/hpg/ Headphone General

>>62249877
>bayerdynaHISSSSSS shill
fuck off with that sibilant hissing garbage!
anyway, this is a troll thread.
DO NOT POST TO THIS THREAD!

ps: seek mental help before you murder your whole family.

Daily reminder that all you need for perfect audio experience is $3 earbuds and EqualizerAPO + PeaceGUI.
Anything more is for retarded audiophools who love falling for snake's oil scams.

>>62249928
>sibilant hissing
>the bassy as fuck beyer model
at least get your shitposting right.

>>62249928
thats not even a real beyer

>tfw listening to my headphones with earplugs in

File: 1488997130806.png (686KB, 860x600px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 860x600px

Idol trash here.
What's your setup like, Anon?

File: IMG_20170904_114709.jpg (1021KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 1920x1080px

>>62250215
its like this
I'm on episode 7 of love live now
i feel like a fag watching it it's too girly

>>62250350
>>62250215
Go hang yourself, pedos.

File: 1500287996139.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>62250350
Ahh, the shame stage.
It only gets better from there.

>>62250389
I'm like... the absolute last person you would ever expect to be watching some shit like this if you just saw me in passing.
I think the show is pretty enjoyable though, it has a nice plot and makes you feel the feels.
Still can't see myself listening to your kind of music though

>>62249935
>earbuds
Nope. That distortion. Pleas change to $3 IEM.

>>62250350
>i feel like a fag watching it it's too girly
Don't, it's "seinen" so it's literally made for you.

what are the best replacement earpads for a 7506?
mine are in tatters now and bits a pieces are starting to get stuck in my ears

>>62250467
HD600, HD579, mdr-cd900st.

File: 1503817853133.jpg (307KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 800x600px

>>62249877
>no anime girl
Beyerfags: not one of us.

>>62250467
There are some velour earpads for another set of cans that fit perfectly on the v6/7506 and I really like them, I'm using them as i write this post ama

Beyerdynamic EDT250V Headphone Ear Pads Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0016MF7W2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_taa_R1xRzbGDWKPJN

Another option is you could get some stock 7506 pads, I mean the pleather on mine lasted years before needing replacement

>>62250467
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/888545-REG/Auray_eps_mdr7506_Genuine_Sheepskin_Leather_Earpads.html
Velours will change the sound too much. Get these.

Hey /hpg/ anons I've been shopping for headphones for a while now as I think I'm going to go balls deep audio-phool and spend GPU/monitor tier money on headphones.
Is this graph accurate? Can you help me understand what it says about each headphone in comparison to each other?
It seems like the he560 is the "best"? The lack of subbass on the shure and senn's are kind of off putting. The mids on all of them seem comparable and I don't know to interpert the highs, they're always so spikey on every headphone.
I'm also open to EQ, I will EQ no matter what headphone I buy so I guess that's a consideration.

File: output.png (89KB, 2160x1170px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 2160x1170px

>>62250586
Forgot pic

>>62250571
>>62250543
ok thanks pals

File: 1473289539233.jpg (251KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1280x720px

What is the second best headphone behind the HD600?

>>62250603
Stax are better, zmf shit is better, hd800/s is better, high end hifimans are better, most lcd's are better.

File: 4af27f9cfa44b65f1ab4a6dfb9730286.png (42KB, 630x489px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 630x489px

>>62250586
>>62250595
InnerFidelity's compensated graphs are garbage because their target curve is garbage. They don't represent what a headphone sounds like. HD600 is better than any of those. Most music doesn't have fundamental tones below 40 Hz, so response below 40 Hz is fairly inconsequential. HD600 doesn't have spiky highs; that's why it's great.

File: kumikodeal.jpg (719KB, 1700x956px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 1700x956px

>>62250636
Nah, you're wrong.

>>62250636
>zmf
>faggot retard hipster boutique headphones

I'd rather have beats

File: anattemptwasmade.jpg (121KB, 1361x810px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1361x810px

>>62250687
Thanks for sharing but you forgot about the other like 20 headphones that take a big fat wet shit all over the hd600.

>>62250603
pic+timestamp

File: 1479429538541.gif (1MB, 250x141px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x141px

>>62249877
Alright, here's the deal: it's almost the end of 2017 and I've been using strictly only wireless Bluetooth headphones for the couple last years, simply out of principle and to gather all the needed first-hand experience on this entire "wired VS wireless" debacle. So, after using strictly only wireless headphones on a daily basis for almost two-and-a-half years, I can definitely without any doubt openly state that the "always wired only" and "only highly expensive portable players/no smartphone pleb-tier" pseudo-audiophilic FAGGOTS are completely and absolutely FULL OF SHIT. I won't argue with anyone here that wireless headphones in general and wireless sound technologies in overall were utter garbage just 5-or-so years ago, but nowadays it's NOWHERE even remotely close to being as bad as it was in 2012 and further down the line. Everything (literally EVERY THING) these so-called self-proclaimed pseudo-audiophilic kiddie shithead trolls are openly and absolutely brainlessly proclaiming loudly everywhere about MODERN wireless sound technologies being any "bad" or "not on par with wired" is 100% COMPLETE BULLSHIT. Abso-effing-lute LIE. These retarded deaf kiddies clearly never used any modern wireless headphones that cost more than 50$ (and actually good/worthwhile wireless headphones start from the 120$ mark AT THE VERY LEAST) and/or they never tried Apt-X LL or ESPECIALLY the GODLIKE LDAC. These FAGS basically don't know jack about any of this, but they act like they're the hottest and most knowledgeable shits around the block while in reality they're not hot, but just shit. MODERN wireless sound IS actually VERY good and does NOT lose to wired at all by the sheer quality of sound and latency (if it's apt-X LL or LDAC), WHILE being WAAAY more convenient and comfortable to use due to headphones being completely (WELL, DUH!) wireless. Fuck all those pseudo-audiophilic pseudo-elitistic sudo-entitled "pro-wired" scrubshits, I say. They know fucking NOTHING.

>>62250711
I'm not defending the HD600. I just hate shit eating hipster faggots.

File: 68967907908.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>What ~50$ range wireless headphones would /g/ recommend?
Unfortunately, there are almost no actually decent/good models in that price range. The closest one you can get to be of a "somewhat decent sound quality" is Rombica's "MySound BH-10 2C" model, but they have extremely crappy Bluetooth range and they usually tend to bug out and turn off even if slightest electromagnetic interference is nearby (like, for example, when you're in a convenience store and standing near a commercial fridge). Also note that they are literally "Chinkshit Wireless"-tier of headphones. If you never ever had a pair of wireless Bluetooth headphones before and you wish to get ACTUALLY worthwhile device from the first attempt - you'd have to spend AT LEAST 120$ and these will be MEElectronics' "Air-Fi Matrix 3" model and NO OTHER. This is the EXACT very point where actual wireless GOOD quality starts.

