Really makes you think.

The clay/iron feet represent the transhumanist agenda.

"Ye shall be as gods!" Satan's age old lie.

File: 1479487293828.jpg (143KB, 609x1000px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 609x1000px

>>2029680
this is now a lewd painting thread.

File: Detailed Prophecies.jpg (377KB, 794x1123px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 794x1123px

Reeeeally makes you think.

File: 1477245009788.jpg (621KB, 1224x1779px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1224x1779px

>>2029697

File: 1477367450447.jpg (109KB, 539x720px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 539x720px

>>2029703

File: 1479528865229.jpg (79KB, 519x1023px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 519x1023px

>>2029705

Sup guys,
Jesus Christ here
Ask me anything

File: 1479530588465.jpg (38KB, 329x648px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 329x648px

>>2029709

File: kek.png (61KB, 427x536px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 427x536px

>atheist gets assmad and throws a temper tentrum

Feels good being on the right side of history.

File: 1479505791721.jpg (94KB, 800x460px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x460px

>>2029714

>>2029697
You're doing the lord's work.

File: 1479530752309.jpg (201KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 800x533px

>>2029719
>>2029717
just saving /his/, friend

File: 1479505736846.png (661KB, 452x799px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 452x799px

>>2029725

File: 1479502118571.jpg (162KB, 471x500px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 471x500px

>>2029726

>>2029680
Yeah, because I can't tell what the fuck this thing means.

File: 1475003437923.jpg (51KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x600px

>>2029703

File: 1479499538001.jpg (2MB, 1099x1861px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1099x1861px

>>2029728

File: 1479493302938.jpg (159KB, 1024x813px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1024x813px

>>2029733
>>2029730
I'm willing to sacrifice my IP to save my home board.

File: 1479488822715.jpg (263KB, 1280x745px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1280x745px

>>2029739

>>2029729
Have you never read the book of Daniel?

tl;dr: Babylonian captivity happens, Jews in exile. God reveals to Daniel what's going to happen in the future, which Daniel tells to the Babylonian king.

File: 1479487621335.jpg (256KB, 778x1594px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 778x1594px

>>2029741

File: 1479487344091.jpg (52KB, 650x815px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 650x815px

>>2029744

>>2029697
>SHUT IT DOWN, THE SAINTS KNOW

>>2029739
>saving /his/ by attempting to derail and off-topic posting

You're shitposting and breaking the rules. If you want to post these sluts make a thread dedicated to it.

File: 1477866159817.jpg (101KB, 343x600px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 343x600px

>>2029747

File: Lilith_John_Collier.jpg (39KB, 320x610px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 320x610px

>>2029752
>>2029751
foul spirit! the power of Lilith compels you!

File: 1479487476122.jpg (73KB, 736x834px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 736x834px

>>2029758

>>2029680
Will the rapture be before or after the tribulation?

File: 1477553631502.jpg (71KB, 468x702px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 468x702px

>>2029761

File: design.png (1MB, 1350x1680px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1350x1680px

>>2029758
>>2029752
>>2029747
>>2029744
>>2029741
>>2029739
>>2029733
>>2029732

Facts hurt, doesn't it?
You know God exists and you hate it.

Well guess what, facts don't care about your feelings.

File: 1477553276408.jpg (56KB, 600x760px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x760px

>>2029763

File: 1477367100748.jpg (411KB, 2124x1317px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 2124x1317px

>>2029767
>>2029764
sorry I prefer nymphs to any god

File: 1477553096576.jpg (52KB, 550x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 550x400px

>>2029775

File: 1477552970819.jpg (75KB, 600x746px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 600x746px

>>2029777

File: 1479487689651.jpg (22KB, 574x720px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 574x720px

>>2029780

File: 1477552901406.jpg (809KB, 1500x1997px) Image search: [Google]

809KB, 1500x1997px

>>2029785

File: 1477552274936.jpg (94KB, 494x720px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 494x720px

>>2029787

File: 1477551875707.jpg (309KB, 648x800px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 648x800px

>>2029790

File: 1477551850129.jpg (77KB, 640x449px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x449px

>>2029793

File: 1477551807435.jpg (1MB, 1497x2500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1497x2500px

>>2029796

File: 1477551774450.png (2MB, 1280x814px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x814px

>>2029801

>>2029680
Yeah, wishful thinking.

File: 1477551623880.jpg (110KB, 282x1000px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 282x1000px

>>2029803

File: 1477549934388.jpg (443KB, 1131x1504px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1131x1504px

>>2029807

File: 1477549895526.jpg (369KB, 1040x1633px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1040x1633px

>>2029809

>>2029805
The theory of evolution summarized.

File: 1477543088022.jpg (909KB, 3191x2114px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 3191x2114px

>>2029811

File: 1477542742058.jpg (2MB, 1356x1839px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1356x1839px

>>2029816

File: 1477542685346.jpg (867KB, 1429x1184px) Image search: [Google]

867KB, 1429x1184px

>>2029817

File: 1477542537107.jpg (1MB, 1637x2400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1637x2400px

>>2029818

File: 1477542139631.jpg (287KB, 1030x1338px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1030x1338px

>>2029821

File: 1477542080444.jpg (2MB, 2812x2096px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2812x2096px

>>2029822

File: 1477541931074.jpg (347KB, 1268x2036px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1268x2036px

>>2029824

File: 1477536902422.jpg (38KB, 750x427px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 750x427px

>>2029825

Where the fuck are the mods?

>>2029829
/his/ doesn't have mods

File: 1477535857768.jpg (31KB, 234x480px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 234x480px

>>2029828

File: 1477535119749.jpg (4MB, 3765x5385px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3765x5385px

>>2029834

>>2029812
Damage control after a sick burn, just like creationism.

File: 1477535005820.jpg (1MB, 1239x1749px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1239x1749px

>>2029837

File: 1477534380312.jpg (2MB, 1346x2743px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1346x2743px

>>2029840

>>2029829
And now you know why 4chan has been shit the past few years.

Because the site relies on janitors and they literally work FOR FREE, they have been unable to keep up with the increase in posts and most of the new janitors are all literally newfags who have been posting in the past 5 years so they don't care about any of the rules or global rules.

You now know that the reason 4chan is shit isn't actually because of posters but shit mods!

File: 1477350710356.jpg (1MB, 2240x1400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2240x1400px

>>2029841

File: 1477267639409.jpg (1MB, 1440x1159px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1159px

>>2029846

File: 1477245073011.jpg (3MB, 2212x4000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2212x4000px

>>2029850

>>2029732
Personal favorite right here

keep it up anon

>>2029764
>when you cut a carrot to make it look like an eye, it looks like an eye
>when you trim facts to suit your purpose, your argument looks better
religion in a nutshell

File: 1477157521095.jpg (889KB, 981x2000px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 981x2000px

>>2029854

>>2029855
euphoric

>>2029696
>transhumanist agenda.
The autism on 4chan is reaching dangerously critical levels

File: 1473999542520.jpg (4MB, 2266x3285px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2266x3285px

>>2029858
last one for now. expecting my ban in 6 hours time

>>2029864
The irony is that you're the only one in this thread who's legitimately posting humanities.

>>2029859
that's not an argument

>>2029874
time to get saved anon

>>2029871
If only we had someone who would post historical lewd paintings in all "discuss this contemporary political topic that clearly belongs in /pol/, but I said discuss it historically therefore it's relevant to /his/" threads

>>2029862
t. Trans-humanist upset that he got called out on his retarded unnatural belief

>>2029764
this is like saying "I'm right because I got dubs" while responding to someone with a better roll.

>>2029864
>expecting my ban in 6 hours time
>the only one in the thread willing to put themselves on a cross for a cause is an atheist

your heroism will not be lost upon us

I also kinda doubt you'll actually get banned. I mean, you're basically doing the same thing Op's been doing, but in his thread rather than in the catalog; posting a bunch of nonsense while blissfully ignoring criticism of how nonsensical it is as a means of simply reinforcing your presence.

>>2029888
trips decide. we need to make an effort as a community to do so.

>>2029895
>>2029871
>>2029864
Samefag.

>>2029764
I can understand the rest kind of, but how are grapes at all shaped like a heart or red blood cells? Grapes are oviod and smooth while red blood cells are cylindrical with an impression in the center.

>>2029888
Sounds like something our janitors ought to be doing.

>>2029888
>trips
if there is a god, he favors athiests

>>2029899
now that's what I call a claim backed by nothing but blind faith

>>2029844
I mean if the posters were good there wouldn't be any need for mods, so it's still mainly the posters' fault.

