Pentagon Will Open All Combat Roles to Women

>muh gender equality

LETS SE THEM STANDARDS DROP

if dubs we are fucked

>>28077324
This is the peacetime military. Once something major happens and we get innawar again this shit won't stand as soon as females fail to preform combat duties and die in mass numbers compared to male troops. Then they'll be begging not to be in combat roles. However, standards will unfortunately be lowered, and more betas and females will benefit from muh feelins and the overall pussification of 'Murica.
In short, some men just want to watch the world burn.

Very simple solution:
raise the standards so that even roided up 'women' can't pass, guaranteeing no women can serve in combat roles and making all of the military better off.

>>28077782
And just how are you gonna do that with the current state of things?

>>28077822
"Oiy, how would like a military the preforms better and costs the same or less money?"

That sounds pretty good.

"We raise the standards, it doesn't cost money to reject someone (relative to the cost in money and lives of having to train inferior soldiers)"

Fair point. Sorry women, you can try but you are pretty much guaranteed to not be able to serve.

>>28077367
We were already fucked. Our marines are like Britain's boy scouts

Mark my words: There will never be a female member of Delta or DEVGRU\ ST6. They might shove a few through army SF or BUD/S just to shut up the SJWs, but they will never see operational deployment.

America you are fucked so lay down already spread your ass cheeks and prepare to enjoy the White Gorilla AIDS Spetznas will pound into you good.

>>28077927
Of course they will anon, they'll just lower the entry requirements to 3 push ups and a 100 meter run in 20 minutes.

File: 1447175321178.jpg (73KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x720px

I'm probably stupid but the pussification of any military has always puzzled me. These people kill other people for a living. Literally paid to end lives. What part of that tells other people "let's make them shit so they can't do their job properly/anymore"? It's the last place you want to disrupt since it's the last line of defence for your nation and people.

>>28078050
The people calling the shots will gladly fuck over the people the front lines if it benefits their careers and towing the feminist line is currently very politically savvy for high ranking military officers.
Then when a real war comes along again and people die because of this bullshit, other high ranking military officers will capitalize career-wise by making a big show of protecting women from combat.

>>28078050
There comes a point when your warhorse has beat the shit out of all the other horses and now only functions as a showpony. So people think it's ok to put bows in his hair, cut off his testicles, and parade him around. Which is ok. Until you need a warhorse again.

File: 1333466957380.png (2KB, 83x108px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 83x108px

>>28078117
>>28078141
So it's a lions being led by donkeys type of thing? Or maybe led by snakes?

>>28078181
Snaked headed donkeys.

The solution is so fucking simple, don't change the standards for women! It shouldn't be "female soldiers" and "male soldiers" with different requirements, it should just be "soldiers" and a single set of requirements. Why is this such a hard thing for the military to implement?

>>28078222
Even for the SJWs, isn't this insulting? The inherent implication that even the most qualified females couldn't meet the base standards for scrawny teen guys straight out of high school?

File: Screenshot_2015-12-03-15-10-52-1.png (413KB, 1440x1966px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1440x1966px

>>28078141
>>28078181
>>28078192
Topest of keks.
/k/ a magical place.

>>28077324
>brits policing an empire
>not wearing red coats

What is this world coming to?

>>28077324
Female draft registration when?

We need true eqaulity. Can I hit women back now without people making something of it?

File: 1448120658654.jpg (23KB, 350x234px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 350x234px

>>28077324
Fish here.

I'm going to enlist in the us army with the intention of eventually going special forces. A lot of you say "that would stress logistics" or "the standards will end up lowered" but this is just the pathetic lashing out of anti-ichthites who couldn't even get a nibble despite investing in a new Panther Martin. I can breathe air and operate a rifle too. I totally know a shark that once bit a kid that got whisked away by a rip tide, which means I have a good chance at fighting enemy soldiers. It's time to embrace a new progressive era, people. Check your mammalian privilege.

>>28078285
All good points

File: 1443497616962.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>28077324
>in reality women often found themselves in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 14 years

>>28078285
So I can enter the female lockerroom at the gym? And female soldiers will be required to get the same haircuts as men, right?

Shit Americans, you need to do something about your PC politicians.

The horrors of a female soldier or marine getting captured, especially by Ahmed and friends...

>>28078320

No, but you can enter the women's locker room at planet fitness.

File: image.jpg (115KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 640x1136px

>>28077324
>even though in reality women often found themselves in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 14 years.

>>28078312
Insurgents may not be comparable to an actual army, but yes, being shot at and shelled by poppy farmers instead of soldiers still counts as combat.

>>28078366
You can?

>>28077324

>conduct test to see the effectiveness of female soldiers
>female soldiers empirically proven to be much less effective than male soldiers
>being good doesn't matter, looking good does

This a sad day in human history, sexist ideologies like feminism will see this as a victory but in the long run I believe history will see it as the sad patronising act that it is

You aren't equal when people prop you up, you are equal when you can stand on your own, the men will still have to work and the women will be given a free ride without putting in any effort because it wins votes and increases approval ratings

It would be different if there weren't studies proving that it's pointless and even detrimental but oh well

>>28078386
I don't understand their point.

Real active combat isn't just being shot at. If that was the only barrier for women in combat roles then most of our black population would be fit for duty.

File: 3354341.jpg (194KB, 951x1300px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 951x1300px

>>28077324
THANK GOD 7 MONTHS UNTIL ETS

>>28078392
Got a source on said test? I don't disbelieve you; rather, I want it on hand for when I discuss this with other people.

Also, and this ties into the above, but aren't the PT standards for men and women different? Aren't the minimums for women well below a failing score for men?

fuck it...more people for if we ever need to go to war with china or some shit...some one do the math as 2 how many soldiers that would add.

>>28078389

Yep, the whole SJW thing is imploding on itself.

You simply say you identify as a woman and waltz on in.

Their offical policy is they can't question your gender identify.

>>28078499
about twice as many

>>28078386

False. Circumstantial exposure to direct fire and reactionary firing back is not combat.

Combat is waking up and exiting friendly lines explicitly with the purpose to seek and violently kill the opposing force trying to kill you. Combat is an all encompassing endeavour where every movement you make is intended to place yourself in a more advantageous posture or position to kill. Combat is moving towards the machine gun lighting you up before your last mortar round has exited the tube.

Getting shot at diving through a mountain pass, and blindly firing into the sky while moving is not "lol combat"

File: apftpushup.jpg (182KB, 490x858px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 490x858px

>>28078472
>aren't the PT standards for men and women different?

YES.
The bare minimum amount needed for males to pass is the female's max score.

File: google veterans day image.jpg (53KB, 550x220px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 550x220px

A good day for the military

>>28078472
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/11/04/454672813/controversial-marine-corps-study-on-gender-integration-published-in-full

And yes, female PT standards are a joke. As a male, if I was to run a "C group" standard, I'd be failing my PT test of 15:54. Females are praised if they maintain a "C group" standard. A 15:54 scoring is a 96% on their test. Male standards for pushups is 42 minimum. If a female gets 42 pushups, everybody shits their pants and she gets an award.

>>28078549
Hue

>>28078550
Just want to lean on this guys point some more.

Most of the "combat" females have seen are the truck drivers getting hit by IEDs (which counts as a combat action). Or taking indirect fire while on a FOB. That being said, yes, a select few females have been in protracted firefights, but generally in a stationary position, unless they were gunning from a truck.

We had a female medic who'd ride with us when we went on mounted patrols. She saw combat when we got into several small firefights. Largely, she stayed by the trucks, or in the truck.