>Have they also opened it up for non-Sony headphones or do I need a Sony wireless?
That we don't know yet, as there are simply no massive amount of Android 8-based smartphones on the market so far, but I personally highly doubt that this will be Sony-only when it becomes mainstream, simply due to default LDAC implementation in all Android 8 devices making no logical sense in the case if Sony decides to not license this to other wireless headphone manufacturers. They've already licensed this to Android 8, so why the hell will they restrict it only to their wireless headphones now? That will be an asshole move and will undoubtedly garner a lot of critique on Sony's ass. I don't think that Sony's THAT stupid as to not provide other wireless headphone manufacturers with a LDAC license. And even if (and that's a very big IF) they actually in all seriousness restrict LDAC usage only to their wireless devices, this still at least leaves us an option to not use a Sony smartphone for it if we wouldn't want to, so there's at least that.

Anyone got experience with Brainwavz free shipping in Canada or Mexico?
How long did it take for non-USA NA territories for you?

File: 1502525403390.jpg (65KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 601x601px

>>62250730
>i hate people who buy things i don't like!!
>mom why do they keep doing things i dont like!!
>MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
>MAKE IT STOOOOOOOOOOP
RWEQREIHNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQFWEDQWEFEQWF

File: 14611724307922.gif (302KB, 640x636px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 640x636px

>Name one worthwhile wireless headphone that isn't shit-tier or overpriced for what it sounds
Plantronics BackBeat Pro 2 SE (monitor, closed, neutral, medium price)
MEElectronics AirFi Matrix 3 (monitor, half-open, neutral-to-bright, price-wise this very start of the actual good quality in wireless headphones so this is as low as you should go if you're planning on using LDAC/Apt-X LL)
Marshall Monitor Bluetooth (monitor, closed, V-shape, medium price)
Master & Dynamic MW60 (monitor, closed, V-shape, high price yet not ineptly overpriced)
Bang & Olufsen H9 (monitor, closed, neutral, mid-to-high price)
Sony MDR-1000X (monitor, closed, warm-to-neutral, mid-to-high price, best ANC)
Onkyo W800BT (IEM, closed, neutral, mid price)
JVC HA-S90BN (monitor, closed, V-shape, mid price)

All of these currently available headphones are absolutely worthwhile wireless solutions. The most expensive one in that list is Master & Dynamic MW60 and even it is not really overpriced (usually sells for 600$, but can be found for as cheap as ~420$ at some places during sale-off days).

P.S.
Answering the question that was made in the previous thread: "open" structure is not actually common in the wireless segment, at least when it comes down to monitor headphones, but if anything - you could always try MEElectronics' AirFi Matrix 3, they're partially open. Also please don't ever lump "closed" design and "bad" together all the time, because this is simply not true. All of the closed monitor headphones mentioned above are absolutely top-notch pieces of hardware and sound very good for their respective pricing segments (Master & Dynamic MW60 having the best materials and sounding phenomenally even in artificially created bad conditions, but it's sound curve, which is very clearly V-shaped, is definitely not necessarily for everyone. I personally prefer absolutely neutral sound, so my personal wireless headphones of choice for everyday usage are Plantronics BackBeat PRO 2 SE and Onkyo W800BT).

File: obama-pajama-boy-white-house-r.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>62250762
t. beta cuck nu-male faggot

Are the HD600s still the go-to open mid-fi set?

the sennshit shills are simply unparalleled

File: AXPONA2015_ZMFHeadphones_Photo_Main.jpg (35KB, 600x498px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x498px

>>62250778
Here anon give these a listen
Maybe you'll cheer up!

>>62250786
Obviously. It's not even close.

>>62250803
what headphones are these

>>62250813
what a punchable face

>>62250786
May as well buy IEMs. They'll sound better and have a bigger sound stage. HD600 is depreciated trash at this point.

File: 1474645205060.gif (446KB, 369x251px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 369x251px

>>62249877
>Budget
$400
>Location
US
>Source
Luxman L-430 Integrated Amplifier
>Type of headphone
Over ear
>Open or closed
dont care
>Comfort level
Will be wearing them every day for 8+ hours at a time
>Sound signature
Reference
>Past headphones
DT-770 Pro 250 ohm, Koss R-80, Koss KO-727b, Audio-Technica ATH-AD700 (favorite so far)

>>62250837
This is bait.

>>62250824
It says right on the image.
>>62250837
HD600, obviously.

>>62250837
HD600
>>62250849
Definitely. There's an obvious, scripted answer for that kind of template.

File: 1500602401966.gif (74KB, 630x489px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 630x489px

bakers penha

>>62249877
>itt: shitposters and people who haven't tsted more than two good headphones in their entire lives.

File: 1499040236460.jpg (846KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 1920x1080px

>>62250882
Er, put captcha in message.

>>62250831
>sticking shit in your ears
I would hope by now that there would be something on the market that sounds real good that isn't made primarily out of plastic.

>>62250882
alternatives to 770?

>>62250926
Satania a cute. A cute!!

>>62250931
Custom Studios are bass boosted; like DT770 without the ear rape. DT250 are fairly neutral with a much smaller treble spike.

>>62250931
ath msr7

>>62250926
say that to >>62250650

>>62250849
>>62250865
>>62250861
>HD600

Are these actually any good or am i being meme'd?

File: 1499462952448.jpg (191KB, 457x686px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 457x686px

I don't see any Beyers here.

>>62250987
You're in a /g/ general.

File: 1500843956640.png (18KB, 649x685px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 649x685px

>>62250988
That's because DT880 aren't neutral. They're bright. Bright. Not neutral.

>>62250988
No, only veiled garbage and one strong v-shape.

>>62250987
Yes, they are good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AZTKCMRzHM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2Es9S9tXTY

>>62249935
Oiled snake salesman!

>>62251046
dat cute fang.

>>62250987
Both. They're the best full-sized open headphones at any price and you're still being memed.
https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/very-important-sennheiser-hd-580-hd-600-and-hd-650

>>62250987
Yes to both questions.
They are good, but people here don't suggest them because of it.

File: 21291745_1211206832317708_1688396968_n.jpg (58KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 540x960px

> tfw AKG quality
Bought them in september 2015. Saw daily usage for about a year, then spent the majority of the following year inside a box in my closet.

