[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Porn Thread

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 317
Thread images: 62

File: op.jpg (49KB, 782x600px) Image search: [Google]
op.jpg
49KB, 782x600px
Post your nsfw, critique work and so on.
Furry is not allowed. LOLI IS NOT ALLOWED. This thread is dedicated to helping anons improve their erotic drawings and paintings.
Do not start flame wars.
Do not reply to shitposting.
Stay on topic.

Previous Thread:
>>2656057
>>
>>2666332
Blog please?
>>
>>2666408
BBC I'm using your artwork to practice digital painting.
>>
>>2666408
She's a rabbit not an owl :^)
>>
>>2666645
that's not his obviously
>>
>>2666656
whose is it
>>
>>2666794
me
>>
>>2666797
BLOG??
>>
File: asdas.png (102KB, 440x632px) Image search: [Google]
asdas.png
102KB, 440x632px
posting w fixes again
how's the pose? ignore the green lines
>>
>>2666839
I'm no authority on art but it looks good to me, I'd guess that her face is going to be pretty covered up though.
>>
File: 2016-09-06_00-23-24.jpg (140KB, 960x953px) Image search: [Google]
2016-09-06_00-23-24.jpg
140KB, 960x953px
im not sure about the foreshortening of her belly and torso. it looks off, but i can't figure out how.

>>2666839
hard to say, but i think his hips might need to be lowered a bit in order for his dick to get a better angle into her vag.
>>
>>2666884

focus on construction and getting the body proportions symmetrical, theres a lot of anatomical problems, especially the hands and the eye on the right side. id consider just redrawing everything and trying again.
>>
>>2666883
thanks m8
>>2666961
thanks!
>>
>>2667021
It's just a sketch. No shit it isn't perfect...
Still better than the rest here though, who just make three lines and call it a day.
>>
>>2667027
For a sketch, thats quite a clean drawing. I mean no offense, m8.
>>
>>2667027
>asks for a critique
>gets pissy when he gets what he asked for
bruh
Your response is a great way to make your stay on /ic/ miserable.
>>
>>2667037
It's a clean sketch, yes. But I didn't ink it, so it's still a sketch.

>>2667041
I'm obviously not welcome here anyway. Who cares how I respond to you cucks?
>>
>>2667037
>I mean no offense, m8
Sure thing... I just find it funny, how everyone here posts poor "drawings" with 3 lines, and people say it's good, but when I post an actual drawing with more than 3 lines, everything on it is ostensibly wrong...
>>
>>2667044
Calm down dude. I'm just trying to give you advice.
A clean sketch doesnt mean a whole lot when the structure has problems, doesnt matter if its a sketch, its something you should fix BEFORE you enter that 'attractive looking sketch' stage of construction.

>>2667052
example >>2666839 is a drawing with few lines, but structurally and proportionally its alright. putting a lot of effort into detail on your sketch or during early stages of construction doesnt make it a good drawing, what makes a good drawing is the ability to convey something accurately, ie proportion, foreshortening, perspective, symmatry, etc rather than how many lines there are or details.

I'm not being harsh on you because I don't like loli, I'm giving you advice because I want you to keep drawing loli and get better at it.
>>
>>2667102
>Calm down dude
I am totally calm, asshole.

>its something you should fix BEFORE you enter that 'attractive looking sketch'
That's complete bullshit. Just because my sketch doesn't look like shit, like the rest here, doesn't mean it has to be perfect.

>structurally and proportionally its alright
Are you kidding me? Apart from that you hardly can see anything on this sketch (hard to see something with only 3 lines), the proportions are completely fucked up, everywhere. Just look at the leg of the woman... It looks like a box...

>I'm not being harsh on you because I don't like loli
Sure thing... And I am the Kaiser of China!
>>
>>2667114
If you think your sketch is fine so far, then alright.
But trying to fix its structural problems in the inking phase will cause you a lot more frustration than if you'd just re-draw things in the early stages.
>Sure thing... And I am the Kaiser of China!
Whatever man.
>>
File: asd.png (147KB, 482x624px) Image search: [Google]
asd.png
147KB, 482x624px
>this thread so far
wew lads
anyways i cleaned it up a bit and added more detail + tried to make girl smaller and make it look like he's actually choking her
also hopefully the hips look better/looks like dick is actually in her
crits/redlines pls friends
>>
File: 1470300075100.png (498KB, 798x920px) Image search: [Google]
1470300075100.png
498KB, 798x920px
>>2667114
Dunning Kruger x10 + bitch syndrome
>>
>>2667129
>trying to fix its structural problems in the inking phase will cause you a lot more frustration than if you'd just re-draw things in the early stages.
Why would it cost me more frustration? Because I don't make sketches with 3 lines? You don't make any sense.
The drawing is still in an early stage, dipshit. The actual drawing will be at least twice as big in the end... And I still can erase and correct everything I want on it.
>>
>>2667134
>look guys I totally like loli and am not biased at all
The fact that you post this cheap animu garbage only shows how poor your taste is
>>
>>2667135

Are you shitposting or just dumb? If you're better than everyone here, why did you ask for their opinion? And for that matter, why did you post a sketch, ask for critique, then immediately get defensive, then fire back at any criticism with "IT'S A SKETCH OF COURSE IT'S NOT PERFECT DIPSHIT"?

Or were you just fishing for compliments, not critique? If so, please on your next post add the disclaimer "Please don't critique this sketch because it's not finished and I'll get really angry, just say nice things, thank you."
>>
lol, guys, come on, let's not fight, can't we all just get along?
>>
>>2667149
>why did you post a sketch
I actually just reposted my drawing, because I know it will trigger you assholes here. Last time it got deleted, and the whole thread derailed into cucks arguing with each other, which I found funny.

However, I was still open for critique. I just found it weird that on my drawing everything is ostensibly wrong, while the other drawings here are ostensibly good the way they are, although you hardly even can fucking see anything on them.

It's not that I need critique from you cucks. You can't tell me anything I didn't know yet, anyway. It would have been nice to post here anyway, though, just for the fun of it, but you faggots here are really total cucks, so who cares.
>>
>>2667166
>Last time it got deleted, and the whole thread derailed
it wasnt due to your drawing, some other person gave a red line and THAT derailed the thread.

>everything is ostensibly wrong
No, you are only assuming that.
I wasn't saying it as "bad" I was saying it needed improvements. You asked for a critique.
>while the other drawings here are ostensibly good the way they are
That as never implied either, most of the drawings here arent "good the way they are"
>It would have been nice to post here anyway
Then stop getting so offended at criticism, you're anonymous here, you shouldn't take things so personal.
>>
File: 1451620729672.png (163KB, 344x290px) Image search: [Google]
1451620729672.png
163KB, 344x290px
>>2667166

>"I was only pretending to want critique;I already know everything. Y-you guys are t-total c-cucks, who c-cares."


