Don't mind me, just posting the king of CCW.

We already have a shield thread
>>31522529

File: Taurus_Curve_Review_F_2.jpg (117KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1000x500px

needs more curve

>>31532506

>king of ccw
>cucked version with the gay safety

kek

>>31532520
Shit, didn't notice.

File: image.jpg (59KB, 550x666px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 550x666px

You have no idea how long I've been waiting to post this

>>31532526
gotta give them credit for thinking outside the box

File: IMG_0720.jpg (53KB, 649x455px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 649x455px

>>31532506
>what is pic related?

>>31532506
>magazine disconnect
yea, ok, here is your (you)

File: unnamed1.jpg (277KB, 853x1280px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 853x1280px

>>31532789
Here is your (You). Remember there is more than a single version of the Shield, including CA/MA compliant models that are only sold there.

>>31532526
full size zero drag pistol when

>>31532968

If I could buy a shield here in Cali without the safety and do a trigger job on it, I would try it out, Its slimmer than my glock but I dont know if it would really make much of a difference when carrying.

File: image.jpg (188KB, 816x762px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 816x762px

>>31533008
>full size Taurus Curve

>>31532506
Full size, plastic 9mm guns are probably worst choice for civilian carry.

Low weight makes mag dumping harder than it should be.

All three alternatives are better:

>revolver for people that can aim
>steel frames for people that want to mag dump 9mm
>.380 compacts for people that want to go light and still mag dump

>>31533027
Probably not, grip length is more important than anything when it come to concealed carry because it's the thing that will stick out and print. When you're comparing Glocks and M&P's it's all down to user preference of ergos, because they are pretty much equal on nearly all levels.

File: 1459658410480.jpg (21KB, 600x357px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x357px

>>31533400

This is either bait or your way of saying, "lol look at me boyz. I'm a girl on the internet."

>>31532506
>what is a ruger lc9s?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opx_IFm0iQU

Only downsize is that it's 9mm and not .45 or .40.

Do they make higher caliber models?

>>31534394
>lol look at me boyz. I'm a girl on the internet
I don't get that part, unless you are you are implying that I'm a gril

>>31533400
To be fair, in an altercation where you have to mag dump, you aren't going to be worried about how much it hurts/kicks, and you aren't going to be accurate enough with a 1.5inch barrel to hit anything past 25 feet away repeatedly. You will probably be backpedaling too.

>>31532506
Hahaha
>looks again
>not universally accepted g19
Hahahahahaha

>>31535003
It's not about pain, it's about putting as much holes in attacker as you can.

I propose you do a little experiment.

Rent a .380 (or bring your own) and magdump target at somewhere between 15 and 20 feet.
Measure how long it takes you and how many shots hit centre of mass .

Now take Glawck or something similar and do the same, but you have take same amount of time you took with .380.

Now Barreta 92 or something similar. Same procedure as above.

Which of the above will have most shots on centre of mass? Can you guess?

>>31535322
You do realize on average most engagements are 7 yards and less? Do you know how short that is?

Also, are you talking full-size or CCW-size pistols?

>>31535322
Honestly, if we are talking straight up I would say beretta 92 since glocks can be notoriously hard to aim w/ a short barrel and non-perfect grip setup.

>>31533410

You said it yourself. Grip length matters and the glock 26 beats the M&P shield on that matter big time.

Then add 10+1 rounds. The glock 26 wins. You can also put 15, 17, and 33 round mags in it.

>>31535629
>The glock 26 wins
Not in the comfort department. The 26 comes in at 1.2" thick, the Shield coming in at .9" thick. Those who think it doesn't make a difference either
A) Do not own a single stack to compare to their double stack
B) Are lying through their teeth

This comes from a Glock 19 and Shield owner.

>>31533334
Dem big curves like THICC gurls.

File: IMG_8106_BERETTA_92C_INOX.jpg (81KB, 910x592px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 910x592px

>>31535322
How about a nice middle ground?

File: 1471059246569.jpg (38KB, 363x379px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 363x379px

>mfw putting an apex hard sear in mine

I think I'm going to get a dawson fiber optic front and a rubber talon grip then call it done. Just came back from the range shooting 300 rounds through it and it's 10/10

>>31535759
One seems to be an opinion due to a person's size, while the other is a fact. My hands fit the glock personally. And I don't feel much of a difference what's inside my waistband since its all pretty much the same size.

What I do feel is the extra ammunition and concealability

File: 1465899636665.jpg (192KB, 1024x717px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1024x717px

>>31535876
Here's the better Beretta.

>>31532526
>pocket clip
this would stick out enough to be seen, thus not concealed.

>>31535944
Would be interested in the Ernest Langdon version when it comes out

>>31535322
I mag dump my .40 just fine, stop being a pussy. The real test is go to an indoor range, put a paper target out, and push the call button. Once it passes the 25 yard line, draw and start firing. You'll notice how hard it is to get out more than 3-4 shots with literally any gun before they're basically right on top of you. The fact you can back away while drawing and shooting makes a bit of difference in the real world, but realistically if someone is coming at you, it's hard to draw and fire before they're on you. Once they're literally on top of you, if you have your gun in their gut you're basically good to mag dump any kind of gun.

>>31538091
you have proved >>31535003