Adnauseam thread

how is this any better than just block all ads and the requests?

>>62213034
This is what I came here to say. How is loasd of clicks better than no clicks?

>>62213034
>>62213036
tldr it kills google

>>62213034
faking click and cost ad company money

later some shill will say this is a malware

Google probably blacklisted everyone who posts here so I'll just stick to to ublock origin

>>62213044
>faking click and cost ad company money
isnt it better to just not provide it in the first place?in aaddition to ublock origin i dont save cookies or any browser stuff except bookmarks (ff resets itself each time)

>>62213059
no, because ignoring ads doesnt prevent google from getting money from all non blocking users, this way can attack their revenue

>>62213034
It devalues clicks, making them worth less and less.

I still have a hard time believing that 4digit number of cave trolls running this make a difference. Google will just adapt to filter them.

File: 123.png (5KB, 161x91px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 161x91px

>>62213128
2 days worth of usage. 4 digit number of cave trolls is rip for goolag

>>62213128
yeah no, they cant, they dont require an account and they can block by IP, all htey can do is throw anti adnau shill over imageboards/forums and spread FUD. also we have scripts that automate things1 person running it manages to generate damage like 100 non script users

>>62213023
>set clicking on ads to "sometimes" in adnau settings (important)
Why is it important, why is it better than always? this way they cant really tell if its a real click or not or what

How do I know if google started to not count my clicks for my ip address?

>>62213155
So google wouldn't stop counting your ad clicks

>>62213157
Try not to click too much

>>62213155
if you always click on every ads they theres something wrong with you because no one deas that in real life. you could be blacklisted for it

>>62213170
I tried it for a day with always click on, am I blacklisted?

>>62213023
But I don't want to kill google.

I want to silently profit off their partner's content while other users supply the ad revenue.

Crashing the system only kills content I like.

File: Untitled.png (3KB, 295x166px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 295x166px

>>62213059
>isnt it better to just not provide it in the first place?
No. When you click on an ad the company pays may pay money for it. If you click tons of ads and don't buy anything, you cost them lots of money. In turn this also devalues clicks, so advertising companies will pay less for them.

It can also makes profiling more worthless, since they'll see that you've got so many interests from clicking so many ads that they will know that your actual interests are completely masked by all these fake clicks.

>>62213186
Ask google. Even if you are, they won't keep you blacklisted forever, and if you have dynamic IP you can leave your router off over night, your IP should be different in the morning.

File: 265252019177.jpg (10KB, 440x475px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 440x475px

>>62213190
google is on their way to kill all non google approved content either way, it doesnt matter if you like it or not, porn/torrent sites are first target. it either we kill internet and google or google will kill it and also take control over everything that will remain

>>62213207
How long do you think they'll keep me blacklisted if I am, it's not like google will just tell me

>>62213215
Do you have any reason to believe that slippery slope argument?

>>62213243
chrome's next update, read about it cuck

>>62213269
I did, I still see plenty of open spaces between that and the internet fucking dying. Post arguments.

File: damore.jpg (135KB, 1015x1015px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1015x1015px

>>62213243
>blocks adnauseam, an innocent adblocking app, from app store
>adding built in ad blocker to chrome but only blocks non-google ads
>extreme search filtering to prop up false narratives (have you been online at all in the last year?)
>allowing extremely SJW culture to completely take over the entire google

>>62213276
what arguments, more than calf internet users use chrome, if they block ads for such number of users, websites using non google services will just die, hopefully these sites will block content for chrome users and they will switch to something else. google is pure evil

>>62213309
>but only blocks non-google ads
Bullshit. Just intrusive ads. The others are no reason to believe they'll kill the internet, just that google sucks which isn't news.
>>62213311
>what arguments
That google will kill the internet.

>>62213332
>Bullshit. Just intrusive ads.
lmao, that the official version, you really believe this?

>>62213332
they are already censoring internet

>>62213332
You ever read 1984?

>>62213347
That's not just the official version, that's also what's being tested. And yes, I do believe it considering it's not just google that's working on that.
Anyway, if you think I shouldn't believe that, care to post a reason to not believe that? One that's not just a slippery slope of saying that google is evil so obviously they'll do bad shit.

File: 1504127100471.jpg (59KB, 895x653px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 895x653px

>>62213385
good for you but there are poeple outside your cuck circle that actually want better internet

>>62213399
>Literally no reason to believe that
Nice.

