Were people back in the day tougher than in contemporary times?

>>3188589
Yes

>he's never encountered Pawpaw strength

>>3188589
Mentality is subjective, but in objective cathegories people were indeed tougher.
>more muscle density
>more bone density
>higher sperm count
>higher pain threshold

the dudes arguably were

>>3188589
By literally every metric, they were

>>3188609
>>3188637
Can you prove any of this, besides sperm count?

>>3188661
>>3188664
Times don't create men, women create men. Men are shit right now because their mothers sex-selected for shittiness.

File: good genes.jpg (69KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1024x768px

>>3188589
of course

>more stress
>more daily activity
>start work younger
>most likely labour jobs
>put up with shit food
>"better" food for jaw and teeth developement
and so on and so on

can't' remember what website it was but it showed how genes flow down and how people are affected, they had generations of the family patriach and showed how the more recent it god the facial features became softer and they looked less intimidating, depending on their jobs this degradation varied as it wasn't a perfectly linear pattern.

>>3188864
Yes, we all saw how that anon asked if they can prove that. I, for one, would like to see the proof.

>>3188875
I should lay off the bath salts

>>3188826
>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/

>>3188882
I don't know what you're saying.