/BRG/ Battle Rifle Thread

File: IMG_0091.jpg (134KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 720x960px

In on battle rifle thread

I need some new pics of my rifle.

File: PTR_zucchini_breads_10-08-2016_B_1280.jpg (816KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

816KB, 1280x960px

Bread?

>>31763560
>stainless steel barrel
Kek

>>31763828
You can have good stainless barrels. But as those are Anderson and Armalite receivers, it's probably full budget

I just moved to colorado and want a new rifle now that my old one shit itself. Are the 7.62x54r veprs still a good buy or should i hold off and get something else? And about the 15rd mag size thing, is it just something i have to accept?

>>31764187
Stainless barrels are a gimmick for mall ninjas

>>31764656
Nah, buy your mags in our neighbor states, or order them online, send them to a friend out of state, then have them send them to you. Rebuild kits are also a thing but only for more common magazine types.

>>31764682
How are they a gimmick?
What are they supposed to be that is over hyped?
More accurate than chrome lined with a lower barrel life? Cheap as fuck? What's the hype?

File: BLSz2ZE.jpg (4MB, 4573x3430px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4573x3430px

>>31764684
FALs *can* do submit, but that's luck. Moa is a realistic goal if you get a barrel made, use top notch parts, and understand how an FAL is accurized. 1.5 should be considered an acceptable threshold.

The Irish use it as a DMR still

>>31764684
They aren't really known for their accuracy, they have pretty limited usage as marksmans rifles, but I think you'll find its performance adequate.

>>31764763
If your using irons, check your upper/low slop. I'd it's loose, you can get an oversized lug, tighten that shit up.

>>31764709
Is it something that gets actively enforced or is it more something that isnt going to get attention as long as i dont do dumb shit?

>>31764805
Not enforced. You would be more likely to get funny looks for using compliant mags than for using standard or high cap ones.

>>31764818
Easiest way, use a super fine mechanical pencil, put witness marks across the upper/lower mating. Open and close a few times, check for play in the marks each time. It's not that common, but can be a hard thing to diagnose otherwise

>>31764884
Your looking for inconsistent lockup, and yes, not locking all the way.

>>31764821
Ok sounds good to me, im right by boulder and denver is there anywhere i should check out as far as ranges/gunshops?

File: IMG_0577.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31763560
All these posts and no scar yet, baka

>>31765066
I'd do one by the front sight and dust cover and at the rear of the upper where it meets up with the lower at that tab just forward of the frame lock

>>31765219
OEM as fuck

>>31765260
Natural beauty best beauty

File: WWadmql.jpg (150KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 800x534px

>>31765963
Not always

Best red dot for FAL? I've got a DSA mount on order so I'll have some real estate on the receiver now.

>>31766288
Aimpoint

>>31766318

What does the Comp M4 do that the Carbine Optic doesn't? Price difference is big.

>>31766355
I have an m4, better batter life, and over built like a motherfucker. Noting wrong with a pro or aco. M4/m4s is just more of what aimpoints great.

>>31766395

Well, I'm looking at a Comp M4s right now. $829. Buy once, cry once. Do you like the sight picture on it? Is the dot clear enough for you? Any starbursts or any issues?

File: 1459111933737.jpg (442KB, 1600x1039px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1600x1039px

Where can I order a 21" DSA FAL that isn't a voyager, other than on DSA's website?
Every other site has them listed for $1500-$1600 (DSA is priced at $1700), but they've also all been sold out for a year or more.

>>31766570

I just got one off Gunbroker. It's new through a website that I can't recall at the moment. It ran me like $1850.

https://www.atlanticfirearms.com/component/virtuemart/shipping-rifles/rock-ola-m14-308-battle-rifle-detail.html?Itemid=0

I can't recall hearing anything good or bad about Rock Ola. Is this worth it?

Newfag here, I want baby's first .308 semi auto. I need something for shtf that isn't going to break the bank at 1800 dollars base rifle cost... What should I get that's durable and accurate for that price? I'll buy good glass later.

>>31767113
>break the bank at 1800 dollars
get a real job then.

>>31767049
Never owned one or even another m14, but from based on what I read over the past few months while researching battle rifles and trying to decide which one to get:
damn good but, unless you really really want a nice m14 clone and money is not at all an issue, not $2,150 good.
If you meet that exception of not giving a fuck about the money and want a m14 go for it. If you want a m14 and $750 left over to spend on ammo and mags just get a Springfield.

>>31767113
At what you want to spend consider a used fal or ptr.

>>31767160
Ah so it's not superior quality to a Springfield?

>>31767213
LMT, nightmare, sphur, Atlas
Nice

>>31767547
New tablet.....
Nightforce not nightmare

>>31767113
vepr should be below that price point i believe. the only other br i can think of is the rfb but that has a finnicky gas system that you need to dial in right. from what ive read if you shoot it a lot youll have to dial it again but over time itll need less and less gas pumped into it. its an option

File: 2016-10-22 18.01.24.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31763594
bars

>>31763979
the case it ships with is complete junk btw

>>31764684
build an ar10 and have dat moa but shity DI or buy a scar and just get wallet raped

>>31766161
>taping over wording
lel

>>31767049
they are good not castmeme like spring if you believe that jazz

>>31767213
>no dickmod
i like that

>>31767137
I drive interstate as a commercial motor vehicle operator. I make plenty of money.