>>2029680
>""""world empires""""

>>2029702
What is supposed to prove? That if you believe the biblical accounts of Jesus's life then he's the Jewish messiah? No shit. If Jesus's followers wanted people to believe he was the messiah, they wouldn't tell a story that failed to fulfill these prophecies.

>>2029907
Believing your ancestors were monkeys that crawled out of a slimepit requires alot of faith.

>>2029915
Good thing that's not even close to what I believe.

File: da reptilian jews!.jpg (56KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 320x240px

>>2029912
>It's a conspiracy! Everyone was working together to create this figure!

>>2029829
Yeah shitposters like OP need to be banned.

>>2029915
significantly less than assuming the world was handcrafted for you simply because some beans look like your kidneys

File: Nope.png (9KB, 400x127px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 400x127px

>>2029899

Notice the surge of atheists suddenly.

They got BTFO in the YEC thread, took 1 hour recovering from the asspain, and now they're back.

>>2029918
kek, this is what they actually believe

>>2029888
Agreed. Let's all start doing this.

File: nope.png (15KB, 712x144px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 712x144px

>>2029923
to add to this inbetween post timers

>>2029928
just ignore them, let them wallow in their ignorance and anger

>>2029920
fedoras should be banned

>>2029928
>They got BTFO
I left the last one of these I was in because I won personally. OP was unable to do anything other than complain about "evolutionist mentality" rather than discuss evolution or creationism as ideas. No substance.

>>2029937
YECs should be proven right about the evil atheist conspiracy to kill Christians.

>>2029938
Evolution really was BTFO this time

>>2029968
And all the other times we've had this discussion.

Monkey-Myth believers never post any proof or evidence, they never back up their claims.

Creationism has won, evolution is dead until they can actually form a coherent argument that hasn't been debunked to death already.

But expecting reason and logic from an atheist is too much.

>>2029968
>more unfounded claims
by the way
that's not an argument

>>2029940
germ theorists should be proven right about the evil miasmatist conspiracy to kill Scientists

>>2029977
>that's not an argument
No it's not, it's a statement of fact

>>2029976
>But expecting reason and logic from an atheist is too much.
Really? The largest counterargument in the thread asserted that "a claim with false premises has a false conclusion," which legitimately couldn't be further from the truth. You clearly take "logic" to be a type of demeanor, something that makes you look like Spock from star trek, rather than an actual process.

>>2029940
euphoric

>>2029977
>unfounded claims
evolutionism in a nutshell

>>2029986
>my opinion is a fact
okay anon

>>2029764
>the penis conveniently fits into the asshole
>we pee out the same thing we fuck with
what did god mean by this?

>>2029988
The only ones in the thread linking to research and scientific facts as opposed to saying how dumb the other side was were the creationists

>>2029999
QUADS
GOD HAS SPOKEN

>>2029999
>>2030000
TWO QUADS
WHAT DOES IT MEAN

>>2029999
>>the penis conveniently fits into the asshole
The fact something can be perverted doesn't mean a design doesn't exist.
>>we pee out the same thing we fuck with
That's just efficient.

>>2030000
They weren't linking to facts, they were linking to tabloid articles, youtube videos, and memes. I even went and read one to explain how dumb it was, and went literally unopposed after posting valid criticism.

>>2030012
>anything convenient that suits my argument is valid
>anything convenient that doesn't is perversion

>That's just efficient.

>>2030013
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
https://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.php
https://www.trueorigin.org/creatheory.php
https://www.trueorigin.org/isakrbtl.php
http://www.evidentcreation.com/TRM-Logerr.html
http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/dragons/

None of these tabloids, youtube videos or memes.

Looks like you're just suffering from cognitive dissonance.

File: 1480625028825.png (30KB, 700x800px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 700x800px

>>2029711
>tfw you're the messiah but no one wants to talk to you
Why have you forsaken me?

>>2029680
But who is the Antichrist? Islam?

>>2030029
jesus wouldn't be a frogposter

>>2030013
>They weren't linking to facts, they were linking to tabloid articles, youtube videos, and memes. I even went and read one to explain how dumb it was
Translation: They were posting facts while i called them dumb

>>2030024
>http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/dragons/
>dragons in history
>but the people who believed we descended from apes are weird

>"The dragons of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past."
>Also astonishingly like creatures in the present, such as a wide array of reptiles, snakes, etc
>These creatures are also dispersed across the globe
>"but common ancestry is silly"

>>2030035
>your wrong and I'm right!
this is the extent of the christposter's wit

>>2030036
The term "dinosaur" was coined in 1842. Before that, they were known as dragons.

What's silly about that? You sound like you're retarded and can't grasp basic things.

>>2030034
But I am a frogposter

>>2030046
>your wrong and I'm right!
Correction: the Christians say they're right whilst posting evidence.

Atheists say they're right without posting anything to back it up.

>>2029703
This entire picture was done with water color. Blows my mind.

>>2030046
>your wrong and I'm right!
thats exactly how evolutionists/atheists behave

>>2030051
the claim the article was making was that the tales of dragons suggested man walked among dinosaurs, when in reality the idea of a dragon is something any child could invent after seeing a lizard.

once again relying upon fantasy novels

>>2030055
>Christians say they're right whilst posting evidence.
but I'm literally blowing counterarguments out

File: pots.jpg (166KB, 684x540px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 684x540px

>>2030063
>ignoring all the real historical records talking about how man killed giant dinosaurs

>ignoring all the artwork and paintings of dinosaurs that they made

Only an atheist could deny such obvious blatant evidence right in his face.

>>2030024
I feel bad that you hate your science teacher, but that first link alone is fucking retarded. I just want to comment on this:
> parts of living creatures are constructed of intricate components with connections that all need to be in place for the thing to work, controlled by many genes that have to act in the proper sequence. Natural selection would not choose parts that did not have all their components existing, in place, connected, and regulated because the parts would not work. Thus all the right mutations (and none of the destructive ones) must happen at the same time by pure chance. That is physically impossible. To illustrate just how hopeless it is, imagine this: on the ground are all the materials needed to build a house (nails, boards, shingles, windows blah blah blah
We didn't evolve everything at once, we evolved the important stuff. Like metabolization?


Unfortunately for you, you don't know what metabolism is, or what amino acids are. But they are the first signs of life that appeared on earth.

>>2030063
Since you have trouble reading, let me help you.

Ancient explorers and historians, like Josephus, told of small flying reptiles in ancient Egypt and Arabia and described their predators, the ibis, stopping their invasion into Egypt. (Epstein, Perle S., Monsters: Their Histories, Homes, and Habits, 1973, p.43.) A third century historian Gaius Solinus, discussed the Arabian flying serpents, and stated that “the poison is so quick that death follows before pain can be felt.” (Cobbin, Ingram, Condensed Commentary and Family Exposition on the Whole Bible, 1837, p. 171.) The well-respected Greek researcher Herodotus wrote: “There is a place in Arabia, situated very near the city of Buto, to which I went, on hearing of some winged serpents; and when I arrived there, I saw bones and spines of serpents, in such quantities as it would be impossible to describe. The form of the serpent is like that of the water-snake; but he has wings without feathers, and as like as possible to the wings of a bat.” (Herodotus, Historiae, tr. Henry Clay, 1850, pp. 75-76.) This is a remarkable description of a pterosaur! In his third volume Herodotus goes on to tell how these animals could sometimes be found in the Arabian spice groves. He describes their size, coloration, and reproduction. It seems that venomous flying serpents were infamous for living in frankincense trees. When workers wanted to gather the tree’s incense, they would employ putrid smoke to drive the flying reptiles away.

The Chinese have many stories of dragons. Books even tell of Chinese families raising dragons to use their blood for medicines and highly prizing their eggs. (DeVisser, Marinus Willem, The Dragon in China & Japan, 1969.) To the left is a pictures of a fossilized dinosaur egg compared to a chicken egg and to the right is a double-yoked Protoceratops dinosaur egg (which would have yielded twin dinosaurs). Marco Polo wrote of his travels to the province of Karajan and reported on huge serpents, which at the fore part have two short legs, each Two-legged Dinosaur acambaro figurine2with three claws. “The jaws are wide enough to swallow a man, the teeth are large and sharp, and their whole appearance is so formidable that neither man, nor any kind of animal can approach them without terror.” (Polo, Marco, The Travels of Marco Polo, 1961, pp. 158-159.) Marco Polo goes on to describe how the local citizens of the area hunted and killed these creatures. He noted that the reptiles were nocturnal (assisted by “eyes larger than a loaf”), dwelling in “caverns” during the day to avoid the heat. After they had killed their prey, Polo wrote that they would find a water source such as a lake, spring, or river. Their massive bodies left “deep impressions” in the paths “as if a heavy beam had been drawn along the sands.” Since the creatures predictably followed these same rutted paths, the natives buried large “wooden stakes tipped with sharp iron spikes, which they cover with sand” (p. 159). Apparently these spikes so severely wounded the creatures that they died soon thereafter. It is interesting to note that two-legged dragons have also been reported in Europe (see the Aldrovandus story below) and depicted in the ancient Acambaro art found in Mexico (see on right). Some of the Chinese dragon art is remarkably like dinosaurs.

