AK vs AR

AK because go to hell reliability

File: AK reliability.webm (273KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 480x360px

>>29240400

Fucking neitheR.

>>29240400
just dont get mud on it

Will this ARvsAK nightmare ever end?

File: AK Reliability.gif (2MB, 388x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 388x240px

>>29240407

Why not both?

>>29240422
>>>/out/

File: 1452453653688.jpg (100KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 720x540px

WHY NOT FUCKING BOTH

>>29240418
Been here since 2006. It will never end. Leave now while you can.
>tfw typing that and realize I've been here a decade
Kill me. Just fucking me kill me already.

File: 7eca1e18e6db70dd7b7ba850d8dc3606.jpg (182KB, 736x567px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 736x567px

>>29240392
FAL

>>29240407
This was one of the shit Century rifles that had the 5.56 barrel.
>>29240420
This was spiked ammo.

is this even a question?

fucking ARs man

fuck that outdated commie slavshit rifle

>>29240392
ak for simplicity, reliability, lower price and dirt cheap ammo, cant find in gunstores though
>>29240422
>>29240434
because not everyone is willing to spend $600-1000 plus ammo costs plus parts on a redundant weapon when you only need one to do the job

>>29240418
This.Fuck pleb grunt guns.

I like one for coyotes. I like the other for feral hogs.

File: work out.jpg (61KB, 499x364px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 499x364px

>>29240507
>because not everyone is willing to spend $600-1000 plus ammo
>W-WHAT ARE U A PORFAG?!

>only need one to do the job
>need one
>need

Not really tho, both are nice

The ARAK

>>29240392
kys

ak never jam
ar is fucking america shit weapon

>>29240400
>>29240702

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX73uXs3xGU

>>29240721
propaganda

>>29240392
Using the M4 and AK-74M as examples:
They both fire a small-caliber intermediate cartridge, which trades some terminal ballistics for being able to carry more ammo.
They are both carbines (14.5" for M4, 16.3" for AK-74M) with great reliability, provided they have proper maintenance, and have an effective range of about 500 meters.
They're both designed to be mass-produced and built so the trained monkeys who use them have to put a fair amount of effort into breaking them.
They are both designed for ease of use, with their lighter weight making them easier to carry around, and their shorter length and folding/collapsible stocks allowing them to be more easily maneuvered in vehicles and buildings.
The users of both rifles spend 99% of their time doing things other than firing their weapon, and are generally unconcerned with accuracy in combat situations.

>>29240507
>reliability

I've had more failures with an FEG built AMD-65 and an Izmash saiga than with a franken AR with a BCM upper and bolt. This is including thousands of rounds of steel case .223

>>29240442
The only correct answer.

>>29240434
Because poorfags need to argue instead of working a little harder to have both.

I prefer the feel of AKs, ARs feel too plasticy to me

File: IMG_0216_7_8_tonemapped_resized.jpg (4MB, 2999x2000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2999x2000px

>>29240392
Both

>>29242211
nice sticks but that photo is over processed