Sri Lankans

>>1985417
In terms of colloquial usage of "black"? Yeah, why not.

In terms of being African? No.

They seem to have black hair but their skin seems to be a coppery burnt umber color.

The Sri Lankan kid and my school was deemed NOT BLACK by the black kids at the school. He fell in with the Brown Town crowd, the Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis.

I think that settles it.

>>1985417
Their facial structure seems different compared to the average facial structure of an African. They also have different hair. To be fair I don't have any data on this.

>>1985432
>He fell in with the Brown Town crowd, the Indians, Pakistanis, and Bangladeshis

Maybe because Sri Lanka is right off the coast of India eh? Maybe I'm just crazy.

>>1985450
Well yeah, obviously. Culturally he has much more in common with them than black people born and raised in America.

>>1985417
My roomate is sri lankan. Hes got a pretty long beard and he says black chicks dig him. Lots of compliments. I'm black and before we talked about it for abit.

He's chill, wouldnt say he's "african" black. The skin is fairly resembling the complexion of black people though.

He draws a hard distinction from sri lankans and indians.

File: 1326722129719.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>1985417

>I can only comprehend things via a dichotomy
>All things must conform to my rigid categories

>>1985417
Considering they share no physical characteristics with african ethnic groups except dark skin(also found in other south indian populations which are not considered black), no. They are not.

>>1985455
>every indian is completely the same.
>unlike us sinhalese/bangladeshi/pakjabi/etc.

>>1985455
Most Indians are culturally completely different from other Indians. That's what you get when your country is like the size of Europe and as populated as China.

>>1985471
>>1985467

No, he says indians are very rude people, they get aggressive in soccer & cricket games ect. Fans included.

Btw, sri lanka is it's own independant state from india. And they claim their difference from it. He says ethnically, they are different from many indians.

"They (Sri Lankans) have more defined facial attributes".

I'm slightly seeing his point.

>>1985459
Well, not everything does but race does.

>>1985463
>african ethnic groups except dark skin

They do though.

>>1985493

Why? Just because you can only think in simple terms does not mean that reality has to conform to you, that is what you call hubris anon.

>>1985485
Indians also say that about other Indians.

>>1985518
I know what you're saying, but he can atleast say, "hey, they are a totally different country than us"

>>1985417
>tfw Sri Lankan girl wants my dick

what do?

>>1985537
Same. Go for it. They're pretty wild desu.

>>1985530
and he would be a moron. India is pretty much a subcontinent just like europe with a wide variety of different ethnicities and cultures inhabiting it.

>>1985537
Wear a rubber

>>1985548
Sure man, all neighboring south east asian countries, neighboring arab countries all have the same cultural identity.

Just copy and paste.

File: global-genetic-distances-map.jpg (856KB, 3741x3887px) Image search: [Google]

856KB, 3741x3887px

>>1985425
Colloquially, "black" in the context of people's race means "of subsaharan african extraction".

Sri lankans are quite clearly not subsaharan african genetically.

they are clearly part of the caucasoid cluster.

any unsupervised clustering algorithm like Expectation maximisation or K means would clearly pick up that the caucasoid group with europeans, arabs and indo-iranic peoples was a different cluster from those of subsaharan africa.

>>1985493
Whenever something doesn't conform to your racist categories, the best option would be to make more categories.

>>1985673
But there are differences in race. I don't see why you're so angry

>>1985594
they are Australoid, specifically Veddoid

the Australoid is the proto-race of Caucasoids and Mongoloids

>>1985817
Australoid is a meme race.

South indians cluster with caucasoids genetically speaking. Insofar as there is an australoid race, it would only encompass australian aboriginals and melanesians. Might as well just call them abos.

>>1985826
Southern Indians are a mix of ASI(related to the ancestors of Oceanians) and Iran neolithic component that may be related to the Caucasus(Gedrosian?).

Northern Indians have additional steppe ancestry(something Yamnaya like) most likely from Andronovo,BMAC or historical migrations(Kushans,Scythians etc.)

>>1985850
>Southern Indians are a mix of ASI(related to the ancestors of Oceanians)
About as related as swedes and chinamen.

ASI were probably neolithic farmers who migrated east. But the truth is nobody knows.

And anyways the ASI/ANI model is fucking retarded. The guy just did PCA and saw that there were two big clusters. Wow what a discovery, it's almost as if there was a massive migration of central asian peoples into the subcontinent a few thousand years ago.

>>1985417
they're descended from australoids aka abos

>>1985826
This, don't even try to convince the likes of:

>>1985677
This Ignorant retard

>>1985677
I wasn't condemning your racism. I was condemning your adherence to arbitrary distinctions in the face of evidence. If there are major differences within a race, perhaps you ought to reconsider what you consider a race to be.

>>1985594

This image was made a decade ago by an Argentinian mathematician based on 20+ year old data.
It doesn't show anything meaningful about human genetics.

>>1985417
They are australoid.
>>1985425
No, black only refers to bantu, bantoid and the black american mongrel race.

>>1986676

>They are australoid.

Fuck off retard

>>1985537

If she wants it, the only thing to do is to give it to her anon

>>1986676
Idiot

So you're saying Ghanaians, Togolese, Sudanese, Gambians, Malinese, etc aren't black?