File: 1498759795881.jpg (49KB, 565x486px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 565x486px

>>62250903
>shitposters who haven't tested more than two good headphones in their entire lives
Yeah, I completely agree. All of these wirecucks truly make me laugh out loud with all of this "buy Sennheiser and Audio-Technica, GOYM!" carp of theirs. Hipster kiddies seriously stuck in an underground cave, lol. Meanwhile, the TRUE and ONLY gods of headphone sound in these modern times are those who use quality wireless headphones in a combination with LDAC or Apt-X LL.

>>62251122
next time go with real leather or velour.

File: tsfdeal.jpg (90KB, 572x488px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 572x488px

>>62251211
Nah, you're wrong. Wireless is shit.

>>62251046
This poll needs to be completely redone for this modern day and age where wireless reigns. This shit of yours is too old an stuck-up, literal stone age.

>>62251248
Wireless is fine for lossless audio but unacceptable for lossy audio. Stacking lossy codecs = audible artifacts, period.

>>62251281
prove it kike

>>62251281
>listening to lossy audio in the first place

File: Leia_endorpromo02.jpg (394KB, 1920x2400px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1920x2400px

>>62251234
You're not trying hard enough, wirecucked sucky boy faggot. First actually personally at least TRY all of the models listed here >>62250771 and only AFTER that dare to say anything to me. Just FYI - I own BOTH an Orpheus and SR-009, but I still prefer wireless nowadays simply because MODERN (not from 5-or-more years ago) wireless is actually just THAT GOOD now. It doesn't lose to wired AT-FUCKING-ALL in the case IF you do it ALL right.

>>62251234
>>62251211
I will only accept a wireless listening experience if the benefits outweigh the sound artifacting -- such as listening to music at work where I just want some background noise and I'm not trying to hear detail.

Bluetooth compression artifacting is still a problem, even with 4.1, and my music sounds tinnier when played through anything but a cable.

>>62251306
What's the wireless equivalent of HD600?

>>62251300
Your music collection is pitifully small if it is not larger than the storage capacity of your phone.

>>62251308
proof of audible artifacting?

>>62251306
3DPD.

>>62251337
By that logic a handfull of Wav rips is less pitifull of a collection than many more Flac albums.

>>62251338
>he transcodes lossy to lossy
kek

File: 1504397065428.jpg (71KB, 611x508px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 611x508px

>>62251393
>no proof

>>62251281
This.
>>62251391
Your FLAC collection is pitifully small if it is not larger than the storage capacity of your phone.

>>62251434
Prove your FLAC collection is bigger than 1.5TB.

File: 6750ab4d8314108fd6d68949e927feb31314502762_full.jpg (99KB, 608x511px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 608x511px

>>62251281
Naturally, but who's stupid enough (aside from Chinks and Niggers, of course) as to buy a pair of high quality wireless headphones, then a smartphone or player with LDAC/Apt-X LL, and then listen to friggin' mp3 instead of FLAC or Redbook? If anything, just a daily reminder to all here that LDAC goes all way up to 24 bit and 990kHz - this shit can pwn even some of the more expensive "audiophilic" and downright "ANALytic" offerings on the market IF you do everything right (read - "right" is quality wireless headphones with a quality smartphone/codec and FLAC/Redbook tracks only). Apt-X LL "might" be considered somewhat lossy, but it's latency is so goddamn low and it's still so much better than even the Apt-X HD, that it's almost never an issue. LDAC, on the other hand, is pretty much as close to the "raw wired with best cans" as you could've ever just dreamed it to be, "lossy" is essentially a nonexistent word for LDAC.

>>62251450
Which phone has 1.5 TB of local storage ?
I know UHS-1 mSD slots can take up to 2TB, but the cards themselves only go up to 256GB as of yet.

>>62251498
1TB OTG hard drive
Now where's the proof dumb goy

File: 14821802979790.png (1MB, 1412x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1412x2000px

>>62251335
Bang & Olufsen H9. But that's sound-wise. Sennheiser is nowhere even remotely near to have such outstanding build quality as the one that B&O H9 has. So it's comparable by sound, but quality is way better.

>>62251507
Alright, but what about the remaining .5TB ?
Two 256GB mSD cards ? If so, which phone ?
I'm not even that guy, I'm just actually curious how you manage 1.5TB of local storage on a phone.

>>62251308
>I will only accept a wireless listening experience if the benefits outweigh the sound artifacting -- such as listening to music at work where I just want some background noise and I'm not trying to hear detail.
There is no "artifacting" with LDAC at the very least. Can't say 100% sure for Apt-X LL, but that's a different kind of beast altogether. LDAC is for fidelity AND top-notch quality, Apt-X LL is for INSANELY low latency and very good (but not necessarily for "ANALytically"-good) quality.

>>62251557
256GB internal + 256GB SD

>>62251377
SHEDEAD, d00d. Chill.

File: 6136903119_b97c71cb83_b.jpg (392KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1024x1024px

Why is dt770 the most versatile and best bang for buck headphone? Especially the 32ohm version with leather
>more bass with leather verison
>durable against sweat, you can use them while training or running,
>and thanks to their superior isolation, as good as ear protection gear, they are great for traveling
>affordable at 130e from amazon
>great sound clarity and deep bass, great separation, as good as open headphones like hd600 and X2

Literally can't recommend a better pair of headphones for newbies and pros alike on a budget

best closed over ear headphones at $150-200
neutral, bassy, or v-shaped

>>62251710

Here is your answer
>>62251705

>>62250452
>Don't, it's "seinen"
How can an anime original series be a manga magazine demographic

File: WTHIWWYP.gif (1MB, 458x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 458x250px

>>62251705
>while training or running
>using ANYTHING aside from 100% wireless IEM during workouts

>>62251705
I wish I could buy headphones used by cute girls
I bet they smell so good. Like qt hair. that always smells good.

>>62251730
Well to be fair it's actually the manga adaption that is seinen.
Also not being able to use the already established terms for manga for anime with similar themes too seems like some autistic shit, senpai.

>>62251776
Fuck you, I'm a big, liftan and trainan autist, I can wear whatever the fuck I want bitch

>>62250389
>Mama Mia unit
:^)

>>62251805
Get qt hair yourself anon :3

>>62251858
>Also not being able to use the already established terms for manga for anime with similar themes too seems like some autistic shit
it doesn't exist in anime, the only reason it exists in manga is because it is determined by the magazine the manga is published in.

>>62251870
>Acts like autistic nigger
Nice try, but no cigar.

>>62251908
I'm an autist but no nigger, now fuck off audiphile

>>62251905
It's determined by the alphabet they use isn't it?