File: 1504120236882.jpg (32KB, 348x260px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 348x260px

>>62213410
no reason to believe company that censors content on youtube while allowing isis video on front page

>>62213479
That's not a sentence, but read what I said in my posts maybe.

>>62213485
you bl;ind believe in everything that you master at google will tell you, thats what all your posts are about

>>62213499
I would be happy to believe your arguments if you posted some though, read my posts and you'd see that. There's literally no valid reason to believe google will destroy the internet aside from slippery slope arguments.

what would happen if a massive botnet ran adnauseam instead of DDOSing? Would that actually kill google?

>>62213080
>>62213199
>>62213023
So it's a botnet that uses your computer to click on ads periodically, without you knowing it, with the intend to reduce per click revenue for google. OK

>>62213518
That would be fascinating to try out

>>62213547
>without you knowing it
Well, it does it in the background, but considering it's the main feature you do know about it. But yeah, botnet is technically almost accurate I guess.

>>62213571
And you think that the few dozens, maybe hundreds of computers running this will actually have any effect on google's revenue?

>>62213583
Considering "news" sites are reporting on this, yeah I think it has an effect.

>>62213583
yeah, considering we now have scripts that do things for us im pretty sure it does

File: 1504259801725.jpg (76KB, 500x866px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 500x866px

>>62213518
it might rob them of many people who advertise with them, massive damage. It should also run the script with a nice large list of search terms, I've seen one floating around with the 1mil of most expensive search terms.

>>62213590
any links to 'news' articles?

>>62213613
I'd have to search for them, so no. If you want you can try and look for them, you'd have as much luck in finding them as I do.

File: simone.jpg (59KB, 480x673px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 480x673px

>>62213023
If I was Google, I would actually invest in AdNauseam. Not publicly, of course. This is an excellent way to dominate the market even harder and stomp out the competition. All you need is to fill the internet with more white noise which others will have trouble filtering. Google, with its machine learning, won't.

The only people who can really fuck over Google are so called blackhat marketers. They are real pros. To generate fake clicks, they have an arsenal of sophisticated botnets and they often use malware on normies' computers. They're not volunteers, they have a strong financial incentive to click-spam their competitors. AdNauseam is baby-tier. Google has seen it all before. It has fought click wars for more than a decade.

Those refunds you keep talking about do not even come from AdNauseam traffic. They come from professional blackhat botnets that imitate user behavior and are only detected post factum. AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.

Do you think that amateur AdNauseam fanboys are smarter than blackhat gurus? I don't think so.

Here is some insight on how Google battles them. This is from 2015, before AdNauseam took off.
http://adage.com/article/digital/inside-google-s-secret-war-ad-fraud/298652/

So, what do we have in the end? Google's competitors who use outsourced pajeet coders make heavy losses, advertisers just flock to Google because it's the one who can combat click fraud best. Google strengthens its monopoly. Wow, what a victory.

The only thing AdNauseam really does is playing into Google's hands. I am pretty sure the thread is full of Google shills who promote AdNauseam to kill competition and advance their "anti-hate speech" agenda. Every AdNauseam shill can be declared a Google shill at this point.

Oh yea, have fun passing your real IP address, location and ISP each time an ad is clicked. You are truly doing a good goy's job.

>>62213590
>>62213600
>>62213604
Well could luck on your crusade lads. Most likely scenario I can see is, google sues them for loads of money and takes it offline OR ad companies make a deal to promote certain ads.

File: 1485092333745.jpg (47KB, 327x322px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 327x322px

>>62213633
google is so much butthurt right now, shit must be working >>>/pol/139956112

File: 1504352109357.png (419KB, 545x392px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 545x392px

Below is the real red pill on AdNauseam.

The Marxist Jews are the masters of subversion. They know best how to infiltrate the discourse and twist it for their own good. One of their common techniques is called "false equivalence". The trick is to substitute a minor, mundane issue for a major one and eventually take the attention away from really important things. So called "ad surveillance" is one of the examples. Yeah, it's kinda nasty, but no more than dog poo in the street. It's basically cookie tracking which can be disabled with one click. Only tech-illiterate normies who buy shit online are affected by it. Can I easily disable government surveillance? The effects of mass migration, affirmative action, anti-hate speech regulations? The Marxist Jews don't want people to talk about it, they want everybody to focus on their ad poos. This is not even helping the cause. Instead of promoting alternatives to Google services and Youtube, damaging Google's reputation in the eyes of normies, they make people vent out in a safe outlet, which may actually benefit Google in the first place.