Bantu is an ethnic group

>>1986676

They aren't australoid

>>1985417
"Black" is a political construct, not a genetic one.
You need to clarify which "black" you mean - the everyday use one (so skin color), the modern politics one (so west and south african descent), the colonial one (so all subsaharan africans) and so on.

>>1985432
>I think that settles it.

Yeah man, whatever black children in your school say is fact. We can't possibly argue otherwise.

>>1985417

No, she is a wog.

>>1986990
>Praise Ganesh!

lmfao

File: MOZGUS_HERETIC_3284.jpg (134KB, 715x590px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 715x590px

>>1986990
>Praise Ganesh!

>>1985860
ASI is clearly Onge like that split from the ENA branch of humans. Whether or not ASI can be divided into several subgroups is best left for another day.

ANI is a composite of two major West Eurasians groups,neolithic Iranian and Steppe.

All of this can be solved if with ancient dna(whenever that comes out).

>>1987036
>>1987018
Siamese are Buddhist though

>>1985826

the mtdna Haplogroup M unites Australians, Papuans and Indians (Dravids, Hindis included)

Subcontintentals (Indians/Lankans) are Australoid


Haplogroup M2 [2] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M3 [3] - found mainly in South Asia
Haplogroup M29'Q found among Papuans, Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M31 [24] - found among the Onge, in the Andaman Islands[15]
Haplogroup M32 [25] - found in Andaman Islands
Haplogroup M33 [26] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M33a - found in India
Haplogroup M34 [27] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M40 [30] - found in South Asia[15]
Haplogroup M41 - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M42 [31] - found among Australian Aborigines
Haplogroup M5 [5] - found in South Asia
Haplogroup M6 [6] - found mainly in South Asia

>>1985860
>>1985850
>>1985826

These Holocene inhabitants of India were getting dominated by Dravidian-speaking Persian Elamites of the Indus Valley Civilization pushing further south into the Indian peninsula. The Veddoid natives of India experienced Dravidification by adopting the language of the Elamites.
mitochondrial DNA (which is maternally inherited) studies indicated that Indian mtDNA lineages cluster with the southeast Asians (Papuans), indicative of the Australoid-Veddoid substratum.

Modern studies indicate that the mtDNA lineages in India belong to the Australoid M haplogroup, whose Indian variety (T at np16223) probably originated around 48000 +/- 1500 years before present (i.e. about 46000 BC), and more than 98% of the M individuals carry this variety. This haplogroup is reaches 96.7% amongst the Kotas of the South.


Among its lineages M2 is the most diverse and occurs in significantly higher frequency among the Austro-asiatic tribals. The M3 (frequent among Dravidian tribals), M4, and M5 are also found in significant numbers.

>>1986882
>>1986679

back to plebbit

>>1987681
siam is modern day thailand, what are you talking about?

>>1986600
Bruh that's not an argument lmao

>>1986631
What evidence nigga. You can't just bring it up and leave me hangin.

>>1987845
>>1987681
probably meant sinhalese

>>1985432
Sri Lankans are literally the same as Tamils

>>1988531
Are you kidding me dude? Why would they have a 30 year civil war if they were the same. Sinhalese and Tamils are very different, both culturally and biologically.

>>1985417
The darker skin tones result from proximity to the equator and working conditions that involve farming for 18 hours a day or w/e
I'm there on holiday right now, middle class Sri Lankans skin tone is indistinguishable from Indians and upper caste ones are basically Pakis

>>1990077
so the meme that pakistan is whiter than india is true?

>>1985417
This girl is a South Indian Tamil

My TA is Sri Lankan, they're essentially Indians, aren't they?

File: IndoEuropeanMap.jpg (42KB, 445x272px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 445x272px

>>1990096
There is the fact that Pakistan is more northern/further away from the equator than India.

Additionally Pakis and North Indians are both Indo-Aryan while South Indians are Dravidian, but neither group today is purely Indo-European/Caucasoid or Australoid unlike 6000 years or however so much ago.

The further North and West you go, the more "pure" Indo-Europeans you find. Pakis and Kashmiris, Sikhs, Punjabi etc, are probably around 5-10% Australoid, while middle Indo-Aryans are at least a quarter or so and the southern groups (Marathi, Dhivehi, Sinhalese) are probably around a third.

Modern Dravidians have identifiably caucasoid features like brow ridges and overall skull shape, so probably have a fair amount of Indo-European admixture themselves.

>>1990100
"Indian" is not really an ethnicity or race, originating as a blanket term for the region, but under the ethnic umbrella of the Indian subcontinent, yes, they are quite literally Indian. Don't tell them that, though.

File: 213440.b.jpg (399KB, 1398x761px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1398x761px

>>1985417
nah

>>1990100
Whoa dude hold up where you go to school?

>>1987774
Back to pol you retarded fuck

>>1990134
>anatolian mymothesis map

no

>>1985417
why is she so cute?

I'd take the poo to her loo if you know what I mean

>>1988165
The internet is vast, and a quick google search will tell you all you need.

>>1985417
No. Dark skinned south asians.

