can we talk about the Kursk submarine disaster?
>the Kursk, an Oscar-class sub twice the length of a 747 passenger jet, was severely damaged when the launching of a dummy torpedo failed catastrophically during a Naval exercise
>the sub wrecked on the sea floor, 23 surviving crew gathered in the 9th compartment to await rescue
>remained there for at least 6 hours in dwindling light and oxygen levels
>the compartment was gradually filling with oily water
>when it was at waist height, one of the crew dropped their oxygen candle, causing a fire
>some of the crew managed to dive under the water to avoid the flames
>however, the fire quickly consumed all remaining oxygen
>the remaining men all died of burns, asphyxiation, or carbon monoxide poisoning
Murdered by US or maybe English. Vladimir Putin is biggest coward for refusing to admit it.
it hit an american mine laid by an italian frogman who was dropped of from a croatian helicopter using a lithuanian registration
the paper trail was too long and they were yearning to end it
>>3189547
No.
We can not talk about it.
It has been less than 25 years.
You may however talk about the '92 US Presidential Campaign.
>During the meeting with the crew's relatives, Putin loudly blamed the oligarchs, who owned most of the country's non-government media, for the poor state of Russia's military. Putin told the family members, "They stole money, they bought the media, and they're manipulating public opinion." When relatives asked why the government had waited so long before accepting foreign assistance, Putin said the media had lied. He shouted to the assembled families, "They're lying. They're lying. They're lying."
>Putin threatened to punish the media owners and counter their influence through alternative "honest and objective" media.
Wait a second, why does this sound so senpai-