Going by aesthetic alone, what is the best tank of WWII?
>>33139233
Jagdpanther.
>>33139233
M4A3E8 or the Sherman Firefly, hands down.
>>33139233
I personally have a soft spot for the classic Sherman. Something about the smooth rounded lines, you know?
>>33139233
>>33139233
Chaffee
>>33139466
This, but preferably an IS-2M
Hellcat, allways Hellcat.
>>33139320
That is generic as fuck
>>33139233
t34 IMO
>>33139466
>soviet tanks with super forward turrets and retard welding
>>33139507
What if someone threw a grenade inside?
>>33139650
throw it back out.
faggot.
>>33139551
You only say that because it's ours, look at the angle of the rear leading up to the impasse at the front, it's basically art deco
>All this shit taste
T-35
>>33139589
Glorious square box of the reich 10/10
>>33139233
and what >>33139282 said, but some will say it's not a tank.
>>33139631
>Vertical welds on butted plates in the 40's
>Retard
?
>>33139931
PzIV chassis with PzIII turret and 37mm gun?
Just why?
>>33139233
>Generic, generic as far as the eye can see
Watch this nigga
>>33140364
The finns was really short on tanks and anything they had leftover was considered good enough.
Also, Im pretty sure thats a 50mm
>>33139320
This or hellcat
>>33140801
Nigger I alredy claimed her, even the exact same vehicle, are you trying to steal my tankfu?
See
>>33139507
>>33140641
It has cupola and two MGs of Panzer III Ausf. B turret which had 37mm gun.
Also the place is where Germans operated.
Germans only sold 15 PzIV J to Finland.
>>33139750
always thought the crusader was handsome. prefer the 2-pounder, though. seems to fit the lines of the machine better
>>33140364
That's not a IV, it's an early Panzer III, an Ausf D by the look of it. The Ausf B to D's were preproduction prototypes, but I've read they saw service in Poland and possibly Norway.
They experimented with a bunch of leaf-spring suspension setups before settling on torsion bars.
>>33140364
it's a panzer iii ausf. d
>>33140916
You are probably right on both points.
Yet still it is in Finland and if you had a Pz III turret and a Pz IV hull, you might aswell slap it togheter and call it the day. Anything is better than no tank and divisions (especially infantry ones) usually used whatever armor they could get ther hands on
>>33141042
>if you had a Pz III turret and a Pz IV hull, you might aswell slap it togheter and call it the day
see >>33141002 and >>33141019
NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER
>>33139423
Well done sir.
Sweet lines, wonderfully smooth suspension, and it's powered by not just one, but TWO Cadillac mills.
>>33139507
M18 is a close second, even though I did not like working on them.(Ridiculous engine access. Undo a bajillion bolts and hinge down a plate. Yay, sucks if you don't have an air ratchet.) They were stupid fun to drive though. Like riding a 36000 pound roller coaster car.
>>33139320
>t. Ameriboo
>>33139233
This beauty
>>33141131
>not the Locust
Rethink your life
The FCM 36
Diesel engine, sloped armor, and is adorable
>>33141002
Disgusting, but have some more Germans tanking in Lapland forest.
>>33141112
>Firefly is UK tank.
Durr
>>33141112
From a functionality standpoint? He's not wrong.
The M4A3E8's were , as far as medium tanks in WW2 go, simply amazing in their cohesive balance of armour, gunnery and mechanical reliability.
Very very few tanks in their weight class could match their firepower, and the ones that could were lacking in other categories.
For a ww2 Medium tank , The old M4 is tough to beat. The E8 /76, even harder.
>>33141154
hon hon hon mon garlic voiture
>>33139233
Panzer IV H, for sure. Good for actual battle as well.
>>33141229
but.............they look like shit
>>33141258
They look like a tank.
I like the "looks" of the M24 better, but the M4 still has it's charm.
>>33139507
not a tank
>>33141185
picture is staged
german soldiers would never take cover behind a tank
plus theres a guy on the right thats just standing taking a piss
either the tiger or the maus
>>33139320
>Literally the ugliest tank of ww2 discluding Jap shit and Italian shit
>>33141112
>t.slaviboo
back to >>>/k/ you autistic commie
>>33139233