Race based on skin colour is bullshit anyway.
Geography and genetics are better.
Look at the girl in the picture. She is dark skinned, sure, but she has straight hair and caucasoid features. My first guess would be indian/pakistani/bangladeshi etc. not Kenyan.

>>1985459
This.

>>1991594
>caucasoid features meme

like?

straight hair is not unique to caucasoids, but occurs also in mongoloids and australoids

her abo nose aint caucasoid, neither is her puffy abo cheeks

infact she resembles a typical australian abo

>>1986990
Aww yiss.

>>1991704
The Indians descended from the higher classes are closer to the Ayrans than the mix-'n'-match Whites (i.e. Americans).

>>1985417
I have no idea but their girls are qt as fuck.

>>1988542
>Are you kidding me dude? Why would they have a 30 year civil war if they were the same
Yes.

>>1985417
No, just darker streetshitters.

>>1988165
Here is an example, Africans should be divided into 3 races, pygmies, East and West African.

>>1991929
Massive holes in that one.

they are genetically related to noongas,
so yes

>>1986887
The modern and colonial are one in the same.

>>1986855
Bantu is a language group.

>>1986990
I initiate her as my Yogini and Wisdom Consort ;^)

>>1985417
No, different skulls mang

>>1991917
Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans poo in loo as i recall

>>1992379
>bangladeshi
>poo in loo
lmoa

File: dh2.png (1MB, 1060x630px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1060x630px

>>1985417
one image isn't quite conclusive evidence, is it

picrelated are also sinhalese/sri lankans; they are clearly overwhelmingly Indian

>>1992533
>In a remarkable achievement, official data reveals that open defecation has reduced to only 1%, a “milestone change” from the 42% in 2003, making it a role model for other countries in the region. Approximately 595 million people in India, about half the population, do not use toilets. In Pakistan the number is 41 million, or about 21%, while for Nepal the number is 15.5 million, or 54% of the population. Only Sri Lanka, of all other South Asian states, has managed, like Bangladesh, to virtually wipe out open air defecation.


knoema.com/atlas/topics/Water/Sanitation-Total-Population/Open-Defecation-Sanitation-percent?type=maps

>>1990134
>Modern Dravidians have identifiably caucasoid features like brow ridges

Aborigines and various "black" races in Asian all have those.

>>1986990
>praise ganesh

lol you fucking autist

>>1990134
>There is the fact that Pakistan is more northern/further away from the equator than India.

that's bullshit because a lot of pakistanis immigrated from india after partition

persian admixture in muslim population could be a factor

>>1992658
I wanna fugg with the third and fourth on the first row, the second and fourth on the middle row, and the fourth on the last row desu

>>1992379
Do Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan get triggered when people mistake them for Indian?

>>1992792
Don't know any Bengalis but the Pakis I know hate it and the one Sri Lankan guy i asked here if he considered himself Indian got really huffy and insisted they were not like Indians or w/e

>>1985417
resembles a south indian, as opposed to a black person

indians are
literally
niggers

>>1993209
This but unironically

File: downloadfile.png (309KB, 880x2016px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 880x2016px

>>1992792
yes dont do it
t.sri-lankan

>>1993209
North Indians are genetically closer to whites than they are to niggers senpai

>>1985417
They're aryans who mixed with the Sudras(black population)

>>1993745
isn't aryan a meme indians use to make themselves seem more white

I guess Mixed Dravidian

>>1993209
We are all niggers, anon

>>1992658
The next to last girl looks kinda asian, sorta nepali

Hijacking thread to ask for a good intro to genetic anthropology. I want to learn about haplogroups, prehistoric human migrations, etc., essentially non-meme race science (pol need not apply).

Books, websites, and videos are good. Thanks in advance.

>>1992750
A lot of the stuff mentioned is pol-tier, but Pakistan is fairly ethnically homogenous compared even to North India. Majority Punjabi, with large Pashtun minority, and smaller Sindhi, Balochi, and Kashmiri/Dardic minorities. All are historically well-established in the region, although it is likely each group assimilated (genetically distinct) Muslim immigrants from India proper.

>>1993893
>prehistoric human migrations
https://mega.nz/#!MIR2UZ5D!x_fP9ZNa55zrSk4zMEPx0daEaSeZyxJw7tIFthW00OY

Text on that subject.

File: human_race_map_post-pleistocene__by_thomas_huxley.png (370KB, 1600x794px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1600x794px

>>1993893
dunno how accurate it is by this a map of races and people after the pleistocene by thomas huxley, who advocated evolution with darwin

>>1993929
Cheers

>>1993949
Thanks. Saved, but I would prefer something more recent (more genetically based synthesis).

>>1993964
You could refer to these i guess;
>>1990203
>>1985594

>>1985417
>>1992658
Girl in OPs pic and last girl here look like typical niggresses, the rest just look like average curry niggers

>>1985826
they cluster with south asians and other indians
australoid is a phenotype designation btw

>>1985417
>>1994076
>>1992658
why do they look so different

>>1994234
>arr should rook same

get out

>>1993876
she might be malay

>>1992683
yeah, rural west bengal doesn't have the poo in streets problem either.

>>1993827
the word aryan entered the european lexicon from India moron.

