What philosophers were right about humans?

Spinoza, Rousseau

>>2289863
Philosophers OP has never read

File: 1483369022393.jpg (46KB, 472x407px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 472x407px

>>2289863
>Zizek
>let's integrate psychoanalysis into marxist critic of capitalist
>woooo Im a philosophurr now because subconscious

>>2289863
>no de Maistre
>no Spengler
>no Evola
>fucking Zizek even on the list

File: 1483129528397.png (190KB, 499x432px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 499x432px

>>2290459
>Evola

>>2290459
Mr. Slavoj Žižek is twice the man Evola was

>>2290459
Evola is a meme

File: 1483916113443.png (321KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 640x360px

>>2289863
Diogenes

>>2290462
>being an analytical faggot

>>2289863
It's all white males, what did history mean by this?

>>2290590
>slavs
>jews
>arabs
>white

Yes, white - they're all of the europid race

Diogenes, Heidegger, Foucault were all pretty based

I think socrates took sophism to its farthest logical extent and was on the verge of a classical greek postmodernism equivalent. I think it was right that he was executed for such a thing because holy shit look at where un-anchored philosophy has taken us today. I think plato recognized this and that's why his shit searches so hard for solid grounding, and where forms are useful.

just my 2 cents tho

>>2290472

yeah he is, the fat bastard

>>2290462
Can you show me some instances where Evola said feels are greater than reals?

>>2289863
Ayn Rand. Speaking of which, why isn't she on the image?

>>2291455
Because she wasn't famous enough, just like Stirner.

This explains why there's not alot of lolbertarians out there.

>>2289863
y no Burke

File: 272d3f1985fbb13fd8701390fa2c8723.jpg (38KB, 640x628px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x628px

>>2291455

>>2291455
>libertarian
>philosophy

Besides if you actually read Rand you'd recollect she described herself as a purification of Aristotle and nothing more.

>>2291455
>Speaking of which
Speaking of witch*

File: 1468005304517.jpg (77KB, 447x540px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 447x540px

>>2291455
This isn't even good bait.

>>2291455
Rand is pretty good

>>2291550
I'm not even baiting. Ayn Rand deserves to be on that image, regardless of whether you like her or not.

File: ayn-rand.jpg (55KB, 1058x1058px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1058x1058px

>>2289863

She is objectively right about the whole "great people need to prop up pathetic parasites" thing, but leftist let their fee fees get in the way of rational thought and just bitch about her while also intentionally taking her thoughts on the evil of altruism out of context in order to egage in strawmen arguments.

>>2289863
how do you call this style of drawing characters?

I take it some of you have read Ayn Rand's non-fiction work. I was thinking about buying it the other day at the book store. How is it?

File: image.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

>>2289863
Devo.
They were right about everything

>>2289863
How was Galileo a philosopher?

>>2291649
The same reason Ptolemy was, probably.

Not a single one of those are right. In fact, basically everybody on that stupid list is wrong about everything.

>>2291630

Memes

>>2291738
>u cant kno nuffin, not even about philosophy

>>2290607
>>>/int/

>>2291648
Freedom of choice is what you got. Freedom from choice is what you want.

>>2289863
All of them in their specific context.

>>2291523

Nozick was a libertarian and a pretty good philosopher.

>>2290459
>no Evola
True, you can't have a real list of philosophers without meme man

>>2290622
>Europid race
Not a thing. Caucasian as a racial category includes Middle Easterners, North Africans, and even some Indians. /pol/ can't handle this fact so it invents a new fake category

>>2291590
>Ayn Rand deserves to be on that image
Why? Her impact on western philosophy has been negligible.

>>2291478
This

>>2291550

Yo the pic the source you took that from I need the name and where to find it.

>>2291550

Ayooo help a guy out here

>>2289863
Nietze

no pascal?

absolute garbage graphic !

>pythagoras
>no Nicomachus

>Adam Smith
>no Keynes

>Thoreau
>no Emerson

>>2293861
>>2293873
Enjoy.
https://exhentai.org/g/826878/7be28560f9/

>>2289863
>No Max Stirner
>FUCKING Zizek on the list

get fucked

Bakunin > Marx

>Machiavelli was right about humans
wut

File: 1483945072615.jpg (34KB, 564x651px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 564x651px

>>2291607
>only leftists hate her nonsense
it's ass covering bullshit to frame it as morally right to exploit others, be greedy, and frames those who are unlucky and needy as being bad. It's pathetic. The real answer is that morals aren't real so do what you want

>>2291455
She's completely irrelevant. She's to philosophy what E. L. James is to literature.

>>2289863
>Hayek
>No Mises
Who made this degeneracy

>>2294922
Not a mises.org cultist, for starters

>>2294926
Hayek should be there tho

>>2294937
Economics was already professionalized by the time of Hayek, becoming a separate branch of study from philosophy. Same as natural sciences, which is why 20th century scientists aren't there.

>>2294926
Why would it include Hayek who is even LESS of a philosopher then Mises. You can tell just by reading the two that Mises is a better fit. Not really expecting you to read though.

>>2292389
Pfft, all categories are fake aka constructs. Categories are made up abstractions to put messy reality into neat little boxes.

Haploid groups aren't even that accurate at grouping humans.

>>2295157
I saw a book about him in Barnes and Noble, it was written by some woman, but I honestly never do read books by females.

>>2295178
>but I honestly never do read books by females.
I would only apply this to philosophy and literature, otherwise a solid decision

>>2290541
This is a great meme.

Mind if I take this image?

>>2289863
Joseph de Maistre and Julius Evola.

>>2290459
I really hope you aren't implying a reactionary can't enjoy Zizek.

>>2294092

Thanks man

who studied the most psychology and sociology and was around the nearest to right now? probably that person

>>2289863
>only two people of color
SICKENING

>>2298240
>linear evolution of knowledge
right

>>2289863
Zeno. /stoic/ master race.

>>2298266
They should get some better philosophers then.
WE

>>2298268
>socrates knew more about human nature than someone today with a phd in psychology and 30+ years experience doing research

>>2294531
>. The real answer is that morals aren't real so do what you want

in other words, shes right.

>>2298323
>the most important figure in philosophy knows less about humans than someone who studies a pseudo science
sure

>>2291648
I'VE GOT AN UNCONTROLLABLE URGE

>>2298268
Knowledge not necessarily accumulates linearly, but in the case of knowledge about the human psyche and societies it is definitely true anyways.

I'd say Spinoza has one of the better views of humanity. It's not as idealistic as Rousseau, not as pessimistic as Hobbes.

>>2298760
>someone who theorises instead of testing knows more than thousands of phd scholars with combined millions of hours of research

sure thing, bud :^)

>>2300920
>social studies
>viable
kek
proves literally nothing

>>2298323
Psychology isn't a science.

t. psychologist

>>2300991
Do you consider logic a science, how much is reason applied?

>>2300999
logic isn't a science it's a tool

>>2301512
The scientific method is derived from logic and is itself a logical process, a tool.

>>2301518
except science is a very specific field that relies on reasoning with empirical information and experimental data

logic doesn't necessarily require either of these

science requires logic but logic is not a science