When we went on dismounted patrols, they always switched her out to a male medic. She knew, and our higher ups knew, that she'd never be able to keep up with us. Hiking those mountains sucked.

Are you guys ready to learn more about female hygiene and cater to the girls in your unit?
Coz it's gonna happen!

http://www.stripes.com/news/task-force-aims-to-reduce-urinary-tract-infections-among-deployed-women-1.193088

File: 1449184187426.png (57KB, 1263x879px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1263x879px

Women are totally fit for any role in the military.

>>28077324
>Pentagon disbands US military as a pointless relic
>"We'd be fucked by russkies anyway" Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter was heard to remark
>Money in the defense budget still poured into a burning pit as tradition demands

So, here's what I think. You have 2 options here, really 3 but #3 is "men only" so here we go. Keep in mind that failure is NOT an option.
#1- Roll out the sweet new BigDog logistics aid and exoskeleton tech. Equalizers, far more so than the firearms that females can use effectively already (most of 'em anyways). Tech does the heavy lifting saving all soldiers, male and female, from the more intense physical labor.

#2- Female soldiers need to take specific roles that minimize their weaknesses. Like not fighting.

Let's be honest, men and women ARE different. Women are built to carry babies and not die and men are built to do all the dangerous crap without a baby in them. Hence, we are not all 7' hermaphrodite amazons (wouldn't be too bad though). Men are far more disposable than women due to the way we reproduce.
Hell, it's 2015, you could probably take every man and put him in a coma and just wake him up for sex, world would be fine. Any of the old threats that men protected against could just be shot with a gun.
Of course, it is not only men with a desire to fight and be violent, the human body is a strange thing. Males and females can exhibit characteristics of their opposite.

>>28078386

Let me know when they strap a hundred pounds of crap on and climb over some mountains to close with other killers and take their lives.

Pulling the trigger is the easy part.

>>28077782
The military already gives female recruits a much easier time than men when they can't complete the same courses. Raising the standards isn't going to do anything of value except make the standards higher for men which may not actually be a bad idea. So in a way you're on to something but not for the right reasons.

>>28078905

Option 3 is the sneaky route: Say publicly that of course we welcome all people among the few and the proud, but simply apply equal physical standards to everyone - standards that women cannot meet. Equal treatment, you see.

>>28078973
>The military already gives female recruits a much easier time than men when they can't complete the same courses

So stop doing that.

Directly order no one to ever help a woman, no matter what. Let them fail, then kick them out when they inevitably do. And if some genetic freak actually does pull it off without needing a man to carry him, fuck, welcome aboard.

>>28079070
You and I both know that won't happen. We have it too ingrained in our culture and psyche as humans that women are the weaker sex, that they need help and protection. Science does back that up to some extent. It'd be great if we could just toughen up and say "This is how it's going to be. If you can't complete the same requirements as the men then we don't want you because you'll be a liability." It's not going to happen today or tomorrow.

>>28079070
This

>women often found themselves in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past 14 years.

ohohohoho

>>28078266
Simply ebin XDDD :^)

>>28078559
Of the SJWs want gender equality and believe women have the same physical capabilities as men, let's throw those shit standard and give the female standards that of males. Let's give them a taste of true equality

>>28077324
>the military should operate under a common set of standards.
That already isn't the case really. Carter should go spend a month in a Marine company and then a month in a Air Force office job.

>>28079233
>The world works on the premise of specialization
>So let's abandon that in favor of an objectively worse alternative

>>28079257
that looks like a sci-fi movie

>I see no problem with this as long as women meet the same physical standard!

What are the chances of this actually happening?

>>28079258
But muh feelings...

File: B9318615199Z.1_20150828113800_000_G0HBOG23C.1-0.jpg (34KB, 540x380px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 540x380px

Sergeant Hester's squad of two women and eight men in three Humvees were shadowing a 30-truck supply convoy when approximately 50 insurgent fighters ambushed the convoy with AK-47 and RPK machine gun fire, and with rocket propelled grenades (RPG). The squad moved to the side of the road, flanking the insurgents and cutting off their escape route. Sergeant Hester maneuvered her team through the kill zone and into a flanking position, where she and her squad leader, Staff Sergeant Timothy F. Nein, assaulted a trench line with hand grenades and M203 grenade launcher rounds. Hester and Nein assaulted and cleared two trenches. During the 25-minute firefight, Hester killed 3 insurgents.

When the battle was over, 27 insurgents were dead, six were wounded, and one captured. Sergeants Hester and Nein were both awarded the Silver Star. Nein's was later upgraded to the Distinguished Service Cross.

Also awarded the Silver Star in this ambush was platoon combat medic Specialist Jason Mike, who took up and simultaneously fired an M4 carbine and M249 SAW light machine gun in defense of his comrades.

>>28079307
>who took up and simultaneously fired an M4 carbine and M249 SAW
Dual-wield works mother fuckers.

File: 1235eb0861da52cb72f497c9d836007a.jpg (30KB, 624x464px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 624x464px

>G.I. go home!

File: cbafcb761c6cb513ae4ecfea47bbd293.jpg (54KB, 500x684px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x684px

>hey anon I brought some ammo for the assault on the gun grabbers! Where do you want me for the firefight? I can lay down cover fire or spot for you.

>>28079357
>Rambo, you're not expendable

File: 14e8671fe1497ae8e5a25771c6dd0cd3.jpg (31KB, 400x546px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x546px

>Hi anon mind if I take point on the patrol? After we setup an LP/OP maybe we can share the same foxhole together and get each others back ʕ·͡ᴥ·ʔ

File: f9c81e01ef0530324fe744ac14baaed3.jpg (89KB, 500x696px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 500x696px

ʕ·͡ᴥ·ʔ FIND A FLAW ʕ·͡ᴥ·ʔ

File: CzUkTdo.jpg (67KB, 550x749px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 550x749px

>Hey anon want to go indawoods with me?

>>28078296
Good post.

File: fe1192cfa2e3b3e4acd348a94645c866.jpg (558KB, 736x1087px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 736x1087px

OPERATE HER

>>28079284

Zero, that's why it doesn't happen in any military that didn't already lower the men's standard

If women were capable of doing it they would have already, instead they have to be forced through

>>28079428
That's great, you should start posting all the pictures of child soldiers too

File: 1439283565287.jpg (81KB, 448x500px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 448x500px

>'skeet'

>2 years until ETS

Jesus Fuck.

>>28077324

No big deal. Let them put women in the front lines. Let them get wiped out by some Russians or Chinese and all this progressivism will reverse right quick

>>28079535
What's the over under on a woman infantry getting raped in the showers while deployed?

>>28079284
It's already not happened. Remember those two female that made it through Ranger school? They were tested softer than the men out of fear of political backlash after all the other women dropped.

File: 20at080.jpg (94KB, 1074x854px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1074x854px

>>28079454

>Faggot detected, fire up the DShK

File: savaso.jpg (64KB, 950x565px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 950x565px

>Get in AnonKun!

>>28079217
So proud, so strong!
Thank you for your service!

>>28078312

Lol stop talking out your ass. And stay in your lane. I spent 2 years Iraq as a 0311 grunt. And 6 months in Afghanistan.

Females being in convoy security and civilian contact teams is hardly fighting your way house to house.


Nor is it carrying a sustainment load + fighting load while humping the Hindu Kush up and down mountians chasing Taliban Hillfighter.

The most bad ass rate female will suffer terrible Muscle and skeletal injuries from prolonged carrying heavy loads with their lighter weaker bones. And lastly and most importantly it will destroy the cohesion of all male infantry platoons which operate like a modern day Gladiator school. People who work in offices like to pretend they know what the fuck they are talking about when it comes to gender integration of combat arms. Next time you have to shit in the MRE bag you just finished eating from and carry your wounded 220 pound squad leader 1000 meters under fire to a waiting track then come talk to me.