No one cares. You need to fix your mistakes, like everyone else on this thread. Grow up
>>
>>2667166
considering all that butthurt, you must care a lot.
>>
>>2667166
kys
>>
>>2667194
>it wasnt due to your drawing, some other person gave a red line and THAT derailed the thread.
What derailed the thread was you faggots getting upset about lolicon, and my drawing started this.

Also, the redline guy just seemed important to you cucks because he drew clean and acted important with a wall of text, although in reality his redline looked like shit desu (no offense, still thankful for his reply).

>I wasn't saying it as "bad" I was saying it needed improvements.
You basically said it is full of problems, while on the other hand saying that the other drawings here are good. Which is just laughable. I know my drawing wasn't perfect, but it is still ten times better than the other shit posted here so far.

>That as never implied either, most of the drawings here arent "good the way they are"
Are you dense?
>structurally and proportionally its alright
But sure, my proportions are all fucked up... sure...

>Then stop getting so offended at criticism
I don't get offended at critique. I don't even take you retards here seriously, because I know you are just full of shit anyway. Loli is obviously not even allowed here, retard. So why should I care what you faggots here think about my drawings?
>>
>>2667226
Just

LOL
>>
How is this porn?
>>
>>2667166

How immature do you have to be to be this monumentally butthurt, vindictive and egotistical? In this thread the guy probably gave you some of the least abrasive critique you can get on this board and you threw a fucking fit, now you're treating it like a competition and you're buttblasted that someone critiqued you when there are worse artists who could have been critiqued, as if the point is to post your art and get as little critique as possible.
>>
>>2667250
>hurr u r just butthurt
Again, it doesnt interest me what you faggots think. Lolita art is not welcome here anyway. Why should I give a fuck about the opinion of a general which probihits my drawings anyway, you dumbfuck? LOL
>>
>>2667260
>Lolita art is not welcome here anyway
Nobody in this thread has complained about your loli drawing yet, the only complaints are about how you handle criticism.

Either you can judge it for what it is, or you can be delusional and think people are only pretending to criticize you because they dont like the subject matter of your drawing.
I draw loli, I have nothing against it, I just wanted to give you some advice to help you.

Getting this upset over a crit isnt worth the effort, just buckle down and try to improve instead of wasting energy shitposting.
>>
>>2667260
Your pic is still up so obviously no one cares.
Stop using that as an excuse to dismiss valid criticism.

fix your mistakes faggot
>>
>>2667268
I honestly don't care why you faggots dislike my drawing. Perhaps you also just don't like toddlers, who knows?

Fact is that you are full of shit. Otherwise you wouldn't claim that the other drawings here would be better in any way.

And again, I am not upset, butthurt or anything. I don't give a shit what you retards here think.
>>
>>2667270
Last time it also took some hours to get deleted.
And criticism was not valid at all. It was just bullshit.
>>
>>2666884
My critique is I've given it a fap because pacifiers are an almighty turn on for me and if you add in a diaper I'll love you forever
>>
>>2667313
why do pacifiers do it for you?
>>
File: not_my_art.jpg (1MB, 2453x3307px) Image search: [Google]
not_my_art.jpg
1MB, 2453x3307px
>>2667314
I have an infantile fetish and bibs, bottles, pacifiers, diapers, rattles, cribs, etc, they're all turn ons. Pacifiers are kinda special though because they're not unlike gags and the noise made from sucking on them is just so HNNNNNG

I can't 'splain it very eloquently, but it's just a fetish very deeply ingrained in me.
>>
>>2667279
>>2667282

O my fucking god NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE LOLI. No one even said that the pic was that bad man seriously chill the fuck out.

Anons first comment was that you need to work on your construction dude. The other anons CONSTRUCTION was more realized than yours. You know, the layer you obviously made that "sketch" from.

You would not have made the mistakes you made if you worked on your construction more before working so hard to make the "sketch" look pretty to show off to the thread.

And you did work hard to do it. It shows in the amount of lines you used to pretty it up, as well as how many mental hoops you are jumping through to not accept the critique. If you didn't care, you would simply fix the errors, repost, and move on.
>>
File: 1405438643830.jpg (3KB, 122x125px) Image search: [Google]
1405438643830.jpg
3KB, 122x125px
>>2667319
>I have an infantile fetish and bibs, bottles, pacifiers, diapers, rattles, cribs, etc, they're all turn ons. Pacifiers are kinda special though because they're not unlike gags and the noise made from sucking on them is just so HNNNNNG

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>I have an infantile fetish and bibs, bottles, pacifiers, diapers, rattles, cribs, etc, they're all turn ons. Pacifiers are kinda special though because they're not unlike gags and the noise made from sucking on them is just so HNNNNNG

I bet you have a soft quiet voice. Cringe as fuck.
>>
>>2667114
do you want to improve or do you want backpats.

lose the ego
>>
>>2667319
>>2667326
Not gonna lie, I like some of that shit too.

that's why I want Loli-kruger anon to get better, because I simply cant fap with that eye sliding off her face
>>
File: cdd.png (160KB, 492x352px) Image search: [Google]
cdd.png
160KB, 492x352px
>>2667326
>>
>>2667319
>Pacifiers are kinda special though because they're not unlike gags and the noise made from sucking on them is just so HNNNNNG

never thought about it that way. thanks for sharing, anon.
>>
>>2666594
>45 Replies
>8 Images
Fecking wew lads.Starting as well as the last one, I see.
>>
>>2667319
>tfw my fetish is being forced into this stuff ;-;
>>
File: 1457585871605.jpg (9KB, 477x360px) Image search: [Google]
1457585871605.jpg
9KB, 477x360px
I am not even going to give that shithead the (You), but if you haven't died today I'm going to be fucking pissed that some lonely, insecure, entitled piece of shit still breathes the air I have to share with, and to know he's going to be the next set of shitposters Porn Threads have been plagued with for 9 fucking months. I don't fucking get how of all places on this shithole of a site, /ic/'s porn threads are the most cancer containing threads to exist on this site next to the likes of /pol/. You either are as good as BBC and still try to improve yourself, but then get trashed to oblivion by jellyfags, OR you're that not-mikufag faggot that shitted this thread with 20+ posts of him getting ass fucked because he didn't want anything other than "suck my dick :3", which makes these threads absolute pointless now.

