True? Where does your views/ weapons of choice align

>>31833490
What if I'm purple and I want an AR and an AK

>>31833490
How are TV media and sex weapons of the authoritarain right. They're the ones most likely to want to limit such things.

>implying Kalashnikovs are not the weapon of the liberal and authoritarian right and left

A weapon for the masses used by all to oppress and liberate
Kys

File: 1474226547921.png (99KB, 500x569px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 500x569px

>>31833490
Fixed.

>>31833490
>Purple/Blue
>Want AK instead
Nope, this doesn't work.

>>31834008
>AK-47
>-47
It's just AK.

>>31833933
He's talking about a different kind of right obviously. The right-left.

File: x1.png (3KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 480x400px

>>31833490
Pretty much like my actual political leanings, centered. I want a little something from every side because I like certain things about all of them.

>>31833490
>purple having a fucking shotgun
>purple not having Recreational Nukes®

git out

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31836227
also

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31834524
>I like certain things about all of them.
Pretty much this. I think the compass is a tad skewed because what you believe should be allowed doesn't mean you completely agree with it.

i.e., I believe people should be able to fuck whoever they want, but I follow more traditional values.

>>31833490
>Implying libertarians don't own assault Dragon Dildos and assault weapons and assault flat screens

Arson sounds fun.

File: compass.jpg (18KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x400px

i only come for the AK threads

File: Screenshot_20161028-215539.png (164KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1440x2560px

I like all types of funz.

>>31833490
Im purple but want an ak

>>31834008
>anarcho-communism

KEK, nice oxymoron

File: politcompass.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

What does this make me /k/?

>>31838314
Mexican.

>>31838314
Slightly socialist, considerably libertarian. Not really any American political groups along that line, most of the ones that are that libertarian are either much more socialist or much more capitalist.

>>31838238
I am staunch free market capitalist but thats not an oxymoron. The point of communism is a stateless society not totalitarian state controlled economy. Capitalism says nothing about how you should run society, culture, day to day life, etc while communism on the other hand is totally different in that its a full lifestyle and way to run society requiring full participation by everyone.

File: ss (2016-10-28 at 11.50.37).png (10KB, 428x366px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 428x366px

I remember in days of olde, when /k/ was pretty green


but I just wanna smoke weed and throw molotovs

File: IMG_0415.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I'd bet a good amount of mature k is near me.

File: compass11.png (16KB, 504x514px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 504x514px

>>31833490

File: chart 4523.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Looks like I'm getting a M16 to fight off the degenerates and a dildo to shove it up their asses, feels good.

File: 20161028_232206.png (71KB, 941x1024px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 941x1024px

Everyone outside the red circle is a meme

File: cant stump.jpg (539KB, 1200x1149px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1200x1149px

>used to be staunch libertarian
>now far-right because I've seen the horrors of what the far-left wants and have realized that the only way to fight it is with a strong leader who lays down the law

I prefer AK-pattern weapons, though I have no problems using AR-15s because military.

>>31839065
Hobbes go back to /his/

purple and a solid M16 guy

>>31833490
I am technically in the upper right, and I personally think Military-style civilian rifles are unnecessary. I prefer lever actions and semi autos.

Daily Reminder if you arent in Upper Purple or Low Blue you are not an American

>>31839121
>> I personally think Military-style civilian rifles are unnecessary.
>>I prefer ... semi autos.

well which is it Che?

>>31839065
I unironically feel somewhat similar to this shitpost.

I'd like it if everyone was free but we clearly aren't responsible enough for that so no freedom for anyone.

literally anyone who sits left of the middle line here should be killed

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Pretty green for someone who still believes in the death penalty.

>>31839253
As a professional shitposter, I find your post offensive and demeaning.

What people fail to understand is that shitposting isn't just deliberately posting low-quality material to an online message board; it's a way of life. Shitposting isn't something I DO, it's something I AM. Shitposting is what helps me get out of bed in the morning, and what puts me to bed at night. I don't know what I'd do without shitposting in my life. Through all the ups and the downs, shitposting has always been there for me.

I've been a shitposter as long as I could remember. It all started when I was 12-years-old. It all started from when began posting low-quality comments on YouTube videos for attention; humble beginnings. I was discriminated against from all directions. People called me a "shitposter," a "troll," a "spammer," and a "retarded faggot." However, the word "shitposter," in particular, resonated with me. Like an African American wears the word "nigga" as a badge of honor, I decided to proudly identify as a shitposter. Shitposting became who I was and what I stood for.

My shitposting abilities allowed me to get through my college creative writing classes with a solid C- average, and go on to make something real of my life with my unique talent. Before I knew it, a shitposting talent scout searched me out, and next thing I knew, I became a high profile columnist for the Huffington Post. I now do what I love for a living. Can you say the same for yourself? So the next time you use the harsh pejorative "shitposter" in a derogatory sense, remember the struggles, trials, and tribulations of my people, and try to walk a mile in our shoes.

File: Screenshot_2016-10-28-23-49-12-1.png (142KB, 1260x1325px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1260x1325px

Not really sure what this means /k/. Not a commie I just don't give a fuck what people do and want to be left alone, nfa register opened again, 922r/some import limitations gone and large conglomerates to fucking burn. What does that make me k?

File: politicalcompasssquares.jpg (31KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 480x400px

>>31839275

>>31839288
I'm going with progressive anarchist

File: e03b16ed-d6cf-4988-9dcb-931e03ce201d.png (2MB, 1600x1598px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1600x1598px

>>31833490

File: ae3d592073f690d78b0db2931a8914db.jpg (46KB, 555x726px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 555x726px

>>31839216
The fuck is going on here?

also:
>>31839253
Git out fascist

>>31838631
Anarchy means having no one controlling anything not pertinent to them.

File: politic_allignment.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31839308
>TFW average

Also I prefer ak type weapons.

File: tmp_19771_1458931648022778029234.jpg (71KB, 600x383px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x383px

>all these people on /k/ sitting in the green

As someone with an IWW tattoo on my left arm, I approve.

File: my political compass.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

b-b-b-but I like AKs....

File: 1474675425547.jpg (50KB, 600x302px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x302px

>>31839452
>"Why can't everyone just be nice?"
Jesus, I didn't understand how I was rated this way until now. This is a though I have on a regular basis. I get it, I'm not a flower child, but I wish things were simpler and people were kinder...

>>31839512
Here I am btw.

>>31839174
>upper right
>Che
You're fucking stupid.

File: Screenshot_2016-10-29-01-31-30.png (70KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1920x1080px

>>31833490
I'm going to shove that dido so far up my ass.

File: 12312513462475.png (2MB, 1872x1870px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1872x1870px

>>31839308

>>31833490
I am quite fond of the flaming beer bottle.

>>31839452
>want a hobbesian state

Most accurate one yet.

File: 34556456.png (137KB, 1084x807px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1084x807px

A stupid thread

>>31833933
Consuming propaganda and fucking yourself over.

>>31838314
>What does this make me /k/?
It makes you me.

Sadly, I think the only place political parties like that exist are in some ex-Soviet Eastern European places, because they appreciate some of the socialist aspects of Soviet life, but dog-gone-it they want their freedumz back!

File: Screen Shot 2016-10-29 at 2.22.11 AM.png (116KB, 1244x968px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1244x968px

I guess, I get two weapons?

>>31838985
>Everyone outside the red circle is a meme
>red circle
>circle

anon...

>>31840189
DELET THI-- oh.

>>31839275

It means you are a small government-leftist. You don't have to be a communist but lets put it into communist terms.

An authoritarian communist would be like a Stalinist at the extreme end.

You are closer to an anacho-communism/syndicalist than to a Stalinist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7qT-C-0ajI

But you are also closer top the center, than to communism as well. Perhaps you belive in some socialist principals but mostly for a largely hands-off government?

>>31840257
>But you are also closer top the center, than to communism as well. Perhaps you belive in some socialist principals but mostly for a largely hands-off government?
Not him but I usually get there when I've tested, and that describes me pretty well.

Freedom and whatnot, but government should be there to help people live up to their potential and ambition regardless of circumstances of birth.