Mixed units are a leadership nightmare. Everyone is fucking each other and it is still 3 to 1 or more make to female. I pitty pogue NCOs.

The poor bloody infantry has one mission. That is to close with and destroy the event by fire and maneuver. It sure as fuck isn't to serve as a gender intergration lab for sjw fucks.good men will die because of this and it isn't necessary.

File: VC-fighters-in-Da-Nang-with-M-16s-and-AK-47s.jpg (353KB, 1024x1017px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1024x1017px

All right, listen up. You people will not die on me in combat. You fucking new guys will do everything you can to prove me wrong. You'll walk on trails, kick cans, sleep on guard, smoke dope and diddely-bop through the bush like you were back on the block. Or on guard at night you'll write letters, play with your organ, and think of your girl back home. Forget her. Right now, some hair head has her on her back and is telling her to fuck for peace. This is Han. Those of you who are foolish will think of him as 'gook,' 'slope,' 'slant' or 'dink.' He is your enemy. He came over on the Chieu Hoi programme, and after he fattens himself on C-rations he will be hunting your young asses in the Ashau Valley. Now forget about this Viet Cong shit. What you'll encounter out there is hard core NVA, North Vietnamese. Highly motivated, highly trained and well equipped. If you meet Han or his cousins, you will give him respect and refer to those little bastards as 'Nathanial Victor.' Meet him twice, and survive, and you will refer to him as 'MISTER Nathanial Victor.' Now people, I am sick and tired of filling body bags with your dumb fucking mistakes.

File: C0x74bcr.jpg (84KB, 500x394px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x394px

Han is closing in on your position. It's night... Look at me! I'm gonna save your life and your gonna save mine. It's night, it's raining. While your thinking about peace, love and whether or not we should be in Vietnam, Han is going to cut your fucking throat. And your sleeping. You've been humping the boonies for months. It's your turn to sleep, you're allowed to sleep. What do you think Han is going to do? Is he going to wake you up, Alphabet? And smile? And talk about women? Mister Nathanial Victor gets his rocks off watching you die. Some of you think you have problems because you're against the war. You demonstrated in school... you wear peace symbols on your steel, and you have attitudes. I'm orphan, my brother's queer, the city of Chicago got the clap from my sister, Mom drinks, Dad coughs blood, I have ringworm, imersion foot, the incurable crud and the draft ruined my chances of being a brain surgeon. People, you are in Vietnam. You have no problems. Except me.

And Han.

I'm fine with it on a case by case basis. After all, I'd rather have the right chick watching my back than the wrong dude. There are some pretty stone cold chicas out there after all.

File: Demonic Laughter.jpg (142KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1600x1200px

>>28079357
>>28079388
>Comparing peasant farmers with American sows

>>28079738
check out this faggot

>>28078905
What about option 4, segregated combat units so the myriad problems they'd cause for men are averted and they can tailor their load to be more manageable for a woman.

File: lQxPT3dr.jpg (18KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x400px

>>28079753

I think those fucking peasant farmers were some pretty hard tough mother fucking fighters. I have a lot of respect for them. You do not have to support a a nations political ideologies to respect it's soldiers and warriors. I seem to recall some colonist peasant farmers kicking the SPEC OPS BritBongs asses.

I dread the day when our military turns around to look at what they are protecting and defending and decide to walk away, fed up and done with the degeneracy and liberalism.

Sometime soon the 9/11 support the troops yellow ribbons will get set on fire and trampled into the dirty and the FEEL THE BERN socialists will start to throw the dog shit at the baby killers once again.

>>28077324
Doesn't this mean women can join the military, get pregnant and then get all the benefits of it without any work?
Not sure how this stuff works for women.

Don't most women get pregnant before deployment anyway?

>>28079994
>women in the military
>gaming the system
never

File: Attention grabbing image.png (186KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 640x640px

A lot of you in this thread do not understand that our government uppers are complete traitors to this nation. This idiotic decision was not about inclusiveness or equality; it's solely to destroy our military. I'm going to stop my pol level rant, but there is some serious sabotage going on against the USA by our "leaders".

>>28080145
>solely to destroy our military

How does this benefit the upper echelons of american society exactly?

>>28079070
>simply do something that won't happen

>>28079573
How did they see our planes?

>>28080069
Something like 40-50% either say they are or are about to be.

>>28080176
They rule in socialized hell. That's the Cloward-Piven strategy, that's the Alinsky strategy, and so far, it's working. No tin foil hate required; they've always been quite open about this. Google Rules For Radicals to know more. And do bear in mind both Chocolate Nixon and Shrillary are Alinsky-trained activists.

>>28080176
Why regulate guns?
Why make the military worse off?
My guess would be: To cause a state of emergency and vie for a dictatorship.

>>28080176
The military is the most powerful barrier to their takeover. Soldiers swore an oath to uphold the Constitution not the politicians. The traitors recognize this and are out to destroy it along. It's also why they're out to silence opponents, destroy the 2nd and 4th amendments.

>>28079815

Segregated units would help a little bit, but would invariably lead to male units having to handle all the real war (with fewer resources) and female units doing parade formations in the safe corner of the map.

Also somebody would call the segregation evil sexism that must not stand, just because.

>>28080270
What if... We tried to make the military as efficient and effective as possible?
I mean its only American values and the life of every American that are at stake...

>>28080342
Maybe you didn't hear that trannies are next in the inclusivity line. Next to giving suicidal doped up people who chopped their own junk off access to heavy weapons, giving them to normal healthy *women* is pretty small beer.

>>28080342
It has never been that way, and it will only continue getting worse.

Ideology trumps reality, especially in Democracy.

>>28080357
Now what is your problem with trans people in the military? They tend to join anyway, would you rather them be suicidal while hiding it? Or be treated for it properly and have vastly improved mental health.

>>28080523
I respectfully submit that any guy who has himself surgically mutilated, cons his boyfriend into doing the same, and keeps said boyfriends balls IN A FUCKING JAR is not necessarily an unbiased observer.

I won't go into the various considerations of logistics, group morale, the hypocrisy of bouncing somebody who took a but let the crazies who cut off their junk in, etc.

>>28080523
I like my squad mates to be healthy mentally, and I've never met a Trans person who isn't a complete nutjob

>>28080567
>>28080569
Case in point

>>28080567
>took a
Toke. Took a toke. We'll disbar anyone with THC in their system or any depressive who is okay (?) while medicated, but let in people who want to sexually mutilate themselves surgically who need constant special treatment lest they flip their shit.

I'm sorry, I know it's happening anyway and the bobblehead media will happily gloss over the mass desertions from the officer corps who are fed the fuck up with their career being social engineered to death, but there are certain kinds of shit I won't eat. Sorry. Not even for a /k/ommando.

>>28080523
I'm surprised you would want transsexuals in the military. The most famous example we have of one, Manning, was a mentally unstable traitor; furthermore, unlike previous proscribed groups like Blacks or Japanese who belonged to segregated units that were some of the most decorated in U.S. military history, it's not as though there is an argument to be made for utility in favor of transsexual soldiers.

Putting aside the obvious damage it would do to unit cohesion, has there been even a single transsexual who has earned a Distinguished Service Cross or equivalent/better decoration?

>>28077927
They could be admitted to those groups because of muh equality but the govt would just create new "secret" big boy clubs to do their door kicking and hvt kidnapping.

>>28080567
She was trans since before i met her. She had talked about getting an orchiectomy before we even met in person. I didn't "con" her into getting them removed. When she had the surgery, they put them in jars and let her keep them. I really don't fuck with her balls.