Big advertisers have been waging click wars on each other for YEARS. Reports of mass click fraud date back to 2015, 2013, 2011.. And they use much more sophisticated methods than just blatantly sending 100 clicks an hour from your home IP. Over 50% of web traffic is bot traffic at this point. Do you think Google's quantitative analysts are dumb? That they don't have early filters in place? If anything, it's Google's competitors that will suffer from click fraud first.

So, what's the REAL goal of these Jews?
- To give Google an edge over competitors because the latter can't handle click fraud effectively and lack good quants
- To sell data to Google for their new adblocker
- To suppress smaller scapegoat websites in favor of (((big))) ones
- To push the discourse sideways, in a safe direction
- To expose the IP addresses of people with questionable political views
We can only guess.

File: google-logo.jpg (76KB, 1604x802px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1604x802px

If I was Google, I would actually invest in AdNauseam. Not publicly, of course. This is an excellent way to dominate the market even harder and stomp out the competition. All you need is to fill the internet with more white noise which others will have trouble filtering. Google, with its machine learning, won't.

The only people who can really fuck over Google are so called blackhat marketers. They are real pros. To generate fake clicks, they have an arsenal of sophisticated botnets and they often use malware on normies' computers. They're not volunteers, they have a strong financial incentive to click-spam their competitors. AdNauseam is baby-tier. Google has seen it all before. It has fought click wars for more than a decade.

Those refunds you keep talking about do not even come from AdNauseam traffic. They come from professional blackhat botnets that imitate user behavior and are only detected post factum. AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.

Do you think that amateur AdNauseam fanboys are smarter than blackhat gurus? I don't think so.

Here is some insight on how Google battles them. This is from 2015, before AdNauseam took off.
http://adage.com/article/digital/inside-google-s-secret-war-ad-fraud/298652/

So, what do we have in the end? Google's competitors who use outsourced pajeet coders make heavy losses, advertisers just flock to Google because it's the one who can combat click fraud best. Google strengthens its monopoly. Wow, what a victory.

The only thing AdNauseam really does is playing into Google's hands. I am pretty sure the thread is full of Google shills who promote AdNauseam to kill competition and advance their "anti-hate speech" agenda. Every AdNauseam shill can be declared a Google shill at this point.

Oh yea, have fun passing your real IP address, location and ISP each time an ad is clicked. You are truly doing a good goy's job.

>>62213633
>>62213722

Hey hey hey, Google PR team you can't do that, spamming is against the rules, coordinate with yourselves and don't do this again.

>>62213746
These guys are professional pasta chefs and bait salesmen, they're too clever to be google shills

>>62213660

Yes defiantly working

fuck off with this botnet. if ppl support his, then change Stallman logo for Linus to go with the sub-culture here.

>>62213779
>botnet

I agree

File: gVKW9Br8lr2wEyt_EacT4M2eoPlHHnZGdCR5KLI1SEc.jpg (113KB, 960x639px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 960x639px

>>62213646
It's open source, it would get forked before that happened.

No thanks, uBlock Origin and uMatrix are better for privacy and are enough to kill Google.
I ain't doing anything black hat.

>>62213984
>black hat

They are running out of words and are now starting to use words they don't even understand.

Too funny!

>>62214144
>! at the end of the sentence
fuck off to /r/the_donald
Yeah, it's unethical to drive a company bankrupt.
You won't shut up about FAKE NEWS but have no problem with fake clicks.
Kys, retarded nigger.

File: 06874932.gif (14KB, 250x242px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 250x242px

>>62214271
fight fire with fire, in this case we fight FAKE with FAKE. and you cant stop us

>>62214271
¿Would you rather have it at the start of the sentence?

>>62214271
There is nothing unethical about AdNauseum despite whatever dumb narrative you push

File: 1504127861091.png (470KB, 610x319px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 610x319px

>>62214271
its unethical to promote ISIS, google needs to die

>>62214271
When google tries to implement psychological warfare on us, it's fair

File: 111.gif (71KB, 500x369px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 500x369px

i just installed this

some faggot jew keep hijacking me into ads
can i stop with it?