File: images.jpg (10KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 275x183px

>>31833490
an AR and an AK are basically the same weapon
>hurr muh gas system
>muh bolt system
>muh plinking at 400m with a gucci AR
Theyre both midrange rifles that can fire fast. Anyone who gets all uppity between the two always comes off as sonic-vs-knuckles mega autist.

>>31839567
Humans thrive off struggle. Nature favors the aggressive (not necessarily in the physical sense, but pursuing one's interest). As long as people compete for anything, they'll never be "nice". Even a post-scarcity (if such a thing exists) world wouldn't change this

>>31834008
Can you tell me some actual anarcho-communists, as in living right now?

>>31839452
Why are Hillary and Trump in the same box?

Hillary wants the TPP, while Trump does not.

He's a protectionist.

>>31840326

There is a bunch in Greece right now.

>>31840315
>Even a post-scarcity (if such a thing exists) world wouldn't change this
We can only speculate, but it would likely severely reduce the amount of aggression and increase the frequency of "niceness".

File: a.png (7KB, 481x400px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 481x400px

We don't need no stinkin roads.

>>31840349
But Greece is neither anarcho nor communist.

>>31840375

There also is no libertarian country. So I guess libertarians don't exist either.

>>31840386
Libertarian can exist because they are small government libertarian.

Anarcho-communists don't actually exist.

>>31840396
>Libertarian can exist because they are small government libertarian.
>Anarcho-communists don't actually exist.
What the fuck are you on about? If someone says "I am an anarcho-communist", they most certainly exist. They may have a retarded and self-contradictory ideology, but they are definintely not imaginary.

>>31840405
Do they live as anarcho-communist?

Or are they just liberals who say they are anarcho-communist?

>>31840418
They cannot live as anarcho-communists (if such a thing is even possible) because their government prohibits it.

Like the other guy said, libertarians must not exist in the US either because the government is gigantic and they cannot live as libertarians.

>>31840434
So they aren't anarcho-communist then.

>Like the other guy said, libertarians must not exist in the US either because the government is gigantic and they cannot live as libertarians.
They certainly can live as libertarian in some states, such as Arizona.

>>31840334
Why does no one answer this?

Is it just a troll chart after all, that tries to paint Trump and Hillary in the same light?

>>31840434
You could just buy a bunch of private land somewhere isolated through a holding company and go live away from the eyes of the government and according to your ideals there.

>>31840447

An example right here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Community_Farm

>>31840453
Would you like to start with forced pay for child care and maternity leave or the NSA having unchecked power?

>>31840447
In fact, you can live as a libertarian in fucking Russia out of a place, due to how the government simply does not give a shit about rural people, completely with no road or central infrastructure.

So libertarian does exist, but anarcho-communists do not.

>>31840460
I would like to start with TPP and no TPP, and pro-gun vs no guns.

>>31840468
And pro-Russia vs anti-Russia.

But of course, somehow that is all the same.

This is why Hillary supporters/liberals fight, by trying to say Trump is the same as Hillary, so people do not vote for him.

>>31840454
>>31840465
Have fun paying property taxes to finance all sorts of non-libertarian shit, and being subject to laws that WILL be enforced if the government catches on. Or is that part of living the libertarian lifestyle?

>>31840365
In a world of flying Deloreans, Strict Libertarians are jizzing themselves now that they don't have to pay for roads anymore.

>>31840468
That goalpost is real hard to reach from my original post anon.. Yes, being anti-TPP is good, but that doesn't excuse Trump of his wrong doing. And "pro-gun" is bullshit outside of national concealed carry. I hope you don't share a name with anyone on the no fly no buy list. The NRA isn't pro gun, they're pro-buying American made guns. They didn't do shit about import bans.

>>31840486
Minarchist libertarian is down with paying taxes.

>Or is that part of living the libertarian lifestyle?
A libertarian lives far away and without the reach of government, if government catches up to them, they are no longer libertarian.

>>31840494
You are trying to say Hillary and Trump are the same shit when they are opposite of each other.

> I hope you don't share a name with anyone on the no fly no buy list
I don't share a name with them.

>The NRA isn't pro gun, they're pro-buying American made guns. They didn't do shit about import bans.
And they are still pro-guns by keeping our guns, american made or not. I would take them over having no NRA.

>>31840486
Not all places pay property tax, and 95% of a libertarian's life would probably be law abiding anyway, so there's not much to be found out about, meaning less to be enforced.

>>31840460

>these are bad things

What the fuck? When did maternity leave become a bad thing?

>>31840487
I get a kick out of people who cry about muh roads when around half of all light vehicles in North America are pickup trucks and SUVs.

>>31840496
>Minarchist libertarian is down with paying taxes.
Taxes that go toward national defense, courts and policing, and maybe some select few public services, if any. They are not down for financing all the shit the government does when they collect those taxes. By your own idiotic definition, those "libertarians" are not libertarians since the taxes they pay are not in accordance with libertarian ideals.

>>31840508
>Not all places pay property tax
Name one in the US.

>>31840515
>When did maternity leave become a bad thing?
When you get a new employee for a few months, she gets pregnant and goes on mat leave, and then you're stuck with the bill for the next year. Not to mention the added expense of getting a replacement employee for that time.

Voluntary maternity leave is fine. Government-mandated maternity leave is not.

>>31840517
>Name one in the US.
Not necessary, as someone else already pointed out, taxes aren't inherently anti-libertarian.

>>31840517
>Taxes that go toward national defense, courts and policing, and maybe some select few public services, if any.
The taxes US citizen do go into that.
>By your own idiotic definition, those "libertarians" are not libertarians since the taxes they pay are not in accordance with libertarian ideals.
Those libertarians still live without the aid or reach of the government, they are still subjected to the government because the government holds the monopoly of violence.

>>31840525
So you pay some more taxes for maternity leave?

Is this a big issue?

>>31840525

Most places require like 6 months of work to get paid maternity leave.

I think that paid maternity leave is good, I think forcing companies to pay out for maternity leave is fine. I do, agree however, that you should work for a company before they shell out benefits.

You and I both know that "we should allow companies to decide maternity leave" would turn into "maternity leave is cancelled" during the next recession.

There is a careful balance of workers rights and the rights of business owners I do not believe we have quite reached.

>>31840531
>>31840535
>taxes aren't inherently anti-libertarian.
>The taxes US citizen do go into that
And as I pointed out, the taxes that are taken from "libertarians" by the US government do not merely cover military, police, and fire trucks. They also cover the NSA, the FDA, the DEA, BLM, etc. It is explicitly NOT libertarian to pay for things like that. So if we are defining (incorrectly, I maintain) a particular ideologue by how he lives, and not the ideology he claims to subscribe to, then there is not a single libertarian living in the US.

File: 1421570450692.gif (1MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x225px

>>31840537
>Is this a big issue?
To the general public, or to childless single men who masturbate to anime, aren't real political players, and who will not matter in the overall course of humanity?

>>31840546
We're talking about specific taxes though, not taxes in general. Property tax doesn't go towards the NSA.

>>31840546
As said:
>Those libertarians still live without the aid or reach of the government, they are still subjected to the government because the government holds the monopoly of violence.

>>31840501
This whole post you have made is a confirmation that neither of them are pro gun.
It's the middle of the road stance of "well at least x is better than y". That scenario is what this election is. Trump is certainly better than Clinton but he's nothing to get excited about. Nothing will drastically change, in the field of gun ownership, from Obama to Trump. The best scenario that could happen is a mass shooter and Trump blames mental health instead of guns. Then every poor sap that got depressed and saw a psychiatrist is subject to screening.
Hillary is anti-gun, Trump is neutral-gun, neither of them are pro-gun.

>>31840547
It's only anti-Trump who think this is a big issue, as well as the libel laws to sue the press.

>>31840537
>people thinking taxation is a big issue
What lunatics, right? It's only money after all!

>>31840539
>would turn into "maternity leave is cancelled" during the next recession
If this is in violation of the employment contract, then it is grounds for a lawsuit. If not, then you get exactly what you signed up for.