But yes, true. I have a trans gf and I am not unbiased on that subject.

>>28080612
Manning was a piece of shit and is not a good example of trans in the military. I know a few, and they are some of the most hard working, dedicated individuals i have ever seen.

>>28080698
>I really don't fuck with her balls.
>her balls
>her
>balls

File: transgender-navy-s_2581073b.jpg (74KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 620x387px

>>28080612
Bronze Star with Combat Distinguishing Device, Purple Heart, 2x Defense Meritorious Service Medal

File: 1445391984558.jpg (264KB, 897x624px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 897x624px

>>28080698
>"con her into getting them removed"
>her
>them removed
>balls
>her

>her

>>28079307

Niiiiice.

>>28080612
>it's not as though there is an argument to be made for utility in favor of transsexual soldiers
Boy do I have bad news for you.

https://news.vice.com/article/the-us-army-is-retreating-from-its-prohibitive-policies-on-transgender-soldiers

>>28079257
>empty mag pouches
>one womyn doesn't even have mag pouches
these cunts are there to talk to the village women and that's it.

File: 1449088607702.png (366KB, 548x303px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 548x303px

>>28080750

I would breach her butthole with my shaped charge cock.

>>28080750
i'd hit it

>>28080750
>went into service to "fix" dysphoria
>left service and became a tranny

I have no idea how this will turn out.

But to those women who intend to join, I wish them luck. And I ask them to prove wrong those in this thread that say they will amount to nothing but a hindrance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJCTi9LakuU
yeah theres vidya in the background but I respect this guys opinion, he was a sniper in the marines and went through MARSOC indoc

>>28078530
>>28078530
most states allow you to change your legal status, they could simply check your ID

>>28080879
>And I ask them to prove wrong those in this thread that say they will amount to nothing but a hindrance.
>please become wizards and magically change reality because muh feels.

>>28080821
Yeah, I heard about this. I would have less of a problem with it if, regardless of what the actual policy said, the military exercised it with extreme discretion and only allowed in transsexuals who were low-key and had no potential to cause disruption, but the reality of how it will likely play out is that it will be opening the floodgates to every narcissistic and incapable Bradley Manning-type out there.

>>28080750
Not a Distinguished Service Cross, but decent decorations nevertheless. My question is whether this guy turned into a woman during or after his service. Do you know?

>>28080750
Must be Army.

>>28077324
fucking stupid

anyone who supports this is a fucking idiot

RIP American military

>>28080821
>>28080612
I thought MtF trannies were part of the selective service and the draft anyhow

>>28080879
Let's shoot you and leave you in a screaming heap and select any random woman in good physical shape to drag you to safety while both you and she are wearing rucks and body armor and receiving fire.

Better yet, let's shoot *her* and see how well you function under fire while listening to a woman scream. We are biologically geared to flip our shit at that point. Which, when you are taking fire, is not good.

>>28080821
>requires hormone therapy and special medical care
>belongs anywhere in the military

only one

>>28078572
that sent me into an autistic rage when i saw that

>>28080942

Seriously unethical, but sure. Any women around here want to get shot for me? Any volunteers?

>>28080915
they still could check your penis status fucking FAGGOT

>>28080567
is ivy actually trans tho? I mean, i have seen enough of the shit she or he has posted to confirm they are a securityforcesfag, but i can't imagine security forces being friendly to a tranny in their midst. I was one of them for a while and they are like an island in the sea of PC bullshit that is the air force.

Has anyone actually seen what ivy looks like? Or the boyfriend, for that matter?

>>28078050
>Implying that the people who are pushing this agenda want America to win.

If you are trying to bring a nation down corrupt it's education system, social structures, and military.

Guys what if this is a ploy to make the combat forces stronger?

Like, if women start making it into the infrantry without any help it will be a huge flag saying the training is too easy. What if training starts getting incrementally harder over time until girls stop making it in?

File: Warrior_Princess_(book)_cover.jpg (138KB, 432x648px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 432x648px

>>28080927
>My question is whether this guy turned into a woman during or after his service. Do you know?
Transitioned after leaving the Navy in 2011.

>>28080932
>implying Army could write a tell-all memoir like this

>>28080963
that wouldnt be "tolerant" you porchmonkey

File: 3b03002bf77dcc2d42ea3d19abf0680b.jpg (124KB, 607x837px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 607x837px

>>28080889

This fucker never even deployed. He claims "his supervisors prevented them from taking any pictures of any deployments".

What a lying sack of shit.

Never saw any combat, never fought, stayed back stateside like a bitch.

INTO THE TRASH HE GOES.

File: war never changes.gif (2MB, 659x609px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 659x609px

>>28077324

if a 5 foot 94 pound woman can carry a 6 foot 5, 230 pound man with his gear, ill be amazed.

hell, if a woman can carry a 240 with all the ammunition etc ill be amazed.

women will be a burden in combat

>>28080966
Ivy is trans as well, but they are still on record as 'still liking guys.'

The only picture we've ever seen is the jar with the balls in it, which I didn't save because I had no desire to ever see it again.

>>28080958

No one? Come on, ladies, it's for SCIENCE!

>>28077324

Don't they DARE drop the standards an inch for a glorified PR stunt. I want these women to be as ever bit as tough as the men, carrying the same loads of weight on their backs, with the same expectations of conduct. If they can nail that down, then said women are 100% qualified to do what they do.

Equality, /real/ equality or bust.

>>28080993
>Ivy confirmed trap

Shit now i am wondering what they look like, for um, no reason really

>>28081023

Damn right.

If they're good enough to do the job, excellent. If they can't, too bad. Combat isn't a game.

Seems fair to me.

>>28081023
That ship has sailed and you know it.

>>28077324
Oh boy I can't wait to see how all these strong womyn complain about how the modern battlefield is sexist or unfair, and the resulting shitstorm + damage control

>>28081027
I am too tall ;-;

>>28081023
Agreed. i do believe they should allow women into combat jobs, as long as they maintain the same high standards they have for the men. There will be very few females for that reason, but that's fine.

>>28079638
>this is why you are in the infantry

Protip: greentext usually implies sarcasm or mocking of the text posted

File: 1449191923864.jpg (61KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 720x960px

Should we get rid of all manlets under 6' from serving as well?

File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>tfw people are going to die unnecessarily for this

>>28081132
Most men can be forged into soldiers. Most women cannot.

>>28081138
Well at least it's consistent with most other military policies in that regard

>>28081132
Those manlets can still get strong enough to carry another soldier.

File: hmm.jpg (1MB, 3928x2685px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3928x2685px

>>28077324
>Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter
This is probably the most emotive United States Defense Secretary I've ever seen. More to follow.

File: nice.jpg (207KB, 1484x989px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1484x989px

>>28081161

File: ha.jpg (18KB, 657x421px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 657x421px

>>28081175

>>28081144
>most women

But not all women. Don't you think the physically exceptional females should be allowed to serve in that capacity?

Anyway, just think about it.

The top performers selected from the most physically able women will be in a unit with the most able men.

That means a high chance for super athlete operator babies

>>28081193
Men and women mixing erodes discipline, you can slice it anyway you want, but that's the real world works.

File: come on now.jpg (23KB, 534x401px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 534x401px

>>28081187

File: swerv.jpg (642KB, 1885x1442px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 1885x1442px

>>28081213

File: kurdish-girls-soldiers-cover.jpg (386KB, 1280x856px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1280x856px

>>28081144
>Most men can be forged into soldiers. Most women cannot.