>>62214271
>slash r slash the underscore donald

I wonder who should fuck off to where rather

>nigger

Out of words! Out of words!

>>62214487
More ads is good

>>62213706
>>62213722
TLDR?

>>62214528
It's pasta

If you get banned from one google API for exceeding rate limit, do you get banned from all of them?
What's the quickest way to get banned?

Yeah, but it literally doesn't work on Firefox. It neither blocks nor clicks any ads.

>>62214640
no, you just get capcha for google search, funny thing is you dont get it for youtube, maps or any other service

>>62213360
It's a pretty good book, he did a nice job conveying how the future might look.
-someone else

What's so bad about being blacklisted by google? At least it means they won't collect or sell your data anymore, because they know it's worthless and false

>google is spyware.
>run this random script.
ok.

>>62214729
the source code is right ther

>>62214689
But for example google ads and google search share their blacklist, right?
What if you use a script to blacklist your entire ISP from using google's services? Android's terminal can toggle airplane mode and issue requests with wget or curl, so you could just make a small script that anyone can download.

>>62214750
google will never blacklist any IP, they would lose too much legit user in the process

>>62214768
But you can get your IP blacklisted, if you use Tor you sometimes get an error page, for some IPs you can't even use recaptcha.
>Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. This page checks to see if it's really you sending the requests, and not a robot. Why did this happen?
When I was on vacation in Ukraine the internet there was used for spam or something, you had to solve captchas to use Google.

>>62214788
I suspect there is always a timeout for the ban to release some IP when a botnet is taken down for the device to return to normal etc

4. You will not post or request personal information ("dox") or calls to invasion ("raids"). Inciting or participating in cross-board (intra-4chan) raids is also not permitted.

10. No spamming or flooding of any kind. No intentionally evading spam or post filters.

11. Advertising (all forms) is not welcome—this includes any type of referral linking, "offers", soliciting, begging, stream threads, etc.

>>62214921
If you cycle through the IPs you can keep them dirty, just ban them as soon as they're released again.

>>62213504
lol
Back to plebbit nigger

>>62214990
Nice post.

>>62214921
How long till they release an IP from the blacklist?

>>62215190
Don't know, don't work at Google

>>62213023
how long should i run that script for?

File: 1501511921820.png (382KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 600x600px

>>62215583
im running it for 15h every day, litrally when i turn on pc, first thing i do is start this script

>>62215605
alright, thanks

WE CAN DO IT REDIT

>willingly installing malware on your computer just to perform click fraud

I hope /g/ is smarter than this...

>>62213215

>porn/torrent sites are first target.

As far as ads go this is fine. I use a porn blog that insists on using imgrock for its images. They do the whole 'disable adblock, we're completely innocent' while their site is riddled with ads and javascript onclick events. At least with Google targeting malicious ads sites like that will have to rethink their approach and hopefully die.

>>62215998
>malware
????????

>>62216196
google is not targeting malicious site, they target all other ad companies like them, they want to destroy competition, all content that is not google approved will go down

>hurr durr google is bad
Kek. All those retards.

File: 1503903819476.jpg (197KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 720x960px

If I was Google, I would actually invest in AdNauseam. Not publicly, of course. This is an excellent way to dominate the market even harder and stomp out the competition. All you need is to fill the internet with more white noise which others will have trouble filtering. Google, with its machine learning, won't.

The only people who can really fuck over Google are so called blackhat marketers. They are real pros. To generate fake clicks, they have an arsenal of sophisticated botnets and they often use malware on normies' computers. They're not volunteers, they have a strong financial incentive to click-spam their competitors. AdNauseam is baby-tier. Google has seen it all before. It has fought click wars for more than a decade.

Those refunds you keep talking about do not even come from AdNauseam traffic. They come from professional blackhat botnets that imitate user behavior and are only detected post factum. AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.

Do you think that amateur AdNauseam fanboys are smarter than blackhat gurus? I don't think so.

Here is some insight on how Google battles them. This is from 2015, before AdNauseam took off.
http://adage.com/article/digital/inside-google-s-secret-war-ad-fraud/298652/

So, what do we have in the end? Google's competitors who use outsourced pajeet coders make heavy losses, advertisers just flock to Google because it's the one who can combat click fraud best. Google strengthens its monopoly. Wow, what a victory.