Famous in the annals of British literature is the poem of Beowulf, the heroic Norse warrior who killed a number of dragons. In the end he died in the process of vanquishing a winged dragon. Dragons were even described in reputable zoological treatises published during the Middle Ages. For example, the great Swiss naturalist and medical doctor Konrad Gesner published a four-volume encyclopedia from 1516-1565 entitled Historiae Animalium. He mentioned dragons as “very rare but still living creatures” (p.224). The story is told of a tenth century Irishman who encountered a large clawed beast having “iron on its tail which pointed backwards.” It had a head similar to a horse. It also had thick legs and strong claws. It sounds eerily like a Stegosaur.

>>2030076
If evolution were true, why is there no evidence of any lifeforms that are not irreducibly complex?

In Medieval times, scientifically minded authors produced volumes called “bestiaries,” a compilation of known (and sometimes imaginary) animals accompanied by a moralizing explanation and fascinating pictures. One such volume is the Aberdeen Bestiary, written in the early 1500s and preserved in the library of Henry VIII. Along with the newt, the salamander, and various kinds of snakes is the description and depiction of the dragon: “The dragon is bigger than all other snakes or all other living things on earth. For this reason, the Greeks call it dracon, from this is derived its Latin name draco. The dragon, it is said, is often drawn forth from caves into the open air, causing the air to become turbulent. The dragon has a crest, a small mouth, and narrow blow-holes through which it breathes and puts forth its tongue. Its strength lies not in its teeth but in its tail, and it kills with a blow rather than a bite. It is free from poison. They say that it does not need poison to kill things, because it kills anything around which it wraps its tail. From the dragon not even the elephant, with its huge size, is safe. For lurking on paths along which elephants are accustomed to pass, the dragon knots its tail around their legs and kills them by suffocation. Dragons are born in Ethiopia and India, where it is hot all year round.” Flavious Philostratus, the third century historian provided this sober account: “The whole of India is girt with dragons of enormous size; for not only the marshes are full of them, but the mountains as well, and there is not a single ridge without one. Now the marsh kind are sluggish in their habits and are thirty cubits long, and they have no crest standing up on their heads.”

>The dragon is bigger than all other snakes or all other living things on earth."
>From the dragon not even the elephant, with its huge size, is safe"

Sounds like they're describing dinosaurs. You'd have to be extremely in denial to say otherwise.

>>2030063
>but I'm literally blowing counterarguments out
You're just shitposting

File: John-of-Damascus-Dragon.jpg (200KB, 767x609px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 767x609px

The 16th century Italian explorer Pigafetta, in a report of the kingdom of Congo, described the province of Bemba, which he defines as “on the sea coast from the river Ambrize, until the river Coanza towards the south,” and says of serpents, “There are also certain other creatures which, being as big as rams, have wings like dragons, with long tails, and long chaps, and divers rows of teeth, and feed upon raw flesh. Their colour is blue and green, their skin painted like scales, and they have two feet but no more. The Pagan negroes used to worship them as gods, and to this day you may see divers of them that are kept for a marvel. And because they are very rare, the chief lords there curiously preserve them, and suffer the people to worship them, which tendeth greatly to their profits by reason of the gifts and oblations which the people offer unto them.” (Pigafetta, Filippo, The Harleian Collections of Travels, vol. ii, 1745, p. 457.)

>>2030074
your pic is a very well known fake.....one villagers in an area perpetuate for cash

>>2030089
>>2030086
>>2030083
Where are they, then?

>>2030024
>http://www.newgeology.us/presentation32.html
Oh, I recognize this one. Already went over it.

>Whenever variation is pushed to extremes by selective breeding (to get the most milk from cows, sugar from beets, bristles on fruit flies, or any other characteristic), the line becomes sterile and dies out
Then how is this much of our food supply from GMO based food? Mind you, these animals actually can reproduce; it isn't as though each offspring is modified. Furthermore, the infertility of animals whoms generations have undergone too much selective pressure stems from the fact that they were expected to change too quickly. Macroevolution takes place over far larger spans of time. By highlighting that there's a speed limit (while admitting to microevolution, as the article does), you aren't actually proving that there's any range limit (ergo their line in the sand between micro and macro is still just an arbitrary line in the sand).

>>2030074
>lots of people drew it so it must be real
you should go down to /aco/ or /h/

>>2030083
>>2030086
>>2030092
>Copy pasting text I already read and responded to
nice try anon

>>2030092
>irreducibly complex?
because every time someone labels something as irreducibly complex (atoms, etc), it ends up getting reduced. Furthermore, to reduce in that fashion is simply to apply a man-made distinction.

Why is /x/ posting allowed on /his/?

File: dino drawing.jpg (66KB, 612x426px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 612x426px

As western pioneers colonized tribal lands around the world, reports of dragons continued to come back to Europe. It became standard practice for cartographers to identify the unexplored regions at the periphery of their maps with the cryptic words: “Here be dragons!” But as civilization took hold even in remote regions, the changes to the ecosystem and hunting down of predators took its toll on the remaining dinosaurian remnants.

Author Charles Gould sought to dispel supernatural notions and give a sober account of the dragon. “The dragon is nothing more than a serpent of enormous size; and they formerly distinguished three sorts of them in the Indies. Viz. such as were in the mountains, such as were bred in the caves or in the flat country, and such as were found in fens and marshes. The first is the largest of all, and are covered with scales as resplendent as polished gold. These have a kind of beard hanging from their lower jaw, their eyebrows large, and very exactly arched; their aspect the most frightful that can be imagined, and their cry loud and shrill… their crests of a bright yellow, and a protuberance on their heads of the colour of a burning coal. Those of the flat country differ from the former in nothing but in having their scales of a silver colour, and in their frequenting rivers, to which the former never come. Those that live in marshes and fens are of a dark colour, approaching to a black, move slowly, have no crest, or any rising upon their heads.” (Gould, Charles, Mythical Monsters, W.H. Allen & Co., London, 1886, p. 140.)

File: dino depiction.jpg (33KB, 300x252px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 300x252px

>>2030104
Largely extinct.

>>2030111
>6000 years of human history doesn't belong on a history board

>>2030122
>6000 years
>>>/x/

>>2030092
You're asking why amino acids don't fuck around by themselves anymore? I'm sure some do, on the ocean floor next to sulfur vents.

The reason God made amino acids possible to spawn in prehistoric times

(the Earth was a different temperature back then, not that you know this)

was so that they could eventually become cells that float in the primordial ocean. These cells became faceless worms eventually,, then fish finally.

Have you worshipped your savior, Fish Christ recently?

>>2030124
*tips fedora*

File: dinosaurs.jpg (144KB, 728x546px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 728x546px

On April 26, 1890 the Tombstone Epitaph (a local Arizona newspaper) reported that two cowboys had discovered and shot down a creature – described as a “winged dragon” – which resembled a pterodactyl, only MUCH larger. The cowboys said its wingspan was 160 feet, and that its body was more than four feet wide and 92 feet long. The cowboys supposedly cut off the end of the wing to prove the existence of the creature. The paper’s description of the animal fits the Quetzelcoatlus, whose fossils were found in Texas. (Gish, Dinosaurs by Design, 1992, p. 16.) Could this be thunderbird or Wakinyan, the jagged-winged, fierce-toothed flying creature of Sioux American Indian legend? This thunderbird supposedly lived in a cave on the top of the Olympic Mountains and feasted on seafood. Different from the eagle (Wanbli) or hawk (Cetan) the Wakinyan was said to be huge, carrying off children, and was named because of its association with thunder and lightning–supposedly being struck by lightning and seen to fall to the ground during a storm. (Geis, Darlene, Dinosaurs & Other Prehistoric Animals, 1959, p. 9.) It was further distinguished by its piercing cry and thunderous beating wings (Lame Deer’s 1969 interview).