>>31840551
Property tax also doesn't go toward strictly libertarian purposes.

>>31840552
>still subjected to the government because the government holds the monopoly of violence.
So they are not libertarian by your own admission?

>>31840556
So Trump is better at gun right than Clinton, and you put him at the same light as Clinton, that's intellectual dishonest.

>Nothing will drastically change, in the field of gun ownership, from Obama to Trump
I welcome back the return of slavshit.

>>31840564
>What lunatics, right? It's only money after all!
Dude, you are already all sort of taxes to the government, yet some more for maternity leave get your rocks off?

>So they are not libertarian by your own admission?
As said, some libertarians are minarchists, they live under the monopoly of violence.

>>31840569
Yeah I'd welcome it too if I thought he'd support it. But when one of our few manufacturing jobs left is weapons good luck convincing him we are better off importing slavshit than building it here.

>>31840578
No, there's the other way.

Kalash Concern and Radom can open a factory and make their shit here.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/09/donald-trump-first-day-in-office
(lol fucking mother jones)
"Repeal every single Obama executive order." (He has also pledged more specifically to "eliminate every unconstitutional executive order.")

>>31840574
>yet some more for maternity leave get your rocks off?
>implying I'm happy about paying those other taxes and it's just maternity leave that is the dealbreaker
Suppose that your car insurance company has raised your premiums by 10%. You should be fine with it right? After all, you're already paying insurance premiums anyway, what's a little more expense?

>they live under the monopoly of violence
So a minarchist libertarian whose ideology is defined by an acceptance of some limited government monopoly of violence, can still be a libertarian if the government he is actually subjected to uses violence to a much larger degree? Presumably, you wouldn't see any difference in this regard between a libertarian living in North Korea and one living in the US?

Your reasoning is all over the place. Again, someone can be a libertarian without actually living in a libertarian society. Otherwise nobody can be ideologically distinct from the country that they're living in, which is nonsensical and ignores basic reality. How are we even arguing this, jesus christ.

>>31840604
>>31840604
>Suppose that your car insurance company has raised your premiums by 10%. You should be fine with it right? After all, you're already paying insurance premiums anyway, what's a little more expense?
I would take a problem with that, but maternity leave is something reasonable and I support. Heck, I don't even support working women.
>So a minarchist libertarian whose ideology is defined by an acceptance of some limited government monopoly of violence
Indeed.
>can you still be a libertarian if the government he is actually subjected to uses violence to a much larger degree?
No, he ought to fight or remove himself from the reach of the government, or even fight the government.

>Your reasoning is all over the place. Again, someone can be a libertarian without actually living in a libertarian society.
They are just talkers, libertarian can exist and own up to their ideology of not having government interfering with every parts of their life, such as opt-out and live in remote, countryside.

>>31839288
I like this one the best.

I'm a green-Square Social Democrat. Most people put us in middle Authoritarian-Left.

I also like it because it puts Liberal-Democrat on the right, which is about where I think the UK Lib-Dems have belonged for most of their history (aligning economically with New Labour, who'd either be upper-right democrat or eek into Neocon territory, but not being quite as nightmarishly authoritarian.)

>>31840334
>Why are Hillary and Trump in the same box?
Because they have more in common than they have different. What's more interesting is why Ted Cruz is to the right.

File: political-compass-gun-comic.png (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>31833490
>posting a shoop

>>31840619
>Because they have more in common than they have different. What's more interesting is why Ted Cruz is to the right.
But they are opposite to each other.

One is pro-open border and pro-amnesty, one wants to build a wall.

One is pro-TPP, pro-NAFTA and free trade, one is protectionist.

One is pro-gun and the other is anti-gun.

One is pro-America first, while one puts NATO/globalist interests first.

Why do you think they are more similar?

>>31840617
>libertarian can exist and own up to their ideology of not having government interfering with every parts of their life, such as opt-out and live in remote, countryside.
Those are just "talkers" too, because like I said, and like you admitted, they will never be NOT subject to the laws (and enforcement thereof) that the government in power upholds. You can try to weasel out of it by saying
>but they're mostly left alone by the government
but you know it's bullshit. A libertarian, by definition, ought to be able to produce and sell cocaine. What do you think will happen to those libertarians living in their remote ranch in Arizona when the government catches on that they are breaking the law?

You are using a bizarre definition of ideology that literally nobody else uses. If that's what you're into, go nuts, but don't be surprised when people think it makes no sense.

>>31840626
Don't forget: One is male, one is female. One is a democrat, one is a republican.

Both of them fundamentally accept a globalist and neoliberal economic orthodoxy. (Remember, Trump's tax plan is "Cut taxes and businesses won't go abroad!" instead of "Restore capital controls so that businesses CAN'T go abroad."), Trump's protectionism is severely overstated. He's not against free-trade deals, just "badly negotiated" ones, he's not against legal immigration, his gun control position pivots around who he's trying to appeal to. And on and on and on.

It's much easier to list individual points of difference, but in substance they add up to far less than the core fact that their economic and social ideas are those already entrenched in our society. Even the "radical" ideas like a total ban on muslims are ideas that were already relatively popular in the public mindset. (Perhaps not over 50%, but not below 25% of people having them.)

I'll raise the tangent that Brexit is similar, that those leading the "Anti-Globalist" Brexit movement were arguing for free-trade deals outside the EU. Hardly anti-globalist.

t. Protectionist Nationalist Leftist.

File: 1462058063883.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I can't tell if I'm actually getting more radical, or just more firm in my answers. Despite getting so far down, I vote for a moderate social-democratic party and the best economic system I can imagine on a national level is social democracy (capitalism with a consensual style of relationship between management and workers, good welfare, etc.), kind of surprised how libertarian I am given my anti-corporate (Well, "Pro-Corporate but regulate like a motherfucker") anti-globalist inclinations.

Though to be fair, I quite like some "far-left"-ish type ideas when they work, and on that basis I'm open to deregulating trade unions and letting them start causing hell again. (Possibly as I give up hope for a better world and start wishing someone would fuck with this one) Sympathy strikes are the greatest idea ever.

Truthfully I'm just sad that I'm not entirely sure I'm "Violent and class-conscious animal rights activists living by the motto "smash the state and masturbate" ( >>31839452 ) instead of "Insurrection and Riots", since the former sounds much cooler, even if the latter is also preferable to what we've got now.

vis-a-vis guns, I've always been drawn to the Uzi for aesthetic reasons.

>>31840626
>one wants to build a wall
This is such a meme it's funny. The wall is only efficient in populated areas, otherwise it's just a finish line for the Sinaloa cartels. The wall is a political move and backed by contractors. Every cartel that exists already has a bypass system for the wall. Don't believe that the wall will solve all the problems, it'll only do that in populated areas.

>>31839418
That's the everyday usage of the word anarchy. Political anarchy is lack of or non-recognition of a govt. power. Communism and anarchy are not mutually exclusive.

File: ODkAwG5.jpg (159KB, 700x609px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 700x609px

>>31839408
Don't be mean to facism. It's good.

>>31834008
>recreational nuclear bombs

Kekd

>Libertarian-Left are pussies meme

I kinda wonder. Have there been any particular individuals, organisations or groups that were Libertarian-Left but were also some real hard motherfuckers? I refuse to believe that entire Quadrant is comprised of nothing but weed smoking faggots and edgy ANTFA dickheads.

>>31840819
I think a number of them probably get co-opted by the authoritarian left (who love nothing more than to purge the libertarian left)

Doubtless there were some of them as anarchists in the Spanish civil war or something. I'm quite drawn to the vision of them as Moltov throwing animal loving punks.

>>31840819
Plenty of ANTIFA dickheads are going to fight against ISIS, and a fuckload more actively hunt neo Nazis and fight them. They may be edgy, but they're willing to get into fistfights at the very least.

File: chart (1).png (8KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x400px

>>31833490

>always put in the green
>want to exterminate muslims
>anti-authority due to jewish influence in the state

Political compass is a bunch of shit.