I wish this place can get purged of shit, mods need to only allow redlines and tutorials so jellyfags, pedofags, and shitposters can finally gtfo and /ic/ can actually be worth it again.
>>
>>2667612
weeeeeew
>>
File: 001p.jpg (338KB, 658x900px) Image search: [Google]
001p.jpg
338KB, 658x900px
Thread needs more fluff imo.
>>
>>2667668
you da real mvp
>>
File: random.gif (173KB, 449x451px) Image search: [Google]
random.gif
173KB, 449x451px
>>
>>2667321
>the layer you obviously made that "sketch" from.
I did not use any layers, you dipshit. I drew the lines how they are and that's it. Only thing I did was making them a bit darker afterwards, because the opacity was really weak, and of course erasing sometimes a bit.
>>
>>2667331
>implying you scrubs here could tell me anything about how to improve
Listening to your "advices" will only make you worse at best
>>
I see why they say the sticky is the only worthwhile post on this board.
>>
>>2667313
>if you add in a diaper I'll love you forever
That's actually a pretty good idea I haven't thought about yet.
I'm not really satisfied with the dildo anyway, so I will try to add a dildo diaper to it.
>>
>>2667723
this looks really sweet. nice job anon.
>>
>>2667826
I'm failing to see even one "nice" thing.
>>
>>2667833
not nice
>>
File: Werehyena.png (312KB, 1351x955px) Image search: [Google]
Werehyena.png
312KB, 1351x955px
Doing something for halloween; I feel like there's something off about her proportions. Any advice or redlines would be appreciated!
>>
>>2667132
Pink dudes face looks smooshed together. Adjust both knees
>>
>>2667987
her proportions aren't really bad, the overall perspective is.
>>
>>2667725

bullshit.
>>
>>2667725
lol bullshit.
>>
>>2667987
I think the legs and hips are off...
I say, either drop the right hip down a bit for gravity or move the left leg back into the distance to balance her pose... maybe a little of both?

Though I guess you could just move the middle hand that's right by her hip down to support her hip.

The proportions look okay to me.
>>
>>2668287
>>2668290
Just because your sketches look like shit and you are unable to draw decently, doesn't mean everyone else is so bad.
Doing rough constructions is just a waste of time if you are also able to do it how you want it more or less from the beginning.
>>
>>2668694
but YOU clearly lack that ability dude. The eye is sliding off your lolis face
>>
>>2668829
I never said the drawing was perfect dipshit. It also doesn't have to because it was just a sketch and wasn't even finished.

However, it's more or less how I wanted it, and such small corrections like the eye are still easy to do.
>>
>>2668837

>it's more or less how I wanted it

full of beginner level mistakes? ok fair enough.
>>
>>2668846
If it has so many beginner level mistakes, why do you claim I had to use a construction layer for it?
You retard make no sense. If the drawing was really that bad, one would rather believe the opposite.
>>
>>2668850
you did, did it poorly, and that's what you need to work on.

pretty simple actually
>>
>>2668852
How do you wanna know how I did the drawing? Again, the fact that you find it so unbelievable that I did the drawing without a construction sketch, only proves how full of shit you are and just talking hypocritical nonsense.
>>
File: Puppy in the window copy.jpg (142KB, 929x718px) Image search: [Google]
Puppy in the window copy.jpg
142KB, 929x718px
I'm honestly not too sure how well I did on the vaginas, looking for any advice there. Also not sure if nipple placement is a bit off... or if there's anything else terribly off that I've gone blind to from staring at this all day.
>>
>>2668861
at the very least redo their vaginas
>>
File: pussybox.jpg (774KB, 800x3263px) Image search: [Google]
pussybox.jpg
774KB, 800x3263px
>>2668861
>>
>>2668870
beat me to it

>>2668861

consider doing something about that tangent you got going on as well. maybe move the girls a bit further apart or bring the left girl's knee down a bit more?
>>
>>2668856
Hey anon i just wanted to say that your redline on the previous thread was some nishi iori level shit and i would appreciate if you posted your pixiv or gallery, good western loli artits are scarce and its a shame to hid your art.
>>
>>2668946
Are you dense? The redline was made by some other guy to one of my drawings, and I personally found it looked pretty bad. It was clean, but the proportions or the style looked like crap.
>>
>>2668950
This wasn't you? >>2664675
Well then that guy i guess, i missed the thread and i really want his pixiv.
>>
>>2668957
No, I did the drawing that he defiled with his "redline".
>>
>>2668961
your drawing sucks dick in comparison lol
back to the drawing board (literally)
>>
>>2669008
You have no idea about art. The only thing which was better on the redline was that it was drawn clean. But my drawing was just a sketch anyway.
>>
>>2669021
It was shit, anon.
>>
>>2669028
As if you'd know.
>>
File: redline-dadasdasd.jpg (296KB, 724x718px) Image search: [Google]
redline-dadasdasd.jpg
296KB, 724x718px
>>2668861
Haven't done one of these in ages.
Anyway, you have some foreshortening issues with your torsos. The proportions aren't bad, but the way you shade should be more cylindrical so that you achieve a better volume and feeling of depth/foreshortening. Also, always try to work with body language. Trying to put limbs in interesting positions making them interact with the bodies, telling a "story", making the characters have an actual character. Don't hide feet and hands. Learn to draw them, as they are essential elements for good smut art. Hope this helps.
>>
>>2669031
great redline, duder.
>>
>>2669031
hnnnggggg muh dick!
>>
>>2669031
bay bay see you're the best bay bay
>>
>>2669031
blog please?
>>
>>2669087
it's bbc-chan you newfriend
>>
>>2669031
Talk about good morning... thank you and I love you!
>>
>>>2665268

So, I noticed you divide muscle groups in a a way to better study the structure and forms youre doing.

i am in a stage of my work where i am feling th need to do that, boxes arent cutting it anymore for me.

do you guys have resources on how to do this well?
>>
>>2668961
>No, I did the drawing that he made infinitely better with his "redline".


ftfy
>>
File: 1457583604085.png (80KB, 228x228px) Image search: [Google]
1457583604085.png
80KB, 228x228px
>>2669021
What sketch?
>>
>>2669674
Yea, sure, apart from that he turned her into a cheap sexualized slut with down syndrom and completely fucked up the hair, but scrubs like you will probably think anything is good as long as it's drawn clean.
>>
>>2670271
In your original drawing, the character looked like a fucking alien in the face, even by anime standards. The perspective of the lower body also didn't make any sense in relation to the upper body and pose (standing). Chill with the autism, guy. His drawing being cleaner is only the cherry on top. Fundamentally it was better but your so blinded by "mah style" bullshit you can't even see it.
>>
>>2670271
Your shit sucks.
Deal with it. Please stop being so fucking triggered, git fucking gud first, then we'll stop bitching.
>>
>>2670278
>looked like a fucking alien in the face
So did the redline, plus on the redline she even had down syndrom and looked like a fucking retard. Also, the drawing was just fanart anyway, and not even my style, but such moe anime faces tend to look like aliens.