The only thing AdNauseam really does is playing into Google's hands. I am pretty sure the thread is full of Google shills who promote AdNauseam to kill competition and advance their "anti-hate speech" agenda. Every AdNauseam shill can be declared a Google shill at this point.

Oh yea, have fun passing your real IP address, location and ISP each time an ad is clicked. You are truly doing a good goy's job.

I'm honestly shocked at the current state of this website. Yeah, we made racist jokes sometimes, but it was all fun, right? At the end of the day, we all voted for Obama, we all supported gay marriage, and we all opposed racist conservative christians. But now? Our entire fucking site is subverted because of fucking nazis.

The internet is OUR platform. the LIBERAL platform. Racism, sexism, misogyny, were all confirmed to be left in the past because millenials are the most left-wing generation of all time. So why in the FUCK, do we still have to deal with nazis IN TWENTY-FUCKING-SEVENTEEN? Despite how much you wanna cry about how it's just a conspiracy and a boogeyman, Russian hackers ARE real, and this site is proof. We went from one of the most liberal sites in the world to supporting Orange Fucking Hitler? Nah, that's not normal progression because people only get more liberal with age, just like how you get smarter with age.

Threads like these just show that we need MUCH more strict moderation around here. I'm sick of all of this shit. Fuck Nazis, Fuck Fascists, Fuck Hitler, Fuck Trumpf, Fuck White Pride, and FUCK REPUBLICANS. Just fucking nuke this site already.

>>62216771
THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Someone screencap this post and send it to hiroshima.

We have to stop the nazis even if it means no more freeze peach

>>62216741
>>62216771
>>62216797

Do they use adblock at Google?

>Muh James Damore got sacked :((

Yeah no. Sorry I don't care

File: 1504016633907.png (94KB, 676x572px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 676x572px

>>62216889
no, google is a valuable company that i am proud to support, you are just hurting it and me

>>62216909
>google is a valuable company
(You)

Which one of you made the other thread XD

>>62216771
I think you should eat shit and die. You treat commie ideas like they are best thing since sliced bread. Newsflash. It will just end in replacing one elite group for other. You want to replace banksters with diversity officers.

>>62216909
Time to short them shares you fuckwit.

Adnauseam is a Google product. In a few months it will be exposed.

You're welcome again, 4chan

-NSA

5

>>62217463
>-NSA
ok

>>62217463
NSA please stop this scameme adnausememe

>>62213633
>AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.
yeah this. why is /g/ so stupid these days? make sure to call me a google shill and continue your retard crusade

Ignore the Google shills, continue the anti-Google crusade.

It cost them two billion dollars in refunds last month alone. Spread this, install it on normie computers, be subversive. Google certainly is.

>>62213023
HOW MUCH DAMAGE DID YOU DO SO FAR ?

>>62220682
I AGREE ITS ALL COPY PASTA

SAD...GOOGLE MAKES THEIR BOTS AND EMPLOYES TO SPREAD THIS ..

File: 1503818856472.jpg (72KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1280x720px

>>62220726
14k in 5 days

>>62220748
JUST STARTED :( 500$ 2-3H

>>62213034
It's not.
You got tracked while spend bandwisth.
You can't beat kikes on their game the only same thing is to not play their game.
Use umatrix and block Google.

File: 679090081.jpg (55KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 400x400px

>>62220758
its never too late to start doing good things, just dont stop now

>>62220761
THEY ALREADY TRACK YOU

>>62220784
i didn't hate google before until they went to political NOW ITS PERSONAL

A form of personal crusade against Satan

File: 1503854591779.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 460x259px

>>62220761
3 squares of toilet paper have been deposited to your street
>t. Indian google shill

>>62220682
install on best buy and apple store computers. gorilla warfare!

File: aidsads.jpg (563KB, 1493x895px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1493x895px

>>62214659
http://jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/
sounds like you have an adblocker of some sort running already.

File: DHpQFLWXYAAHgEp.jpg (31KB, 237x432px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 237x432px

>>62216771

Quality bait.

>>62220738
All Google employees are expected to shill on the Internet, at least a dozen shillposts per day on the approved topics.

>>62220875
I already installed it on about 1400 school computers.