I shouldn't pay 200% more for a rifle that is 5% better than what's on the market. I also doubt a high-spec expensive ass ar10 used by ranger seal recon operators for 5000 dollars can handle being innawoods its whole life. Let me rephrase than.

What is a rifle that is durable?

File: image.jpg (4MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2448x3264px

>>31767888
This is the reason you're so fat! Every time you post pics it's always cakes and breads and beer. You could be cute again like pic related if you put in minimal effort. I'm disappoint desu

>>31764682
No gimmick. I live pretty far up north so 416R is the best choice for winter shooting. Where I used to live, we had 20 days below 0F (winter 2014-15). Where I live now is even colder.

>>31764187
I'm happy with the accuracy from the two Armalites. The Anderson is full on budget. I've not been able to stretch the range on the 20"--I've been out to 200 yards pretty often and pretty easily but the roll of the land prevented further.

>>31769034
Fixed stock on short barrel, collapsible stock on longer barrel, you nigger

>>31768231
>A grown man in a dress is cute.
Jesus christ what a disappointment you both are.

File: Untitled.jpg (656KB, 1600x1184px) Image search: [Google]

656KB, 1600x1184px

>>31769091
>>31769091
I switched lowers for the picture. Here's something a little more Gucci.

>>31769121
I think grown men not wearing dresses are cute too. Some people are just filfthy fallik faggots

Is the SKS a battle rifle with the right furniture?

File: CHNA_PTR.jpg (1MB, 2656x1348px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2656x1348px

>>31769223
No detachable mag (normally), no select fire, and still an intermediate round.

>>31769146
Suck start a shotgun.

>>31768231
whats up wirty

looking to spend around 1400 on a battle rifle. I am particular to g3 and fal style rifles, but am open to pretty much anything. what would you recommend of the highest quality?

>>31769427


what is that

File: 334-3.jpg (1MB, 4000x2992px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4000x2992px

>>31769479
M1A

File: IMG_20161022_201328484.jpg (2MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4160x2340px

>Sunday is starting to come together

anyone build an AR10?

>>31769713
I have. Maten set, noveske barrel, UBRs, apex hg, etc. Sweet rig

>>31769362
The G3, the CETME, PTR 91, C308 etc. are all based on the FN FAL.
There is a reason for that.

File: untitled.png (767KB, 3060x960px) Image search: [Google]

767KB, 3060x960px

>>31769713
I've personally built lowers.
>top left
AR-10B 16" (98%--need new grip)
>bottom left
AR-10B 20" (84%--need new scope mount, stock assembly, stock, and grip)
>top right
DPMS GII Compact Hunter (0%--not even started saving for a hopefully great 7 pound battle rifle)
>bottom right
AR-10B 18" (20%--accumulating some parts)

File: 1459200473202.jpg (897KB, 2027x1621px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 2027x1621px

>>31769877
>The G3, the CETME, PTR 91, C308 etc. are all based on the FN FAL.
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>31769923
are you that retarded you fell for that bait post

>>31769969
>I was merely pretending

>>31769923
You fell for the meme my friend.

Tfw falling for a meme is a meme is a meme

>>31769713
I just finished my Maten, haven't shot it yet. It seems like DPMS pattern is the way to go, since there is a lot more available there in the way of compatible parts.

>>31770004
>implying i posted the bait post
nah just you thats retarded

>>31770013
Maten is kac pattern newfriend
Well except for the takedown pins

>>31767308
They use forged receivers and other components and are great quality, but if it's your first m1a you may as well buy a springfield and if you ever shoot it to death then you can pick up a fulton or have one custom built

File: Capture - Copy.png (8KB, 630x116px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 630x116px

>>31770071
Any more choice wisdom there, smartguy?

File: DPMS AR10 lower receiver comparison.jpg (126KB, 1120x840px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1120x840px

>>31770234
That dpms and kac spec are not the same new friend

>>31769923
Not sure what bait/meme these boyz are talking about.
The Belgians wouldn't sell the germans any more FALs, so they had CETME, a spanish company replicate the design.
That was the original CETME, then since spaniards are lazy good for nothings, the germans had HK make the G3, which is the CETME, which is the FAL. Then PTR made the 91 which is the G3, then Century made their own CETME which earned a bad rep, then they made a decent version, by asking PTR to manufacture their Century design (that's the C308)
All the while, the FAL was winning and losing wars all over the world. That is the rifle I want more than anything in this life.

File: 1476563314052.jpg (27KB, 650x456px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 650x456px

>>31770304
>The Belgians wouldn't sell the germans any more FALs, so they had CETME, a spanish company replicate the design
> the germans had HK make the G3, which is the CETME, which is the FAL.
If you don't slow down you are going to hurt yourself bucko

>>31770304
German engineers working for the Iberians designed it.