>The perspective of the lower body also didn't make any sense
The perspective was completely ok. The hands were bending upwards that's why it may look to retards like you like the perspetive was wrong, but it wasn't.

>Fundamentally it was better but your so blinded by "mah style"
This has nothing to do with style, you fucktard. If you make characters who fucking retarded on the face, make completely nonsensical hair wisps, add shit like string tangas to lolicon characters just to make it more sexualized, then this doesn't make better, it makes it worse.
>>
>>2670286
Show me your drawings, then we can talk again. You are just another retard anyway, who has no idea about art.
>>
File: 29203897487312.gif (537KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
29203897487312.gif
537KB, 480x270px
>>2670288
>So did the redline
No, it didn't. The eyes on the face of the red line were spaced correctly. Your's were spaced too far apart putting them way to close to the edge of the face, making it look like she had fetal alcohol syndrome.

>The perspective was completely ok.
No, if the perspective was actually ok it wouldn't have read like shit. Learn to draw hands in perspective properly or just pose them differently, like the redline did. Your perspective is shit if those hands were any indication.
>This has nothing to do with style, you fucktard.
>proceeds to complain about stylistic choices in the red line
wew lad.
>>
>>2670288
the redline was better, you are the only one who thinks it was worse. It is because you are a shitter mr. loli-kruger

I wonder how salty you must be after bbc-chan came into the thread and got the positive reaction you so desperately craved?
>>
>>2670290
Where is your drawing m8? I don't see it
>>
>>2670294
>The eyes on the face of the red line were spaced correctly
Didn't you just say "you are just blinded by muh style"? Now it's you who is talking about styles here lol. Anime faces are not meant to look realistic, retard. They can have all kinds of proportions, you fucktard. However, the whole expression on the redline was looking retarded, not because of the style, but because of the expression.

> it wouldn't have read like shit
It's just that you can't read. The head was obviously bending forwards, while the hands were bending upwards. Retards like couldn't understand this, that's why you think the whole perspective was wrong.

>proceeds to complain about stylistic choices in the red line
It's you who complains about styles here. Making mistakes like hair wisps which make absolutely no sense, has nothing to do with style, it has to do with fundamental anatomy flaws. Just like making your characters having expressions like retards has nothing to do with style, while at the same time trying to make them as slutty as possible, has nothing to do with style, it just has to do with bad taste. Lolicons don't give a shit about stuff like string tangas. They like childlike things, not things whores would wear. The person who made the redline probably also thinks lolicons want their lolis to wear make up just because it would make them more slutty. He is a fucking retard.

>>2670298
The redline was not better at all. And I don't give a shit what you retards here think. I rather find it pathetic how you act like retarded groupies here towards people who draw halfway decently.
>>
>>2670299
I already posted 3 drawings in the last 2 threads. No idea what you draw though.
>>
>>2670307
You don't understand that regardless of style, faces still follow elements of the general rule of 3rds in proportions. You still are a novice and with that stubborn mindset you aren't going to be getting any better. You can't break the rules effectively and get away with it if you don't know them well enough to begin with and you are lacking fundamental knowledge. It doesn't how much you try to explain away, the point is your currently skill level did not display what you intended, meaning you have to work on conveying what you want by continuing to grind fundamentals so you can accurately display it.
>>
>>2666594
I want to learn how to draw porn; obviously going from videos of porn work best but what are others anons modes to get better?
>>
>>2670307
You fucked up the face horribly in both your "sketches" in the previews thread your excuse was muh animu style is not my style and
this time for the eye who was completely melting from the face of the character it was "it was just a sketch bruh i could fix it at any time.

I wander why all you post are sketches and never finish them after the critique.
>>
>>2670320
>faces still follow elements of the general rule of 3rds in proportions
Anime faces do not follow any rules of proportions, only styles. You can make an anime face with 2/3 of the face being nothing but eyes, and it can still look good, even though the style may look retarded. You have no idea what you are talking about.

>>2670320
>>2670341
Again retards, post your drawings or fuck off. Show me how it's done "right" instead of just talking nonsense here. The sad truth is you have no idea what you are talking about and are just here to shitpost on your 4chan hater bandwagon.
>>
>>2670357
>Anime faces do not follow any rules of proportions, only styles.
You are fucking retarded and beyond help. You were already shown an example of how to do it better and you completely scuffed it off and cried "muh style" like a autistic deviant art shithead. End your life.
PS: Deathsmiles is garbage.
>>
>>2670361
That wasn't an example of how to do it better, it was an example of how to do it worse, but cleaner.

Post your drawings if you think you know it so much better, but stop shitposting. I already posted drawings, but I'm not going to waste any more of them n this shitty ass thread.
>>
>>2670362
>if I say it long enough, it's bound to become fact
With you're degree of autism, you shouldn't waste anymore of your time drawing either tbqh.
>>
>>2670368
>still no drawings
Yea, seems like I was right. You are shit and only here to troll.
>>
>>2670369
Someone was already nice enough to give you a solid red-line and you spat in their face. Why the hell would anyone waste their time red-lining your shit again? You're the only one trolling at this point, kys.
>>
>>2670385
I wasn't even talking about redlines, just post anything. I just wanna see with what kind of scrubs I am dealing with here, because judging by your posts, your drawings must look abslutely retarded.

>a solid red-line
Again, the redline was full of flaws, but retards like you are probably too stupid to see them and just think it is better because it was drawn cleaner.

>the hair had many wisps which made absolutely no sense and looked unnatural as fuck
>the whole body and face expression looked completely awkward and retarded instead of like before cute and sexy
>the removed layer of clothes made the clothes look boring not better
>the string tanga made it unnecessarily slutty, instead of child-like cute
>the collar was completely wrong since it became bigger at the back instead of being bigger at the front - that's not how perspective works
>the hands looked boring because he took away an interesting perspective on them
>etc etc
I could go on like this forever, but you are probably still too dumb to understand anyway.
>>
>>2670397
>if I say it enough, it will become fact.
Just go and stay go. No one wants your autism here.
>>>/deviantart/
>>
>>2670405
>I have no arguments so I'm just going to shitpost
Fuck off retard. You have no idea what you are talking about.
>>
File: 001bnf.jpg (565KB, 707x800px) Image search: [Google]
001bnf.jpg
565KB, 707x800px
Imo you should quit arguing whose dick is prettier and post more art.
>>
>>2670405
>>2670407
both of you are retarded.

