're not writing journal papers here.

>>8352122
>Chomsky-FoucaultDebatein5seconds.mp4

>>8352142
>evolutionarily predisposed

>>8352079
Because the right wingers here always post pictures of cute girls and complain about their virginity. It's clear it had a formative role in their worldview.

>>8352145
Explain.

>>8352183
>the right wingers here always post pictures of cute girls and complain about their virginity.

Where is the proof?

>>8352212
>proof
Boorschwa positivist detected.

>>8352212
>>>/r9k/

>>8352212
Elliot Rodger

>>8352187
Just watch the video on youtube

>>8352228
Elliot Rodger was a literal subhuman half-breed who was obsessed with materialistic ideas, how was he reactionary? Hell, was he even Republican?

>>8352243
Too long. Tell me.

>>8352245
He considered himself fascist

>>8352254
Abominations produced by miscegenation can't be fascist.

>>8352252
Chomsky regularly appeals to human nature. Foucault does not believe in a set human nature. Hi-jinx ensue

File: cuckold.jpg (164KB, 910x780px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 910x780px

>>8351804
>Oh my god, I literally can't even. Fucking evil, nazi racists. GET OUT, MY FEELS ARE HURTING!1!
>is for insecure weak men who need some form of faux masculinity to cling to.
This, feminism and multiculturalism is for strong secure men.

>>8351984
>No wonder women won't touch them.
Why do we as a society assign so much value to sex? I mean come on, it's 2016 grow up, sex is completely normal and healthy and young women shouldn't be shamed for being sexually active. It doesn't matter at all if a women has slept with 50+ guys, all that matters is the present, get over it fucking sex-obsessed puritan misogynists.
>Meanwhile
Oh my god all you racists are fucking virgin loosers, lmao!1!11!!!111!!!11!!!!1!! Bet you haven't even kissed a girl, lol. All racists are just insecure virgins!!11!!1!!!1!!

>>8352275
Why oh why was there never a sitcom.

File: 1453038404753.jpg (71KB, 555x781px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 555x781px

>>8352254
Fascism is kind of neither here nor there. The chief/duce/fuhrer still claims to have the mandate of the people, which makes it a demist system(at least in intention). Then again, Nazi Germany for example had a lot of signs of being reactionary.

It's a controversy that will need to be resolved if NRx political theory is to be developed further.

>>8352079
>>8352278
>triggered
Kek.

>>8352278
shut up numale

>>8352287
>make dumb post
>get replies pointing out you are dumb
>hurr I was just pretending to retarded

classic

>>8352292
>fall for bait
>"that wasn't bait"

Classic

>>8352284
Is "NRx political theory" even a thing? Who has written anything worth reading that could be considered "neo-reaction," besides Moldbug? And don't get me wrong, I actually like Moldbug, but he's clearly a crypto-Jew pretending to be an atheist which makes a lot of what he says inherently suspect.

>>8352079
Because half the men who actually are progressives are so because they hope to get laid.
Much fewer mentally sound men would advocate for the destruction of their people and homelands (talking about Europeans), and defend the people who murder their fellow Secularists/Westerners had they not desperatively hoped to get laid.

Women use the virgin-insult because very few of them are capable of rational thought, so it's just convenient.

>>8352296
>I was just pretending to be retarded in order to "bait" you
>I win haha

>>8352283
Chomsky claimed it was due to the oppressive weight of Neo-Liberalism preventing him, the worker, from taking power and driving the project forward.

Foucault felt that people misunderstood the pilot, so he threw a stroppy fit and didn't bother turning up for the other 6 of the 7 episodes he promised

>>8351385
>right-wing intellectuals

>>8352305
I'm glad that you asked. Here's a list of all significant NRx reading:
http://hestiasociety.org/bestofnrx.html

You can also find blogs and other stuff on
http://hestiasociety.org/

The Hestia Society is the main Neoreactionary organisation right now(which is honestly not saying much, but it's something).

Everything in the canon before The Democratic Age.