>>31770287
No need to get autistic, sperg. The shape of the receiver doesn't matter to the end-user if they're buying a Mega receiver set combo (as you should always buy an upper and lower from the same company and line for a 308), since the lower parts will all be standard AR-15 anyway, with the receiver extension mostly the same as well. What really matters is the barrel and bolt, which Maten uses the DPMS/SR-25. You carping on about KAC is useless quibbling since buying DPMS high parts will give the builder the most possible options while maintaining compatibility.

Also
>When using an Armalite or Knight carrier a narrower then mil-spec hammer is required. Check with carrier manufacturer

Now fuck off.

>>31770402
The material will take dpms or armalite spec bags and barrels newfriend

>>31770421
Maten

Anyone have a good source for some quality metric wood FAL handguards? Not Ironwood, they're too barebones.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>31767888
>what can this gun realistically do
>buy shittier, less fun gun

Nyet, I don't like ARs and I've already bought an FAL. I just need to know which route I'm taking for that beautiful 18 inch goodness

File: IMG_1008.jpg (1MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x4032px

>>31770493
But real nato sux lol

>>31770342
I did my research friendo. I'm genuinely curious what you think the bait is.

>>31770684
What sling on the SCAR?

File: IMG_1133.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31770772
Idk some sling I got at a fun show for beating some dude at tic tac toe

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>31770684
r u trolin me sun

File: 1473782066678.jpg (45KB, 692x512px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 692x512px

>>31770764
>implying the delayed rolker action is anywhere near similar to the tilting breach action
>implying that they share anything but cartridge and gas piston systems

>>31770994
Nice

>>31770994
>share gas piston systems

>>31765219
What is that little black bump below the charging handle?

>>31771114
misspoke, both run off of gas piston systems. thank you for the correction

Would L1A1 furniture fit on my DSA STG58?

>>31767113
c308

>>31771247
Maybe

is PTR/C308 SHTF-reliable?

File: G3_Bullpup_concept.jpg (74KB, 1191x670px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1191x670px

>>31771293
PTR probably
C308 fuck no

>>31771165
The G3 doesn't have a piston.

>>31771293
PTR yes.

>>31771114
>all this b8
REEEE

What's a good AR10 for SHTF?

File: 1474948012217.jpg (49KB, 600x801px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x801px

>>31771318
what they fuck do you think the fuckhuge tube on the top of the barrel is you monkey

>>31771272

Yes or no? Why maybe?

>>31771386
Look at a G3 bolt, it's not a piston like an FAL is. You're retarded

File: ptr-91_gir_angled_cc_whitebg_1000w_v2.png (193KB, 1000x488px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1000x488px

>>31771311
>>31771318
what's budget but better than the PTR? ive been thinking of getting a c308 because its cheaper. should i wait 2 weeks and drop the extra 300 on a PTR?

>>31771386
:^)

>>31771426
Get the PTR.

>>31771352
Lmt

>>31767888
Dude stop posting food what the fuck.

File: 20110811_images_brain.gif (213KB, 210x224px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 210x224px

>>31771453

File: Screenshot_2016-10-15-12-53-03.png (2MB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x1280px

Best place to buy metric receiver? Im having a hard time finding one under $300.
I heard inch works, but which parts will/wont?

>>31770304
>The Belgians wouldn't sell the germans any more FALs
wrong

they wouldnt license it to them so they could build them in germany. of course theyd take their money

>>31770421
Jeez I didn't know it was so complex that you can't even use the same bags for certain pattern builds.

>>31771398
is the thing that attaches to the bolt on an ak not a piston?

>>31771788
Not in the same way a piston on an FAL works

File: PTR_pumpkin-bars_7-26-2016_A.jpg (791KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

791KB, 1280x960px

>>31767888
Witnessed
>bars
What'd you make?

>>31768172
Aesthetically pleasing composition.

>>31771818
I understand that, that is what im saying, they are both gas pistons, just not the same kind.

>>31771860
That's like saying gas and diesel cars are the same cause they use fuel

>>31771890
i wasn't saying that though, I was saying they both run on gas piston systems. which would be like saying they both use petroleum derivatives. I'm not saying they are the same.

>>31771917
If it wasn't you then someone was. But it's still enough difference to protest calling them both piston systems. Short stroke vs long stroke is weird as fuck really

File: ARs2.jpg (303KB, 1432x745px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1432x745px

>>31763560
Posting OG AR10B copy with my '15

How are the DS Arms voyagers?

What's the difference between the voyagers and the sa58s?

>>31771965
What is that string on your AFG for?

File: Dutch_airline_KLM_arctic_survival_kit_AR10.jpg (260KB, 1280x710px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1280x710px

>>31771965
>dat 50th Anniversary Armalite
Beautiful. Why did they fuck up so hard with the 60th? They went full CZUB on their commemorative line.

>>31771969
Voyageur uses a cast receiver, cannot mount a carry handle, has no bi-pod cut on the barrel, and uses the single-elevation "Holland"-style rear sight.