If you think the redline is fine, cool.

If you think the redline is bad, study its flaws and learn how to avoid them.

now kiss
>>
>>2670422
>>2670419
>it's not allowed to prove retards wrong when they criticize your drawings without any reasons
I posted actual reasons why the redline was flawed and not better at all. The other person is just shitposting.
>>
>>2670419

I would, but it's all gay furry garb I draw so I don't want to upset the thread. Unless it's alright to link to imgur or something, I'de appreciate the critique.

Also for your pic, I like it, but the hand pushing in the carrot seems weird.

Also I know the implication can be transitional, but for me atleast the transition in the closeup seems like she's slouching or at least leaning forward but in the afterimage she's straight up. Maybe I'm just reading the perspective wrong.
Also fox ladies left eye is kinda derpy.
>>
>>2670427
Just your tone alone in all these posts is wrong.
You think you will make him change his mind if you call him retard? And if you don't want to make him change its mind but just prove him wrong in front of everybody else here, I suggest you stop that as well, as I'm sure pretty much no one here cares who between the two of you is right.

Just be the better man (if you think your art is really that good) and stop arguing. If you want to have your art criticized without unnecessary hugboxing, then post it. If you don't then just move on.
>>
>>2670433
The way a person expresses himself doesn't make his arguments invalid.
If you want a hugbox, then go back to red dit.
I'm just giving back what I receive from assholes here.
>>
>>2670436
I tell you that you shouldn't expect hugboxes and that people will be merciless here, and you tell me I should go somewhere where there is a hugbox. You make 0 sense.
As I said, no one cares if you are right or wrong. Just stop littering the thread already. If you're going to reply to this, don't expect a response from me. I don't want to be part of your little primadonna fit.
>>
>>2670443
>I tell you that you shouldn't expect hugboxes
Then why do you complain about my tone? It is YOU who makes zero sense.

>no one cares if you are right or wrong
I do care, that's enough for me. It's not liek I give a shit about your opinions here anyway. I'm just killing some time here.
>Just stop littering the thread already.
I could say the same about you. You complain about arguing here, while you are currently doing the same.
>>
>>2670445
being this autistic. gtfo already.
>>
>>2670309
don't see them. you liar
>>
>>2670419
oh god MY DICK
>>
File: 20160908_050105.png (193KB, 532x306px) Image search: [Google]
20160908_050105.png
193KB, 532x306px
>>2670419
Someone botched the surgery
>>
Does drawing porn really get you blacklisted from having a not NSFW art career?
>>
>>2670593
Keep them separate
>>
>>2670594
Isn't it likely people will be able to tell due to your "style" or whatever?
>>
>>2670598
This is a myth perpetrated by lying shitters who refuse to post their work when asked.

Style is so fucking malleable that any actually good artist is able to conceal theirs with ease since they understand the mechanics of what makes individual styles different
>>
>>2669021
lol. too bad im getting paid and you never will be. toodles.
>>
>>2670614
>toodles

Different guy but thats some cunty shit
>>
>>2670607
Sure it's malleable, but then you're stuck conciously not drawing in your comfy style for porn, or changing your style for your normal drawings.
>>
>>2666594
I'm offended by the OP image. why isn't my brown cock represented?
>>
>>2670562
I know what you wanna say anon, but I prefer my own version.
>>
>>2670593
No and anyone who will tell you otherwise has some hidden agenda for spreading shit rumours,
tell me one artist who came out and said that he got refused interviews/jobs because he was previously a porn artists,
on the contrary you have tons of porn artists that also have high profile nsfw careers like Joel Jurion.
>>
>>2669031
p-post your brushes pls.
>>
>>2670626
>giving a fuck about the color of the penis
>not giving a fuck about the desperate need of loomis for the vagina and the penis
someone redline the op pic pls
>>
>>2670972
ever thought about doing standup? you are soooo funny.
>>
>>2671064
He's not wrong, ya know.
>>
>>2671064
what's so funny about a critique?
whoever made the op pic desperately need the /beg/ thread
>>
>>2670797
also that guy who did art recently for marvel
>>
>>2670797
You don't get told you're being refused because of your porn, you dunce. They just don't call you back.
>>
File: 3438afe61cba79e15c75453f18fe8cbd.jpg (339KB, 1349x925px) Image search: [Google]
3438afe61cba79e15c75453f18fe8cbd.jpg
339KB, 1349x925px
a butt
>>
>>2671446
>...and then she farts!
>>
>>2671459
>>
File: 57593022_p0_master1200.jpg (349KB, 826x1200px) Image search: [Google]
57593022_p0_master1200.jpg
349KB, 826x1200px
>>
File: 57580018_p0_master1200.jpg (648KB, 966x1200px) Image search: [Google]
57580018_p0_master1200.jpg
648KB, 966x1200px
>>
>>2671603
I'm ok with this, but I don't think this is the right thread for it.
>>
>>2671621
guy wanted it
>>
>>2671625
>guy wanted it
[citation needed]
Get your literal shit fetish out of here you parasite.
>>
>>2671603
>>2671607
>>2671610

Read the sticky and
>>2669499
>>
File: 2016-09-09_07-32-41.jpg (165KB, 666x867px) Image search: [Google]
2016-09-09_07-32-41.jpg
165KB, 666x867px
>>2667987
it's easy to lose sight of perspective when dealing with legs. that often leads to drawing things from impossible angles, like you did with her left lower leg.