>>1994481
because there are no streets? :^ )

>>1992658
Not sure if 'over-whelmingly' is a correct term to describe some of the people in that picture who are clearly Goan (mixed Portugese-Sri Lankan).

No, they're caucasoid.

>>1994508
>Goan
Goans (Konkani: गोंयकार, Romi lipi: Goenkar, Portuguese: Goeses) is the demonym used to describe the people of Goa, India,

nigga what
they don't look particularly portuguese either
you could argue some of them look moorish (arab ancestry) though

>>1994491
no, they have common toilets/outhouses.

>>1991945
>>1992712
>>1993827

this

the "causasoid" features are superificial and misidentified (ie:straight hair is not unique to caucasoids, indian abo nose misidentified as a special type of caucasoid nose)


south asians are the australoid type


aryan is a meme

dark Elamites (Mediterraneans) from iran and Arabs did migrate to india

the addition of elamite features confuses indians and promotes a false sense of aryaness

File: IMG_0897.jpg (45KB, 505x359px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 505x359px

>>1994543
>Indian abo nose

>>1994543
>europeans in charge of determining who is "aryan"

>>1994520
thats pushing the boundaries beyond the extreme

if that is the case then the following are also caucasoids:
abos, papuans, american indians, mestizos, ethiopians, ainu, african americans

>>1994508

Firstly, Goa is in India, not Sri Lanka. Secondly there is no breed of half Indian/ half Portuguese going around.

>>1994557
abos and papuans are closely related to native sri lankans, veddas, who are not caucasoid
modern sri lankans are indian invaders though

File: pudoo.jpg (81KB, 609x583px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 609x583px

>>1994550
>Indian abo nose

>>1994541
was just bantz senpai

>>1994558
? fkr i meant burghers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burgher_people

>>1994583
>bush btfo by local motel owner.

>>1994583
>Patel

>>1994583
>Pudoo Patel
>Pupoo Patel

>>1994606
They look more North Indian than Euro mixed, tbqh

>>1994624
Surprised it took this long for the poo in loo memes

>>1994583
>>1985417
>>1992658
>>1986990
>>1994550

Literally all niggers

File: 1478405769375.png (8KB, 687x450px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 687x450px

>>1994393
>malay
>sri lanka

File: DSC_0029.jpg (39KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x399px

>>1994723

Surely, it can't be that difficult to Google something

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_Malays

>>1987737
Notice how no subclade is found both among south asians and melanesians.

There's a R1b subclade found in Nigeria. I guess Nigerians and Western europeans are the same race too...

>>1987765
>probably originated around 48000 +/- 1500 years
Says it all.

File: 1479504951215.png (30KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 657x527px

>>1987737
>>1987765

wut

>>1987765
>Indian mtDNA lineages cluster with the southeast Asians (Papuans),
And with Chinese, central asians, middle easterners and some europeans...

File: dravid.jpg (28KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x332px

>>1994771
>no subclade is found both among south asians and melanesians.
>Papua

get the fuck out of /his/

>>1991954
Not really, you are just a very backwards and uneducated man.

>>1994829
Sub-Saharan Africans are all black/negroid/congoid lad

File: dravidi.jpg (138KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 640x427px

>>1994801
>>1994799
>>1994771
>>1994550
>>1994520
>>1991594
>>1986882
>>1986679
>we iz caucizoid n shit

shillin this hard to be white

File: draividans.png (83KB, 300x306px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 300x306px

>>1994842
>all indians are dravidians

WEW lad

>>1994839
>black/negroid/congoid

Those are outdated terms denoting sociopolitical taxons, and not genetic clusters.

>>1994842
>cherrypicked picture
that'll show em

File: 220px-Dom_man2_kurta_eastbengal1860.jpg (16KB, 220x321px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 220x321px

>>1994849
>>1994857
>we wuz non-dravidian n shit

whats w/ indians and the eternal inferiority complex?

indians insecurity and self-hate and trying so hard to pass as white is hysterical

>>1994869
>caucasoid=white

wew
e
w

>>1994871
Literally 18th century pseudo science.

>>1994876
It's not used anymore because "social scientists have argued that such analyses are rooted in sociopolitical and historical processes rather than in empirical observation" which is more pseudo-science than anything

File: 3310738303_955247be47_m.jpg (10KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 240x240px

>>1994871
>>1994884
get a whiff of this poojeet

today you a str8 up caucasoids from the andamans

tomorrow you are nordic blonde aryans from punjab

File: 170px.jpg (11KB, 170x256px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 170x256px

>>1994891
not caucasoid at all

File: pubjab.jpg (12KB, 300x323px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x323px

>>1994891
fuck you anglo
i am pure white punjabi caucasoid!!

>>1994884
Its not used anymore because we developed genetics.
Races are a pre-genetic concept. It doesn't apply in a modern setting. Clustering does.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_cluster

File: 4715298547_991548b26e_b.jpg (197KB, 1024x794px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1024x794px

>>1994901

File: indoalbino.jpg (11KB, 255x333px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 255x333px

>>1994906
>>1994901
>a typical indian
u aint foolin no1 poojeet

File: t1larg.kashmir.protest.gi.jpg (95KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 640x360px

>>1994911

gets the cogs spinning, doesn't it?