>>31771969
Forged > cast

File: 1475549981514.jpg (100KB, 1800x528px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1800x528px

>>31771942
ok fair enough, thank you for correcting me, didn't know the G3 had a different gas system

>>31771973
>string on your AFG

It's a paracord loop attached to my sling mount because my MS3 clip refused to not bind up there.

>>31772001
But is it worth the extra $500?

>>31772093
Are you thinking about a new sling mount? I'm soon to be in the market for one and was wondering if you had any suggestions.

File: blowback_operation.png (3MB, 2112x3037px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2112x3037px

>>31772087
As much as "roller-delayed blowback" qualifies as a gas system.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>31772138
>extra 500

I paid 1300 for Stg58 built on a forged DSA. Also having played with a Voyager, yes. It almost felt like airshit to be honest. And it looked thin as fuck

>>31772163
will you just fucking accept that I am saying I'm wrong and take your fucking (you)

File: roldelboltanirollerdelayedblowbackHKMP5G3.gif (82KB, 678x128px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 678x128px

>>31772201
It's not enough that you know you're wrong, you have to know why you're wrong.

>>31772166
>Cast
>Thin as fuck
You seem really dumb

>>31772255
but what is pushing back the fucking bolt!?

>>31772255
Top kek

>>31772271
Have you held a voyager before?

File: Kenyan_lion_shooting_2.jpg (684KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1500x1000px

>>31772277
The same thing that's pushing the fucking bullet.

>>31772277
It's blow back. There is no gas system.

File: 1474923186114.jpg (65KB, 554x476px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 554x476px

>>31772292
so you are saying the momentum of the bullet is pushing the bolt back, or the fucking gas you mong

File: concerned_PTR_owner.jpg (33KB, 399x421px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 399x421px

>>31772354
Anon, what makes the bullet go forward?

>>31772354
Do they not teach Newton in school anymore?

File: what a time to be alive.jpg (28KB, 500x367px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x367px

>>31772415
>>31772330
>>31772415
>>31772292
okay I looked it up and i get it now. I'm the Mongoloid.
> As the bolt head is driven rearward, rollers on the sides of the bolt are driven inward against a tapered bolt carrier extension. This forces the bolt carrier rearward at a much greater velocity and delays movement of the bolt head. The primary advantage of roller-delayed blowback is the simplicity of the design compared to gas or recoil operation

File: Range_3.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

>>31772471
It's how you learn anon. You got there.

File: 1473976123160.jpg (61KB, 416x620px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 416x620px

>>31772487
I'm a dumb ass and I apologize for wasting everyone's time

>>31767888
nigga are those blondies?

>>31772487
>>31772521
As long as you own up to it, I'm happy to be a part of this teachable moment.

File: 14769224826141500822003.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

FALs please

>>31772597
who CNC'd that out, looks like its not even a type 3

>>31772614
Does it say Enterprise on it? It's hard to make out.

>>31772614
Unsure. Found the pic on /k/ and just saved it. Also I'm really drunk. Love you tho

File: 1455989613038.png (45KB, 596x658px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 596x658px

>>31772521
At least you have the courage to admit it

File: Top.jpg (30KB, 468x323px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 468x323px

>>31772630
I think it does, looks weird without all the different cuts in it

File: 1453410097943.jpg (634KB, 4030x1096px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 4030x1096px

>>31772597
prettiest FAL on /k/ at the moment desu

File: 1473033783030.jpg (496KB, 1024x635px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1024x635px

>>31772597

>>31772487
Do you like the strike eagle?

File: akfn_apart900_1w.jpg (45KB, 900x522px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 900x522px

>>31772597
here

File: 1473899438703.jpg (3MB, 3973x2240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3973x2240px

>>31772614

File: OwfMZIw.jpg (128KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 768x1024px

What does /brg/ think of the SIG 510?

File: R716-16B-P-large.jpg (18KB, 633x348px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 633x348px

I'm looking at getting a battle rifle what does /brg/ think of the SIG 716? It seems well priced.

Or should I just say fuck that and save longer to get a SCAR or MR762.

File: 3-gun-elite-b.jpg (38KB, 1440x324px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1440x324px

I'm new to ARs and gun ownership in general, but I've been doing some research and wanted to see /brg/'s thoughts on this gun. Keep in mind I'm looking for competitive sharpshooting and accuracy here.

This is an Anderson Manufacturing AM15-3G-Elite. What was highly interesting about Anderson's rifles is that some of them, including this particular model, claim to require no lubrication down the barrel due to the metal being impregnated with calcium (RF-85 treatment). Because of the use of no oil, I don't see this thing gumming up at all, probably requires very little soap/water cleaning.

To further minimize contamination in the chamber/action/bolt carrier assembly, I was thinking about installing an Adam's Arms gas piston conversion kit. I'm also unsure of how well the gas piston system works, but it makes sense to me to remove as much contamination from the critical parts of the gun as possible.

I need your advice:
1) Am I retarded?
2) Suggestions for what kinds of equipment I should be looking for on a rifle
3) DI or Gas Piston? Apparently this is a controversial subject.