>>62252006
no?

File: 1497563503011.jpg (91KB, 660x708px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 660x708px

>>62251972
>I'm no nigger

>liftan
>trainan
>whatever the fuck I want bitch
Yeah, sure you are, TYRONE

>>62252013
>Seinen manga (青年漫画) are manga marketed toward adolescent boys and men old enough to read kanji.
>A common way to tell if a manga is seinen is by looking at whether or not furigana is used over the original kanji text: if there are furigana on all kanji, the title is generally aimed at a younger audience.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seinen_manga

>>62251705
some of us actually want mids, deshawn

>good for travelling and running
>using leather instead of velour

gross

Razer Kraken > all these german shit

>>62252057
except rubi can be used in seinen manga as well

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/MangaDemographics

>>62251710

Dt250 for neutral

File: 1403118448587.jpg (102KB, 720x951px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 720x951px

>>62252080

>>62252086
Well it seems to differ then. But anyway, as in your own link suggest:
>The most common manga categories are
>Shōnen - boys, roughly 8-18
>Shoujo - girls, roughly 8-18
>Josei - younger women, roughly 18-40
>Seinen - younger men, roughly 18-40
>Shounen, shoujo, josei and seinen are also used to describe demographic groups
Which would work excellent to categorize anime too.

>>62252198
and how would you go about categorizing anime without knowing its target demographic?

again, manga demographics are based on the magazine they're published in. that's why to love ru and aria are both shounen manga.

File: 15045488483061182748185069726520.jpg (3MB, 3036x4048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3036x4048px

>people actually spend more than $200 for dynamic driver full sized headphones.

I feel so sorry for you senncucks.

>>62252279
>he unironically bought chi-fi aliexpress-tier shit

>>62252279
>tfw I have a pair of HD 800s on my head

File: hd800.jpg (151KB, 1500x1126px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1500x1126px

>>62252279
maybe when you save up you can upgrade

File: 1504549112171493950936181173884.jpg (2MB, 3036x4048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3036x4048px

>>62252297
>shipped in a leather box
>non snapping, metal strut, leather floating headband
>leather transport case
>2.5mm connectors and Teflon braided cable
>shipped in less than 4 days from a U.S. warehouse

I feel so sorry for you

>>62252342
>save up
>for inferior headphones
>when I own $3500 speakers

Nah.

>>62252215
Every anime probably have a target demographic. I don't think the producers are spending tons of money just throwing out stuff that people might watch, they certainly have some group in mind when producing stuff.
Otherwise you could base it on themes they contain, how they present them, characters etc. Like how you could easily judge most movies for who you think they are aimed at, e.g:
>The Shawshank Redemption -> seinen
> American Pie -> shonen
Of corse there can be things that are harder to categorize and overlapping stuff, but as a general rule it could certainly be implemented.

File: 1503886415636.jpg (3MB, 3036x4048px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3036x4048px

>>62252354
>$3500 speakers
>lives in a poverty tier hovel
fucking lol

>>62252446
Imagine the stench

>>62250350
STOP BEFORE YOU START FAPPING TO GAY LOLI TRAPS

File: BeyerdynamicAmironHomeAngle.jpg (71KB, 1024x910px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x910px

Looking for a headphone with a V shaped sound signature that is comfy enough to be worn all day. Price <$600.
Trying to choose between Beyerdynamics Amiron homes or a pair of fostex TH-X00.

Along those lines, does anyone know the major differences between the 3 types of Fostexs?
Anyone have any time with both of these?

>>62252446
>you actually saved this image
>my 8 y/o chair is ripped up
>"poverty tier"

whatever helps you sleep at night

>>62252503
>too poor to replace 8 year old chair
L O L

>>62250595
That graph is saying purchase HD600 and Fulla 2

>>62252503
Were did you get the keyboard switch poster, Chink printing?

>>62252517
>too poor
>works fine
>replacing something that isn't broken

:^) maybe one day you'll learn the value of money and move out

>>62250712
get out autist

>>62252446
is anything in this picture not made in china?

>>62252527
https://inkedandscreened.com

They're nice posters, just make sure you frame them.

File: 14639219979430.jpg (152KB, 780x1001px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 780x1001px

>>62252330
>mfw reading "debacles" of all these Sennheiser HD600 and Audio-Technica/Beyerdynamic so-called self-proclaimed pseudo-"audiophile" kiddies, each and every single time while having an Orpheus and SR-009 sitting right beside me
>mfw actually own an Orpheus and SR-009, but still prefer high quality wireless for an everyday usage nowadays

>>62252543
>chair literally falling apart
>buys $3500 speakers instead
>works fine dude
JUST

>>62250831
What do you recommend that's close to flat and doesn't have shitty sound stage like the HD600?

HD 600000000000

>>62252489
>Looking for a headphone with a V-shaped sound signature that is comfy enough to be worn all day Price ~600$
Master & Dynamic MW60.

>>62249877
>Budget
$15-$25
>Location
united states
>Source
phone,laptop and desktop
>Type of headphone
ear buds
>Open or closed
close
>Comfort level
decent
>Past headphones
tascam TH-02

would be nice to get a good set of ear buds if there are any good ones out there

File: 1504470871706.png (342KB, 448x690px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 448x690px

>>62252575
pic+timestamp

>>62252582
>"buy"
>gift from my boss
>spent $1000 on upgrades for them to make them top performers
>literally falling apart
>upholstery is ripped up because cats
>nothing else wrong with chair

in a few months I'll replace it but otherwise I have no immediate reason to.

>>62252583
Onkyo W800BT are currently the best 100% wireless IEM on the worldwide market. Kanoa's not yet released globally, so there's pretty much no competition so far.

>>62252632
HD 600

>>62252561
Ok, suspect shipping etc. would be expensive to Europe, thanks though.

>>62252616
>wireless
I have yet to find a wireless headphone with even slightly decent build quality. Store near me has these in stock though so I might give it a shot.
Thanks anon

>>62252645
>too poor to actually afford speakers, was actually given to him by his parents ("boss")
>entire workstation reeks of poverty
lol and this is the guy calling other people poorfags
A M A Z I N G

>>62252648
i wish man

>>62252655
no prob, if anything throw them an email and ask for a quote to be sure. They ship them out in a tube (up to 5 at once) I couldn't imagine shipping being more than $10 to Europe (it was $5 for me)

>>62252662
>I have yet to find a wireless headphone with even slightly decent build quality

See here >>62250771 and read thoroughly.

>>62252575
HD600 is more objectively accurate so it's better than your artificial cash grab cans.