Bible
Homer
Cervantes
Goethe
Shakespeare
Petrarch
Aeschylus
Virgil
Plato
Aristotle
Dante
Beowulf
Cicero
Ovid
Edda
Chaucer
Marlowe
Milton
Montaigne
Moliere
Mahabharata
Bhagavad Gita

>>8352314
>>I win haha
Who are you quoting?

File: culture_of_critique.jpg (30KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x360px

Is pic-related good?

Are there any other books acessible by non-psychologists that ties Evolutionary Psychology to politics in a pro-right wing way?

Are there any prerequisites for Evola's political writings?

File: 13721328_281463028882525_48631676_n.jpg (86KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1080x1349px

>>8352339
Check out that one book by Anonymous Conservative about r/K selection theory.

>>8352330
>look mom, I know memes

File: TheLessonsOfHistory.jpg (41KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x500px

not sure if Right-wing / Reactionary enough for you, but the Durants' The Lessons of History is an excellent historical and philosophical primer on western civ.

from wiki:
In The Lessons of History the authors provided a summary of periods and trends in history they had noted upon completion of their momentous eleven-volume The Story of Civilization. Will Durant stated that he and Ariel "made note of events and comments that might illuminate present affairs, future probabilities, the nature of man, and the conduct of states."[1]

Thus, the book presents an overview of the themes and lessons observed from 5,000 years of world history, examined from 12 perspectives: geography, biology, race, character, morals, religion, economics, socialism, government, war, growth and decay, and progress.

Chapters:
Hesitations
History and the Earth
Biology and History
Race and History
Character and History
Morals and History

Religion and History
Economics and History
Socialism and History
Government and History
History and War
Growth and Decay
Is Progress Real?

>>8352349
>look mom, I know memes

File: 1454117118159.jpg (281KB, 684x1024px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 684x1024px

>>8352351
Huh, that's actually pretty good. Thanx breh.

>>8351385
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/5103.Newt_Gingrich

I've read all of these.

>>8352368
Marion is so pure and beautiful.

>tfw she will never bear your children

>>8351807
>>8351784
These are good recommendations. Also, Ernest Junger.

>>8351399
>Nouvelle Droite
Uninteresting pagans and faggots.
Venner is the only nice one in all these hacks, because he was an aristocrat and had a poet vibe.
They cared about interesting things and made Molnar's and Dumézil's works known by a wider spectrum of people but it probably stops here.

Some names mentionned in this thread are really worth it thoug
>>8351401
>>8351784
>>8351807
>>8352621

May I suggest Charles Maurras and basically the whole Action Française school of thought ?
Bernanos (his essays, especially "France against robots") and Boutang ("Reprendre le pouvoir", but also his biography of Maurras) probably were some of the most interesting.
Archbishop Lefebvre and the whole Franch Christian counter-revolution thinkers like early Maritain, Thibon, Madiran also had a great body of work.

>>8352902
The French have a strangely strong conservative tradition author wise, unlike the Germans, which is strange.
Or maybe Germans don't post here as much as the French so I don't know as many authors.

>>8352992
The Germans don't post as much but have strong contenders. I don't know as much about them, but try searching names of the major figures of the Conservative Revolution. Also, things that De Maistre wrote were predated by Herder and his Counter Enlightenment.
The main thing with us is that we're the one that started the fire (if we take Luther out of a bigger frame) with 1789.
Try some Carl Schmitt or Ernst von Salomon, they're good. The rest I know too little about.

>>8353035
Don't blame yourself, Luther fucked it up originally.

File: As-I-Walk-These-Broken-Roads.png (708KB, 600x960px) Image search: [Google]

708KB, 600x960px

Davis Aurini's Fallout fanfiction.

>>8352992
Fichte
von Herder
Junger
von Solomon
Gottfried Benn
Julius Jung
Niekisch
Thomas Mann

I'm not even German

>>8352902
Speaking only English, I've only read de Benoist's translations but I find him to be the most refreshing right wing theorist today