File: 2016-10-23 08.18.39.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31771857
shitty pumpkin bars to satisfy my white girl cravings

>>31772524
pumpkin

>>31772597
here

>>31773935
a scar is literally the best rifle ever made

>>31773997
1. yes
2. its not a battle rifle
3. go to arg

>>31773392
Great, accurate rifle. Uncommon ammo. Some people find it really ugly but I honestly think that it looks decent.

>>31774013
Alright. Hey, thanks for directing me to the right board. Again, just getting my feet wet with rifles. I'm guessing a 'battle rifle' is anything that uses 7.62 or above?

>>31774013

I like the scars performance. Unfortunately I think it's kind of ugly.

>>31772701
Yeah. It's been great.

>>31773392
Here in burgerland, its a poor decision.
Finding parts would be onerous at best, no gunsmiths with intimate knowledge. Its a mechanical system with no support, finding ammunition is difficult, hell finding .306 bullets might be a challenge.

File: IMG_1125.jpg (3MB, 2602x3470px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2602x3470px

>>31772721
One if the mist aesthetically pleasing fals

>>31773392
Ugly as fuck, but reliable or so I hear

>>31773935
Get scar

>>31773997
AR15=/=Battle Rifle

>>31774013
You are gay lol

>>31774051
Scar is best tho

File: tumblr_nv8n8cNUqX1sw78zao1_1280.jpg (452KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1024x678px

>>31774552
Para FAL is objectively an aesthetically superior rifle.

File: IMG_1194.jpg (547KB, 1706x1003px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 1706x1003px

>>31774568
Maybe w/o the rails lol, and the izzy fal is objectively the most aesthetically superior fal

File: ARS-PARA.jpg (386KB, 2032x1354px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 2032x1354px

>>31774586
yeah, no

>>31771123
Pretty sure it's supposed to keep the barrel in or something, I forget.

File: IMG_1193.jpg (41KB, 400x298px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 400x298px

>>31774595
Yes

File: IMG_1020.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>31774609
Yes, you are correct

>>31766570
What's that handguard on the FAL?

File: CHNA Bayonet.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

>>31774786
T48 I think.

File: IMG_20161023_122859955.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>31775556
You are correct sir.
You get a limited edition range caterpillar picture.

File: 2016-10-23 11.58.10.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31776720
barrel was shot to shit and not matching bolt btw

>>31776720
Wow that's a killer mosin. That would make a good shtf sniper. I bet you could get sub Moa with good ammo. That is a 1000yd rifle right there

File: 2016-10-23 12.26.11.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31776740
no doubt

if im buying an upper w/o a BCG & CH...

The CH is no problem but will these separate Bolt Carrier Group come with the smaller parts inside it? i.e. the firing pin/cam pin/FP retainer pin

File: 2016-10-23 11.59.33.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

i saw a few 750$+ c308s and just laughed

>>31774595
BREHS

File: tumblr_oejg1cX6F71sdxszuo1_1280.jpg (196KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1080x1080px

>>31778595
>Super skinny arms
>Chic lean
>Chicken wing
>unstable offhand position
>no sling
>Some shitty camo
>uniform so loose on him its like hes fresh outta concentration camp
As to be expected of countries fielding the G3

File: 1458489650856.jpg (181KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1024x768px

>>31778872
We can't all be men inside other men.

>>31779411
Looks like sa/k/uya

File: 6367.jpg (31KB, 300x352px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x352px

>>31779686
fal isnt babyshit enough

>>31779787
But the guy is fat enough

Any one here own a imi golani? If you do, what are your thoughts on it? How did you acquire it?

>>31779772
always thought about buying the EBR chassis, never could spend the money on it tho. so expensive and heavy.

>>31779846
Dumping money on shit, doesnt make it not shit

>>31779846
It completely eliminates the need to have it bedded ever, it's way more ergonomic with body armor, and it looks awesome.

>>31779868
my loaded shoots under an inch with handloads
>>31779884
it also makes it 36 pounds.

>>31779996
It's 15lbs.

How did men ever carry the BAR across Europe? That's right, they weren't faggots.

>>31779829
rood

>>31780020
same way the guys do it now, with the 240b and body armor.

a heavy rifle gets used less. i use mine a lot.

>>31780440
Want to tell me anything else about how I use and shoot my favorite rifle? Perhaps you would like to rename it for me?

File: extreme memerty.png (27KB, 1195x561px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1195x561px

>>31779829
too manlet though

File: range day.jpg (2MB, 2448x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x1836px

>>31780563
I enjoy that a billion people owned PTRs in 1820.

>>31780563
So youre a poor fag?

File: PTR_range_10-06-2016_A.jpg (786KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 1024x768px

>>31780563
>>31780629
A *BILLION* BUDDIES

>>31780678
>I thought PTR was poverty enough
>Then I saw that spotting scope
Is that your monthly ammo budget right there?

I'm going to buy a keltec rfb and be the only guy here that has it fuck you guys and your shirt battles rifles

File: PTR side.jpg (2MB, 2988x1681px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x1681px

>>31780908
There's at least one guy that already has one here. Have fun with that though.