File: srsly.jpg (893KB, 1956x1285px) Image search: [Google]

893KB, 1956x1285px

>>28081228

File: hmmmm.jpg (126KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1200x800px

>>28081243

>>28081205
But not mixing normal guys with guys who want to fuck them up the ass or chop their junk off, I assume. We can be sexist but not homophobic. Or is it the other way around? Or does it vary according to which politician is trying to appeal to any given target audience....?

I am confuse.

File: everythings coming up ashton.jpg (20KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 640x425px

>>28081264
I wonder if he has guns at the house.

>>28081233

Reminds me of the story of how Sun Tzu got some palace concubines to do military drill.

File: donkey.png (312KB, 254x906px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 254x906px

>>28081233

>>28081277
Oh come on. There really hasn't been any problems with gays in the military. They have been getting along with everyone just fine. To be complerely honest, the straight ones act waaaayyyy gayer than the actual gay ones.

>>28081193
>Don't you think the physically exceptional females should be allowed to serve in that capacity?
No. Their body degrades much more dramatically than men, unless you lower their burden at the expense of men.

>>28081277
Gays cause a problem as well, I'm not denying that, but it's limited because the sexual tension won't go both ways in most cases. Trannies obviously can't serve because they're mentally unwell.

>>28081233
>Kurds are "most women"

>>28081193
Also, the most able women would only ever be on par with lackluster men from a conscript army. I know you're a mentally deranged freak so you probably won't get it, but this way you can't say you weren't told.

File: 4660935227_4d94f8cb26[1].jpg (45KB, 440x330px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 440x330px

Even the POGest MOS is still male dominated. Very few females will even want to join the infantry. The ones that do are going to be less girl power "we can do it" and more pic related.

>>28079194
SHUT UP YOU MISOGYNIST!

>>28081319

First stfu, what do you know about the straight ones faggot.

second gays are another forced pentagon action, the politicians should stay out of military affairs in general (commander in chief excluded as he is the top honcho).

Have you seen this feminazi shit!

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-pentagon-women-combat-20151203-story.html

>"military combat may be the last totem of male superiority to topple"

>>28077782
>>28078973
quotas

>>28078266
Faggot.

File: HLzJaaR.jpg (35KB, 500x335px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x335px

I support giving people in wheelchairs rifles and tossing them a uniform if they want to serve their country and fight.

I would be fucking proud to fight with anyone who volunteers to deploy and fight and can pull a trigger. If I were Leonidas I would give Ephialtes some spears and say "Hang out in back and toss these at the enemy for us little buddy!"

I can tell you that 90% plus of the men I served with did everything they could to get out of deployments, and then once deployed did everything to get out of missions.

They were only there for a job, or for school, or because they had no where else to go.

They cared very little about guns, tactics, learning, training. They had no love for the military, only what they could get out of it.

So yeah, if the women are volunteering to go into combat? Please let them come.

It can not possibly be any worse than the majority of the military that we have who are dead weight.

Oh, quit fucking whining. Canada's had this policy for two fucking decades and their infantry are still just fine (and 98% male, I might add).

>>28078444
ABD IVE ONLY GOT 3 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS LEFT SEMPER FUCKING FI
fuck me

>>28081405

Thank you. Nice to hear some sense.

File: army-fat-chow.jpg (36KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x300px

Dead fucking weight.

>>28081429

>Canada
>Military

>>28081435
*and fuck I'm dumb

>>28077324
HOLY SHIT, FUCKING WHY?!?!?!?!?!
Does the SecDef just want to kuk the US military to death? I mean, if they can fit the male standards for serving, I don't really care. But no, their standards will be less than half of what the standards are for men. Either the PT standards I have to meet are the standard, or they're not. Women don't get 50% less incoming fire in a firefight. They don't have to carry 50% less injured squadmate. I've only met one fucking female that could come close to the Male standard and I beat her in runs and situps and I'm completely average

>>28081429

/k/ is full of whining hypocrites. Nothing new, really.

>>28081435
fucking boot....

>>28081435

Err'ahh, semper fi

REENLIST!

>>28081405
>who are dead weight.
And that's exactly what women will be trying to keep up with male standards.

>>28081405
So what happens when the soldiers see their brethren going trans and turning into much prettier girls than the fat beasts they are married to?

>>28077853
It costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $120,000 dollars to train a soldier, whether they make it or not. And that's just basic training. You could save money by just not letting them in. 3/4 people who dropped out in my battery during basic were females. That's like a million dollars wasted

>>28079217
double action breast feeding?!

you're pretty good

>>28077958
>3 pushups and a 100 meter run in 20 minutes
It's only funny because in reality that's really close to their standards already. 13 pushups and 19 minute 2 mile run

>>28081467
Prepare my anus lancecooly

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pentagon-nbc-news-all-combat-roles-now-open-women-n473581

At least NBC wasn't bs'ing around about equality and showed the hard facts of the MC's report on females in combat.

>>28077324
>implying women will gravitate towards these roles without policymakers dangling carrots to create a false sense of equality
>except the latter will inevitably happen

>>28078266
Fucking fag

>>28079333
>>28079357
>>28079388
>>28079405
>>28079412
>>28079428
>>28079573
>>28079592
>>28079902
>>28080982
>>28081233

there is a difference between having a military that is desperate for personnel and a military, like that of the US, which has more volunteers than it needs

>>28081551

This guy gets it.

>>28079039
That would imply that the highest levels of the US military are not willingly acquiescing the policymaker demands. The case seems to be that the higher ups are in line with policymakers on this subject

>>28078386
Being shelled isn't even enough to get a CAB. You need to be engaged by the enemy and engage them back.

>>28079357
>I'd like a combat jack if isn't too much trouble

File: us-army-military-demotivational-poster-1242443008.jpg (72KB, 640x752px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 640x752px

Maybe we need to look at what we have currently before we start worrying about those who are fighting to get into combat roles.

>>28078853
Underrated post

File: Screen-Shot-2015-04-23-at-11_13_41-AM.png (348KB, 600x356px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 600x356px

Because we could probably drop some of these worthless piles of shit and replace them with gung ho soldiers who are itching to get into the fight.

>>28081233
You want militia? Sure.
You want operational professional military force that deploy at a moments notice and do back to back missions on a vomit inducing pace for weeks on end? I'm not so sure about that.

File: 1302141388.jpg (48KB, 394x604px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 394x604px

>>28081644

Bro do you even operate?

>>28080224
Phil, you so crazy.

Please tell us more of your 'wisdom'.

>>28080698
Daily reminder that you and your "girlfriend" are both monsters and should have been culled from the general population when you admitted that you have a severe mental illness and wish to mutilate your genitals

>>28080953
Is it really that offensive that the white guy is standing slightly behind the front row?

>>28080224
Go stuff a dildo up your ass and fap to some Poju, Phil

>>28080991
>I can't carry the 240, anon, gimme your SAW please? :)
Every fucking female had to carry a 240 in our platoon because someone made a joke about it. It was fucking hell hearing them bitch for 10 miles

File: 27DC528D00000578-0-image-a-11_1429708345098.jpg (52KB, 634x365px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 634x365px

Daily reminder that currently 10% of the entire U.S. military is unable to deploy and is combat ineffective.

do you have to be that strong to shoot a gun?

>>28081193
I'm completely average in PT, and I still destroy the most high-speed PT stud female in my company. The best PT in the batallion is about equal with me, and the best in the brigage is about 5% better than me. Show me this huge group of females who can do the job effectively and I'll be happy to have them. Until then, fuck off with this PR bullshit

>>28078296
>Fish here.
i thought this was some kind of asian slur until i got over halfway through your post

>>28081834

I'll refer you to >>28079638

>>28079638
The only answer now is to get out. If your family or kids ever think about going in, steer them away from combat arms. Take your GI bill and run.