>>62252666
>making accusations of poorfag on the basis that my chair is ripped up by my cats
>get pair of speakers from my bosses previous company
>my parents
>owners of Nola

I feel so sorry for you.

>>62252676
Still a bit much for a poster for me. Aren't patent stuff public anyway? Could maybe order some Chink print for one.

File: 950102872.jpg (49KB, 374x430px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 374x430px

>>62252685
>HD600 is more accurate
>Than SR-009
>Than FUCKING Orpheus
People such as these are the exact reason why we can't have nice things anymore, folks.

>>62252705
I'm not the one who couldn't afford to replace his ripped up chair for 8 years. You can't afford (lol!) to be sorry for others in the state you're in m8.

>>62252279
Kek no backplate
>he fell for the HE400S drivers in a HE400i scam

>>62252632
https://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/KZ-ZS5-Double-Hybrid-Daynamic-and-Balanced-Armature-Sport-Earphone-Four-Driver-In-Ear-Headset-Noise/1358152_32817080129.html?spm=2114.12010608.0.0.2995e5c0sWKWgo

>>62252728
>state I'm in
>bought an htc vive before the price cut a year ago
>just spent $400 on my turntable
>your argument is that my $70 8 year old chair that works perfectly fine but is ripped up by my cars is proof of "poverty"

look if you're jealous just admit it. I'm sorry you're fucking poor.

>>62252725
I'm sure that's possible. The paper and ink they use is nice but I wouldn't see any issue with just doing that.

File: 1445973215446.gif (783KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 750x422px

Who here enjoying their HD600 right now?

Sugoi desu ne

>>62252789
You ever wonder why black people are poor as shit and live in slums yet own iPhones and macbooks? That's you. You're literally as bad as a nigger.

This thread is living proff that the longer a general goes on the more diluted the conversations get until it turns into a place for the same "regulars" to circlejerk every day
Purge this shitty thread already

>>62252740
I bet that those detachable cables last no longer than 30 days.

>>62252397
tl;dr "i base demographics on my shitty uninformed opinions"

stop

>>62252807
Nope. Enjoying my HD650 though.

>>62252816
pretty our melanin blessed brothers don't use laptops or computers.

>>62252807
All Yuyus are equally cute. Yukari is simply more equallier cuterererererererererer. Er.

>>62252735
I actually asked the seller about this. Apparently they revised the magnet structure on the he-400i drivers so that newer ones do not need a backplate. They appear to be 400s drivers but they're not.

>>62252830
>tl;dr "i base demographics on what magazine something happens to be published in"

>>62252860
because that's literally how manga demographics are determined you fucking retard

>>62252397
what it really means is: "anything i like is seinen, anything I dont is shounen".

What's better, the OPPO PM-1, or the Focal Elear?

>>62252816
>live in slums
>upper class town on long island
>upper 5 figure salary
>"worse than a nigger"
>resorts to shrimp dicked racism to make himself feel better about being poor

>>62251468
Most normal people use streaming audio at least infrequently. Some streaming audio is at a high enough bitrate (192 kbps and up) to be transparent 99% of the time, and is thus adequate for nice wired headphones, but unacceptable for wireless headphones.

File: he400i-glue.jpg (951KB, 921x1200px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 921x1200px

>>62252858
>revised the magnet structure
so they put more glue on it

>>62252879
hd 600

>>62252889
i love how you have a trip and you're trying to justify all these terrible things about yourself. just shut up fag.

File: 1504312969018.jpg (78KB, 1200x848px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1200x848px

>>62252889
>proud of a five figure salary
>m-m-muh racism

>>62252879
different headphone but

http://fakespot.com/product/oppo-pm-3-closed-back-planar-magnetic-headphones-black

http://fakespot.com/product/focal-elear-open-back-over-ear-headphones-black

>>62252899
>a consumer audio product uses glue

wow what a surprise. I make the cabinets for $150,000 speakers with multiple ribbon tweeters and woofers with alnico magnets the size of pumpkins.

You know what the cabinets are held together with? Glue

>>62252877
Who say I don't like it, they have different purposes.

>Budget
140$

>Location
USA

>Source
PC & Phone (But I have an LG V20, It has a DAC built into it ifrc, so I don't know if the headphones have to be low ohm.)

>Type
Full

>Open / Closed
Closed

>Comfort Level
High

>Sound Sig
Warm or Neutral.

>>62252917
>start out with my first career
>"u-upper 5 figure is chump change!"

and you probably collect neet bux

>>62252915
>justify terrible things about myself
>implying you aren't projecting your insecurities every post

>>62252889
>upper 5 figure salary
congratulations you're almost lower middle class

>>62252979
this is literally my first post in this thread, and i just saw how much of a faggot you were being, so i decided to say something about it.

>>62252939
>Confirming that you produce snakeoil for a living
hahahaa holy shit

>>62252683
Of that list I've tried out the B&O H9 and the MDR-1000x. I would agree that they are nice for wireless headphones, but comparing them to a decent wired set even at more than half the price they just aren't as good. Unless you really have wireless as a priority it'd be strange to recommend these.

>>62252917
>anime reaction image

so you're collecting NEET disability money?

>>62252979
I don't have anything against poor people. Just poor people who LARP as rich for the sole purpose of being an obnoxious cunt.

>>62252867
And what are the magazine they are publish in based on
>By convention, manga magazines are divided into roughly a dozen official publishing categories, mostly based on the age and gender of the intended audience.
Literally impossible to do the same for anime...

>>62253036
>Literally impossible to do the same for anime..
hence why anime aren't categorized as such, you fucking retard.

>>62249877
Idiot here. Does anyone know of any 3-button headphones that work with Android? Currently using a rooted Samsung Note 4 with Lollipop

>>62252999
>top of the line, flat measuring custom loudspeakers using the absolute best drivers available
>perfect phase crossovers using top shelf components
>dipole midrange and tweeter sections
>bass down to infrasonic range
>treble flat up to 40khz
>"snake oil"

>>62252997
>first post
doubt that

File: BlasterX_G5_MoodShot_0.jpg (32KB, 600x379px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x379px

Any opinions on the soundblaster X G5 for a dac+amp combo? Seems like its pretty much a soundblaster E5(which I've heard is at least better than an E10k) with some gaming features added.
I'm looking for something that supports digital surround sound for gaming and can drive decent headphones but would prefer not to have to do an optical out to another DAC.