>>31780908
a long time ago there was a handsome anon with an RFB. It was the only pic of a /k/ meetup that didn't look like autismfest (the memes are real)

File: e96ed8aa142766142104954651_700wa_0.gif (637KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

637KB, 500x280px

>>31780908
Maybe I shoot my battlerifles shirtless
What about that?
unhhh!

File: IMG_20161023_215040469.jpg (1MB, 1456x2592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1456x2592px

>>31780563
You're a faggot and this is your fault

>>31781023
I'm like 40% sure that's 40% of a FAL

File: raifu4laifu.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>31781023
paint it

>>31781038
Yeaaaa just gotta get the damn receiver. I bought one it's just taking a while to get here.
>>31781066
Nigger it's not even built yet but that's the plan

>>31781103
excuses

File: image.jpg (19KB, 274x274px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 274x274px

>>31781103
Are the imbel kits metric or inch? Also
TOASTY ROASTIE NO MORE POSTIE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 153037ir24paporyr97ss4.jpg.thumb.jpg (48KB, 700x522px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 700x522px

>>31781129
Metric

File: suggestive-hand-signal.jpg (50KB, 507x603px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 507x603px

>>31781156
What about c1A1s?

File: C2s.jpg (372KB, 824x930px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 824x930px

>>31781165

Metric.

Only the Brits hung on to that goofy system of measurement.

File: image.jpg (121KB, 500x713px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 500x713px

>>31781148
>>31781165
Get this 3D SHIT off of my board RIGHT NOW you fucking scum. It's already bad enough we have a fucking roastie posting here. Desu you should just kill your self you fucking piece of shit, rejoice in the fact that it will be the only good decision you've ever made in your pathetic life. Pic related

>>31781187
I thought the commonwealth countries used the version based on the inch pattern licensing

File: tumblr_oeu1z70if51u66m1jo1_r1_1280.jpg (311KB, 906x1280px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 906x1280px

>>31781253
2DPD

File: IMG_0072.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31780908
>RFB
>Battle Rifle
Pick one

File: tumblr_ofcxkykkFk1t4o0z6o1_540.jpg (126KB, 540x537px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 540x537px

>>31781335
>Why would you ever pick the RFB?
anon does like to be special snowflake

>>31781423
Doesnt make it a battle rifle tho

>>31781548
No
Im not trying to say it is
Im saying its a piece of shit, put out by a second rate company, with third rate manufacturing.
That people who want it are desperately looking for something "different". That they assume its rarity means its desired, not that one guy and keltec can make them, when hes not too drunk.

File: 2016-10-23 23.14.05.jpg (2MB, 3771x2121px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3771x2121px

You knew this was coming.

>>31772697

is that a DSA upper and lower??

great looking gun, did you build it yourself?

>>31776286
Wooly boogers is what the old timers here in TN Appalachia calls them they tell how winter is going to be black being rough and orange being mild also indian tale i guess lol

>>31782865
I downloaded the image myself

>>31774568
Is that a DSA FAL?

File: 1466696717348.jpg (136KB, 750x741px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 750x741px

>>31783025
Probably

>>31785287
>those man calves

>>31782903

> wooly boogers
> goober
> boy howdy

Old southern guys crack me up.

>>31780563

You might be a contrarian asshole, but you even knowing about that graph means you're not a total panty waste.

Too bad no one will ever know because of the constant ahit posting.

>>31781605
Are you just mad because keltec actually foxes their guns??

>>31787125
Yes, I'm mas
Mad about foxes

>>31787125
Fixes*
>>31787232
Kekekek

>>31787249
No, they simply make inferior products. It's the market segment they occupy, and the amount of development work they are willing to do.

They are known for cheap, interesting ideas that haven't been wrung out.

>>31785470
you're right anon. whoever bangs her is most definitely a fag.

your medal is in the mail.

>>31771426
The PTR's paddle mag release alone is worth the extra 250-300 bucks, not to mention the metal lower, HK drum rear, better finish, and better reviews.

>>31774586
The Izzy HBAR is shit.
THe Izzy Romat FAL rifle is where it's at - unfortunately they had no muzzle device until late production but Izzy rifles with a brake/hider look excellent

File: 0B5My1S.jpg (356KB, 1944x2338px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1944x2338px

>>31787517
>But the HK drum is literally the worst iron sight on any battle rifle
>Yes, worse than an FAL

File: resources.jpg (67KB, 498x480px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 498x480px

>>31769877
this is one of the most retarded posts i have ever read and demonstrates a clear lack of knowledge of the subject matter

>>31787587
The CETME's 4 position flip sight is worse.
Besides the Drum sight picture is good.
As soon as you realize that you should never, ever use the 100m (1) setting you'll be fine

>>31787616
Optics are where its at.

File: 1433116510407.jpg (140KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 640x640px

>>31787611
You clearly have zero understanding of the direction anon is coming from, and even less of his intent. Your obliviousness is typical, to be expected, and yet still completely disappointing.