>>28081838
Nowhere did he say "huge group." Why does it need to be a large number?

>>28081723
There is no fucking way that's real. I had to get out for my leg getting fucked by a ied (I can still run and ruck) but this asshole gets to keep fighting?

File: VOoFll.png.jpg (48KB, 477x640px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 477x640px

>>28081723

Fun fact: This female marine gets a 90 on her "Female" PT Test.

>>28081870
Because to get that small number, you have to turn away a lot of failures, who cost money to train. $120,000 per soldier, and when you have to turn away 3/4 soldiers because they can't meet the standards, and they all have one thing in common, they probably shouldn't let that group in.

>>28081296
Sun Tsu knew how shit worked.

Armies aren't built entirely out of this hoo-rahh 6'6" g.i.joe bullsiht that everyone seems to use as the reason for why women soldiers can't possibly work. Armies work on discipline. It's something the American military could use more of.

So how did Sun Tzu turn a bunch of professional royal whores into an army? He started cutting their fucking heads off until they obeyed orders! Discipline.

File: bodas-graciosas123191323473099.jpg (33KB, 595x395px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 595x395px

An OHG-92 lands next to you and fragments into your leg.

You turn around and see these two people.

Which one do you ask to pick you up and take you to the medic?

>>28077324
I don't get why everyone is so butthurt...simply tell your sons that serving with females in the infantry is unacceptably risky, then form a fraternal militant order funded, armed and trained through private means. Then, when the Pentagon inevitably comes to the conclusion that a private contractor is more cost-effective than their now all-female army, you'll become a state-funded Diamond Dogs. Problem solved in one generation.

You niggas need to learn to see every crisis as an opportunity.

>>28080942
>We are biologically geared to flip our shit at that point. Which, when you are taking fire, is not good.
Shut your mouth Phil, you fucking feminist!

Most men aren't complete fucking children who fall apart every time their instincts kick in a little. And to expect that professional soldiers, from a disciplined fighting force would do so is even more insulting to every male everywhere.

>inb4 the Isrealis...
The Isrealis are a shitty conscript army that can't even beat a bunch of half-starved arabs without destroying entire buildings at a time.

>>28081926
I've still got one good leg.

>>28077367
>67
Dodged a fucking bullet there. Dubs/quads etc confirm grillz will never opr8

>>28081914

More discipline, yes.too many pork chops arn't feeling the grind and continue on their merry way.

But I doubt most whores make for great combatants.

File: michelle-obama-arms-3.jpg (58KB, 483x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 483x600px

A BM-21 Grad rocket hits your vehicle and you are unable to walk. As you look up you see the Highest ranking military member commander in chief President Barack Hussein Obama standing over you offering you a hand on your right.

On your left you see America's first lady Michelle Obama offer to throw you onto her back and run you to safety.

Which hand do you take?

>>28079307
Why is that female wearing soft shoes?

>>28081980

"I choose you Mr President!"

*We go get a drink at the local pub as the Grads position is bombed back to the fucking stone age by 1000 tons of high explosive laser guided 'murican airpower.*

*Michelle lectures the dead ISIS corpses on the wonders of nutrition*

>>28079307

Why does google not bring up ant of this?

>>28079412
>Dat nugget
>Dat booty

>>28081980
>Which hand do you take?
Have you seen Obama lately? He's looking pretty rough. The way being President sucks the life out of someone, you'd think the 2-term limit was to protect them, and not the country.

>>28082026

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Ann_Hester

not bad actually.

>>28080145
I will never look at loli the same again...
Fuck you for that.

>>28080523
^^Get a load of this nigger.
>Improved mental health.
>In the motherfucking military.

Top fucking kek.

>>28081293
kek

>>28081888
the only fighting that nigga was doin was fighting for air in his sleep

>>28080932
Navy, you faggot. Read the goddamn filename. Or, you know, leave your fucking basement every now and then.

>>28082129
>>28080932
Or for that matter, LOOK AT THE GOD DAMN UNIFORM!!!!!

>>28081023
It's already too late. They need batted ranger school for some diversity cunt LT's a few months ago. Directly on orders from the white house.

>>28082200
Fucking phone changed nerf to need.

It really sucks all the land is claimed on this earth, this country is going to shit with these liberal fucks.

>>28081132
A 135# man can do everything a soldier needs to do. A 135# female cannot.

>>28082022
Alcohol is haram, familio

File: 7oHYSLt[1].png (39KB, 400x147px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x147px

>>28078848
I did a google image search of "SSTO pump" because I have no idea what that is and wanted to see what this task was that every man succeeded at but almost no women did... all I got were pictures of rocket ships.

File: 107410_2015-12-03_00025.png (721KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1366x768px

>>28077324
Does this mean there will be females in Arma 4?

>>28082259
Ain't PROGRESS grand?
When people die due to this liberal insanity, including the women themselves, we'll blame some meaningless unrelated thing, maybe climate change.

>>28078254
Who gives a fuck what it implies, fact is the military is an age old system, with a proven track record. This decision will cost young men lives.

>>28081603
You do know what the story behind that picture is right?

Because it's depressing.

>>28081510
I've gained sixty pounds in the decade I've been out and I can still CRUSH the female or test and can only barely pass the male test.
T. B. H. I would fail the run. Can still do my age bracket pushups and situps though.

>>28082081
>>28081888
>>28081723
>First deployment
>Buddies die
>Get home
>Become obese by drowning depression in food and beer
>Get called on another deployment
That's that guy's story. Now don't you feel like shit?

>>28081895

>Stolen squalor

Why doesn't that bitch have a name tag?

>>28081405
Women can't perform at the same level.
Plain and simple. If I'm incapacitated, dying on the side of a road taking machine gun fire, you think Jessica Sanchez will be able to drag my 350lb loaded self to evac, let alone a ditch? I know this concept is hard to digest.

>Complains about useless pussies in the military(you didn't specify where/when you deployed, so i can't say infantry) while simultaneously defends adding more useless pussies quoting "what could go wrong"

File: 67f52907c151d056272be6becae6f2d8.jpg (32KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x500px

>>28078382
>MFW you post an Aie-Aie.
>MFW it's so good they named it twice.

>>28081277
Someone got touched in the hotel room the night before MEPS.

>>28082390
99% of them don't have the mental ability to handle it either

But the issue of women in the military has less to do with combat, more about the general dysfunction & resentment caused in the entire military by em.

>>28077958
>>28081510
U W0T M8?

Holy shit, I'm fucking fat and can do that.

>>28082390
As long as women are tested by the same physical standards as men there's no issue, right?

>>28078905
>Hell, it's 2015, you could probably take every man and put him in a coma and just wake him up for sex, world would be fine.

The only problem with this is that the entirety of our infrastructure is built and maintained by men. Every brick, every mile of asphalt was likely laid by a man. All the electrical lines, every one of the sewers and water mains were put in place and maintained by men. The number of women in construction makes the number of women in the military look huge by comparison.

We've already diverted tons of cash away from maintaining our infrastructure for bullshit programs. Pull men out of society, and the whole fucking thing would start to crumble. Civilisation would fall apart within months as water stopped running, electricity stopped flowing and the internet died along with the telecommunications network that supports it.

Which would be the end of Feminism and the Social Justice...

Never mind. This is an excellent plan. Carry on.

>>28078382
Then what are they complaining about?

>>28082362
Not at all, fatass. I guess when he took the TAPAS his question was like

Would I rather:

A. Watch a friend die

B. Commit suicide by eating mcdonalds

C. Both A and B

>>28081493
the way she twists her elbow is more of a single child technique, though.