>>2030124
>gorillions of years
>>>/b/

>>2030128
*waits for argument*

>>2030132
>posting things that have already been refuted
>no response to refutation
Really makes you think.

File: history9.jpg (14KB, 206x260px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 206x260px

The atheistic astronomer Carl Sagan once remarked: “The pervasiveness of dragon myths in the folk legends of many cultures is probably no accident” (Sagan, Carl, The Dragons of Eden, New York: Random House, 1977, p. 149). Indeed he felt compelled to address the similarity to the great reptiles of the Jurassic era and “explain them away.” How could Sagan do this? Peter Dickinson stated, “Carl Sagan tried to account for the spread and consistency of dragon legends by saying that they are fossil memories of the time of the dinosaurs, come down to us through a general mammalian memory inherited from the early mammals, our ancestors, who had to compete with the great predatory lizards.” (Dickinson, Peter, The Flight of Dragons, New York: Harper and Row, 1979, p. 127). Thus Carl Sagan believed that we evolved not merely our physical bodies, but also memories “uploaded” from our mammalian ancestors!

>Atheists can't explain why all our ancestors talk about dinosaurs
>"W-we were just psychic!"

Instead of the logical, rational explanation that these dinosaurs we are digging up are the creatures they were talking about.

>>2030133
>>2030133
here's your argument>>2030125
I'm assuming you're the literal creationist cuck since you think that dinos still exist

>>2030095
>"scientifically minded"
considering you probably consider yourself "scientifically minded," that doesn't mean much. Your argument once again boils down to "I read it in a book so it's real".

File: giants.jpg (128KB, 668x531px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 668x531px

>>2030135
>no response to refutation
There has actually.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT7EhE7YJbI

The top photo is real.

The bottom smaller one is fake, done by evolutionists in order to discredit the real one.

Atheists not only are in denial, they actively try to cover up real history that goes against the Darwinian narrative, especially the Smithsonian.

>>2030140
>since you think that dinos still exist
You quoted the wrong person, the *tips fedora* poster I'd responded to who claimed the earth was 600 years old is pretty clearly the creationist

>>2030140
>post historic proof that dinosaurs existed with man
>points fingers in ear and shouts LALALALA

Looks like you lost.

"After Alexander the Great invaded India he brought back reports of seeing a great hissing dragon living in a cave. Later Greek rulers supposedly brought dragons alive from Ethiopia. (Gould, Charles, Mythical Monsters, W.H. Allen & Co., London, 1886, pp. 382-383.) Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia (“Dinosaur” entry) explains that the historical references to dinosaur bones may extend as far back as the 5th century BC. In fact, some scholars think that the Greek historian Herodotus was referring to fossilized dinosaur skeletons and eggs when he described griffins guarding nests in central Asia. “Dragon bones” mentioned in a 3rd century AD text from China are thought to refer to bones of dinosaurs."

>>2029888
I like to post Osprey army illustrations.

File: Turkish-Dragon-by-Levni-in-Surname3.jpg (907KB, 1737x928px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 1737x928px

Although the Ottoman Empire ruled for over six centuries, there are not many depictions of dinosaurian creatures in their artwork (as compared to Medieval European art). Perhaps dragons were not as common in the eastern European/Middle East theater at that time. The Turkish painting to the left, entitled “Procession of the Trade Corporation during the Festival of 1720 in Constantinople” is in a surname (or historical album) called The Surname-I Hümayun archived at Topkapi Museum of Istanbul. It was written and illustrated under the direction of Abdulcelil Levni (aka Abdulcelil Çelebi) who was the official Ottoman court painter till he died in 1732. The picture shows the guildsmen, followed by clowns and what seems to be a mechanical three-headed dragon. (Click for an enlargement of the dragon.) Note the similarity to baby sauropods dinosaur. A sauropod with multiple heads, a condition known as polycephaly, while curious, is hardly unknown among dinosaur reports.

>People literally drew dinosaurs like they were normal animals
>Evolutionists will still deny the obvious

>>2030150
Wow and did you know that Hera let Paris give a Golden apple to his lover? Wow

File: never ever large.jpg (2MB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5000x5000px

>>2029680
>babylon
>world empire
>alexander's """""""empire""""""""

>>2030138
>Atheists can't explain why all our ancestors talk about dinosaurs
I think you mean "dragons"
already been explained in this thread; you can invent a large lizard creature the same way you can invent a Minotaur, by combining the elements of your environment together to form a new idea.

>>2030143
>The Civil War Pterosaur Photo No One should see!
It's like a buzzfeed article or something

>>2030150
>post historic proof that dinosaurs existed with man
Correction: historic proof man wrote novels about dragons, which they still do to this day in spite of the fact that there are none to be found.

>>2030158
>they literally drew it in a book
>it must be real

>>2030107
>Then how is this much of our food supply from GMO based food? Mind you, these animals actually can reproduce; it isn't as though each offspring is modified. Furthermore, the infertility of animals whoms generations have undergone too much selective pressure stems from the fact that they were expected to change too quickly. Macroevolution takes place over far larger spans of time. By highlighting that there's a speed limit (while admitting to microevolution, as the article does), you aren't actually proving that there's any range limit (ergo their line in the sand between micro and macro is still just an arbitrary line in the sand).
You literally just begged the question again

>>2030158
>polycephaly
>implying any lizard couldn't get this when even humans are susceptible

>>2030166
>>2030166
Yea dude btw my grandad met Paul Bunyan, he was half Fred Flinstone half-dragon actually

>>2030163
>I think you mean "dragons"
Dragons and dinosaurs refer to the same creatures you retard.

The word "dinosaur" was invented in 1842. What do you think people before that time period called them?

You're so dumb, it's like I'm talking to a wall.

>It's like a buzzfeed article or something
Not an argument.

>there are none to be found
Because they're extinct? Besides, there are still legends and sightings of them in places like Congo, India, Ethiopia and Loch Ness.

>>2030172
In saying "Macroevolution takes place over far larger spans of time." I was not stating that "macroevolution does take place" but that it, only by definition, is defined as something occurring over a long period of time, and thus you can't say "macroevolution doesn't work when I do something which isn't macroevolution," given that doing so would be strawmanning. Furthermore, you could completely remove that statement and my argument and conclusion still hold.

>>2030172
The GMO organisms are the ones that gain food-giving ability without losing in other departments. So that debunks your article.

If you still want to drown without self-awareness go ahead

>>2030177
Yeah dude no one has ever said "I want to say I saw a dragon so I look cool!"

No one has ever said that, no one has ever done that, you're right, good job

if dinosaurs coexsisted with umans where are the side by side fosils, mumifide remains that date to a human era, human preserved remains that also clearly date to huma eras

they dont....all we get are dragon images(which change in every culture and usualy arent very dinosaur like but are more snake or large lizzard like)

most of the suposed evidence is disproven by most scientific / anthropology fields and is only ever held up by crack pots with little mainstream curency(and often lack of peerreviewd/ useful work)

>>2030177
>Dragons and dinosaurs refer to the same creatures you retard.
Begging the question

By assuming these reffer to the same creature, you're assuming people were writing about dinosaurs, which your conclusion "man existed with dinosaurs/dragons" depends on. That's a recursive argument.

>Not an argument.
Not worth my time either

>Because they're extinct?
Because it's possible to write about them without ever having interacting with them, as proven by the fact that modern day authors do, retard.

>>2030186
>mankind allegedly existed with dragons
>chose to mummify cats instead

File: Fresh dinosaur tissue.jpg (60KB, 520x386px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 520x386px

So it's settled.

Concrete proof that old records talked about dinosaurs not in a mythical sense but real animals that lived with them, including drawing them and making figures of them.

Any sane, logical, reasonable person using his brain can conclude that dinosaurs lived with man.

If you believe dinosaurs lived "9999 gorillion years ago senpai!" then you are deluded and thoroughly brainwashed.

I think it's hilarious how atheists go through mental gymnastics. A severe case of cognitive dissonance indeed.

They have so much faith in evolutionism, no matter how un-scientific it is and how much it has been proven wrong. I admire their faith, I could never have that much faith.

>>2030193
>mental gymnastics
better than being unable to do anything mental at all, anon

>>2030186
Dating methods are inaccurate and flawed, see the article on trueorigins.org

>>2029680
None of those were world empires. The first world empire was spain or portugal and currently the US.

I prefer the Maya prophecy, I see it as more likely. No offense to christians, but they should rewrite the bible to apply better to modern times. That's the problem with the abrahamic relgions they don't adapt.