File: compass.png (11KB, 451x405px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 451x405px

am I fucked boys

File: 1420751928270.png (272KB, 959x538px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 959x538px

>>31841093
The ATF will be there in a few minutes to take your guns and shoot all your dogs

File: 1466589999825.gif (1MB, 180x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 180x200px

>>31838985
That's not a red circle, tho.

File: IMG_20161029_133206.jpg (32KB, 479x433px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 479x433px

Libertarian Socialism > anything else

>>31839065
Libertarian values can only be upheld if you remove every communist, socialist, hippie, homosexual and anyone that doesn't support the nuclear family from society.

File: edLzqCdH.jpg (42KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 400x400px

>>31833490
>Purple and Blue
>Helicopters

>>31840679
I like you. you remind me of myself

t. first year politics student

>>31840679
>>31841207
>>31839533
>>31839512
>>31839275
>>31839260
>>31839139
>>31838691
>>31838314
>>31834524
look at the these greenies

>>31840564
>grounds for a lawsuit.

Which won't happen soon enough for the mother to avoid needing welfare, will be very stressful and expensive at a time the mother will need all her mental/emotional/financial resources for the kid/s, and might not even end in her favor regardless of how obvious a breach of contract it is because the corporation will outspend her many times over on their legal team. Thanks, but no thanks.

>>31840819

Do you count labor unions? IIRC, back in the day they had to get pretty scrappy just to not be beaten into submission.

>>31839693
You're a stupid thread.

>>31833490

reverse the blue and purple and it would be fairly accurate

>>31840819

Well, today lots of people tend to count Rojava, those Kurds in Stria fighting ISIL.

The most notable hgistorical example that I can think of is the Ukranian 'Free Territory' that was defended by the Black Army in the Russian Civil war, eventually they were crushed by the authoritarian-communists, but they had a good run.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Insurrectionary_Army_of_Ukraine

>>31839288

I'm somewhere in between 12 and 16

>>31840315
>Humans thrive off struggle.
Back in your coffin, Mengele.

>>31840883
>fighting skinheads

Yeah, when it's five of them against one skinhead. Antifa can't do shit unless they have superior numbers.

>>31840819
>>31840872
>>31840883
>>31841859
>>31842192
Can someone tell me why left wing libertarians are called pussies, google didn't give me shit.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31833490
W-what am I....

>>31842307
Because most of the ones that weren't pussies got chained along in an authoritarian leftists wild ride, while those that remain weren't good enough to be useful by stalinists.

>>31842636
Reasonable

File: chart (1).png (8KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 480x400px

>>31842636
normie get
>>>/out/

File: hellsyes.png (22KB, 498x443px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 498x443px

mmm I am feeling the urge to take over some shit.

File: screenshot-www.politicalcompass.org-2016-10-09-17-16-59.png (15KB, 550x510px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 550x510px

>>31833490
fuck molotovs, I demand at least 4winds & pipebombs.
>>31839260
I'm in favour of corporal punishment (public/uploaded tazing, hammer broken fingers or getting the belt for minor crimes); death penalty is no deterrent but pain is one of the quickest and most effective ways to teach any living being a lesson(more so when rewards are available for the reformed).
I'm a nationalist but in a swiss-style hightly devolved communes/regions within a national framework.

>>31842732
idk why it says im authoritarian. There is nothing wrong about eugenics. If you have a genetic condition, like huntingtons, cystic fibrosis, black skin, tay sachs, etc... you shouldnt be allowed to breed.

>>31840650
Good post, but

>t. Protectionist Nationalist Leftist.

So t. Joseph "Socialism in One Country" Stalin?

File: muh chart.png (11KB, 530x400px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 530x400px

>>31839636
Well I smoke weed and hate taxes, fairly accurate. I also prefer AK pattern rifles cause Muh AK Aesthetic

>>31833490
that's the wrong kind of dildo, horse dildos give you better impact against a home invader and they need to be glow in the dark so you can find them quickly

>>31839216
On the what? Better waterboard her to find out.

File: 1454983769308.jpg (2MB, 1580x2238px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1580x2238px

>being this /pol/
This is the REAL, 1000% official /k/ chart. If you disagree with this, you are wrong.

>>31843716
>???

>>31843734
A true operator never reveals his secrets.

>>31839271
Am I on /ck/ because this is some fantastic pasta

>>31842919
i'm>>31842856
& I agree. Breeding people who will require care is a burden on society so for the greater good it should be forbidden: also people who use a free healthcare system have a duty to stay fit.

>>31843190
Not really. I'm willing to accept that the workers don't universally own the means of production if they're otherwise well provided for, so when on the left I'm more of a social democrat than a socialist.
That's why I mentioned capital controls. I'm very drawn to them (as part of a coherent international system - like Breton Woods but with some kind of stability mechanism to ensure huge trade surpluses are discouraged just like huge trade deficits to create balance.) since they help return power over economic policy to national governments instead of leaving it with disproportionately powerful international businessmen with no loyalty to nations or people. It sounds frighteningly statist in some ways but to the average person things should remain steady or get better.

I'm a bit of a Green-Square on social issues and guns (After all, we all know Marx said that the workers should under no circumstances be disarmed, and we've got to make concessions to Marxists to make 'em support our social-democratic program.) which I'd hope helps to distance me from the Moustache Man.

>>31840679
so who r u voting 4

>>31844235
I tacitly back Trump in the US elections. I hate Democrats in the style of Hillary Clinton and want the party punished for rejecting Sanders, which had me on that track by default for a long time.

Of all political ideologies, the "Third Way" right wing Democrats (in the US) or Labourites (in the UK) have been the most harmful. As we all know: Always kill a traitor before an enemy, Jimbo.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31844294
Literally me

File: 1468004305413.gif (2MB, 300x262px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x262px

>>31844322
was this world meant for us

>>31834008
>BECAUSE ACTUAL ANARCHO COMMUNISTS ARE NOT FUCKING SJWs CRYBABIES
Right

>>31842661
Those that remain run with the libertarian right and focus on things other than issues, since nobody else will actually be okay with them having differing opinions.

>>31838314
Gary Johnson aka numale

>>31841093
You're right now track

File: 1473689463673.jpg (61KB, 265x258px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 265x258px

>>31834008
>BECAUSE ACTUAL ANARCHO COMMUNISTS ARE NOT FUCKING SJWs CRYBABIES

File: Purple Master Race.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

I've always floated around the purple

Purple or die.

File: 1147865.jpg (13KB, 384x395px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 384x395px

>>31833742
Depends if you like roads.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31833490
I like the AK.

Perhaps I could get one of those Spanish Anarchist pistols.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Buy a shotgun
Buy a double barrel shotgun

>>31842178
You're the stupid thread.

>>31840541

Holy shit my exact point hi hello there

You got to admit one thing about anarchists, they got aesthetics.

You know, the whole hoodie thing. Very punk.

>>31840650
No, one decides to bring back jobs, decides to deport illegals abd ban muslims while the other does not.

You cannot say they are fundamentally the same when there are differences like that.

The very same for Brexit, it is a movement of anti-EU, not anti-capitalism. Remember that Stalin himself traded with the Pact countries and did not pursue no trade route.

You are barking at the wrong tree, commie.

>>31847334
>You cannot say they are fundamentally the same when there are differences like that.
Don't forget: He has a penis, she has a vagina. He's got a wife, she's got a husband!

>it is a movement of anti-EU, not anti-capitalism
The problem isn't capitalism or trade, it's fucking globalism. It's free trade with everyone. You don't pursue no trade, you regulate trade in your own nation's interests.

I'm not a communist at all, but if you want to "bring back jobs" by cutting taxes then you are a globalist and you are playing into the hands of the globalists.

>>31847367
You are repeating yourself.

But Trump/Brexit does not trade with everyone, he will bring back tariff even.

And increasing taxes will only destroy the middle class.

And you are still ignoring Trump's solution on the demographics problem, which is more important than the economy.

>>31847521
>he will bring back tariff even.
If you take what he says at face value. But if he's restoring Tariffs, why cut taxes on businesses? You start going down that route and he starts to look like he's incompetent.