>>28081926
>>28081405
Was that bitch dying or some shit like that? Why would that dude marry that thing? I have seen some dependopottami in my time but damn that's fugly.

That goofy bastard could be elbow deep in some Filipino pussy right now. Third world broads don't care about looks. But no, he had to go and marry the ugliest landwhale in Alabama.

>>28082425
That's only 1 issue tho

As other anons mentioned, cohesion and efficiency goes to hell

You are making a really complicated issue seem simple by just saying 'its just a matter of x and x' which is ignorant.

>>28077324
>>Open up all combat roles to women
>>All combat roles to women
>>Combat roles
>>Wimminz

Kek

>>28081980
Allegedly, Michelle has the bigger dick, so...

>>28082437
Any job that involves actually doing shit, will always involve physical work
Which means no women.

You look at these women, even in big companies
Vast majority of them are in more or less makework positions.

Imagine the literally TRILLIONS of dollars we would save, if we eradicated this progressive fetish.

>>28079257
'Lets go hand out chocolate bars'

'Hold on jessica, put on your shemagh and oakleys, we SOF now'

'Yea bitch'

>>28079780
Yeah we wouldn't want a women stroking our cocks would we.

Personally I dont give a fuck either way, war these days are won as much be handingnof guns and cash to the right brown people as with bewts-on-dah-ground.

I swear every time we get involved one of these cluster fucks we do it just to prove that our infantry is better trained than Russia's.

>>28082487
How do those whacky Israelis handle it?

Also while I the Arabs and Palestinians can be shits, they certainly aren't helping. It's also true that they didn't HAVE to move to Palestine.

File: razzle.png (23KB, 590x520px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 590x520px

>>28082437
Reminds me of the Mad Max movie.

>town run by fat, white men
>replete with water, industry, food, government, religion, laws, and achievement-based hierarchy in which men and women can excel -- civilization.

>town run by stronk, independent womyn
>SOMEONE'S POISONED THE WATER HOLE!
>Guess we'd better take up highway banditry until our numbers dwindle to zero 'cause none of us know how to make a basic pump or carbon filter

and you faggots were telling me how SJW it was.

File: Pizza_Hut.png (86KB, 979x1000px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 979x1000px

>>28082340

Yeah I know the story.

http://www.pizzahut.com/ourstory.html

>>28082362
i dont feel bad for welfare queens ever

>>28082524
those whacky israelis have segregated units and dont have to foot the bill as the greastest goy nations pay for their military

>>28082641
Nor have they fought a war since they started really integrating stuff

My wife is a black woman, ostensibly one of the most oppressed demographics in our society. When we started talking about it, she came out as opposed to women in combat roles. Her initial reaction to this topic was "Who the fuck asked for this?" followed by "I believe in fairness, not equality, because equal don't make no kind of god damn sense."

>Soviets use female conscripts
>Vietnamese women fight with VC forces
>Israeli women required to serve
Seemed to work pretty well...

Here's the thing; Putting feelings above the calculated truths of combat is a stupid idea. In fact, it may be one of the worst ideas ever. That being said, to bash ALL female soldiers is simply stupid. To say that ONLY female soldiers will turn tail at the first sign that things are getting real, and to suggest that ALL female soldiers would be cowards is simply ignorant. Will some of these GI-SJWs cry for mercy when the artillery starts falling? Of course. But you can be sure that those who stay will be among your finest fighters.

Now, the obvious issue here is the relaxation of standards. As >>28078141 so eloquently put it, once your pony is all prettied up, you may stop caring about how fast it can run as long as it looks good in the act. It seems clear that anyone who can make the grade should be allowed to defend their country. However, the individual must always meet the standard; The standard can never be brought to the individual.

This is the silver medal.
This is your runner-up prize.

>THIS
>IS
>FAILURE

>>28082683
your wife suffers from severe retardation

>>28082684
Giving local women guns and using them in defensive roles is different than sending them over to another country where they don't need to be.

>>28082524
How is that even related to the discussion, we are talking about integration not segregation.

All women squads? Hahahaha

>>28079307

Exceptions don't make rules.

"Three members of Hester's team were shot and wounded. Dozens of insurgents were firing on them. Hester's squad leader, Staff Sgt. Timothy Nein, GRABBED HER AND TOLD HER TO FOLLOW HIM. They ran toward the insurgents' trench line, took up position and started firing."

Your story is a little misleading. She is an admirable soldier and an exemplary fighter, and fulfilled her role as MP to the highest order. But she is not infantry, nor combat-ready, and is absolutely an exception concerning integrity morality and ability.

>>28082700
>sending them over to another country where they don't need to be

but the men do need to be there?

>>28082744
Someone does, if you're planning on winning the war.

File: FMJ.jpg (183KB, 1200x767px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 1200x767px

>>28077324
The Marines are still the only ones in the armed forces with a shred of intelligence.
>Combat effectiveness is the utmost and only concern when considering recruits.
>Men are just far better at fucking killing people, simple as that.

>>28082265

Probably not. There aren't even female CIVs in 3. And it's not like women in combat doesn't happen, especially as bystanders or reserves. It's just that they're not as effective as men.

I'm still pissed at BI for that bullshit.

ok

could literally not give less of a shit

branches will be so buttblasted that they will intentionally be super strict about meeting standards if not raise them in response to this

if women meet them, cool. the unit cohesion arguments were always bullshit, anyway. said the same thing about black people.

>>28079307

Great example of someone who can meet standards and execute the mission.

Which is all I ask for.

>actually its about ethics in combat

its funny how women in military threads just drag the mysogony out of /k/. If a woman can reach the same standards as a man (and thats the big one) i don't see the problem, having worked with women that had their shit together a lot better than some of my male colleagues. Women should also have to have their heads shaved too, right along with the men, but that's just my opinion

>>28082859

Unfortunately you and my ideal model of how things ought to work is far divorced from how reality works. A lot of /k/ agrees, they just don't know how to articulate both at once.

>>28082719
whoa! wher'ed those goal posts go?!?

Better invest in exosuits.
The military is going to be needing a lot of them.

>>28082889
i think the hair cut is the big issue. every male that goes to boot camp is shaved bald so that their is a drastic reduction in 'identity.' For a women especially to want to strip away what's usually considered one of her most important aspects of beauty and identity, she has to genuinely really want to be there. in addition, uniform and unisex grooming standards and clothing i think would do a lot show that the woman are just as much a part of the force as the men are

>>28081161
>>28081175
>>28081187
>>28081213
>>28081228
>>28081243
>>28081264
>>28081293
Why is a guy able to make drastic changes to a military that hes never served in

>>28082859
50% higher casualty rates in mixed units. How is that not a problem? Huh, faggot? How is MORE DEAD SOLDIERS not a problem?

>>28083067
and were the female standards of those units the same as the males?

>>28082859
If they were subject to the same standards as men there wouldn't be a problem.
But a year or so after this goes into effect, when they haven't met whatever quota the Obama/Hillary administration deems necessary, they WILL lower the standards.

>>28083100

It's Israel. I have dated an Israeli. They are pretty kickass... but not kickass enough.

File: 1447671557010.jpg (52KB, 410x429px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 410x429px

>>28078351
jessica lynch breh

>>28081491
thats not true at all mate. it's not like those drill sergeants wouldn't be there if there weren't any women. someone needs to train them. and its not like the army hadn't budgeted to pay drill sergeants to train soldiers; they were going to be at sill or jackson or wherever regardless.


and you cant tell me their gear "costs" 120k. per soldier, their gear and the cost of paying a couple of e-6 women to be there because they have to be there is nowhere close to 120k.