>>31787751
Agreed, but it's always good to get proficient with your iron sights just in case

>>31785700
Haha yeah i love it here
>every family reunion consisted of a wome whos cooking skills were that of aunt bee off of Andy Griffith.
>family reunions seemed like i was taken back to 1955 TN where everyone still hated obama
To keep it /k/ related they all hunted with 1903 springfields and .303 enfields or .308 ishapore enfields.

File: 1420581711552.jpg (105KB, 1067x1304px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1067x1304px

>>31787777
>Checked
Clearly, but still I find the HK diopter to be clumsy and dark.
If that's what you've got, it's what you've got.

>>31782740
Every time I see this rifle, I always ask myself one question.

Why on God's earth does this abomination exist?

File: 2016-09-26 15.24.42.jpg (2MB, 2121x3771px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2121x3771px

>>31788096
Because God has no control over what hell hath put upon this planet to wreck shop.

File: 6_hd.jpg (673KB, 2832x3936px) Image search: [Google]

673KB, 2832x3936px

>>31788182
I'm surprised Ohio ordnance is still in business

File: 608ffd639b7d38f7d0be4322e10f4379.jpg (68KB, 500x359px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x359px

>>31766570
Welp, I'm a tad bit fucked I guess. Called a few pawn shops/gun stores that can order from them, all of them said their wholesaler was out of stock. So then I called DSA themselves, sat on hold for 20 minutes, and then learned that "All our rifles have an 8 week lead time at the moment".

>>31766646
any way you could remember?

>>31788284
Me to actually. I mean they have a terrible product accessory lineup.

File: 2016-10-08 17.14.10.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>31785717
its just because online i sexually identify as sandpaper

>>31787587
use the 100y mark on the drum it looks like shit

>>31788988
better buy your small spare parts now before that shit flops and they become unobtainium

File: 20161020_182142.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

Not sure if battle rifle but any suggestions to better my weapon would be appreciated

>>31789466

Uh, yeah. Kill yourself.

>>31789466
Atlas it is not a battle rifle. Some friendly advice is to not use a handguard mounted bi-pod without a free float handguard.

>>31789477
Why?

>>31789487
Thanks. What makes a battle rifle a battle rifle?

File: Back-to-nature.jpg (293KB, 1069x1069px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1069x1069px

>>31789466
Get you a knock off magpul sight for that gas block, just in case, you know.

>>31789502
Yeah BUIS are coming soon. Poor as fuck so its a slow build

File: 762vs556.jpg (956KB, 2548x1380px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 2548x1380px

>>31789497
Battle rifles shoot a full size rifle cartridge like 7.62 NATO. AR15s shoot an intermediate cartridge, which is about half-way between a full size rifle cartridge and a pistol cartridge.

>>31789522
Cool thanks for the info. Sorry for the newness.

>>31789497
308 or bigger.
Magazine-fed.
People will nitpick from there, but that's about it.
>>31789466
Move your vfg as far forward as you can get it and take the bipod off until you're able to get a free floating rail.

>>31789539
Glad to help. Just as a heads up, a full-sized cartridge alone doesn't make any rifle a battle rifle. It's generally accepted that to be a battle rifle, a rifle must feed from a detachable box magazine, be semi-auto or select fire, and be general issue to soldiers. It's not an official term though, so it's endlessly debatable.

File: 1462148541636.jpg (102KB, 600x749px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 600x749px

>>31789550
It's not diameter. 300blk doesn't count, 7.5 swiss does. It's about powah!

File: 1477346363657.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

Better?

File: 1477346522375.jpg (2MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4128x2322px

>>31789640
Ive also got this guy

>>31789640
Much

File: 2016-10-23 23.09.42.jpg (2MB, 2121x3771px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2121x3771px

>>31789616
Ah my bad.

File: 1415571021295.jpg (124KB, 500x655px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 500x655px

>>31789870
All good baby.

File: 1477011589085.jpg (87KB, 1058x794px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1058x794px

>>31789870
how did you ask your sister to take pictures witht he gun btw how awkward was that?

>>31776783
That was a the Monroeville gun show, where you the guy walking around in a flecktarn parka?

>>31789983
>mfw you are actually straight but realize boi pucci is far easier to get than roastie meat.

I feel like you weren't that successful with women which is why you are salty and fuck twinks dressed as women

File: 2016-10-23 12.14.40.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>31790032
no just the slovak woodland jacket what autist were you?

there is a pa/k/ slack if you want on it

>>31790047
once bled on twice shy
plus i hate kids

>>31790107
I was wearing a m65 field jacket

>>31790107
>blood
And festering AIDS ridden butthole shit dick faggot sex is any less nasty? Your dads gonna kick your ass when he finds out you are a homo

File: 1464911068577.jpg (24KB, 480x486px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x486px

>>31790047
Thank you komrade.
>>31789983
Pic for you.

