give me one (1) reason why i shouldn't be a radical pragmatist

No.

>wasting your time on 4chan
that doesn't seem very practical, I don't think you're cut out for this

>>2955641
sure it is. i'm satisfying my need to socialize while using as little energy as possible

because that would just make you a democrat

Give me one good reason i shouldn't be two random words i put together which have no meaning

>>2955650
because your a humorless pedant

>>2955654

You're*

File: woj.png (622B, 112x125px) Image search: [Google]

622B, 112x125px

>>2955647
y..yeh heheh...

Because moderate pragmatism is literally better in every way.

It won't leave you time for watering your plants bruh.

File: 1424076468440.gif (2MB, 320x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x200px

>>2955648
>democrat
>supporter of muh fluid genders and fag rights
>think he's "pragmatist"..................

>>2955592
Why would you want to hurt someone's feeling?

>>2955999
>"pragmatist"..................
>encouraging their delusions to make max shekels
>not pragmatic.

File: IMG_0965.jpg (304KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1500x1000px

>>2955592
Because wasting your time on any radical undertaking that's not some sick tricks on a skateboard simply isn't worth it

>>2955592
I wish Sam hide would choke me out...

>>2955736
both wrong. militant pragmatism is for true patricians

>>2956305
Cause it's fun, fukken nerd

>>2956318
>encouraging mental illness in your workforce
>prioritizing shekelmaking over a functional society
>"""""practical"""""

File: 20170615_090755.jpg (29KB, 345x284px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 345x284px

>>2955654
>>2955669
heh btfo'd

>>2955592
Because pragmatism doesn't mean anything if you don't have a goal to achieve. What are you being pragmatic towards? What is the goal that we should be pragmatic about?

>>2955592
infinite regress

File: 1497105468057.jpg (359KB, 972x972px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 972x972px

>>2955647
wow that's sad, maybe you should be on r9k

>>2956388
faghaters to >>>/pol/

>>2956662
faglovers to >>>/lgbt/

>>2955648
>Neoconservatism with the most insane elements of idpol mixed in is pragmatism

"Radical pragmatists" in the past believed in a lot of wrong shit.

>>2957111
being wrong is impractical tho

>>2955592

Everyone believes they're pragmatic. What you really mean is "centrist," and that's not a good idea because it gives you the false illusion you're always making some wise compromise between extremes when in reality compromise options are often ineffectual as fuck. Take health care for example. Both a purely free market solution and a purely socialist solution would work decently in their own ways, but the actual American compromise route of trying to sell medical insurance through the government and coercing people into having insurance through fines makes it so that lots of people still can't get medical coverage and many who do have coverage are charged obscene fortunes to keep the broken system afloat.

>>2956327
Look at the original Facebook pic on the MDE page, the infamous comment only has 13 likes
Sam and his cohorts definitely spammed it to get it that popular

>>2957903
Universal single-payer option with private options being allowed is better though.

According to the WHO, the best countries have mixed healthcare systems.

>>2957903
Then what's it called when you mix and match left and right wing policy in equal measure?

Combine socialised medical care with laissez-faire economics. Nationalistic immigration policy with egalitarian immigrant assistance.

>>2958015

>According to the WHO

Not an argument. WHY do they claim it's better? Use reasons.

>>2958059
Most efficient, less financial burden on the individual