>And increasing taxes will only destroy the middle class.
Yeah, Middle class people are notorious for paying corporation taxes.

>which is more important than the economy.
Not when it comes to a left-right axis. One can be on the left and distasteful for immigrations.
(Immigration is also interlinked with the economy. Consider that with restoration of capital controls, incentives to move to the USA illegally and send money home are seriously reduced since international money transfers would arouse government attention and risk being deported, but carrying it yourself risks being caught at the border and giving it to someone else risks it being stolen.)

Also Trump has no real solution to the serious demographic problem, he's just deferring it coming to a head. Even if you cut immigration to zero whites would still be on the decline.


Fundamentally, the power structures of the world as we know it would survive a Trump presidency.

>>31847576
Because he wants to improve national business and deter foreign ones.

Cutting taxes affects both the upper echelon and middle class.

Whites in the US are still the second most birthrate losing to spics, if the spics are out, whites would keep the majority.

You are a lefty but you offer no plan to hamper immigration nor a plan to improve demographics.

Also, the current world geo-political status would change if there is a russian friendly US prez.

>>31838778
just about where i am, just a hair further left and up from me

File: 1464441157133.png (77KB, 538x305px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 538x305px

>>31847678
>Because he wants to improve national business and deter foreign ones.
This distinction is of little value when you have Apple manufacturing everything in China. Do we help them because they're domestic, or penalize them for going abroad?

Only the latter is actually necessary.

>Cutting taxes affects both the upper echelon and middle class.
Utter platitude depending on what taxes you're talking about and at what bands.

>you offer no plan to hamper immigration nor a plan to improve demographics.
1. use the US's position as a world hegemon to forcibly re-introduce capital controls in a Breton-Woods style system, destroying a lot of the motivation for Mexicans to migrate to send money to their families and similar motivations for eastern europeans moving to western europe while creating large incentives to bring manufacturing jobs back home and forcing the wealthy to pay whatever share of taxes they're obligated to do instead of finding loopholes (as storing money offshore becomes more difficult.)
2. taking advantage of the economic powers returned to the state, set about restoring the link between productivity and income (encouraging childrearing via stable incomes) and initiate infrastructure programs including possibly THE WALL for meme purposes (to lower unemployment and improve living standards) and provide tax-incentives for childbirth. Extant demographics (i.e. whites being more middle class) will take care of the rest.

>>31844303
trump is my useful idiot, so I'll be his so hillary won't win

File: ak_in_a_nutshell.jpg (631KB, 2000x1233px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 2000x1233px

>>31834008
Why do ancap memes always without fail destroy my sides kek.

>>31847778
Because we want to improve the national business and shun foreign ones, not to become the next commie bloc.

Cutting taxes and tariffs are necessary for a robust national market.

About your solutions.

1. You do not need to change the economy to enforce the laws

2. Childrearing propaganda and deporting illegals can already be done right now, which will ease a lot of spots for the job market.

3. If you use American hegemony to fix the world. Congrats, you are a globalist.

It seems your codework for globalist is bourgeois.

>>31848171
You won't become the next commie block at all. You are retaining a fundamentally free-market domestic economy.
You've also failed to answer the question on outsourcing: Is apple domestic, or international? Do we keep making iPhones in China?

>1. You do not need to change the economy to enforce the laws
It makes it a damn sight easier.
>2. Childrearing propaganda and deporting illegals can already be done right now, which will ease a lot of spots for the job market.
Nowhere near enough, and nowhere near paid well enough. Also, it's not just propaganda: It's creating actual economic incentives.
>3. If you use American hegemony to fix the world. Congrats, you are a globalist.
Not in the slightest. That's like arguing the British Empire was a globalist institution.

>It seems your codework for globalist is bourgeois.
They are the ones who benefit the most from globalism, as they no longer have to care for any nation and can move around freely with their money leaving destitution in their wake.

>>31839260
I say only keep the death penalty for the very worst people.

Its a sad state of affairs when /k/ has more actual politics discussion than /pol/

>>31844294
Pretty close to me.

>>31848197
Apple made in our country domestic, Apple not made in our country is foreign.

And no, illegals are easily located, the problem is the lack of will to deport them.

Deporting illegals will free up millions of jobs, and increase pay rate decreases birthrate anyway.

The british empire is a globalist movement in its wake and severely hamper nationalism in countries it sets its pawns on.

The fight against the bourgeois makes your fight a communist one. And not nationalist.

>>31848236
You can discuss this on /pol/, do not kid yourself.

You would just get BTFO but you would have it.

>>31848379
Your sentence structure is falling apart and I'm getting tired.

If this thread isn't dead tomorrow maybe I'll reply then.

I'm just barely in the blue, equally far away from Stalin Redism and Recreational Nukes.

If push came to shove, though, I would align with the far-right before even a moderate leftist.

>>31839073
Thomas Hobbes is literally the greatest philosopher who ever lived.

t. reality

OP is a fucking retarded faggot

>>31840405
Anarcho-communism is a paradox.

>be Swiss
>from a country known for being conservative
>usually vote conservative
>mostly agree with conservative party agenda
>member of NRA-equivalent
>end up -4/-4 green

Yeah no, this questionnaire is fucky.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Well... where does that take me?
Funny thing, the older i get the more libertarian my views come, I think I was above the x axis when I was ~20. Probably has something to do with me getting to know my shit-country system , getting discriminated by state propaganda, etc. etc. Get more of that "Live and let live" vibe now :(

>>31849968
Only if you're a retard who thinks that centrally planned state socialism is communism.

>>31850144
he probably thinks that USSR had communism...

File: 6768.jpg (106KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 640x960px

>>31833490
>ak not a liberal dildo loving gun
M16 is the weapon of freedom cock sucker, kys promptly but preferably not with a gun.

>>31850148
That was my guess.

We're now going to get "le not true communism xD" memed on, so I'll pre-emptively put out this example:

The USSR wanted to land a man on the moon.
The USSR built a rocket intended to land a man on the moon
The rocket exploded.

This doesn't discredit the general idea of landing on the moon. It demonstrates that an attempt was made - a genuine attempt - and that it failed catastrophically. It wasn't "not a true moon landing", it explicitly was not a moon landing. It exploded before it left the atmosphere. It got nowhere near the moon. It was a moon landing program, yes, but it never actually managed a moon landing.

Hopefully the purpose of this is clear, but since it isn't:

The USSR (we'll assume good faith) wanted communism
The USSR set up the institutions of centrally planned state socialism while awaiting circumstances favourable to the rise of communism, a world revolution, yada yada yada.
The USSR collapsed.

This doesn't discredit the general idea of communism. It demonstrates that an attempt was made - a genuine attempt - and that it failed catastrophically. It wasn't "not true communism", it explicitly was not communism. It collapsed back into capitalism. It got nowhere near communism. It was lead by a party that believed in communism and desired it, yes, but it never implemented communism.

>>31850160

>It demonstrates that an attempt was made - a genuine attempt - and that it failed catastrophically.

They just lost a propaganda war that's it. It says nothing regarding the idea itself, they were not in a vacuum, a cold war was fought and lost.

Tying the ideas of socialism/communism to a country that lost a war is like tying the idea of Saudi Arabia hanging gays to their high standards of life.

Agree with the rest tho.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31833490
How did I go that far?
Time to go back at the range.

Surprisingly, in recent times I have been calling myself "a moderate"

>>31849968
>continuing

I'll make this easy for you:

anarchy = no hierarchical pyramid shaped power structure, i.e. central power
communism = (in easy mode) living in communes

i.e. hippies who lived on a farm and collectively owned it were anarcho-communists.

They lived in a commune, shared their property, and had no central power structure.

Imagine a federation of states, with the americunt meaning of the word "state", without D.C. where each state has a lot-lot-lot-lot more self-governing powers, but has very limited power over communes of people - i.e. districts, the districts have very low level authority over cities/ etc. etc.

they self-govern to the basic level of a single factory/ village. With no centralized, hierarchical structure.

Scary isn't it? No body to make decisions for you...