>>62220845
Don't care anymore just keep playing the game some kike developed to use you as pawn

>>62221374
just unsubscribe and you are free

File: 1480644700769.webm (823KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

823KB, 640x480px

>>62213023
https://twitter.com/TruNews/status/903770703471796224

>>62213590
>I have no proof to back up my statements, go find it yourself

File: 1480644916923.png (36KB, 432x191px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 432x191px

>>62216741

>>62222016
I don't need to back up my opinions with proof.

>>62213036
We the autists have relished in the glory of ad free browsing for years, but now rival autists have decided it's time attack advertising, instead of just blocking it.

This is stupid. What this is going to do is prompt services to switch to subscription based bullshit (think cable TV) when the ads are no longer enough revenue.

I'm gonna keep ignoring ads with pihole, ublock Origin and the like. Please do the same. Your tactic of diluting ad money will hurt us all in the future.

>inb4 google shill

>>62213023
It's going to work until Alphabet slams ya'll with lawsuits for fraud.

The creator is going to be fucked as well.

>>62213215
'Tis true. They're developing shit right in their search engine to make visits to other websites obsolete. Speedtest.net? Fuck that, I can get results from Google. Looking for flights? Fuck going to a website, I can get them from Google. Weather? News? etc.

I know that the results come from other websites, but still. Why visit them?

>>62213215
>Google is on its way to kill porn sites
Bull fucking shit. This will never happen.

>>62222066
this is stupid. cable TV was a subscription service that used ads. use your fucking brain

It is illegal to make fake clicks.
It is illegal to click ads without buying.
You are domestic terrorists if you use this.

>>62213142
just goto cnn and start opening a trons of links. when you see the ad number pop up close the tab. repeat, getting 9-14 every page. I am aggressively attacking CNN today. so far 1200 done in about an hour

>>62222469
>you can't view these emails. it is illegal for you to view them. but we can, so listen to us

>>62222494

Government has right to spy on citizens and corporations have right to ad revenue. If you attack ad revenue you attack taxes which directly makes you a domestic terrorist.

>>62222469
>>62222516
hi shills :)

>>62222516
come at me then, faggot

>>62222469
>It is illegal to click ads without buying.
Wew lad, one misclick and you're GOING TO FUCKING JAIL.

>>62222516
>ter·ror·ist
>ˈterərəst/Submit
>noun
>noun: terrorist; plural noun: terrorists
>1. a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

really joggin the ol' noggin there. there is no political aim here you gigantic clownshoe

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-02 18-51-20.png (132KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1366x768px

>>62222629

Okay. See pic.

>>62222694

You are attempting to cause financial ruin to a company because you disagree with their politics. This makes you a terrorist.

>>62213044
>visit porn site
>adnauseaum clicks all the ads
>google has an ever better indication of what sites I have visited
yeah no

>>62222890
google doesnt cooperate with porn sites

>>62222835
>ubuntu
>rick and morty XD
>chastity bullshit
>on 4chan

When are you going to kill yourself?

>>62222948

Not until the last nazi is put behind bars :^)

>>62222906
just like how the FBI does not negotiate with terrorists, right?

>>62222948
having tabs open with asinine google searches is common practice, dumbass

>>62213023
This is it. Goolag is finished!

>>62220988
No. I disabled those. Fucking idiot.

Jewgle is literally fucked, I'd sell your shares now.

The deep state can't even keep them going with Trump in office.

>>62213044
>everyone that complains about the hourly threads about a likely malicious meme extension is a shill

Why do you retards think changing some software and installing an extension will kill Google? Google is backed by government agencies and gets public money, it's not going anywhere.

File: 1393546238768.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>62216741
you again?
you are in every thread about this.
you don't even put effort xDDD
just copy pasta...
dat rushed "damage control" xD you guys are slippin liek FAKE NEWS.
Remember SHILLS sell their souls to HELL.

is your life satisfying? pic related xD

File: f32.png (172KB, 968x916px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 968x916px

>>62222835
those tabs, almost makes me think you are legit.

come at me then, faggot

File: IMG_0231.jpg (43KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x400px

Big beautiful tits will press up against your head if you run this plugin and help slay the Google dragon.

>>62214702
What future?

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/letters/2017/09/02/letter-political-correctness-over-privilege-has-reached-orwellian-levels/

>>62213044
>Blocking ads get them 0$
>Fake clicking lessens the money they earn
???????????