>>2030191
this...also the chinese would have fucking preserved them in wine, or honey, or something to use as medicine and presige artifacts

File: btfo1.png (395KB, 942x707px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 942x707px

>>2030197
Keep using logical fallacies and ad hominems, I'll stick to science, history and facts.

>>2030193
they only believe it because they were told to believe it.

kids go through public school getting indoctrinated with darwinism, it takes a while to unplug them from their belief system

>>2030193
Wow man... you're the same hick that believed in dragons in the Dark Ages, congrats

You're that much closer to uncovering the "Anti-Dragon Conspiracy"

Why the fuck would there be an "Anti-Dragon Conspiracy", you idiotic faggot?????

Wait, maybe they are magical creatures?

You might be on to something, OP.

>DO YOU BELIEVE IN MAGIIIIIC

File: palestrina-mosaic1.jpg (302KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1024x576px

To the left is a beautiful mosaic that was one of the wonders of the second century world. Housed in Palestrina, which is just south of Rome, this masterpiece depicts Nile scenes from Egypt all the way up into Ethiopia. Scholars now believe this is the work of Demetrius the Topographer, an artist from Alexandria who came to work in Rome. The top portion of this remarkable piece of art is generally believed to depict African animals being hunted by black-skinned warriors. These Ethiopians are pursuing what appears to be some type of dinosaur. The Greek Letters above the reptilian animal in question are KROKODILOPARDALIS, which is literally translated Crocodile-Leopard (apparently identifying an agile reptilian creature). The picture shown here is only a small portion of the massive mosaic. It also contains clear depictions of known animals, including Egyptian crocodiles and hippos. (See Finley, The Light of the Past, 1965, p. 93.)

>>2030193
http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geology/soft-tissue-dinosaur-fossil1.htm

File: kek.jpg (185KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1000x1000px

>>2030208
>he believes there was a "dark ages"

Is Reddit invading us or something?

How can someone be this historically illiterate on the /his/tory board?

>>2030182
>evolution is true, my high school teacher said so

>>2030202
You literally posted a scientific picture of a dinosaur next to a dragon statue and say they're the same.

Kill yourself, idiot

>>2030181
Begging the question

>>2030198
Tthey can be flawed under extreme circumstances due to specific chemical reactions, but that doesn't explain why there are literally zero accounts of side-by-side fossils. If there were an abundant number of side by sides with a couple that were contradicted by dating, then you could say "hey, dating is sometimes wrong," but when there's litteraly nothing, the notion that it can be sometimes wrong doesn't explain why it's allegedly always wrong when dinosaurs come into play.

>>2030202
>I'll stick to claiming that I'm right because what I believe was written/drawn in a book

File: Natural-Bridges-Dino-AIG-clean.gif (126KB, 694x459px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 694x459px

The picture above was drawn by North American Anasazi Indians that lived in the area that has now become Utah between 150 B.C. and 1200 A.D. Even noted anti-creationists agree that it resembles a dinosaur and that the brownish film which has hardened over the picture, along with the pitting and weathering, attests to its age. One evolutionist wrote, “There is a petroglyph in Natural Bridges National Monument that bears a startling resemblance to a dinosaur, specifically a Brontosaurus, with a long tail and neck, small head and all.

>>2030198
https://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creationist-attacks-carbon-14-dating

>>2030214
>butthurt

>>2030216
>butthurt

>>2030214
>unable to form an argument
btfo

>>2030213
that's not an argument anon

File: Mississippian-Saurian2.jpg (60KB, 646x510px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 646x510px

The Mississippian culture flourished from 800 – 1500 AD through the southwestern United States and it is known for their building of mounds. Above in the center is a curious piece from this culture (click to enlarge). Apparently the swirling pattern on its sides signifies that the animal in question lived in water, while the eye markings allude to the beast’s unusually keen vision. Some of these Indian depictions of this rotund animal show tridactyl feet, a long neck and prominent tail held aloft. Above to the right, note the handle on a Mesoamerican pottery object made by Mississippi Caddo Indians. It seems to display a baby dinosaur. This circa 1200 AD artifact is housed at Creation Evidence Museum in Texas.

>>2030220
Wow, it's almost like Neanderthalic Native AMericans have a communion with nature and remember that dinosaurs existed from hundreds of thousands of years ago.

And I don't think that's a wing.

File: Misc-Sauropod-Stone-clean-lower-res.jpg (274KB, 1020x839px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1020x839px

To the left is pictured an Ica Ceremonial Burial Stone from the Nasca culture (100 BC to 800AD) that is carved in a bas relief technique. In 1500s the Spanish Conquistadors brought back stories that there were stones with strange creatures carved on them found in Peru. Some of the stones were even brought back to Spain. The Incan Chronicler Juan de Santa Cruz Pachucuti Lumqui wrote in 1571 about the strange engraved stones in Ica. (See Swift, Dennis, Secrets of the Ica Stones, 2006.) Dom Geronomo Cabrera was a Spanish conquistador who settled the area of Ica in 1570.One of his descendants, Dr. Javier Cabrera, saw these stones as a child and began collecting them in the 1960s. He eventually accumulated over 11,000 such stones.

>>2030228
>butthurt

>>2030229
I'd be happy to give an argument if you had an argument for me to respond too. All i see are fallacies.

>>2030238
>hundreds of thousands

>>2030209
notice how the evolutionists ignore this one

>>2030240
You realize they smoked ayuahsca which isnpired those engravings right?

You are so ignorant i want to choke

>>2030247
>smoked ayuahsca
>smoked

File: btfo2.png (555KB, 942x845px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 942x845px

>>2030245
He's an atheist, they believe in magic and psychic.

Just ignore him and post facts.

They can shitpost but we have archeology on our side.

>>2029680
>A son of Ham was the first king of Egypt

So... we WUZ kings?

>thousands of years in the future
>anthropologist looks at the culture between the two-thousand tens and twenties
>loads of images of dragons and dinosaurs
>"huh, there must have been dragons roaming the earth in 2010"
>goes onto 40000chan.org
>"guys mankind was walking among dinosaurs in 2010"
>"shut up anon, there's no evidence which suggests that"
>"you better study history or you're doomed to repeat it!!!"

>>2029680
>Daniel 2:41-43
>Whereas you saw the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; yet the strength of the iron shall be in it, just as you saw the iron mixed with ceramic clay. 42 And as the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly fragile. 43 As you saw iron mixed with ceramic clay, they will mingle with the seed of men; but they will not adhere to one another, just as iron does not mix with clay.
>MILITARISM AND BIG BIDNESS.
American pigs are the worst Christians, t.b.h.

>>2030247
>it's pure coincidence, stop looking into it

>>2030209
That's a beautiful artwork, amazing that it was made in 200AD. Your point?
>>2030245
Thanks for the quote. Your point?

File: George-Dragon-Book-of-Hours-Morgan-Museum.jpg (130KB, 819x529px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 819x529px

>>2030247
>the creatures they drew just *HAPPENED* to look identical to dinosaurs

i-i-i-it's just a coincidence! muh jurassic park! muh marxist atheist professor wouldn't lieeee!

"Yet another interpretation of St. George slaying the dragon is found in the Latin Book of Hours c. 1450 AD which is illuminated by the Master of Jean Chevrot and currently housed at the Morgan Library & Museum (right). Notice the Master’s attention to detail (click to enlarge), as seen in George’s armor, the birds in the sky, and the dragon’s genitals. The Fitzwilliam Museum contains another portrayal (left) of St. George destroying the dragon (probably by Bruges) from a Latin Book of Hours c. 1490 AD. This colorful work from the Flemish School portrays a remarkably dinosaur-like dragon.

The country of Georgia sits at the edge of Eastern Europe and Western Asia. High in the hills atop Mount Gergeti is the Holy Trinity Church (also known as Tsminda Sameba) which was originally constructed in the 1300s. The bell tower window contains some unusual carvings that look quite a bit like two dinosaurs, dinosaur-window-carving-georgian-churchperhaps engaged in head-butting combat. Inside the church is an ancient icon of St. George slaying a snake-like dragon. St. George has been revered in the Republic of Georgia since the 4th century. The weathering and patina of these dragons certainly seems to match the rest of the construction, suggesting it is an original carving."

>>2030240
Pictures of dragons are not proof dinosaurs walked among us, anymore than vampiric legends all over the world are proof of blood sucking demons.

The fact is dinosaur fossils are never found with modern animals, and no dating method in existence than reliably puts them anywhere near are period.