File: indoalbino1.jpg (19KB, 258x340px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 258x340px

>>1994911
>>1994914
being w̶h̶i̶t̶e̶ caucasoid isnt a privilege, it is our right!!!!

File: south_asian_phenotype.jpg (156KB, 872x600px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 872x600px

>>1994919
S-surely all people look the same in a country!!

>>1985417
No, they're south asians

>>1994906
>Twinkle
why do north indians have retarded names?

>>1994942
Maharashtra isn't North

>>1994906
Idgaf about her caucasianoidism, that slutty look makes me wanna fucc the shit out of her

>>1994951
the relevant bits are full of them.

>>1994923
>>1994919
>>1994914
>>1994911
>>1994906
>>1994903
>>1994901
>>1994891
>>1994869
>>1994842
>>1994849

autism

>>1994989
You mean pure bred white aryan europeanoid

>>1994998
How about you go back to /pol/ and pajeet gets off this website for good and everybody's happy

>>1994827
Hey niggerbrains, look up the word "subclade".

>>1994842
Indians are not white, but they're not australian aboriginals either.

Dravidians were neolithic farmers who migrated east. Not australian aboriginals.

The australoid meme race needs to die.

>>1994957
are you this guy >>1992764

do you have brown fever or something

>>1995017
Australoid isn't the same as australian aboriginal though

No, they are not black.

My ex girlfriend was Sinhalese, we did her genetics on one of those sites, 23andme i think, she didn't have a single black african gene, some north african, some east asian, mostly north indian.

They're just dark due to climate

>>1995020
Problem?

>>1995017
>>1994771

~50k yrs ago veddoids from india followed coastal route to australia to become aussie abs

~5k yrs ago veddoids from india returned and reinforced themselves in australia


>Huge 2nd Indian migration return to Australia as recently as 4000 years ago

>genetic study in India found similarities among Indian archaic populations and Aboriginal people, indicating a Southern migration route, with expanding populations from Southeast Asia migrating to Indonesia and Australia.

>Aboriginal genomes consist of up to 11% Indian DNA which is uniformly spread through Northern Australia, indicating a substantial gene flow between Indian populations and Northern Australia occurred around 4,230 years ago. Changes in tool technology, food processing and the Dingo appear in the archaeological record around this time, suggesting there may have been migration from India.[15][16]

http://www.journeytoforever.org/farm_library/price/price10.html

>>1985417
No, they're Indian

>>1994901
the whitest india has to offer is just typical arab kek

>>1985417
Not even close to it
There are no indigenous black populations outside of sub-Saharan Africa

>>1985417
Look at their skin.
What do you see?

>>1995203
they hate to admit that their "caucasoids" minority are from arab bulls

File: cavalli-sforza 1988.png (121KB, 719x521px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 719x521px

>>1985594
I see that image posted many times, where's that from?

Cavalli-Sforza (1988) grouped South East Asian with Papuan & Polynesian rather than northern mongoloid.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/32287

>>1995236
from his veddoid ass

File: F1.large.jpg (334KB, 986x1024px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 986x1024px

>>1995236
Depends, most SEA of Austroasian, Austronesian, Tai-kadai, and Tibeto-burman stock are related to northern asians, while people of Melanesian and Australoid stock like Papuans and Negritos are more related to pacific islanders

>>1995317
>Altaic

Thought this was a meme?

File: kaffir-dance.jpg (31KB, 300x227px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x227px

>>1985417
There are black Sri Lankans in the sense that there are Veddoid and African Sri Lankans

>>1986676
Bantu is a linguistic term you retard.

>>1990134
>Anatolian hypothesis map
Directly into the trash, not reading your post

>>1986676
this

>>1986855
>>1996107

subdivide H. sapiens into subspecies, such as H. sapiens afer ( for negroids as paleocongid, sudanid, nilotid [nilotes], and bantid [bantus] races

. Kafrid or Bantid subrace


https://books.google.com/books?id=fsF1AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT40&lpg=PT40


tjsbookshelf.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Human-races.pdf

File: 1446910462086.jpg (15KB, 476x345px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 476x345px

>>1986990
>being a foot fetishist

>>1996223
Bantuid isn't even stable as a phenotype. It just meant sudanid who migrated and to some degree absorbed cushitic, sanid and nilotid peoples.

Even then Bantu is first and foremost a linguistic subtype, not a synonym for black.

These categories are dumb, obsolete and anachronistic.

>>1986990
>ganesh

Hmmm

>>1995129
Now you're just making a fool of yourself.

That study was debunked.
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(16)00078-6?_returnURL=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0960982216000786%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&cc=y=

Pop sci version probably more adapted to you: http://theconversation.com/an-ancient-australian-connection-to-india-55935

You shouldn't speak on subjects you quite clearly know nothing about.

>>1995205
Browns?

She's a QT

>>1985417
>>1992658

All typical poo in loos
I've seen south indians just as darker and darker than the first and last ones here
Their facial features are 100% PooinLoo

>>1996097
Now the afro here, could pass for african

>>1996707
They are African Sri Lankans who have been there for centuries.

>>1996714
Why the fuck are there africans in sri lanka

>>1996723
Sailors, mercenaries, slaves, traders.