File: california.png (12KB, 822x79px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 822x79px

>>62227859
Each company pays google per click of their ad. Some of these clicks are worth less than a dollar, some are worth more than 200 dollars per click (pic related). If their ads were to be clicked by bots, and they saw no sales from said ad, and Google is only refunding 10% of their investment due to this (which is what the news articles are stating), it will break the trust of the companies looking to advertise via goggle.

For example, lets say you are a mesothelioma lawyer in California, and are paying $395 per click of your ad. You sink 100k into the ads, because you know you're gonna get thousands of dollars per client, even when averaging the ones who won't bring you any money. Google is averaging about 210 searches per month, so this should float you for at least a month.

2 days later, you have no money left in your account, and nobody has contacted your firm. Google agrees that it's click fraud, but is only willing to pay back 10k of what you invested. You get to eat the other 90k, with nothing to show for it. How many times would you be willing to have this happen before you no longer trusted google?

>>62227907
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying anon!

>>62213385
Google would gain power by killink no-google sites

>>62227936
Glad to help.

>>62227907
>it will break the trust of the companies looking to advertise via goggle.
That will take years and a lot of AdNausea users.
It's an AdClicker not bloacker.

>>62228000
It's actually an ad-click simulator combined with an ad hider.

>>62228000
It will only take years if you are searching random shit. If you go after Google's bread and butter, where it costs hundreds of dollars per click, then you can do massive damage to them in a relatively short amount of time.

Shit like DUI lawyers and car insurance getting flooded with bots is gonna break the trust of the top payers. If Google loses those clients, they are gonna feel it.

>>62228077
>If you go after Google's bread and butter
> hundreds of dollars per click
>some weird pharmaceuticals
You shills nee to take a break, just chill the fuck out.
I also don't like google but at least I'm not acting irrational.

>>62228120
I'm not actually using it. I was just commenting that it would be easy to fuck up google's profit scheme pretty quickly.

That said, considering they are like 90% reliant on ads, one could easily expect them to find a solution to this weakness. They would adapt within a few months.

does /g/ now how to create adnau downloader and spread it via eternalblue ? might be worth a shot

>>62228142
> it would be easy to fuck up google's profit
Most people don't even use an adblocker of any kind.

>>62228205
Adblocker won't really fuck up google's profit margin. You just aren't counted in the metrics. You would have to click on ads (or simulate the clicks) in order to break the trust between the person wanting to advertise, and google.

>>62228120
looks like someones butthurt

>>62228120
advanced shill tactics

Isn't uBlock Origin + uMatrix better solution?

>>62228390
Depends on the problem. If you're just not wanting to deal with ads, that's the better solution. But if you're wanting to harm google's relationship with companies that want to advertise on google, then explain how using those would break the trust that google would have with the people advertising on google.

File: 1504427065661.png (177KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1000x1000px

this pic explains everything

>>62227945
Yes, I know of the consequences if they hypothetically did this. Not what I asked for though.

bump

Just a casual reminder to install ad nauseam
https://adnauseam.io/

>inb4 how does it work ? >>62228588

Watch out for shills

File: google_2015_logo_detail.png (37KB, 996x333px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 996x333px

If I was Google, I would actually invest in AdNauseam. Not publicly, of course. This is an excellent way to dominate the market even harder and stomp out the competition. All you need is to fill the internet with more white noise which others will have trouble filtering. Google, with its machine learning, won't.

The only people who can really fuck over Google are so called blackhat marketers. They are real pros. To generate fake clicks, they have an arsenal of sophisticated botnets and they often use malware on normies' computers. They're not volunteers, they have a strong financial incentive to click-spam their competitors. AdNauseam is baby-tier. Google has seen it all before. It has fought click wars for more than a decade.

Those refunds you keep talking about do not even come from AdNauseam traffic. They come from professional blackhat botnets that imitate user behavior and are only detected post factum. AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.

Do you think that amateur AdNauseam fanboys are smarter than blackhat gurus? I don't think so.

Here is some insight on how Google battles them. This is from 2015, before AdNauseam took off.
http://adage.com/article/digital/inside-google-s-secret-war-ad-fraud/298652/

So, what do we have in the end? Google's competitors who use outsourced pajeet coders make heavy losses, advertisers just flock to Google because it's the one who can combat click fraud best. Google strengthens its monopoly. Wow, what a victory.