>>62253021
>LARPing

yeah no. Also I never claimed to be rich. I'm financially stable and proud of it

>>62253050
>treble flat up to 40khz
i hope the rats living in your walls and ceilings are enjoying it because you sure as hell aren't hearing it

>>62251710
DT770 for shitty retard ear-raping treble, DT250 for neutral, Custom Studio for bassy.

>>62253050
youre fucking mental man

>>62253067
>constant dickwaving about $3500 speakers
>i-im not claiming to be rich guize

>>62253064
Digital surround is a meme. Causes heavy distortion. You'd be better off using Dolby Atmos as it's built into windows 10 and works with any headphone. The problem is that it sometimes has issues with specific games.

The monoprice desktop amp is a great dac/amp desktop unit. Uses usb as well

>>62253044
It was irony, anon...
How would it be impossible to base an anime
>on the age and gender of the intended audience

>>62253050
Literally a bunch of bullshit that a snakeoil salesmen would say.

>>62252632
HJE120 because comfy as fuck.

File: headphones.png (336KB, 1326x568px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1326x568px

Thinking about getting a pair of these to replace my Sennheiser HD25 II. I need something that sounds good, is portable, and has great noise isolation. Should this fit the bill?

Do I need an DAC + AMP for Beyerdynamic's Custom Studio???

>>62253106
let me guess, anything you can't afford is snakeoil?

>>62253123
Absolutely. Great sonics, build quality, and looks.

>>62253092
Dolby atmos is kinda shit compared to Creative's version of it which has a dumb name I can't remember. Comparing the two is a huge difference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BxO9cd-sYA
SBX is creative's version and dolby headphone is the same as dolby atmos.

>>62252897
>Most retarded people use streaming audio
Uh-huh.

>Some streaming audio is at a high enough bitrate (192 kbps and up)
Again - LDAC does up to 990 and Apt-X LL does 0.8 times more than Apt-X HD (which is 384). What, not "clear and crisp" enough for you?

>>62253073
whatever makes you feel better

>>62253082
>dickwaving
>HUURRRR too poor to afford nicer headphones
>gets shrek'd
>MUH DICKWAVING MUH RIPPED UP CHAIR REEEEE

>>62253068
>the point of ribbon tweeters is the clarity and horizontal dispersion that gives them incredible off axis response. The 40khz is just a consequence of the transducer technology.

>>62253193
honestly my knowledge is limited on that stuff because I don't use either even for gaming. I tried the Dolby Atmos and it just make stuff sound artificially far away and bass to be boomy, but I assumed that would be what some people were looking for and that it may have worked better with different headphones.

File: download.png (177KB, 548x576px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 548x576px

Hey guys I just found this and it fucking WORKS. I could use it as a monitor stand and I think it would look cool on my desk. I found some specs.
https://www.hifiengine.com/manual_library/teac/w-860r.shtml
Could I use it as a headamp? It says it outputs .52v which is pretty good right?
Or is it just 100% garbage?
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/consumer-electronics/teac-w-860r-double-auto-reverse-cassette-deck

>>62253239
>proud of a five figure income (can assume to be exaggerated)
>poverty tier workstation
>calls others poorfags and wanks off about his "expensive" speakers
diagnosis: extreme mental illness

>>62249877

What do I need to plug an electric guitar into hd650's?

>>62253125
Help please.

>>62253271
Yeah dolby atmos negatively effects the sound quality a lot to the point where you're better off not using it. Creative's been doing this for a really long time and is much better at helping with positional audio without ruining the sound. I would suggest giving it a shot, however to use it you need a soundblaster card and a DAC that has optical in.
Newer comparison:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jh7MvfHBBaE

>>62253314
Almost certainly not. Your on board audio should be able to do it assuming it's not a 10 year old $5 motherboard

>>62253308
>only point of argument is a ripped up chair that works fine
>being financially stable is bad
>calls me poor
>having a nice stereo is bad

diagnosis: poor as fuck and projecting his insecurities

>>62253345
Okay, thank you!

>>62253314
Probably not, at 80 ohms. I'd buy them no amp and see if your volume is adequate or not before spending money on an amp.

File: Axel.png (47KB, 125x128px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 125x128px

>>62253001
First of all - Bang & Olufsen H9 are LITERALLY Sennheiser HD600 sound-wise, but of MUCH better materials and build quality.

Secondly
>comparing them to a decent wired set even at more than half the price they just aren't as good
You clearly didn't use them properly with the best setup, that's all. Unless you're Apt-X LL'ing or LDAC'ing FLACs/Redbooks with headphones capable of that - you'd obviously falsely think they might be "not as good as wired", but that will be a VERY big judgemental mistake. Only when ALL required factors for ideal play are combined together, then good quality wireless headphones fully show what they're capable of.

>>62253314
Should work good without amp and dac.

Hey guys,

I've got some Sennheiser 558s and the pads are getting a little bit old, i just noticed a rip on one today. How feasible is replacing them?

File: 1504503227709.png (174KB, 358x358px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 358x358px

>>62253349
whatever makes you feel better

>>62253374
HD558 replacement earpads are very widely available if you look for them on the internet.

>>62253343
Fair enough, if the creative sound processing works well then I wouldn't see an issue. I'm pretty sure you could get a USB to optical converter cable, which may remedy the problem.

Not that it's entirely related but Dolby Atmos for speakers is absolutely not a meme. I heard a demo of 7.1 Dolby Atmos at the New York audio show and it was one of the most impressive demos at the show. Pin point sound effects, overhead images, perfect placement of everything across the entire room.

>>62253364
>Bang & Olufsen H9
Do you have any measurements? I can't find shit

>>62250829
He seems like a happy, nice dude.

>>62253364
>Bang & Olufsen H9 are LITERALLY Sennheiser HD600 sound-wise
>he says without providing a measurement of them

>tfw I fell for the Etymotic MK5 EarDildo(TM) meme

Here's some calming music for you raging autists

https://youtu.be/EuGfYbxu9MY

>>62253476
comply tips may help that out unless your beef is in the sound signature.

>>62253427
>>62253453
There's an H6 chart on Inner Fidelity, and H9 is roughly a 50% improvement off of that on all fields, so that's kind of it (if that helps you any).

P.S.
Whatever you do, guyse, do NOT read/believe that Verge pseudo-"review" article on these. Sound-wise that is absolute FUD and a complete BS all way through.

>>62253514
nah the sound is what I want, similar to my dt 880s

the fit is interesting though, I'm currently trying the triple flange tips and I'm not completely sure that I have a great seal

anyone here tried the fostex t50rp nigger bass edition by mayflower?

>>62253567
what in the fuck does a "50% improvement" mean. how do you even quantify something like that?