>>31850211
>Time to go back at the range.

what does having firearms have to do with political beliefs? Is it an american thing? In many places in yurop its the liberals that are pushing for allowing people to have guns, while conservatives cocblock it.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Arbeit macht frei.

>>31839636
You forgot 1448, retard.

###

I used to be like that: >>31844322

Now, compare these:
>>31844981
and
>>31839452

With my results: >>31850211 (Kek blesses me)
And those of anon here: >>31840679

Again, as anon here >>31840679 pointed out, how comes him and I were first lefties (mid-bottom left), then closing in the libertarian view (bottom right), and now are outright anarchists?

In many an answer, I responded by stating clearly that the State has duties to protect citizen's freedom of choice, without determining what they should do. This surely tells me apart from the right, but how does this make me more anarchist than authoritarian? Is it because of my sexual inclinations?

>>31850231
nah, more like MUHGUNS, MUTRUCK, MUHCUSIN, MUHBEER, MURRICA

>>31850221
>what does having firearms have to do with political beliefs? Is it an american thing? In many places in yurop its the liberals that are pushing for allowing people to have guns, while conservatives cocblock it.
Man, take it easy. I'm European. It was just a joke... I was pulling the leg of American users, who believe the only ppl at the range are the libertarian right wingers.

Seriously, I've always been on the green side at the table and have gone to the range.

But I must admit there was a period in my life I was depressed and, exactly when mental illness kicked in, I started leaning towards the right. Now I'm back.

>>31850243

Oh, I get it now ... me>
>>31850105


I'm also from yurop, also going to the range, getting to the green side while approaching my 30. The older and more educated I get, the more I hate the construct of state...

File: chrome_2016-10-30_07-35-59.png (10KB, 392x356px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 392x356px

>>31841729

+1

>>31850258
So let's dispel the myth that gun nutz are mostly dumb right-wingers. That's an Amerifag stereotype.

>>31840883
>Plenty of ANTIFA dickheads are going to fight against ISIS

No, like all leftists, ANTIFA are suicidal masochists who spend all their time and energy on destroying western civilization and all white peoples.

>>31850314

No problemo, I think this board is predominately american, so a lot of things valid only in america (leftist = regressive idiot, liberal - idiotic nigguhcuck) are being pushed as a sort of standard reference.

>>31850316

>No, like all leftists, ANTIFA are suicidal masochists

14/88 muh arian hitler-loving brutha

>who spend all their time and energy on destroying western civilization and all white peoples.

Wtf? you have some special antifa in america or smth?
How is hunting neo-nazies and siegheiling skinheads "destroying the western civilization"?
Nazis are not the "western civilization", fascists aren't the "western civilization" its the worst that happened to it.

I'm opposed to nazies/fascists/right-wing idiots and do not support migration to europe.

>>31839065
So basically, you wish people could be free to do what they want, but then when they actually do it it bothers you?

I see why you're not a libertarian anymore. A libertarian has to not only support freedom for everyone, but actually not want to stop them from whatever degenerate behavior they feel like doing, because it's really not your goddamn problem.

>>31833490
Not exactly. I'm a moderate libertarian, vaguely right-leaning (think halfway between Gary Johnson and Ron Paul), and my weapons of choice are large, accurate, and durable--magnum revolvers and large caliber bolt action or semi auto rifles. I'd love to have a Dragunov, but I'm too poor for one now.

I suppose my choice weapon, affordability aside, would be the Barrett M82A1. Looking at them makes me hard.

>>31850238
This. Nazi Germany would be more towards the authoritarian center, maybe even a little left of center. They were "National Socialists" after all.

>>31850484
>but actually not want to stop them from whatever degenerate behavior they feel like doing

em... you forgot that part "where it doesn't concern him". I mean this whole >"your right to swing massive gay dildos ends at the first inch of my lawn".

Basically - in my view you can do whatever degenererative things you might like as long as its a) funded by you (does not involve tax money in conducting the act or repairing something afterwards), b) does not affect other people (directly and/or indirectly). c) is private

>>31850530
>" They were "National Socialists" after all."

>Corporativism
>Elitism
>Big factory owners funded ANTI working class
>Private capital to the max, hugo boss trenchcoats, state orders for tanks to private manufacturers
>strict and later on forced labor and working class people control
>extremely capitalist
>extreme right

Nazi germany stole the popular name, they had no socialism, EVER. They are the antipod of socialism.

>tfw middle purple
>tfw legitimately upset I can't own grenades and have to risk building them myself rather than just buying them like I'd be able to in a genuinely free market

Fucking communist states of america

>>31850538
I don't agree with the "is private". That's my gripe with most of the political right.

The right--everyone from moderate to evangelical to Norsefag alt-right--seems to have this idea that it's government's job to preserve culture somehow. That it's somehow a problem if everyone is behaving in ways--such as dildo-waving--that bother them, even though they don't directly effect anyone. I disagree. I think culture should be left the hell alone to go in whatever retarded direction it wants, and as long as you're not harming me or my property you can wave massive dildos on the street or outside my lawn to your heart's content, and I'll argue for your right to do it.

>>31850553
>free market

kek, someone believes in that myth in 2016?

>>31850554
>I don't agree with the "is private". That's my gripe with most of the political right.

I'm politically left, here >>31850105

You see, the term "culture" is very wide.
Pop-art? Justin Beiber? Modern art? please.
Satanist black metal nazi orgy in front of a kindergarden? No.

But believe me, the gay-nazi-metalheads would say its their "culture" and demand it to be allowed, afterwards they will demand for the people to watch them, and after some political pressure, we will see "affirmative gay-nazi-metalhead action" and be required to take at least one gay nazi (preferring heavy metal music) on the board of every company.

See where I'm getting?

>>31850569
I see but I disagree. Culture ends where it (tangibly) effects others. You have to draw the line at any kind of coercion of other people.

It doesn't make sense to say that just giving someone a freedom inevitably ends in them forcing it on everyone else. We have freedom of worship, for example, why is no one campaigning to force everyone to attend church?

I do agree that affirmative action is a complete cancer and just as far from egalitarianism as the racism it's trying to prevent. It actually prevents a business from being a real meritocracy even if it wants to.

>>31850550
>extremely capitalist
Now that's not entirely true. They did use the state to direct investment and generally manage the economy even though they retained private ownership of capital.

Though National Socialism is the utter peak of an ideology diverging between what it says and what it actually does, given it was perhaps the most ad-hoc political structure in recent history. (Consider that during the Posen speeches it was noted that every German goes "Ah yes, eliminate jewry, that's party policy, everyone knows that... Except this one guy I know, he's a really good Jew. We should keep him" and how that mindset would have to be eliminated. Then you have Hitler: "Ah yes, eliminate jewry without exceptions. Everyone knows that's what we need to do... except my mother's doctor, he's a really good Jew. Under no circumstances should be be harmed."

>>31850606
>You have to draw the line at any kind of coercion of other people.

It would be a pretty much debated line, fought over by various interest groups. A freedom to act how you wish gives you the possibility to force your actions on other people if not controlled (the line). Although I agree that the line is drawn too close to personal liberties (strict) right now, it should be drawn. The line might be furthered only coherently with the mental development of the society.

You do understand that there are various levels of development of various societies? i.e. arizonians / tumbuktu tribes, etc.?

>We have freedom of worship, for example, why is no one campaigning to force everyone to attend

Em, but they do, and they affect our lives in a very strong way (all of the abortion fuss for example).

>It actually prevents a business from being a real meritocracy even if it wants to.

Businesses are never going to be "real meritocracies" because they actively take part in the formation of price for labor. You need to pay a good worker more, so why not manipulate the market or create conditions, or make a cartel - to pay less? All for the sake of profit from the working class.

File: Screenshot_20161004-233006.png (121KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1080x1920px

TFW I just want guns, weed, and good vibes.

>>31850621
>They did use the state to direct investment and generally manage the economy even though they retained private ownership of capital.

Wartime. And direct investments are a part of the capitalist state.

>given it was perhaps the most ad-hoc political structure in recent history.