one thing i find helpful is establishing the orientation of the knee using a simple box. the knee is already the boxiest form of the leg, which makes it less confusing to place correctly, and once you have that everything else falls into place.
>>
How many of you are actually earning money by drawing porn?
>>
>>2671446
Nice rendering, gabe
>>
>>2671610
>38$/month
I'm impressed.
>>
File: TiddiesOut.jpg (90KB, 500x1000px) Image search: [Google]
TiddiesOut.jpg
90KB, 500x1000px
>>2666594
Eh.
>>
>>2671459
>gabe
>she
>>
>>2672559
Gimme that blog anon
>>
>>2668870
I stopped reading at "fupa", though my brain gave up way before that. Horrible tutorial, dude(tte)
>>
>>2672559
Get motivated and finish stuff for once.
>>
>>2671603
I like this picture. It does have one part I absolutely hat when it comes to fact pictures, which is visible smoke fart, often either brown or green. However it does something I like, which is depicting the dart through wind effects.
>>
File: s1.jpg (167KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]
s1.jpg
167KB, 675x900px
Im having trouble with feet, now I'm using simplified form of the bottom, but I have no idea how it's supposed to be. Any tips or tutorials?
>>
>>2672559
oh god

oh GOD

MY DICCCKKKKK!!
>>
>>2672559
glad to see you're still around, anon
>>
>>2672604
Interesting. Have any other images that show how you like farts to be shown? Post them in the /d/ thread so they won't shit up this thread any further.
>>
>>2672559
you fucktard that's perfect. FIN. ISH. IT.
>>
Here's what I got so far I'm terrible at critiquing my own work so plz let me know of any flaws (there are probably a lot) and how can I improve
>>
File: elf bindings.png (60KB, 587x618px) Image search: [Google]
elf bindings.png
60KB, 587x618px
>>2666594
Guys, how do I go about finding a commission lewd artist?
I've almost finished my novelette and will need some lewd line art illustrations.
My own art is


>>2671446
That ass is majestic.
>>
File: elizabeth pump.png (233KB, 1564x794px) Image search: [Google]
elizabeth pump.png
233KB, 1564x794px
I like contraptions.
>>
>>2673014
Here is original if you guys wanna try add your own contraptions. While your at it face crit/ red line would be cool.
>>
File: elizabeth.png (91KB, 1172x752px) Image search: [Google]
elizabeth.png
91KB, 1172x752px
>>2673018
h e r e
>>
File: dragonsCrown.jpg (283KB, 693x1200px) Image search: [Google]
dragonsCrown.jpg
283KB, 693x1200px
Could I get some crit on this? Alt thread is kinda dead.
>>2672839
Don't put yourself down, anon
Might need more line variance/ less of a heavy outline.
>>
>>2673170
i like it anon. do some line cleanup and what not.and color that bitch
>>
File: Something.jpg (419KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]
Something.jpg
419KB, 3000x3000px
Nyeh!
>>
File: 2016-09-10_10-01-06.jpg (143KB, 831x973px) Image search: [Google]
2016-09-10_10-01-06.jpg
143KB, 831x973px
>>2672839
cool drawing. great ass. her wrist looks awkward -- too skinny and uncomfortably bent. the strap for the bikini top is placed way too high up on her back. her left foot is in profile, but the rest of the leg appears to be at an angle.
>>
>>2673227
goddamn that pic is hot....
>>
>>2673227
blog? if yours, if not sauce, tried google image lookup.
>>
>>2673244
thanks!
>>2673246
http://basnip.tumblr.com/
>>
>>2673249
no thank you lol.
>>
File: tumblr_oda57fbJLn1vevluvo3_1280.png (312KB, 943x1000px) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_oda57fbJLn1vevluvo3_1280.png
312KB, 943x1000px
fag here.

So I'm having a bit of trouble dealing with my perspective lines and thinking with shapes when doing anything dynamic/not perfect middle horizon pin up.

Is there a good exercise or method for not wonking up my perspective super hard? Sketchy example with plenty of fuck ups.
>>
>>2673256
you could do the whole draw-a-box thing , will help clean your lines up, and help you to get thinking in 3d better. remember , kim jung gi thinks of things as boxes then goes from there so that should tell you how good thinking about boxes is.
>>
>>2667987
dude her eyes make her look like sid the sloth, they're way too low.
>>
>>2673256
my spear is reckless
>>
>>2672924
Here again, does anyone know of semi decent porn artist who do illustrations?

I need around 4-5 images, entirely cleaned up line work that they're willing to cede distribution rights too.
>>
>>2673256
wow anon, would love to see this pic when its finished, no joke
>>
File: 091016_0.png (290KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
091016_0.png
290KB, 1080x1080px
my first one!
>>
>>2673845
Move all the facial features to the left
>>
Did anyone here PERHAPS save a copy of my drawing of loli with the pacifier which got deleted?

I lost my harddrive and with it the drawing.
>>
>>2672559
is this the clean line pops
>>
>>2673891
>karma

I do. I was going to red line the fuck out of it but you outed yourself as a cunt so I'm not giving it to you
>>
>>2673956
Yea siure... You don't have it anyway, otherwise you already would have posted the redline, dipshit.
>>
>>2673891
It's probably in the archive. Just google it.
>>
>>2674002
It got deleted by mods. How can it be in the archive?
>>
>>2674001
>was

dipshit

>>2674003
hahahaha
>>
>>2674003
You incompetent fuck, you. Took me about 30 seconds.
https://boards.fireden.net/ic/search/image/4zLW3KuuSVmDPXHXIzmnzw/
>>
>>2673891
Good. Try again and not fuck it up next time.

Take note of those critiques you were getting and maybe one day you can get your dick sucked like bbc does
>>
>>2674016
Yes, and where is the image there? I just see a deleted file...
>>
>trying to trick someone into posting loli

Scumbag tactics, anon.
>>
>>2674016
>>2674023
NVM, I got it now, thx
>>
>>2674016
>https://boards.fireden.net/ic/search/image/4zLW3KuuSVmDPXHXIzmnzw/
hahahaha. and this guy is talking shit about the users in here.
seriously dude, you are pretty much beginner tier trash. stop drawing pedo material just to be edgy and start doing some proper training.
>>
File: Imp.jpg (459KB, 698x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Imp.jpg
459KB, 698x1000px
>>
File: ThisIsAPRincessDealWithIt.jpg (525KB, 699x1000px) Image search: [Google]
ThisIsAPRincessDealWithIt.jpg
525KB, 699x1000px
>>2674016
I like it.
>>
>>2673845
Clean it up and I'll like it. More please.
>>
>>2673845
>what is foreshortening
>>
>>2673845
Post it finished, I'm interested in how it's going to look >>2674811
>>
File: schindler's list.jpg (38KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]
schindler's list.jpg
38KB, 600x400px
>>2673891

Was it that one where you shit yourself in anger at any critique and started shitposting in bitter butthurt?