Finally stop spamming every thread with this stuff. Stick to one thread if you must discuss this. S

>>2030240
the ica stones are kinda a hoax tho.....its been found that vilagers in some parts of peru fake a bunch and sold them to tourists and colectors.....there are stylistic differences between the ones the archaeological comunity deems genuine.....peru is a mess, becuase its a wild west for artifacts and that has bred fakes, its an easy source of money to a villager with the right tools when the rocks are everywhere

File: kachina-bridge-dinosaur.jpg (14KB, 595x267px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 595x267px

>>2030220
That's been debunked. It's actually more like a serpentine thing with other marks around it. People only want to see a dinosaur, but closer inspection shows something different.

>>2030266
They looked identical to reptiles and other animals, which existed in that time period. The fact that they had common ancestors helps.

>>2030260
Do you not believe in coincidence? A simple mathematical model could prove that it does

>>2030253
Nothinig in that image says that dragons ever existed, so I guess I can't disagree with you!!

File: ancient61.jpg (39KB, 276x141px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 276x141px

>>2030262
>Dinosaur depicted in ancient artwork
>still believes in the "millions of years" myth

"To the right is an artifact from Tiwanaku, an important Pre-Columbian archaeological site in Bolivia. Tiwanaku is recognized by Andean scholars as one of the most important precursors to the Inca Empire. The sculptor depicted a dinosaur-like creature at least 800 years before European scientists discovered dinosaurs. The vase on left was also discovered in the Tiwanaku region. It depicts dueling dinosaurs and is believed to date from 500 – 1000 A.D. The style closely resembles the Nasca dinosaurian depictions (on the Ica Stones).

Axel Photo Amazon Warriors and Dinosaur

In May of 2012 researcher Vance Nelson brought to our attention a panel of pictographs found on a rock ledge at the edge of the Amazon rain forest basin in northern Peru. This artwork is said by secular archaeologists to be thousands of years old. Amazingly, one of the pictographs shows nine warriors hunting what appears to be a dinosaur. In the 1940s the American explorer Percy Fawcett brought back reports of a large dinosaur-like creature from this same region of the Amazon."

>>2030256
Literal false equivalency

>>2030271
More like you're wishful thinking and being delusional.

It's clearly a dinosaur, but you don't want to believe it is one.

>>2030247
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayahuasca#Preparation

>>2030266
Are you trying to convince me that if a lot of people imagine something it makes it real?

>>2030285
Your a crazy person

File: Dennis-Swifts-Acambaro-Figurine.jpg (223KB, 1428x714px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1428x714px

>>2030274
>All of the universal world-wide talking of man describing and killing dinosaurs are all just a coincidence

Atheists have more faith than Christians.

>>2030277
reffer to >>2030256
>"but I'm telling you guys, there were dinosaurs in artwork in 2010! how can you still believe the trillions of years myth int the current year, 2000000000016?"

>>2030274
>PURE COINCIDENCE

>>2030290
>Your

>>2030277
Wow, it's almost as if the descendants of dinosaurs are all around us and inspire us in daily life.

>>2030296
Those don't look like birds to me

>>2030290
Says the one who rejects irrefutable proof.
You are an irrational, dense, brainwashed person.

>>2030299
The fuck is a lizard?

>>2030301
>a drawing
>irrefutable proof of dinosaurs among man

File: Maya-dinosaur-head-being-carried-to-sacrifice-Bonampak.jpg (40KB, 745x459px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 745x459px

The ancient Maya culture, which flourished around the 6th century, is famous for their excellent artwork. Bonampak is a Maya archaeological site in Mexico where there are a number of wonderful murals, including the remarkable one to the left. It shows the presentation of various war captives to the ruler, Chaan Muan, along with some trophy heads (perhaps brought for sacrificing). In addition to the human heads, the men are carrying an animal head and what looks a lot like a dinosaur head (enlarged in the picture to the right). Both the teeth and the large size make it doubtful that the Maya artist was depicting a lizard or snake.

>>2030296
>dinosaurs turned into birds!
>this is what atheists REALLY, UNIRONICALLY, SERIOUSLY believe
Ahahahahahahaha, stop, you're killing me anon.

>>2030277
Have you seen the monsters in Andean mythology from the Mochica? They're not dinosaurs.

>>2030302
Those lizards have legs going straight down, instead of down and out. That means they're dinosaurs

File: ancient50.jpg (5KB, 119x180px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 119x180px

These ancient cups and vases depicting dinosaurs are just a coincidence!

T-this is just a bird, see? It clearly looks like a bird!

>>2030303
>dozens upon dozens of drawings sculptures and mentions
ftfy

>>2030301
>Says the one who rejects irrefutable proof.

carbon dating is irrefutable proof. DNA is irrefutable proof. Primitive art work from an era before people believed in realism is proof of nothing.

>>2030312
>Those lizards have legs going straight down
Yeah, according to cave drawings, retard

>>2030306
I don't know why you deny scientific fact, but the backflipping lizards that preceded birds on the evolutionary time scale were pretty badass and I wouldn't deny they existed if I were you...

I'm going to bed now.

>>2030318
This >>2030277 is a wierd cave painting

>>2030314
looks like an iguana

File: agawa-rock-pictographs-ontario-lake-superior-by-Aaron-Peterson.jpg (563KB, 850x575px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 850x575px

This is an Ankylosau- I mean, clearly a bird. You can see the wings and beaks and stuff.

Don't trust what your eyes see, just trust those evolutionist cartoons in your school books! Millions of years! Millions of years! Good boy..

"Henry Rowe Schoolcraft was a geologist and Indian agent who wrote extensively about the Sioux Indians. He heard stories about a monstrous creature called Unktehi, something like an ox but much larger, with great horns. Schoolcraft reproduced drawings of several types of Unktehi monsters on birchbark around 1850. These were based upon rock art describing a war party of five canoes crossing Lake Superior that encountered animals resembling giant turtles, snakes, and moose. But some (upper right) clearly look dinosaurian. Sioux Indians further west, when interviewed by ethnologists, described Unktehi as an immense reptile or serpent with legs. He was shaped like a giant scaly snake with feet and a notched backbone or crest like a giant saw and had a heavy spiked tail. Still other agawa-rock-pictographs-ontario-lake superior2Indian reports describe Unktehi as a swamp-dwelling creature. Adrienne Mayor, an evolutionist, believes that the Sioux were weaving stories about fossils they encountered (Mayor, Fossil Legends of the First Americans, 2005, pp. 235-237). But the pictures and description bring to mind the dinosaur Ankylosaurus (lower right) with a low slung body, long tail, heavy armor, and prominent multiple horns. A plated and horned creature has also been discovered in Ojibwa Indian art (left – click to enlarge) on the Agawa Rock at Misshepezhieu, Lake Superior Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada."

>>2030312
Or they could be a Chinese artist thinking "hey what if I combine a lizard and dog? Or lizard and cat? or lizard and horse! Lol dude weed"

>>2030277
south america has a lot of interesting fakes/out of place artifacts, and contexteles finds with dubious origin stories....the pic you have for instance is odd and when i revers gogle the image im not finding much reliable about it....which makes it seem kinda sketch

>>2030316
>alongside no physical or fossil evidence
>ignoring the fact that our own generation would have thousands upon thousands of pieces of artwork featuring such creatures, even though none of us have contacted them
>yet this somehow serves as historic proof that we had done so thousands of years ago

>>2030331
>literal pure coincidence

File: fish3.jpg (777KB, 700x1089px) Image search: [Google]

777KB, 700x1089px

>>2030306
Again, have you seen Maya mythic creatures. Keep in mind the Maya often participated in hallucinogenic rituals and their creation stories are littered with strange mythic breasts. Do you believe these were real too?

>>2030325
According to sculptures then, what's your point? I could sculpt a man with dicks for hair; if someone found that 1000 years later, that doesn't prove there were dick-haired men walking the planet in 2010.

>>2030331
>>ignoring the fact that our own generation would have thousands upon thousands of pieces of artwork featuring such creatures, even though none of us have contacted them
Who were all the great Roman paleontologists again?

>>2030329
These people also think unicorns were real. I mean there are stories and drawings of them

File: ancient29.jpg (7KB, 200x155px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x155px

>>2030320
>my opinion is scientific fact
>even though science disagrees with you

Atheism is a mental illness.

Only dumb people could believe nothing exploded, soup came alive, dragons turned into birds. Alot of dedication and stupidity.

e>>2030333
Maybe god did it and science and deism can coexist? And you and your trash conspiracy theroy belong in the trash?