Nothing special. Just a reaction after they lost WW1. Countless other dictators rose and fell in history after wars were lost, the standard of life plummeted, and internal/external enemies were needed to point a finger as a cause of the national shame of loosing.

You know how it went "We only lost because of the jewry, they stabbed us in the back! otherwise we would have our million-year-space-reich"

>>31850649
Its interesting to see so many people here on /k/ having similar profiles.

I guess the slight anti-authoritarianism comes from those pesky regulators that constantly want to take our guns away. So it is understandable why /k/ doesn't like too much state control. Its interesting and pleasing to see everybody leaning to the left.

/k/ is probably older in terms of personal age, than other boards.

File: 1466927200203.jpg (108KB, 450x590px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 450x590px

>>31850655
>Wartime
This was a fundamental aspect of their economy even in relative peacetime. I forget whether it was Mussolini or Hitler who said something vaguely along the lines of "our economic policy is that we have no economic policy", but it's a good way of summing it up. I'd say thanks to their strong interventionism it's not strictly fair to call them capitalists (and for reference, I'd say it would be fair to call postwar Britain capitalist despite their socialising moves), though they did put more thought into the interests of private capital than those of workers and that's something that should be emphasised.

>Countless other dictators rose and fell in history after wars were lost
Hitler is definitely among the more interesting ones, though. His management style of playing everyone against everyone else to ensure he was uncoupable may have been reasonably standard amongst dictators, but in a modern powerful industrial country like Germany it's utterly fascinating to see how it played out in so many different ways and how many terrible and inefficient decisions were rooted in it, but how nonetheless their early successes made them very flashy and exciting and threatening looking, leading into wehrabooism and such.

>>31850664
The political compass is also specifically designed to bring you further to the bottom left.

www.politicaltest.net is a lot better for accuracy.

>>31850685
Regarding the rise of the leader. I've read the diary of Gaius Julius Caesar, which he wrote during the Gaelic wars and his operations in Africa. That's where it gets impressive. The Schikkelgrubber's account is mostly impressive by the bodycount, but that's roughly it, he does not stand out in any other way in my opinion desu.

>>31841237
>libertarian values can only be upheld by trampling on libertarian values

>>31850685
>though they did put more thought into the interests of private capital than those of workers

I disagree. Private capital was merely a tool for them to achieve their ends. They cared about the interest of private capital about as much as a farmer cares for the interests of his cows.

>>31850774
>They cared about the interest of private capital about as much as a farmer cares for the interests of his cows
Consider thus: The rich factory owner is the milk-cow and the worker the beef cow.

>>31850689
I filled out all 10 pages of answers and then it goes "oops something went wrong" and does not give the result - except for maybe decoding this link?

http://politicaltest.net/en/test/result/129796

>>31850774
Something else to consider, one of the reasons that Germany's industry was such a mess during WW2 is they had a MIC run amok. The heads of all the various companies competed to play favorites and trade favors with the various members of the Nazi inner-circle.

If the Nazis really controlled the businesses as much as you say, each airplane manufacturer wouldn't have had a separate jet engine program, they would have combined them all together, and rolled out something in fucking 1940. Instead they competed for resources, and actually fucking sabotaged each other.

Ironically America was more socialist. Because when it picked a design, it told everyone that they were going to fucking build it, no matter who owned the factory. It was also genius, since it didn't kill competition where it mattered, since if your design lost you were still going to make money building someone else's design.

>>31850689
Tried a different language. The site is broken.

>>31850843
>since if your design lost you were still going to make money building someone else's design.

Your production line would have to be gravely modified to start producing someone elses shit tho.. and - different quality, because various levels of factory workers' competence and stuff like that. They had similar model in the Soviets - "instruktorskoje biuro" (design bureaus) competed for the best design, and then the design was accepted for all factories. The above mentioned effect was slightly less though, because all factories were state owned and operated at the same standard, but the standards were pretty low in favor off the mass production.

>>31838778
thats where I am, and I answered them with realization in mind. If it was possible the world could function farther down and to the right i'd be there.

>>31833490
can someone who has it post the picture with the actual (political) system on it?

>>31834008
Well I guess AKs do count as a various weapon so they align perfectly

>>31844452
>>31844675
It literally goes against the very nature of anarco-syndicalism.
Anarco-syndicalism is basically the idea that the only valid authority is one that can be 100% justified. Saying that something should be forbidden because "Muh Feelings r hurt" is exactly what anarco-syndicalism wants to abolish and therefore SJW crybabies are closer to fascists than to anarchists.

>>31833490

>anywhere on the libertarian half
>not the biggest goddamn MG you can afford

Come on op.

>>31851072
>SJW crybabies are closer to fascists than to anarchists.

True that. The same as with liberals

>You either love our liberal muslim gay handicapped feminist movement, or you are the devil and all of your rights should be revoked, and you should probably be sent to forced labor in a coal mine

like, how the fuck are they calling themselves liberal?

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

>>31844884
Brool story co.

Suprised more of you faggots arent in the purp

>>31841729
As long as you're not in the red or the blue you're fine.

>>31851186
Differents between roads and no roads xD

>>31851186
Red is ok up to the middle i think.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

Disappointed I'm not further away from the top half, too close to them authoritarians for my liking. I think it was those questions about corporations, public duties and safe guarding the environment. I'm a tree-hugger and i don't like those big hooknose corporations, they're a lot like big government, they don't care about anything but making money and covering their ass, so I had to answer in a much more authoritarian manner than my ideals tell me to.

>>31851222
No, that's SJW tier socialist and want the government to ban everything they don't like.

>>31851358
SJW's are right-wing authoritarian fascists who hold everyone who do not support their ideals "untermensch"

Just switch from "aryan" to "feminist" and it all makes sense, no connection to socialism whatsoever.

The state should protect its citizens' interests against trans-national corporations.

>>31851396
>SJW
>rightwing

Lol are you daft?

>>31851396
>no connection to socialism whatsoever.
Everyone I've met in real life is a huge socialist who supports the redistribution of wealth amongst other authoritarian socialist measure. Mostly because they're welfare students that have never worked.

>>31851396
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior

>>31851396
Clearly bait no one is this retarded

>>31851431
>SJW
>not fascist

Are you retarded?

>>31851434
Working, not a student, still think that megacorps that fuck up entire countries should be taxed a lot more than me, since they affect whole country markets, don't like any SJW's because they are retards. I'm a socialist.

Making a connection between those fucktards and socialism is like conencting gays and nazis, since a lot of them are gay.

>>31851396
>thinking the goverment protects your interests
>not realizing that the governemnt itself is a monopoly and is bought and paid for by your scary corporations

>>31851464
See>>31851447

>>31851472
>answering to redistribution claims from right-wingers
>the government system will not perish in the next 100 years, nor there will be any attempt at making it do so
>not realising that in your life-time you are stuck with choosing between better and far-far-worse shit. Some are sold out, some have minor (comparing) problems.

>>31851464
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

>>31851503
you've got the links now read what's written there

>>31851503
Never realized how similar they are.....

>>31851503
>SJW
>feminists, lgbt, and other SJW > other people
>excluding "other people" from society
>if you don't agree with us you're not human and might be abused
pretty right wing.

>>31851514
>fascism
Gov owns the people
>socialism
Gov owns business and through business controls its people

Sounds pretty fucking spooky to me you can keep your socialism you retarded fuck who needs roads anyways

>>31851537
More like
>SJW
>femminism
>if youre a man and you think anything different than i do the government should intervene on my behalf
>guns are spoopy
>believes in socialism
>99.9999999% of these people are liberal bernouts

>>31851542
>fascism

a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government

>socialism

a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies

fuck off and learn how to read

>who needs roads anyways

Well, tell me why haven't you moved to somali? the best free market conditions (buy and sell whatever you want) and no restrictions whatsoever, no roads, you have also access to the most liberties ever, do what you want basically :)

>>31851559
Close but its more
>sjw
>government should support the sjw community
>believes the wage gap exists
>wants min wage
>thinks bernie could have saved the usa
>pro choice
>gun control advocate
>white guilt
Sounds pretty left wing to me tho

File: facepalm[1].jpg (35KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x600px

>>31851559
You do understand that not everyone here is an americunt?

anyway

>SJW
>LGBT-QZXYP,whatever
>Muh master LGBT race
>White male/don't agree/ you get blammed

third reich much?