>>1996113
>>1990867
Just looked up indo european peoples map and grabbed the first result senpaitachi

>>1996704
No, not remotely

>>1996741
more for me

>>1996758
>fat
>braces

Wtf is this taste nigger

>>1996728
>africans
>sailors, traders

dubious tbqhimo

>>1996758
She's mine, bitch. Hands off.

>>1996770
Arabs and Portuguese have a long history of trade relations with the East African littoral and Africans were brought as freemen and slaves by those powers as traders and sailors.

Portuguese, Dutch and British utilized then in Naval forces because of their skills on ships.

>>1996770
Swahili coins have been found as far as Northern Australia. The east coast of Africa was integrated into the Indian Ocean trade network

Haha how the fuck is this thread ongoing for days niggers
OP, idgaf whether your sri lankan buddies claim to not be indian, they are literally indians
they are 0% black in the sense of african
skin tone varies person to person

So no, they are not black, they are brown.

>>1996881
Sure, but the trading was done by arabs, persians and indians.

This is pretty common knowledge. I think the extent of participation of africans in the indian ocean trade was as a commodity for the slave markets.

>>1996914
>>1996881
>>1996869
>>1996770

dunno about african traders in general but a quick google shows all blacks in sri lanka descend from portuguese slaves

>The Sri Lankan Kaffirs (cafrinhas in Portuguese, කාපිරි kāpiriyō in Sinhala, and காப்பிலி kāpili in Tamil) are an ethnic group in Sri Lanka who are partially descended from 16th century Portuguese traders and Bantu slaves who were brought by them to work as labourers and soldiers to fight against the Sinhala Kings.[2][3]

>>1996914
That's not true at all. Janjira was founded and ruled by Siddi and Maldives a island nation of critical importance was conquered by Somali back when they were the naval power of the Western Indian ocean. Beyond that Swahili were traders, ship owners and powerful forces in Indian ocean trade.

You're being silly if you seriously think what you post lol

>>1996952
This is what I mean, if you actually read more than the top paragraph of a Wikipedia article you'd learn much more about them.

Does anyone on here do anything more than skim?

>>1996970
Ok,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lanka_Kaffirs
http://roar.lk/identities/morning-sri-lankan-kaffirs/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/expat/expatnews/6613354/Where-kaffir-is-no-insult.html

it all says they were brought by the portuguese as slaves

>>1996970
africans cant sail

>>1996914
>arabs, persians and indians.
Yes, and Somalis, Swahilis and other Bantu groups.

>This is pretty common knowledge.
Nothing about Africa is common knowledge really

> I think the extent of participation of africans in the indian ocean trade was as a commodity for the slave markets.
That's not accurate. Even slaves from the interior were sold by other African nations like the Nyamwezi.

>>1996966
Siddis were literally slaves brought over during the arab slave trade.

Fail.

Also Swahili = Arab. Although the arabs did end up mongrelizing with the natives to an extent.

>>1997540
>Siddis were literally slaves brought over during the arab slave trade.
Mostly but some were mercenaries and traders

>>1997540
>Swahili = Arab.
No it doesn't you retard. Swahili was the arab name for the bantus of the coast.

>>1997010
It's like you're not even trying to find anything on purpose
https://books.google.com/books?id=mdpcgy_aopwC&pg=PA251&lpg=PA251&dq=sri+lanka+kaffir+sailors&source=bl&ots=iKd4zrgO4p&sig=kY2A3FzLoUSQ9DAzDvMZGbH17Ig&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi-vKm948LQAhUM02MKHfJJDP0Q6AEIaTAO#v=onepage&q&f=false
>>1997493
Wrong
>>1997540
Nope.

Its sad the mental gymnastics you'll take to invalidate Africans in Sri Lanka and south Asia as a whole. Sure many were slaves but all were not we know they founded and maintained Princely States and conquered a key island group that was necessary in Indian Littoral trade.

We know they were fighters, sailors, musicians, merchants etc... You can't change that because it doesn't fit your narrative. Same with the belief that Swahili aren't black when we know Ibn Battuta called them such.

Is Australoid a term used so white people don't have to share the term Caucasoid with brown people?

>>1997648
yes

>>1997648
>>1997679
But most brown people are still considered Caucasoid or part Caucasoid. Are you saying Dravidian/ASI/Elamite/whatever people were Caucasoid as well?

>>1985417
>>1986990
>>1994550
>>1994583
>>1994827
>>1994842
>>1994869
>>1994891
>>1994903
hot

>>1994923
>>1994919
>>1994914
>>1994911
>>1994906
>>1994901
>>1994732
>>1992658
not

>>1993827
Aryan is an ethnicity.

>>1993827
>>1993827
"aryan" has nothing to do with whiteness, blonde hair, blue eyes, or race in general, despite what /pol/ might make you believe

"Aryan" (/ˈɛəriən, ˈɛərjən, ˈær-/)[1] is a term meaning "noble" which was used as a self-designation by Indo-Iranian people. The word was used by the Indic people of the Vedic period in India as an ethnic label for themselves, as well as to refer to the noble class and geographic location known as Āryāvarta where Indo-Aryan culture was based.

>>1993949
This is a misleading picture, variation is gradual. Also terms used to describe populations have no biological meaning.