>>62253587
>fostex t50rp nigger bass edition by mayflower
Go look up H6's sound curve and you'll know what I mean.

>>62253599
Ah, wrong dude. This was meant for >>62253587

>>62253571
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KwXEqe6Gq4

File: FOURHUNDREDOLLARS.jpg (661KB, 1132x972px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 1132x972px

Anyone else almost get memed out of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS?

File: 14958027442730.jpg (98KB, 397x295px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 397x295px

>>62253639
>Oppo
>Buying ANYTHING other than their most top tier offered chinkshit smartphones
>Ever
>He's honestly surprised to find out they can't do jack in other fields outside of smartphone making

>>62253639
>actually buying $400 headphones with non-replaceable pleather earpads

My friend suggested I get AKG K7XX's but I don't have an amp/DAC.
Can I get away with this or should I go for something else in the price-range?

File: 1448942843509.jpg (8KB, 220x173px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 220x173px

>>62253639
O_O Did someone physically rape that headphone?

>>62253740
Those are three different headphones. The pleather just flakes off over time all over you and you have to spend like $50 to get them fixed every year because everything is fucking glued on or something

>>62253724
It should be good and you can later improve it with a fulla 2.

>>62253740
That's just what happens to pleather earpads. They flake.

>>62253724
>should I go for something else in the price-range?
HD600, obviously.

>>62253625
thanks anon

seems to fit a little better now, should I buy some ety wax filters for the mk5s? don't want them clogging up

File: 3121529e7tjhad25n.jpg (75KB, 700x440px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 700x440px

i need a good wireless over the ear headphone
less than $150
need it for working out and will have good wireless distance

>>62253784
HD600 needs an amp a lot more.

>>62253571
If they're brand new give them a little while, they soften up after your juices seep in.

Does anyone a wesite where I can buy the plastic cans of he DT 880's or/and DT990's?

I have a pair of closed DT770's and won't to compare the open back of the other ones, but I'm not willing to put down the cash for a pair of new ones.

I've looked around myself, and Beyerdynamic only sleels them off their website in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. I've also managed to find several other spare parts for the 770/880/990 series, but still not the cans themselves.

I'm looking for some good JBL like headphones. Specifically wireless, and has good subs on them. What's a good choice?

Hmm... What does this mean

http://fakespot.com/product/hifiman-he400i-over-ear-full-size-planar-magnetic-headphones

http://fakespot.com/product/sennheiser-hd-650-open-back-professional-headphone-70a37c8f-a3b5-462a-89c9-1f18303aeed1

>>62253819
Sure, but it's much better sounding.

File: 1476050846540.gif (94KB, 500x465px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x465px

>>62253870
You got me there.

>>62253859
It means Chinkshit advertised by paid reviewers and based Sennperior honesty.

>>62253825
You can't just pop the open backs of the 990 on the 770s and expect it to sound the same. The drivers are also tuned differently to accomedate the sound signature needed for open/closed back

I know this isn't the right general but anyone got suggestions for $20-30 earphones?

>>62253936
They're pretty much the same, from what I've been able to find. The difference is mostly the foam and the cans.

I'm pretty comfortable taking it apart, and I've had it for 4-5 years now. I just want to try, I guess.

>>62253789
>I need good wireless monitor headphones
>Good and stable signal distance
>Open/half-open for "breathing"
>~150$
For that money you're pretty much left with only one option - MEElectronics. See here - >>62250771.

File: c10f71f991ba7ab7c529c5d9faeac5ea.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

What IEMs do you think they'd be wearing?
Mee Audio m6??

>>62253987
HJE120 for maximum comfy.

File: 1496310224799.jpg (36KB, 480x486px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x486px

>>62253856
>some good
>wireless JBL
You can only choose one.

>>62253639
Mine still look like new after a year. Feels good.

File: IMG_2346.jpg (30KB, 318x279px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 318x279px

>>62254073
Well shit. Is there a good brand of wireless headphones?

>>62254045
Onkyo W800BT, naturally.

>>62253094
unless the studio explicitly points it out you can't categorize it as a third party.

>>62254097
I fucking want them I wish they'd let me just put my own pads on and then I could wrap the headband in something to keep the flakes in and be good.

>>62254112
The pads come off, so you can swap them with HM5s. It sucks that they don't sell user replacements though.

>>62254101
>Onkyo W800BT
Those look awesome anon. I wish I could have just one day with all these headaphones I'm always reading about.

File: 1429135476441.jpg (4MB, 10000x10000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 10000x10000px

>>62254045
3DPD

>>62254099
See here - >>62250771 (You).

As for "wireless JBL":
>These headphones' sound curvature is very noticeably V-shaped (low and high frequencies are overhanging the mediums, hence the "V" shaped signature on graphical charts). Some like it, but I personally prefer for my headphones to be rather neutral. It's not a more balanced out "U" form, too, but instead a downright aggressive "V" curvature (mid frequencies are way below lows and highs, sharply so, instead of being recessed smoothly). Such a sound type is usually preferred by people who listen to electronic music a lot, especially Progressive Trance and Drum & Bass genres, but it's not well suited for, in example, Deep House. It's also not good for playing video games in general and listening to video game soundtracks in particular, especially those which have orchestral score in them (VERY many game titles out there). And it's absolutely no good at all for classical instruments, like a saxophone (too sharp and bright, downright hurting) or an acoustic guitar (many details are lost, the sound is muddled up). I guess if you're an electronic music DJ and play a ton of Progressive/GOA Trance, or if you're a growling doom metal (akin to Mayhem) lover, then these might be good for you, but for a lot of different genres out there these are not good. "V"-shaped sound signature is usually a pretty niche kind of a taste, liked/appreciated by a few.
This is about the latest 750, BTW.

>>62254136
>I wish I could have just one day
They're not THAT expensive, d00d. Anyone who has at least SOME job can afford them. Considering that at this current moment in time (while Kanoa still didn't release globally) there is pretty much no other actually great/worthwhile 100% wireless IEM out there, Onkyo simply has no competition and is the only wise choice. And it's not overpriced, too. After Kanoa comes out there will be inevitable competition, but right now there's simply none.

>>62254236
That's not what I mean. I could buy them but then there are still 1000 IEMs that might sound better.

>>62254253
Well, my point was that in that Onkyo W800BT are currently the best sounding wireless IEM around. And why the hell should you restrict yourself and become a wirecuckold in this modern day and age? Times have changed, goyz and grillz.

>>62254167
>I listen to mainly drum and bass
>But also like vidya game soundtracks

Should I get the 750's then?

File: 20170817_132248.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Should I get an HD600?