>>31851565
>reading comprehension
>summarizing
Clearly you havent been through the third grade

Why dont you live in Venezuela you hypocritical faggot?

>>31851573
America is fucked up, your right-wingers might come as reasonable social-democrates in europe

Your "leftists" are the epitome of right-wingers in their "you do as we want or fuck you" authoritarian approach to politics.

>>31851578
>reading comprehension
>summarizing

you have failed at both.
You writing this from Somali-land, you hypocritical faggot?

>>31851586
You keep saying somali, as if it were a place.

Somalia is a place.
Somali is a people, and a language.

Pretty sure you're 13.
At what age did your mother put you in the dryer in hopes for a late term abortion.

File: Screenshot_2016-10-27-22-00-42.png (138KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1080x1920px

:D

>>31851610
28 actually, you abort surviving nigcuck, it's just that English is not my native language.

>>31851579
>not understanding the difference between a republic and aa democracy
>thinking these terms are ever interchangeable

Not even american here but you may be a retard.

>>31851627
>repeating my insult in a simplified manner
>getting mad ever
>saying english is not your native language

Clear signs of defeat.

Inb4 google translate as his native language

You're deffinitely 13

>>31851627
>calling a libertarian a cuck
Gud1m8

>>31843716
>tfw don't have enough money to descend to ian status

>>31850314
Dont fool yourself, non-RW gun owners are in the minority and you know it.

And Yuropoors should barly be considered gun owners

>>31851651
*facepalm
>makes false assumptions
>ignores humor regarding his own insult
>Astonished that you've managed to write "you're"

File: spekr test.png (65KB, 1480x911px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1480x911px

>>31851611
shit, i'm a libtard according to this one, funny thing I hate SJWs and libtards.

ARs belong in purple, as long as theyre made from 80% lowers. libertarians love that shit. homebuilt 80% 1911s and 3d printed funs too.

Lugers, STG44s, and MP40s belong in the blue quadrant.

File: 1477364951207-r9k.jpg (6KB, 196x250px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 196x250px

>>31836227
Its you, isnt it AnarchyInBlack?

>>31838238
It's not an oxymoron, it's just a different way to achieve communism

Communism = stateless, classless, society that the workers own the means of production.


Marx style communism believes that an authoritarian socialist state is a necessary step to reach communism via the state giving up power and the world becoming communist at once from a worker revolution , Anarcho communism believes in dissolving the state and establishing a communist society, without all of Mary's "global revolution." crap.
That's basically the easiest way I can explian it.

>>31839288
In between 9 and 10.

File: chart.png (17KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x400px

How am I /k/?

File: image.png (85KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 750x1334px

Where's my shotgun?

>>31839257
I disagree, Blue. They should simply be allowed to starve to death.

t. Purple.

>>31851947
Like most of the non-retards

>>31851947
Your ideology is internally contradictory. Check your premises.

>>31852073
Why so? what's contradictory? (not the one who took the test but similar results)

File: Screenshot_2016-09-24-10-40-51.png (266KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1080x1920px

>>31839308
Purple or bust, faggots

political compass is bogus and needs better questions.

Question #1 If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.

Humanity and corporations is the same thing, there is no way to answer.

Question #4 Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races.

I don't believe in race, no way to answer.

>>31852081
Collectivism necessitates the limiting of personal liberty to maintain itself. When all men are their brothers' keepers all must be accountable to the state for their every action. When every man is accountable to every other no man can be permitted to behave self-destructively. No man may be permitted to behave selfishly. No man may be permitted to speak against his condition. No man may be permitted to opt out. All for fear of harming the collective.

>>31852136
Race exists whether you believe in it or not.

File: plsvickers.png (89KB, 1978x1184px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1978x1184px

Does this mean I'm free to entrench a Vickers gun into a defensive position on my patio?

>>31851072
The movement results in the presence of SJW.

>>31833490
>I'll be using AKs and firebombs

>>31852150
and so what if you are right ? a political test is supposed to output the beliefs on the person taking it.

>>31852146
>Collectivism necessitates the limiting of personal liberty to maintain itself

No it doesn't. Hippies lived in collectivism. And yes it is quite right to be accountable if you kill someone. The state has many forms. There are those where some authoritarian idiot declares rules for everyone, and there are those where collectives of people figure out how exactly they want to live. Changing it if needed on their basic village-level, etc.

So no, unless you're talking about the Somalia level personal liberty stuff (i.e. rape anyone, hurt anyone, kill anyone, etc.) - it doesn't necessitate the limiting of personal liberty, and even if it is limited - it is done through the consensus of individuals rather than some conservative ideology/authoritarian rule, etc.

No contradiction whatsoever.

>>31852175
>Capitalist olygarchy/elitism nao.
>SJW exist nao.
>anarcho-syndicalysm will make SJW
>retard.jpg.

>>31852228
Only a collectivist would conflate killing someone with smoking weed or refusing to produce your quota.

>>31852228
>No it doesn't. Hippies lived in collectivism. And yes it is quite right to be accountable if you kill someone. The state has many forms. There are those where some authoritarian idiot declares rules for everyone, and there are those where collectives of people figure out how exactly they want to live. Changing it if needed on their basic village-level, etc.
Yeah, so long as they don't try to force anyone else to adopt their way of life and community rules it's fine. The world would be a better place in many regards if society was loosely structure and built on those kinds of communities, whatever their size.

>>31852247
>Yeah, so long as they don't try to force anyone else to adopt their way of life and community rules it's fine.

Herein lies the contradiction. A single individual can now destroy the collective by behaving selfishly. Thus, individuals must be limited in their behavior, by the state, for the collective to survive.

>>31852160
And wait happily for someone to violate NAP

>>31852247
>Yeah, so long as they don't try to force anyone else to adopt their way of life and community rules it's fine.

That would just be right-wing retarded authoritarianism. The only thing I might find ok to push on to other people is the idea that they can self-govern.

>>31852305
I mean if they choose to self-govern themselves into a fucking caliphate and attack neighboring self-governing bodies (i.e. villages) everybody around would fuck them up.

But it is not going to happen tommorow, all those right-wing idiots need someone's boot up their asses, this takes too much of a responsibility for your own life.

If an individual is acting selfishly and breaks the rules that the collective has agreed upon (no killing) - the collective fucking punishes him (municipal electable police).

Thus, individuals are limited in their behavior to the limits that they all agree upon compared to some idiotic tradition, be it fundamental christianity or islam or our dur hur fathers , etc...

Surprise, surpise, the rightist utopia will also not allow anal raping.

The whole idea of collectivism is forming small collectives instead of an oppressing government disconnected from the ad hoc needs of people who live on a particular patch of mud.

>>31852319
>NAP
Non aggression pact? If so, yeah, those faggots are the worst.

>>31851092
The entire "tumblr anarchist" movement is so fucking stupid. It's just filled with a bunch of morons who think that anarchy is "hating the big bad police" and nothing more. They don't realize that the entire SJW retoric goes against the entire idea of anarchism

>>31852175
While yes the idea of equality for all inspired todays SJWs the anarco-syndicalist movement is not in any way about "rape culture", "cultural appropiation" (which is lifted straight out of fucking nazi germany ffs) or anything like that.
Anarco-syndicalism draws the line at equality and as far as I know equality is not the same as saying that white people or men are terrible because of what their predecessors did (which once again is lifted straight out of nazi fucking germany)

>>31840883
>a fuckload more actively hunt neo Nazis and fight them

this sounds a lot more tough than what they actually do - they show up at skinheat rallies and try to annoy the fuck out of them by shouting and waving their red flags at them, while hiding behind a fuckton of police protection

whenever skinheads and antifa clash and there's no police around, it ends with antifa getting brutalized or outright killed. turns out a movement that's made up of ex-hippies, potheads and various kinds of pacifists doesn't fare very well in violent situations.