BREAK

Look, who gives a shit if a girl can actually do a job men have been doing since this country was founded. There will always be exceptions to the rule. You don't have to hit me with the studies that everyone has reposted over and over again about how women have less upper body strength, their hips are shitty for rucking/running blah blah blah. Everyone knows that.

What you faggots DONT seem to talk about, which leads me to believe few, if any, of you have served in the military in the past 10 years, is what a fucking cancer women are to the culture of the U.S. armed forces. Being in the army, you see what a fucking problem it is just having them around. I don't give a fuck if they can do their job.

They get special fucking treatment literally wherever they go. You have these fucking fatbody divorced E-6's all trying to get their fucking dicks wet and treating all women like little princesses, leading to a degradation of morale in an active duty unit. I wanted to fucking kill my squad leader and platoon sergeant when I was active. Half of my platoon felt the same way. They let shit slide, they walk all over the rules and regulations and when you correct them they cry about it to drill. That shit is a joke. And no one ever says anything about it for fear of them complaining to IG or whatever the fuck it is that women do.

List all the studies you want joe, no one is talking about the real problem

>>28083124
and i concede i'd rather have male-only than the scenario you predict

>>28083142
>What you faggots DONT seem to talk about, which leads me to believe few, if any, of you have served in the military in the past 10 years, is what a fucking cancer women are to the culture of the U.S. armed forces. Being in the army, you see what a fucking problem it is just having them around. I don't give a fuck if they can do their job.
>They get special fucking treatment literally wherever they go. You have these fucking fatbody divorced E-6's all trying to get their fucking dicks wet and treating all women like little princesses, leading to a degradation of morale in an active duty unit. I wanted to fucking kill my squad leader and platoon sergeant when I was active. Half of my platoon felt the same way. They let shit slide, they walk all over the rules and regulations and when you correct them they cry about it to drill. That shit is a joke. And no one ever says anything about it for fear of them complaining to IG or whatever the fuck it is that women do.

that's why this >>28082980

>>28083179

not who you replied to but you're an idiot if you think shaving their heads will stop them from having a vagina

>>28083228
and having worked with a lot of women, saying all women are dumb cunts is like saying all black people are niggers or all men are fratboys. believe me i can't stand the cunts either but their are ways of discouraging them

>>28077324
If you're not serving in the armed forces, you don't get to bitch about the people that are and the standards they set. Don't like women in combat? Grab a rifle and enlist.

If you're in the armed forces, you follow the orders of your civilian leadership, and they say let women in combat. You get your fucking green book out, you think for a second, write for a second, and figure out how to enact the plan.

>>28082794
Virgin kuk detected

>>28082795
Don't be a homo, cuz I don't plan on sticking my dick in another man. If there are women in a unit that look damn fine after not seeing real women for 18 weeks, you bet ima swiggity swooty dat booty.

>>28083298
>if you are not in the military you have no right to complain

>if you are in the military you have no right to complain

>>28082918
wtf u talking about mane

>>28083100
That wasn't the problem. The problem was that white knights take unnecessary risks when girls are involved.

Gunfire comes in and everybody hits the deck. Dude thinks to himself "Oh shit, they're shooting at the girls! I'd better [run to save them/ draw fire away from them] and gets himself killed rather than just saying "Oh shit, they're shooting at Steve. Hope he's alright by the time the drones bomb the shit out of these guys."

It had nothing to do with standards and everything to do with bad decisions made for the sake of unnecessarily protecting the females.

>>28083430
then that sounds liek shitty training. just about every other facet of psychology tells us that when people are in life or death situation 'fight or flight' and even 'feed' kick in well before 'fuck' does

File: 1449013085767.jpg (116KB, 1000x568px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1000x568px

>>28082683

MUP DA DOO DIDDA PO MO GUB BIDDA BE DAT TUM MUHFUGEN BIX NOOD COF BIN DUB HO MUHFUGGA

File: Leigh_Ann_Hester_-_high_res.jpg (276KB, 2100x1396px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 2100x1396px

>>28082719

She has more confirmed kills than you do you faget.

She probably gets more pussy than you do too.

>>28082918
>>28082918
Up your ass

>>28081723
Ex airborne with fucked up back from that and a failing thyroid iirc. 2 combat tours. He used to be a /k/ommando posting here a while back.

>>28083600
Sorry for triggering you. Girl can shoot, she can move, but she ain't infantry. She got some good for her, you wanna give her a freakin' medal too? Even she says she doesn't deserve all this hype but you can get on that SJW dick and ride it to missouri and blow all them dindu's on your way to the capital so you can get pegged by hillary while gobbling up obama's taint stank

>>28077324
If the women enlisting can get their femininity pounded away from training and become obedient, capable to carrying out orders to the letter, doesn't engage in conversation unless needed, i don't see a problem... Sure they are weaker than men, doesn't mean they cant fight in a war. Just don't put them in mixed platoons. Women are lighter, I'm sure a fit woman can carry another fit woman. The army can always come up with an excuse that says "it distracts the men" to shut the SJWs up.

>>28082531
Geez, that comparison is a failure even for an anti-SJW faggot like you.

>Town
>ran by a dictator who wants to establish a fuedal lineage
>and uses slaves

>'town' run by women
>wasn't a town, was a tribe
>noone poisoned the water, it went bad because muh toxic wasteland
>guess we better take up highway banditry
>highway banditry
You must have missed the part where the War Boyz run Max down and take him prisoner... ya know, banditry.

>>28082753
>if you're planning on winning the war
>wars always involve massive invasions
>you always need to conquer the enemy to 'win'
Americans have such a fucking retarded understanding of war.

>>28084382
>fucking feminist
>calls someone else triggered
>while desperately trying to prove this gurl can't cut it

>come up with an excuse that says "it distracts the men"
So once again, the excuse against women in the military will come down to "men are fucking children who can't handle their shit", just like with the claim that we'll turn retarded and run out into enemy fire because we hear a wounded woman screaming for help?

This is what I was talking about before, with Sun Tsu and fucking DISCIPLINE. Discipline is the thing that keeps you from freaking out when bullets and bombs are going off near you, when your best friend has his face turned to mush. Professional western militaries have it in spades, even America who probably has the least disciplined army out of the entire West (still more than most of the world though). Those men

But we're supposed to believe these highly trained and motivated individuals are just going to forget everything and drop what they're doing for the first 'damsel in distress'? Because 'muh instincts' override everything they've learned, not to mention the entire reason our species evolved our brain so much.

Am I the only person who realizes just how fucking INSULTING this concept is to all men everywhere?

ITT: fat obese begrudged shitlords that are too bootyblasted over the fact that there are women operating while they plink squirrels with their costco AR15s

top kek mate
top kek

>>28085378
Hello tumblr, good to see you again

>>28082684
>Volksturm used child soldiers
let's allow children into army too. It's been done before.

>>28085038
Nice sideswipe there faggot.
I can't wait till you get killed because you were too busy defending our strong "female warriors" while they sit at medic with their 8th kid.

File: image.jpg (79KB, 736x490px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 736x490px

>>28077324
>>28077324
Wait a minute...

>weapons and military equipment.

>Discussions about politics or current events belong on /pol/.

>girls given the right to die and possibly raped in sandniggerville

How is this weapons related and why is it pinned?

Why the fuck is this an actually sticky?

>>28085038
I second this.

>>28078853
I for one welcome the grand opening of the Burning Pit of Money Eternal Flame on the National Mall

>>28085492
Because active shootouts with police is /pol/, but women in male dominated professions is totally sticky worthy.

>Fucking slant eyed nip mod faggots