>>1993964
dont know if your still around but this is a cool paper.


http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6282/235

Stop arguing and post more qts

>>1998018
Why? It's a /pol/ thread.

They Indian like the guy who runs the convenience store

>>1998026
le praise kek xd

>>1998094

>/pol/ is literally plebbit tier now

>>1998130
>now

File: 1479940193446.png (1MB, 1060x630px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1060x630px

>>1992658
2bh

>>1985417
Pretty sure i've seen this girl being posted as a south indian tamil before

>>1998228
You haven't

>>1998232
yeah i have

>>1998236
That's not possible, nig

>>1998237
why the fuck not, spic?

>>1998239
She's Sinhalese, tit

>>1998240
yeah but what if they didn't know that
also how do you know that

>>1998249
I know the girl. South Indian types just look similar.

File: a08961e517912958d392ec0bd76d3ea706a4128fbce5c01c2011a42c688020e1_1.jpg (54KB, 800x704px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 800x704px

>>1998249
>posting pictures of people you know on 4chan

>>1994906
I've never considered italians white.

>>1998258
>italians aren't white

>>>/int/
>>>/pol/

out

>>1998256
Nigga I've already got the pic saved I didn't think the damn thread would go on this long and she was the specific Sri Lankan my mates and I argued about. I wasn't gonna waste time on a Google search or anything.

>>1998258
>>1998265
>still using the term white

Get out, /pol/

>>1998272
Wow, I thought maybe you were just shitposting. You and your mates literally argued about whether someone with 0 African descent was black? Are Swedes black? Leave /his/, you troglodyte.

>>1998152
>he rates the men
lmoa faggot

>>1998014
I'm still lurking; thanks.

>>1998018
This. I think I'm coming down with brown fever.

>>1998279
I was the one saying she wasn't. I pretty much brought up every argument in this thread but nobody believes shit I say.

>>1997941
t.junglefever

>>1998251
did you post this on /int/?

>>1998347
if you do plz provide a link

then when that thread is over make one on /pol/. then /sci/

keep this kindling of autism smoldering it is hilarious

>>1998357
Nah i mean i saw someone, presumably OP, asking what race she was (with the same pic) on /int/

>>1998347
I didn't but one of my mates I mentioned did. I mentioned it as a joke and he took it seriously. But he started the thread on a meme board and worded it all wrong so I started it here instead.

>>1998376
There are none meme boards on 4chan?

>>1998416
There are boards I consider less memeish than others

>>1998284
literally nothing wrong with this you insecure fuckwit

>>1990203

is sri lankas most common haplogroup R1a? if so they are actually pure white aryans.

File: Indo-Aryan_subgroups.png (114KB, 320x335px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 320x335px

>>1998445
see
>>1998000
They are """Aryan""", sure, nothing white about it, though.

Sinhalese of Sri Lanka has shown that 23% of the subjects were R1a1a (R-SRY1532) positive.

A test for Y-chromosome DNA haplogroups showed in Sinhalese 24.1% of the subjects were R2 positive

Map seems to be coloured for R group in general rather than R1a

>>1998436
he did get answered by a guy with a sri lankan flag so maybe it wasn't a wrong decision mate

>>1998544
Damn

>>1997648
caucasoid has been thoroughly abused as a term of privilege than a real phenotypic category

there are strict phenotypic races:

mongoloid, negroid

each of these have set boundaries

anything outside of this goes to caucasoid by default

so australoid has been ignored in favor of the presitgious caucasoid race, it increases self-esteem if you can appropriate caucasoid


see:
>>1998577

>>1998544
>implying they'd inherently know better than anyone else with some researching ability

>>1998506
>nothing white about it, though.

i was just shitposting but the original indo-european speakers coming from the north would have been fairer than modern indians.

>>1998603
>descend from the same genetic stock, have common haplogroup distributions, shared linguistic ancestry
>"not a true Caucasoid cause you're brown bro"

>>>/pol/

>>1998653
>descend from the same genetic stock
NOPE
iranians invading and bleaching small group of veddoid whores

>have common haplogroup distributions
NOPE
mtdna is what delivers truth
south asian mtnda is veddoid haplogroup M


>shared linguistic ancestry
NOPE
veddoid language shifters got dominated by invading iranians and adopted the conquerors language

the invading iranians enforced their language, culture upon the native veddoid indians


dont forget dark Mediterranean elamites did the same before the iranians

and you are as superficially "caucasoid" as east africans, mestizos, ainus, papuans

>>1998677
>shared linguistic ancestry
>NOPE

this is where to stop reading

File: 3310738307_m.jpg (5KB, 206x299px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 206x299px

>>1998677
cant argue with them dubs of truth, infinite wisdom, and universal understanding

>>1998687
>>1998622

you seem obsessed with this topic
cool down, anon, go outside get some air

>>1998677
everything else aside "NOPE" at shared linguistic ancestry is pretty stupid lad
it's indo-european, not irano-european

>>1987737
>>1987765
>>1995129
this

Coastal migration out of east Africa

The coastal route is the initial peopling of the Arabian peninsula, India, Southeast Asia, New Guinea, Australia, near Oceania, coastal China, and Japan.[8][9] It is linked with the presence and dispersal of mtDNA haplogroup M and haplogroup N


humans, likely similar to the Negritos or Proto-Australoids of modern times, arrived in the Arabian peninsula from Africa, then on the southern coastal regions of the Indian mainland, followed by spread to the Andaman Islands and modern-day Indonesia, and thence branching southwards to Australia and northwards towards Japan.

case solved

They are Indian.
Indians are not African and neither are they white.