File: 1437839310022.jpg (42KB, 541x498px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 541x498px

>>31790107
>>31790159

Wearing milsurp in public

File: IMG_1961.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>31773935
Scar is pretty much the top shelf as far as battle rifles right now, and I say that as an owner of a Sig716. Don't get me wrong, the Gen2 Sig716s fixed a lot of issues the gen1s had, but the SCAR will be superior. It'll mainly boil down to if you want to wait for one to show up in stock and pay the $3900 sticker price versus a roughly $2kish Sig716.

File: 2016-10-23 13.13.10.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31790159
well nigga i go to most of them on sundays around 11-3 or im the autist open carrying as well asking everyone if they sell clips for an m14

>>31790274
rude i was just asking because it seems weird and i wanted to know

>>31790588
its a gun show fagpai

>>31790625
i mean i love the fal and its my favorite but the scar is seriously the best battle rifle without a doubt

>>31790828
Has the 17 ever actually been standard issue for a military? Does it actually count as a battle rifle?

>>31791013
It's been used by SOF before but no military fields it as an infantry rifle. It's not really a battle rifle. It's more of a modern sporting rifle

File: IMG_0580.jpg (2MB, 2998x3015px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2998x3015px

>>31790625
Scar sux tho lol

>>31791035

Nigger what are you even saying? It's literally called the Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle. Who do you think uses it? What do you think they use it for? Are people really this dumb?

File: Turkish_MPT76_in_service.jpg (108KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 540x960px

>>31791035
>no military fields it as an infantry rifle.
Because it's expensive and not the best option for general infantry use on the modern battlefield. There is literally one actual military that has adopted a 7.62x51mm rifle infantry rifle in the 21st Century.

>>31791035
>>31791125
>>31791165
So it's not actually a battle rifle then?

>>31791125
Exactly, the term battle rifle isn't even in the name

>>31791220
>>31791247
Its a rifle used in battle, that shoots big boolets very fast

>>31791345
That's a retarded definition.

>>31791360
But thats the definition of a battle rifle lol

>>31791247

Because assault rifle is the technical term for what it actually is. IE: a rapid fire, box magazine fed rifle designed for military use.

"Battle Rifle" is term made up by gun magazine writers in the 90's to more specifically identify assault rifles chambered in full power cartridges.

The label has little to zero use in actual US military nomenclature.

>>31791365
>>31791386
But for the purposes of this thread, battle rifle is usually defined as:

Full power cartridge
Detachable magazine
Select fire
Was general issue for a military

>>31791430

Sure. But then you have idiots in this thread suggesting "hurrr it isn't a battle rifle because the military doesn't call it that"

>>31791430
>Select fire
Automatically disqualifies every single /k/ommando-owned rifle posted ITT.

>>31791444
I don't listen to idiots.

>>31791456
It's over boys, time to let the thread die permanently.

>>31791013
Pretty much only SO forces use the 17, though there are some militaries that that do use the 16 as their primary rifle, Belgium recently but in a massive order for 16s and 17s which is contributing to F&N's backlog of fulfilling civvie orders.

>>31791444
The military doesn't call anything a battle rifle. Like another anon said, it's a made-up designation from the last 20 years that's used to describe a class of rifle that's been around for the last 60 years.
>>31791456
Select fire capability was restricted in many G3s and pretty much all M14s. The capability to have select fire is the import part, not necessarily having it.

>>31791494
99.9% of the civilian-owned FALs, G3s, and M14s in the USA are incapable of automatic fire.

>>31791494
>forgetting the L1A1

>>31791524
Yup, but that doesn't make them not functionally a battle rifle, as I just described.

>>31791529
I didn't forget, I just don't care

File: 1470920216494.png (872KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 1280x720px

>>31791533
>The capability to have select fire is the import part
>incapable of automatic fire.
>doesn't make them not functionally a battle rifle
Can't make this shit up.

>>31791572
A general issue M14 has the same select fire capability as my M1A: fucking none because they're not issued that way. What's so hard to understand about that?

>>31791430
So I guess an AR-10 isnt a battle rifle either

>>31791696
Didn't Portugal use AR10s for a while?

File: Portuguese_paratrooper_with_AR10_Angola.jpg (1MB, 1848x1248px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1848x1248px

>>31791696
Guess not.

>>31791730
You're imagining things.

>>31791696
A battle rifle can't be special issue like a DMR

>>31791768
Jumping with a 20.8" barrel and a fixed stock would fucking suck

File: excuseme.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>31767137
whoa now.

this is the internet y'know.

>>31790828
So are there any actually passable traps with battle rifles?

which .308win rifle will get me less than 2moa out of the box and can be improved.

(other than AR10)

File: 1457740873999.jpg (4MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x1836px

>>31792742
no fucking chaser fag lol

>>31792927
scar, buy a 20inch barrel

File: IMG_0989.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>31792991
I can see why its babby vomit lol

I want to build an FAL but I'm a California/Maryland cuck so a real FN Fal is out of the question.

How should I go about this? Are DSA receivers the next best things out there or should I try to find and IMBEL receiver?

Please advise.

I am a gun babby so pls no bully

File: DSC00243.jpg (223KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1024x768px

>>31789502
who, i need to know