I have a hard time feeling bad for your harddrive loss.
>>
>>2673170
Nice, but I feel that the left (her right) hip and leg is trying to escape. Also the hand holding the staff is a bit big and the lower arm a bit long compared with the other arm.
>>
>>2673256
This has lots of potential, but the the dude doing the shagging has kind of a short lower back and ass.
>>
File: Eggsovicrop.gif (67KB, 730x464px) Image search: [Google]
Eggsovicrop.gif
67KB, 730x464px
>>2673956
I draw pixel porn and one edit lead to the other and this gif was born~

I would have made the eggs move, buuut the file got corrupted.
>>
>>2674738
nice/10
>>
>>2674907

Short enough for me anon
>>
>>2674973
what program do you use to animate?
>>
>>2675143
Like clockwork.
>>
>>2675143
I used MS Paint to make four edits then merged them on http://gifmaker.me/

put pacing to 1000 milliseconds.
>>
>>2675233
Oh, and I used printscreen of MS Paint to upscale the drawings 200%, then made sure the crops were aligned in PS
>>
>>2667668
>>2667723
blooooooog?
>>
File: dik..jpg (104KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]
dik..jpg
104KB, 1280x1024px
spicy wolf ;)
>>
>>2675338
the crink in his dick suggests an injury to me. nice expression on her, though.
>>
>>2675338
what in the fuck
>>
>>2675372
I like holo and interracial. It seemed like a good idea to me :/
>>
>>2675338
Thats pretty bad m8
>>
>>2675384
I know. Practice makes perfect tho.
>>
>>2675384
I think I'll draw from photo reference next time.
>>
>>2675378
just fucking kill yourself you cuck
>>
>>2675396
How about you be more accepting of other people. Nothing wrong with cuckholdry or interracial.
>>
>>2675112
I don't doubt it the slightest, dickbrain.
>>
File: Somethingwip.jpg (90KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
Somethingwip.jpg
90KB, 1366x768px
>>2673209
Progress update
>>
>>2675480
Beautiful! What kind of brush did you use? I don't use sai I use krita.
>>
>>2675484
you're a joke. brushes don't matter
>>
>>2675490
Why because I'm not familiar with all this yet? Thanks, I'll take that as encouragement.
>>
>>2675484
I actually didn't use custom brushes and just worked with the default tpols. Well, I did have to grab a makeshift smudge tool since it doesn't have it by default. So all the shading in there are just by taking three-four contrasting values and doing a helluva lot of smudging. Any texture you might see, like in the rock was done by hand without a special brush.
>>
>>2675496
Thanks so much for explaining how you did that, it means a lot too me. That sounds doable in Krita.
>>
File: ayyo.png (234KB, 422x655px) Image search: [Google]
ayyo.png
234KB, 422x655px
i'm mostly finished, just need to draw the bg and probably some details on the guy
colouring/how to even draw body hair tips appreciated
>>
>>2675511

This is going to sound weird, and I'm mostly projecting my fetishes here but I think your drawing would be a hundred times hotter if you just had one sock all the way up, and the other one being slack around her ankle or hanging loose on her feet.

I
>>
>>2675519
i'll sock ya for that dumb reply, anon
that suggestion truly socks
huehuehue
that's an oddly specific fetish, maybe next time i'll do that
>>
File: 001futa.jpg (407KB, 1013x800px) Image search: [Google]
001futa.jpg
407KB, 1013x800px
>>
>>2675480
Damn, I wud luv to see you colour something with the way you shade
>>
>>2675415
>Nothing wrong with cuckholdry or interracial
REDDIT MY MAN, WASSUP DAWG
>>
>>2675690
Now draw a loli already. Your arts great but it needs to be a loli.
>>
Just letting you guys know, MY BOUNTY IS STILL ON (previously posted here >>2662854)

Who here can shade/colour like this? If it's you, I would like to commission your skills.

Posted here too >>2675900
>>
>>2675913
Become one of us, if your desire if so big to be this patient, then it should be enough to fuel git-gud-ity. Nothing to loose, all to gain.
>>
>>2675913
>BOUNTY
Just commission it like a normal person, you fucking retard. Nobody's gonna draw shit for you for the promise of a reward when they can do it for money for someone else.
>>
>>2676017
Read the second line dumbass
>>
File: merci.png (669KB, 759x1050px) Image search: [Google]
merci.png
669KB, 759x1050px
Thoughts/critique on pose/perspective before I take it any further?
>>
>>2676062
>The bounty? Expect something generous (but not too generous, I'm certainly not rolling in it).

Work on your reading skills.
>Just commission it like a normal person, you fucking retard.
>like a normal person
>>
>>2676062
He means stop asking random people on 4chan and find porn artists that are already taking commissions. You're the only dumbass, coming to /ic/ to ask for a commission when there are already a laundry list of NSFW artists on tumblr that you can ask. Now fuck off. This thread is not for you to ask for commissions.
>>
>>2675792
Don't draw loli, sry.
>>
>>2676078
>like a normal person
Srsly, that's wut ur on about? I knew 4chan's aspie and all, but.. fuck. The message gets across just fine: I want to 'hire' a capable artist (n u thot I'm gonna pay them cookies or some shite? I pay $, obvi)

>>2676080
'kay genius, I'm just s'pose to scour tumblr for an artist (which I'm already consistently doing)? The actual smart thing to do is to put out the ad on a forum full of porn artists (ie. here) and make it a buyer's market. Any other great ideas?
>>
>>2676065
Sorry, I don't think the idea is developed enough to offer a proper insight opinion on. I'm not sure if it's a laying down missionary or a cowboy/straddle POV shot which will determine how it can be approached. At least for me.
>>
>>2676154

Laying down missionary POV (or atleast over the shoulder).

It's through a confession box window so It's supposed to kind of be either arching back to a seat or cramped tightly against the other side of the confession box.
>>
>>2676107
>on a forum full of porn artists
this thread is full of beginner tier scrubs, not porn artists, dumbo.
>>
>>2667319
why do they suck on the pacifiers in reverse
>>
File: 091016_1.png (211KB, 847x1024px) Image search: [Google]
091016_1.png
211KB, 847x1024px
one more
>>
>>2675511
learn who bodies interact with one another. what you have here is completely wrong. unless you are trying to push a new niche called quantum smut or something.
>>
>>2676094
I know you don't. I'm saying try it for a change.
>>
File: caught.jpg (208KB, 1000x700px) Image search: [Google]
caught.jpg
208KB, 1000x700px
I've kinda focused my efforts on some parts while neglecting others. Critique on my efforts so far?
>>
File: satanclaus.jpg (117KB, 1000x983px) Image search: [Google]
satanclaus.jpg
117KB, 1000x983px
>>2676469
bonus quick satanclaus
>>
>>2676452
Not interested at all. I don't find child like bodies appealing.
>>
>>2675792
Gross
>>
>>2667733

Can you please use a trip so I can filter you? Thanks.
>>
>>2676469
10/10 faces
>>
>>2666594
>WARNING: TRIGGERING QUESTION BELOW!!! /co/ and Tumblr, please don't doxx me!