>>62253123

The sound its great, but if you want isolation as good as HD25 II then not as good

>>62254488
Are there any on the market that do?

>>62254483
>no HD600
yes

>>62252685
>artificial cans
>As opposed to the ones grown in the farm
>The accurate organic sound 100% free of pesticides only Sennheiser can offer.

>>62254483
You like how it sounds, sure.

>>62253309
search guitar headphone amp

there are many options

>>62254491

HD 280 Pro or the DT 770, what sound signature are you looking for?

>>62254473
Read more thoroughly about the way it curves. It's pretty bad, because it's very sharp and not gradually receding. This might physically hurt, especially on tracks with a lot of cymbals and high pitched notes. They also produce mud and look like absolute ricer kiddie shit for "niggerbassers". AND they're overpriced as fuck for what they are. Sure, if you ARE a niggerbass "lover" that's half-deaf and LOVES dirt being shoved in his ears, go ahead.

>>62254576
you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about when it comes to bass

>>62254483

If you want flat yes, but you might miss the bass of your old HP so you might like the HD650, you can EQ the HD600 to sound as the HD650 so look for the cheaper one

>>62254521
That's hilarious, considering all of this is pretty much reversed because Sennheiser is LITERAL "pesticide and chemicals-washed chinkshit".

>>62254572
Neither of those have a replaceable cable which is a must for me. I don't really have a preference for sound signature.

>>62254483
>>62254613
don't get the hd600 or 650 if you actually like bass, it rolls off

File: 14782532179780.jpg (176KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1024x1024px

>>62254599
You need to try way harder than just that, kid.

>>62254576
I did look at them and it's a lot of dough. Plus it's oversized as shit, and I'm in a urban area, so I'm not even going to do that. I have Everest ones and they're good, but that fucking pairing shit is annoying, especially when you forget which side changes volume. I'm good for another couple of months

>>62252489
DT1770 or 1990
>>62254491
380 Pro
>>62253987
Tennmak Pro
>>62254045
Generic no name since they're cartoons.

>>62254660
WHICH Everest? Elite or standard? Elite was "bretty gud" for it's time, but standard one sucked balls IMHO.

>>62254637

The MSR7 has good isolation if you only want use public transport and listen to 60-70% of a samsung Cellphone, its better than the mX0x series. Go for the msr7

>>62254652
I don't need to try, your opinions on bass are just like every other thumbsucker over at headfi: full of shit

>>62254689
It's for transit and for work, since I work out of a really loud office and I need to focus. I'm sure the noise isolation should be good enough.

Thanks for the recs anons.

>>62254681
The 300, and I have no knowledge of headphones

>>62254660
Either way, if you can afford to spend ~300$ sometime later - get Plantronics BackBeat PRO 2 SE. These will be an amazing substitute for what you're using right now. Literal night and day.

>>62254712

>loud office

As long is there are not motor sounds or really low frequencies you should be fine

>>62254721
Oh, I though you were talking about the Everest 700. There is "just 700" and the "Elite 700".

>>62254738
Those look nice. Definitely keeping an eye on them.

>>62254701
Now you're trying TOO hard, kiddo. Get a grip already.

>>62254799
non-argument. you don't get to write off an entire frequency range and multiple genres of music and instruments and still have a qualified position on anything

>>62254794
Just mind, though, that BackBeat PRO 2 SE are pretty big in size. You sounded before like you don't like this, so if that's not your thing...I sincerely don't know how high quality wireless monitor/over-the-ear headphones can be with big enough (comfy, unobtrusive) cups AND not big themselves at the same time UNLESS you're going IEM. If you don't wish to wear big monitor headphones, then I'd suggest you look up Onkyo W800BT - these are only high quality wireless IEM currently available on the market, they have decent battery and very good sound WHILE not looking like nigger shit AND being priced at roughly ~200$ right now (so 100$ cheaper than what Plantronics BackBeat PRO 2 SE would cost you), the only possible "downside" being that they are, well, duh, not covering the ear from all sides (but they still work very well considering that they're IEM and not simple buds).

Is it really worth it to spend the extra 100 bucks for a 650? I mean, I do like bass and all but I dunno... currently using an HD 598

>>62254330
battery life

File: Sensible Chuckle.gif (405KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 720x404px

>>62254832
Oh, I get it now. You're just a buttmad JBL shill who saw his beloved 750 nigger ricer chinkshit getting trashed on anonymous boards by someone and you simply couldn't handle the truth. My deepest condolences to your relatives.

>>62254959
wrong, try again, why would I buy that garbage when bluetooth headphones don't provide enough ampage for good bass

>>62254949
Dude it's AT LEAST 10 hours of continuous play on maximum loudness level, tested personally. And that's while NOT mentioning that you can charge them on-the-go from the case.

>>62254937

The HD600 are tuned a lot like the HD 598, the HD650 put the Bass forward the highs, so if you like your HD 598 for the tune then you are buying something different, that said, i have both the HD 598 and the HD600 and i can tell you, the HD 598 are already in the well inside the diminishing returns range, if you want more the HD600 give you more openness, better volumes without hurting your hears and are a lot easier to EQ.

>>62255001
Yeah, keep telling yourself that, caved-in wirecuck.

>>62255083
even more proof that your opinion on bass is shit and uninformed

>>62255099
0/10

File: Onkyo W800BT.png (342KB, 703x1213px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 703x1213px

>>62254101
>>62250771
>W800BT
>neutral
I do not think so.

>>62255175
>"""""(((measurements)))""""" by literal WHO

File: 1445706307063.jpg (75KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 601x601px

Turns out I can only handle wearing my new Etymotics for about 45 minutes at a time before they start becoming painful

>>62255229
Comply ear tips may fix that

I'm currently using an HD598, and I've just ordered a HD700 on Ebay. Even-though I've did research on the headset and decided take a shot on it. I'm quite worried with the fact that the headset had some bad press regarding to the treble. I always loved the sound signature of the HD598's. It's just I was looking for something more 'Clearer' or something. I just think I fucked up on ordering these HD700's, should I return them if they are that bad? And what else should I get instead?

>>62255258
People hate on the HD700 because they are EQ purist weirdos. Either do the hd700 pad mod or pull down the 5khz region

>>62249877
So I fell for the m50 meme way back. Don't regret my purchase at all, but what's the natural evolution from there?

>>62255347
Th-X00. V shaped in a similar way to the m50, but disortion free subbass/bass and not bloomy. Also better soundstage

>>62255366
>>62255347
>Also better soundstage
Sorry, I meant not just soundstage but better overall in everyway. The bass is worldclass with a powerful enough amp