>>2030333
>literal everything was purposefully done for my sake

>>2030334
>mythic breasts

well, at least my fap folder got big.

>>2030337
The Greeks actually did have fossils, they just interpreted them as giants and monsters like cyclops

>>2030334
Could you get me some of those drugs that let you see animals 65 million years extinct? They sound pretty rad.

>>2030338
https://answersingenesis.org/extinct-animals/unicorns-in-the-bible/
https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2016/04/05/giant-siberian-unicorn-discovered/

>>2030340
No form of evolution directly denies theistic belief itself whatsoever, particularly things along the lines of initial cause, etc. Macroevolution typically runs at odds against the christian timeline though.

File: Mesopotamian-Cylinder-Seal.jpg (37KB, 624x285px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 624x285px

>>2030334
Your problem is assuming they were mythical.

You assume they are mythical because you've been told they are mythical because if they were real they wouldn't align with your Darwinian myth.

The way they describe dragons is exactly the giant creatures we dig up from the ground. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck.. etc

File: dobby-house-elf-15[1].jpg (71KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1500x1000px

Did you guys know that house elves are real? Look at this recorded image from 2007 AD.

Scientifc proof that atheists are BTFO!

>>2030340
It's not a conspiracy theory

>>2030336
>>2030338
As soon as you find archeological evidence of dick-hair men and unicorns, yes

>>2030355
>comparing a Hollywood CGI movie to real drawings and depictions made by real people centuries ago

I thought the sub 60-IQ retard atheist was a phase, but apparently plenty of them still exist.

>>2030314
That's literally just a lizard. I honestly can't tell if your trolling or just a crazy person, but you got your (you) so congratulations.

>>2030338
>These people also think unicorns were real.
As one of the people whos argued against man living among dinosaurs, a horse with a horn doesn't sound like an impossible mutation to come across. That isn't to say any of the magical stories or attributes they're expected to have are real though.

>>2030351
The Siberian "unicorn" was a type of rhinoceros. Not a horse with a horn

>>2030338
unicorns were real and biblical

>>2030350
They often combined features of different animals. It's why you have things like the plumed serpents, plumed coyotes, jaguar-bats, jaguar-sharks, crocodilian deer etc. The pic you posted is not weird to think someone imagined.
>>2030344
I can post more if you'd like.

>>2030369
Blasphemy.

File: Hongshan-vs-Protoceratops-300x286.jpg (18KB, 300x286px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x286px

About 4,000 years ago, the Hongshan culture in China produced many wonderful jade dragon carvings (along with other clear animal representations). Over time these dragon productions became highly stylized and were especially popular as pendants. Most of these pieces only resemble dragons in a crude sense, but a few of the older dragon statues appear to be reproductions of certain dinosaurs. Notice the resemblance this jade dragon bears to a small Protoceratops dinosaur.

Dinosaurs lived with man.

>>2030362
Human genitals don't have bones anon

Speaking of people without bones, where's the archaeological evidence that dinosaurs existed alongside man? I mean sure, dating can be fallible under extreme circumstances, but if that is the case then surely at least one fossil should be dated around the same time as man. I mean, how is there not a single one? Could it be a

pure

coincidence?

>>2030369
Unicorn means one horn
>They often combined features of different animals. It's why you have things like the plumed serpents, plumed coyotes, jaguar-bats, jaguar-sharks, crocodilian deer etc. The pic you posted is not weird to think someone imagined.
Please make a dinosaur by combining fish and dogs

File: Sea-Serpent-Mosaic.jpg (127KB, 500x491px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 500x491px

Many ancient sea serpent depictions show the creature coiling vertically and displaying “humps” that come out of the water (making the plesiosaur identification even less likely). A good example is the mosaic to the left, which shows mariners apparently mollifying a sea serpent with some meat. The Byzantine artist depicted a fluke-Sea Serpent Cape Ann 1639like tail, mane, and horse-like head that are remarkably like the modern reports of Cadborosaurus and Ogopogo given by eye witnesses of these mysterious monsters. In 1639 a sea serpent was observed in Cape Ann, off the Massachusetts coast, and a drawing of the encounter (right) was made. Although this massive serpentine form is not known in the fossil record, zoologist Karl Shuker speculated that some of these encounters might have involved a still-living Basilosaurus (lower right), Basilosaurus Skeleton3a slender whale-like creature supposed to have been extinct for millions of years. (Shuker, Karl, Dragons: A Natural History, 1995, p. 38.) It possessed small fins, a flexible neck, a tail fluke, and could undulate its long body vertically (unlike terrestrial snakes that coil horizontally). The creature was given the name Basilosaurus because the early 19th century paleontologists thought it to be very reptilian. Indeed “Basilosaurus, which is over 20 m long and, unlike modern whales, must have looked like a classic sea serpent because of its tiny head and long, thin body.” (Benton, Michael, Vertebrate Paleontology, 2015, p. 373.)

>>2030381
>where's the archaeological evidence that dinosaurs existed alongside man?
We have evidence of dinosaurs existing we don't need the same evidence to show they walked with man.

>>2030354
No, it's simply cause I've yet to see the bones of such a creature existing. You capture a flying plumed serpent for me on a camera or show me its mummified corpse and I will accept they are real. I do believe in some things people would call paranormal and supernatural, based on personal experiences of myself and others I know.

File: acambaro-Plesiosaur.jpg (13KB, 205x154px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 205x154px

>>2030381
Live snails have been dated to be 11,000 years old.

Recently erupted volcanoes have dated to be hundreds of thousands years old.

Dating methods don't work, the only ones who put faith in these ridiculous dates are evolutionists because they need "millions of years" for their bullshit myths.

>>2030384
If I did that and passed it off as one of these drawing I am certain you would consider it proof.

It wouldn't even be that hard as long as I drew in in the non-photorealistic style most of these are done in, there were lots of ancient see creatures with a fish like body and a big snout like mouth.

>>2030390
Scientists also agree that dinosaurs existed; that's not what we're arguing about. You have no physical evidence that proves they were in the time you claim they were, just art, which is also present in this era even though dinosaurs aren't, thus proving the latter doesn't necessitate the former.

>>2030363
> real drawings and depictions

>drawings and depictions
>real

>drawings and depictions
>real

>drawings and depictions
>real

>drawings and depictions
>real

>drawings and depictions
>real


>drawings and depictions
>real
>drawings and depictions
>real

>>2030397
see
>>2030221

We use dating methods in criminal cases. Just because those results can be corrupted by the environment or contaminates does not mean they are not reliable almost all the time

>>2030397
Then how come not a single dinosaur/dinosaur containing fossil layer has been dated to have lived alongside a man? If it is the case that dating is nothing more than a cointoss like you say it is, how has it managed to land against your favor every single time?

Just

a

coincidence?

File: dragonbook1.jpg (21KB, 236x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 236x300px

“True and Wonderfull. A Difcourfe relating a ftrange and monftrous Serpent (or Dragon) lately difcouered, and yet liuing, to the great annoyance and diuers flaughters both of Men and Cattell, by his ftrong and violent poyfon, In Suffex two miles from Horfam, in a woode called St. Leonards Forreft, and thirtie miles from London, this prefent month of Auguft. 1614. With the true Generation of Serpents. Printed at London by Iohn Trundle.

…In Phrigia and Ethiopia are many Dragons, and Serpents, and there were as Auguftine affirmeth in the hollow places of the earth: and not onely in foraine and farre remote countries: but alfo in neighboring and nere adisyning nations: and firit of all there was a Serpent or winged Dragon brought unto Francis the French King: when he lay at the Sancton, by a sountry man: who had Qaine the fame Serpent with a fpade: Chifuen alfo faith that in the yeare of our Lord, 1543, there came many Serpents with feete, and winges, neare Stiria: who wounded the inhabitants ineurably. Cardan writeth that at Paris in France hee himfelfe faw certaine Serpents with winges: when the riuer Tibernuer flowed the banckes many Serpents were bifrouered.