How do I draw a character, male or female, that's just been raped?

I'm talking about bruise placement, should the orifices be sore and reddish, any cuts or scratches, should there be blood, etc? Also, handprints? Where should they be?
>>
>>2676813
Well you don't have to make it accurate (real stuff tends to be different from what you think or is portrayed in porn. Real life can be grosser and non-boner inducing), but must of that kind of stuff I stumbled upon is mostly what you just said:

bruises, some blood, extreme angry/sadness in their face, cry, etc.
Just get some references on what do you like and take note
>>
File: dragonsCrown.jpg (716KB, 1280x1977px) Image search: [Google]
dragonsCrown.jpg
716KB, 1280x1977px
>>2674963
I agree. Hopefully I fixed it
>>
File: 002futa.jpg (430KB, 1067x800px) Image search: [Google]
002futa.jpg
430KB, 1067x800px
>>
>>2676813

Go to the rape thread on /gif/ and study those
>>
File: Elena_of_Avalor.jpg (103KB, 819x1293px) Image search: [Google]
Elena_of_Avalor.jpg
103KB, 819x1293px
>>
>>2676813
Someone told me here that the facial expression is the most important.
>>
File: suckdik_.png (693KB, 2359x2503px) Image search: [Google]
suckdik_.png
693KB, 2359x2503px
>>
Does anyone have a good reference sheet for lewd faces?
Like an ahegeo collage?
>>
>>2671612
...and then she farts!
>>
File: bretty good.gif (29KB, 482x800px) Image search: [Google]
bretty good.gif
29KB, 482x800px
>>2677029
>>
>>2677227
Nice, more?
>>
>>2677389
Either blind or samefag
>>
>>2677393
Sorry what?
>>
>>2677404
That looks like ass
>>
>>2677170
<3 elena
>>
>>2677170
her arm looks a bit short though
>>
>>2677410
the pose is great, think before you speak
>>
>>2677502
>cross eyed tits
>trying to hold a fart pose
Don't let your fetishes get in the way of your judgement.
>>
>>2677505
>implying crosseyed or bow eyed tits aren't common
>implying thats not a sexy pose
try doing some studies from actual photographs of real people instead of copying anime all day.
>>
>>2677508
>real people can look retarded
>therefore you're wrong
Ok.
>>
>>2677508
As realistic standard:
It looks like ass
As anime standard:
It looks like ass
As a drawing trying to be hybrid of both: it looks like ass

Just because is common doesn't mean is hot or well drawn, the line-art looks half assed and it seems you are justifying your shitty art.
TL;DR: Scream saying that it doesnt look like ass, but it still does.
>>
>>2677508
It should look appealing if its supposed to be porn. You can go ahead and tell yourself that its good because it "DOESN'T FIT INTO THE 'STANDARD' DEFINITION OF BEAUTY" like some triple chinned tumblrist, but it doesn't change the fact it looks unappealing.
>>
>>2677511
im not the original artist and not trying to justify shitty art. its obviously a rough sketch. but its also obvious the artist has a respectable level of skill. all I did was ask for their blog and got attacked for it.

>>2677513
>"DOESN'T FIT INTO THE 'STANDARD' DEFINITION OF BEAUTY"

thats not what i said at all, someone else implied it was shit because they didn't like the tits, which is completely subjective. thats all I was saying.
>>
File: asdasdas.jpg (321KB, 942x1000px) Image search: [Google]
asdasdas.jpg
321KB, 942x1000px
>>2677227
Anatomy and foreshortening in perspective. Don't wing it unless you have internalized it.
>>
>>2677520
>respectable level of skill
I know you're not the best artist in the world, but how you think that's even remotely decent is beyond me.
It doesn't take a chief to know a dish tastes like shit, but most people have taste buds.
>>
File: image.jpg (59KB, 419x249px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
59KB, 419x249px
>>2677520
>but its also obvious the artist has a respectable level of skill.
>they didn't like the tits, which is completely subjective.
Holy shit, I thought you were just bumping with (You)s like people from this thread tends to do, you may actually be for real
>>
>>2677521
Thank you so much
>>
>>2677520
>rough sketch.
Shut the fuck up pedofag, we know it's you. Just git fucking gud before posting shit in this thread and gtfo until you do.
>>
>>2677521
Stfu bitch. All you did was shortened the characters height and stylized her differently. You didn't even use the perspective lines correctly, you just slapped them on. why is there is no vertical bowing given how extreme you made the projection angle? Stop talking like you're the boss on """internalizing perspective.""" You're not.

Stfu you Dunning-Kuger bitch.
>>
>>2677765
>shitting on bbc when he made it
salty beginner detected lmao
>>
>>2677765
gr8b8m8
>>
>>2677765
>>2677765
Yeah, you are right. I sounded way too patronizing with that phrase.

>>2677227
Didn't mean to be an ass, anon. Sorry.
>>
>>2677792
bbc is such a functioning and normal human being what the hell. More mature than 95% on the internet.
>>
>>2677776
>>2677785
>>2677792
>>2677798
you people are pathetic
>>
File: 091316_0.png (395KB, 1152x1080px) Image search: [Google]
091316_0.png
395KB, 1152x1080px
>>2676289

some laocoon oyakodon
>>
>>2677832
why? not edgy enough to satisfy your autism?
>>
File: 091316_1.png (121KB, 690x957px) Image search: [Google]
091316_1.png
121KB, 690x957px
>>2677847
>>
>>2677874
Not him but please stop sucking cock. It's even worse to see than that salty fag above.
>>
>>2677847
>laocoon oyakodon
i just want you to know that i got this pun, anon. i got it.
>>
>>2677900
of the posts that captain autismo there qoted, the only one sucking to bbc is this one >>2677798
stop supporting retards like that guy.
>>
>>2677890
way too flat. vary your lineweight more to give some volume and depth to your masses.
>>
File: 0913162.png (139KB, 598x917px) Image search: [Google]
0913162.png
139KB, 598x917px
>>2677947

will do next time, ty for crit
>>
File: 091316_3.png (243KB, 825x1474px) Image search: [Google]
091316_3.png
243KB, 825x1474px
>>2677978
>>
>>2676620
fuckin kek
>>
>>2678177
new thread
>>
>>2672559
Those are the perfect sized nips, not to big, not to small. In my opinion of course.
Thread posts: 317
Thread images: 62


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.