Which is more accurate?

>>34016870
>200-300 yards
with a pelletgun
fuck off

>>34016913
At 405 mph muzzle velocity 200 yards takes a little more than 1 second. If you think a .177 round stops before its flied for 1 second then you are probly the one who needs to fuck some offs...

>>34016870
>>>/toy/

>>34016870
.177 will tend to do better because it's going faster. it's pretty difficult to hit things reliably at 200 yards with an airgun, especially without a stock. it's not impossible but realistically 40-60 yards will be your effective range.

http://www.crosman.com/get-hunting/airgun-ballistics

there are good game tables if you plan on hunting with it that you'd probably want to look at too.

>>34017106
Thanks mate!

>>34016870
>only 300 yards

With a 240 m/s (ca 700 fps) air rifle, you get w friggin 900 cm drop at 300 meters.

>>34016951
dude, a 12 foot pound air rifle (240 m/s with a .177) drops to 40 m/s (8.44 grain pellets) at 300 meters. And drops 9 meters. To put it in perspective - you'd be aiming at a 3rd floor window to hit a target at ground level.
And that's before you account for wind drift.

Crosman=Remington=hot garbage

>>34017746
Am i doomed to buy a sniper rifle? How much is a barret 50 cal cost?

>>34018340
More than a 13 year old posting on 4chan can afford.

>>34018340
a nice starter .50 cal would be around $2000

>>34017106
>realistically 40-60 yards will be your effective range
For a pistol, I agree. A PCP airgun can reasonably hit targets at 100 yards.

File: xchapter6-fig1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.WGsJW5ZReF.jpg (12KB, 385x252px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 385x252px

>>34019626
how many fps is it putting out? and how much wind is there?