>>1998728
dont be this retarded

sanskrit is iranian

it is part of Indo-Iranian

it is closely related to avestan, also iranian

again, all this veddoid self-hate and butthurt ITT caused by iranians bleaching a few veddoid whores causing eternal asspain and veddoids LARPing as caucasoids

>>1998748
jesus christ you're an absolute fucking mong aren't you

>>1998754
no shit.

He is probably one of those iranian diaspora who lives abroad and thinks himself to be white.

>>1998748
>>1998728
>>1998677
white people think they are the original PIE. what they dont realise is Indians had an Arian caste system before white people even existed!!! those cave dwelling neanderthals were eating rats while Indians were building Arian empires.

them british white boys thought that they can conquer India, but we showed them who is at the top of the caste system.

now they come back claiming Indians are Australians. not even realizing how far apart India and Australia are!!! just look on the map! India is not event connected by land. once you show them how close Indians are genetically to caucausoids with extensive research by leading Indian scientists, they pull out psuedo-science garbage about how Indians superficially look like Papuans or that we share alot of dna with Australians.

but let me tell you- looks can be decieving. we may have the same skin color as Papuans but that is as far as it goes. genetically indians are caucasoids!

Indians are not related to Australoids.
case closed

inb4 psuedo scientific atleast 50% Indian dna is Australoid
inb4 psuedo scientific prehistoric coastal migration from India to Australia
inb4 psuedo scientific Australians have atleast 12% of Indian dna

argue with facts. not psuedo science of the last century

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3156952/

>>1998757
I see this applies to you as well, pajeet
>>1998754

>>1998754

there is nothing Indo about Aryan languages
these languages (Sanskrit, Avesta) come from Andronovo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranian_languages


if we apply the same logic then Spanish is an Amero-Asiatic language, but Spanish is just Iberian language that has spread to America, Asia

same with Aryan language which spread to India

indo-european languages are adopted by the descendants of incas, aztecs, mayans, australian aborigines, bantus
modern indians are simply adopters of a language group originating somewhere near the caspian.
modern europeans are also adopters of this language.
the people who originated this language were neither indian or european.


Indian is a useless term like Hispanic or African. Remember that Central Asia has been fucked up over the centuries and what used to be a fairly light skinned place has darkened and the people Mongolized.

>>1998757
>>1998748
I'm 99% sure this is the same guy pretending to be indian rn

>>1998766
poltards claim to fame is appropriating our history. they know that if they acknowledge that India is Caucasian they loose legitimacy over Europe. ie Brahmin domination over Europe and history shows that they can not handle competition.
they will disinform and distance us from our land as far as possible by claiming we are Veddoids.

File: aryan.jpg (26KB, 199x260px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 199x260px

>>1998767
>>1998755
>>1998694
>>1996632


>mfw Indians can't deal with the fact that they are the rapebabies of Slavs and abbo women.

File: 1479968822605.jpg (19KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 251x242px

>>1998776
>being iranian

>>1998757
>but we showed them who is at the top of the caste system.

welp this thread is already full /pol/:

POO IN LOO, PAJEET!

if you cant even shit into plumbing you cant brag.

>>1998766
>the people who originated this language were neither indian or european.

modern europeans have a lot of yamnaya admixture.

File: 1434166950371.gif (1MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x200px

>>1998776
>tfw iranian
>tfw have to come up with random justification as to why your homeland is islamic and your religion is a persecuted minority in it's own home.

>>1998757
calm down pajeet

>itt /pol/ tier 18th century racial theories
post dem craniums /his/

>>1998757
>>1998766

you guys are embarrassments

but entertaining

Sri Lankans aren't even humans. Almost same with Indians

But fuck Poland 1.9 mil get

>>1999986
Nice job

File: voltaire.png (1009KB, 760x920px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 760x920px

>
>
>

>H
>R
>E

>>>1999999

>>1991929
>No Khoisan
>No Sahel

>>1993949
>Australoid being the same race as Negroid

Australoids are literally the LEAST related people to modern Africans, with Negritos coming in close.

>>2000419
what de fugg? australoids look borderline identical to negroids

>>2001350
Yeah and birds and bats both have wings, why come they aren't related? Crazy shit.

>>2001512
>>2001350
Kek

>>1995203
well, he never said "white"

>>2001754
Poltards worship the Kalash as the last foothold of Aryan "whites" in Asia, but Kalash are as ASI as any Dardic group (at least 10-15%). To a poltard, blue/green eyes="white" and brown eyes=subhuman scum, unless they have brown eyes themselves, in which case they show the sourest of grapes. It's not really worth discussing "science" with pseudoscientists.

What more do you expect from cognitive dissonance in normies
>dude don't be racist
>but race is a social construct lmao more affirmative action, too.

>>1994842
>Whites always shilling hard to be aryans