>Someone living in 1500s writes about seeing dinosaurs and how annoying they are to towns
>Atheists will simply ignore this or form some sort of excuse

>>2030406
>incoming ontological argument that misses the point of this post

>>2030419
Are you joking? The person who wrote this never went to Ethiopia

in

File: Josephus.jpg (71KB, 427x544px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 427x544px

Ancient explorers and historians, like Josephus, told of small flying reptiles in ancient Egypt and Arabia and described their predators, the ibis, stopping their invasion into Egypt. (Epstein, Perle S., Monsters: Their Histories, Homes, and Habits, 1973, p.43.) A third century historian Gaius Solinus, discussed the Arabian flying serpents, and stated that “the poison is so quick that death follows before pain can be felt.” (Cobbin, Ingram, Condensed Commentary and Family Exposition on the Whole Bible, 1837, p. 171.) The well-respected Greek researcher Herodotus wrote: “There is a place in Arabia, situated very near the city of Buto, to which I went, on hearing of some winged serpents; and when I arrived there, I saw bones and spines of serpents, in such quantities as it would be impossible to describe. The form of the serpent is like that of the water-snake; but he has wings without feathers, and as like as possible to the wings of a bat.” (Herodotus, Historiae, tr. Henry Clay, 1850, pp. 75-76.) This is a remarkable description of a pterosaur! In his third volume Herodotus goes on to tell how these animals could sometimes be found in the Arabian spice groves. He describes their size, coloration, and reproduction. It seems that venomous flying serpents were infamous for living in frankincense trees. When workers wanted to gather the tree’s incense, they would employ putrid smoke to drive the flying reptiles away. (Note the illustration below to the the left.) Herodotus has been called “the Father of History” because he was the first historian we know who collected his materials systematically and then tested them for accuracy. John Goertzen noted the Egyptian representation of tail vanes with flying reptiles and concluded that they must have observed pterosaurs or they would not have known to sketch this leaf-shaped tail.

Evolutionists also cannot explain mass dinosaur graveyards, almost as if they were hunted.

>>2030397
dating methods work, they just have perimeters, its why multiple methods are used to verify the age of something.....scientists understand this

living things and things fucked with by fire are generaly unreliabale and this is pretty understood

its also known that some methods date better in the hundreds years, others thousands of years...its know that some methods break down at the edges

File: Assiniboine-Warrior.jpg (760KB, 2500x1420px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 2500x1420px

Evolutionist Adrienne Mayor spent considerable time researching the possibility that Native Americans dug up dinosaur fossils. But some of the reports she received make a lot more sense if these early Americans interacted with actual dinosaurs, not yet extinct. There is no evidence for sophisticated Ancient Paleontologists. An old Assiniboine story tells of a war party that “traveled a long distance to unfamiliar lands and [saw] some large lizards. The warriors held a council and discussed what they knew about those Assiniboine Warriorstrange creatures. They decided that those big lizards were bad medicine and should be left alone. However, one warrior who wanted more war honors said that he was not afraid of those animals and would kill one. He took his lance [a very old weapon used before horses] and charged one of the large lizard type animals and tried to kill it. But he had trouble sticking his lance in the creature’s hide and during the battle he himself was killed and eaten.” (Mayor, Fossil Legends of the First Americans, 2005, p. 294.) This story conjures up credible visions of the scaly hide of a great reptile, something Native Americans would not know from mere skeletons. It was once thought that Woolly Mammoths had flourished in North America prior to the arrival of humans. But the discovery of sites where many mammoths were killed and butchered has established the co-existence of men and mammoths. Perhaps similar evidence involving dinosaurs will be forthcoming.

>He took his lance and charged one of the large lizard type animals and would kill one
>But he had trouble sticking his lance in the creature’s hide and during the battle he himself was killed and eaten

>>2030430
>Evolutionists also cannot explain mass dinosaur graveyard

hunting kills things but it doesnt preserve them, like say a landslide.

>he well-respected Greek researcher Herodotus wrote

are you joking? Herodotus worked almost entirely off third hand accounts for his work

atheists BTFO

the earth is 6000 years old. to claim otherwise is to call everyone in history a liar.

and to claim all of these depictions and stories are all just coincidences or made-up is a huge stretch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zz8_MxcnzY

Archeological evidence for the nephilim. Giant deformed skulls, hands with 6 dingers. The Bible is right again.

They are quickly hidden in the Smithsonian basement because we can't have something that would destroy the Darwinian narrative, right? Gotta keep the monkey myth going, gotta brainwash 'dem kids into rejecting the Bible.

>>2030441
alligator

File: creation-wise1.jpg (193KB, 960x329px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 960x329px

are yecs going to homeschool their children to protect them from damaging influences like evolutionism?

>>2030465
i love how every suposed proof for giants always ends with "the gosh darn man is hideing the fucking proof" or " the man destroyed it!"

reeeal convincing.....

>>2030470
Dismissive wishful thinking.

Does this guy think he's winning some imaginary argument just because he's spamming nonsense from fringe fundamentalist websites? It's hilarious how much time he's wasting.

>>2030475
why do creationist comics always have creepily drawn faces

>>2030480
I remember when he used to be around /twg/

>>2030476
Except for all the photographs and physical evidence in that video? Yeah let's just conveniently ignore that.

>>2030475
Sending your kid to public state school is akin to child abuse. Why would you want him to end up like a brainwashed commie?

Either way, it doesn't matter much.

Anyone with critical thinking and who can do his own research instead of blindly believing what he's been told can find out the truth for himself. I remember when I was a militant atheist, but then I grew up.

>>2030480
>objects made by people centuries ago are "fringe"

Whatever floats your cognitive dissonance boat.

>>2030492
photos by themselves don't prove shit since they are easily faked. how convenient for you that all actual bones are hidden by a vast conspiracy. dig up your own bones and then we'll talk

>>2030480
>>2030490
samefag

Darwintards can't refute the arguments in
>>2030024
so they resorted to astroturfing. Not gonna work here.

Christianity: 2
Atheism: 0

/thread

>>2030503
You haven't watched the video so I'm not gonna bother. Here's your last (You)

By the way, 200 replies and nobody has posted any proof for evolution. You've made a fool of yourself, laughs were had.

>>2030492
you mean pics of cradle boarded skulls? pictures with bad perspective....old pics with perspective issues......where are the actual skulls that proove that a race of giants exsisted? exsisted? i find it hard to believe that theres a conspiracy out there getting rid of all the evidence

File: LEL.jpg (177KB, 533x388px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 533x388px

ITT: atheists getting absolutely destroyed

>>2029706
actual evidence that any of these occurred: unsubstantial and tainted with previndication.

>>2030052
this settles the argument

>>2030209
>>2030193
>>2030158
>>2030138
>>2030132
>>2030113
>>2030100
>>2030292
>>2030377
>>2030397
undeniable evidence.

it's funny how the atheist's "reason" and "most logical explanation" conveniently stops working when evidence is shown that contradicts their belief system.

>>2030516
actual evidence for evolution: unsubstantial and tainted with logical fallacies

it goes both ways, retard

>>2030063
there are also many claims of similar caliber that there were fish that looked like and talked like monks and also guided sailors. Does that mean they actually exist? thats for you to decide

File: 1467714328818.png (421KB, 509x480px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 509x480px

>>2030524
Don't bother, we've won. The atheists have ran with their tails tucked between their legs.

They had no arguments from the get-go, Anon's post at
>>2030024
half-way through the thread has already done them in.

At this point just let the atheists/evolutionists cry, moan and shitpost like a used whore. It's all they're good for.

Have a good day.

>>2029706
we know that the new testament was writen after the events happened , and that the authors were literate and aware of the old testament and its hardly beyond belief that they would reconcile the jesus narative with older profesy in order the make the story efective

>>2030534
>makes fun of conspiracy theories
>believes in one

>>2030452
>everyone in history a liar
>some pastor in the early modern era is now all of history

doesn't add up

>>2030539
the bible is literally at the least compilation of accounts of the people surrounding jesus, to take accounts most ardent supporters (if it even was them) is not really the most reliable source.

If that is the bar for your crowd, why don't you believe in the accounts of people like Oliver Cowdry and the other two witnesses of Joseph Smith as fact and convert to mormonism?

>>2030555
>is not really the most reliable source.
>eyewitness is not the most reliable source

>>2030555
>If that is the bar for your crowd, why don't you believe in the accounts of people like Oliver Cowdry and the other two witnesses of Joseph Smith as fact and convert to mormonism?
Seriously, comparing these to the bible? Are you retarded?

>>2030733
The gospels are not eyewitness accounts. They were written latter on with second or third hand accounts of what happened.

>>2029703
Literally more erotic than half the porn these days. Sometimes less is more.

>>2029999

Water sports are the way of the Lord.

>>2030182
Excuse me, aren't GMO organisms made sterile from the get-go?
>gain food-giving ability without losing in other departments
That's kinda debated to say the least. GMO food might as well be poisoning us, you would be pretty naive to eat up all the Monsanto propaganda they fed us. There are billions at stake here, don't tell me Monsanto wouldn't make their hands dirty with a bit of "sponsored" science here and there.