The only thing AdNauseam really does is playing into Google's hands. I am pretty sure the thread is full of Google shills who promote AdNauseam to kill competition and advance their "anti-hate speech" agenda. Every AdNauseam shill can be declared a Google shill at this point.

Oh yea, have fun passing your real IP address, location and ISP each time an ad is clicked. You are truly doing a good goy's job.

>>62229240
I have seen this post multiple times. You could at least not blatantly copy-paste, if you want to appear like its an original idea, instead of Google defense force.

I don't even use Adnauseam, but posts like this are actually making me debate giving it a try.

>>62229240
fucking copypaste you pajeet shill
try harder faggot

>>62229240
Am I trapped in a time loop? I got a deja vu from seeing your post!

Or maybe you're just a shilling faggot

>>62229261
maybe he just really believes what he's saying and is trying to get the word out?

>>62229325
If he really believed it, he wouldn't need to make it copypasta.

They have mathematicians and Statistics on their side.

>>62229396
lol ?

>>62228588
Problem is, I don't want to kill google because they basically finance most of the sites on the internet. And all the shady shit they do doesn't affect me.

>>62229614
i hope you dont watch porn or torrent anything

>>62229658
Why? Because you think google is going to kill that with their adblock? If so, please provide a reason to believe that.

>>62229669
because thats what gonna happen, google is against evil, porn is evil,if you cant see this you are a blind sheep

>>62229699
Yeah, no. That's just google's slogan from I think a while ago. Google itself is pretty evil actually.

>>62229735
we know its evil, you think evil company would not kill its competitors in unfair play?

>>62229753
Porn isn't google's competitor, it's search engines and the like.

>>62222469
pffft ahahahahha!

>>62229764
everyones google competitor

>>62229789
Right, sure. That makes you sound sane and believable. Just talk in hyperbole only.

>>62229796
the same people were saying about google censoring things, keep having your head in your ass like you always do

>>62229822
I'm sorry, that's not an English sentence. I'm pretty sure you're accusing me of shit that I didn't do though.

>>62213034
>>62213036
It makes google's services unreliable to their customers.
In the best case they switch to other companies, in the worst case it devalues google's offers. In any case, it already did damage and google hat to refund money to a lot of customers.

>>62222479
Oh boy, after like 2-5 clicks your IP is blacklisted temporarily anyway...
This is not a fight you can win with burst attacks, this is a long-term thing.
"Attacks" are easily detectable. However, a 5% click rate over many weeks on the normal websites you visit anyway isn't really distinguishable from legitimate use.

>>62213034
>>62220761
Here's how it works. It clicks on the advert that an advertiser has paid, wasting that advertisers money, making his money worthless. That advertiser will pull his money from google as he will realize it is being completely wasted on google adsense.

>>62213023
>clicking all ads is better than blocking all together
right, shills

>>62230084 --> >>62228588

>>62230209
you can post this shit as often as you want, it doesn'tchange the fact that advertisment firms make money if clicks
>naah, we not false flagging
are you so desperate because of adblockers like uBlock origin doing their job?

>>62231279
wew lad

Lemme repeat and pay attention this time :

>you have installed ad nauseam
>it clicks random ads = advertisers pay money to google each time it does
>however, you won't buy anything
>adverts pay for nothing
>builds up distrust
>adverts start leaving google because they pay more than they gain
>google loses shekels

it fucking werks

>>62231279
>are you so desperate because of adblockers like uBlock origin doing their job?
imagine being this employed by corporations.
using ublock = looking away from things you don't like. nothing changes, you don't see it anymore.
using adnauseam = joining a public protest against something you don't like. it may change things (or not, but at least, you tried).

File: 1490564568126.webm (540KB, 322x214px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 322x214px

>>62231340
This will only work if every internet user uses adnauseam. How many people do you think use this? 5000? 10000? You are literally giving free shekels to ad companies.

>>62231620
No.
I am not sure about the exact extent of damage, but I am sure that if every 30th internet user used ad nauseam then google would perish in days.

>You are literally giving free shekels to ad companies.

wew lad
Imagine being this retarded

>>62231651
>every 30th internet user
You clearly don't understand how many people browse the internet, anon. Normies won't use this extension. It's even banned on chrome store.

>>62231620
>You are literally giving free shekels to ad companies.
Except those shekels aren't mine, they belong to a company that's trying to sell their product and have no idea why their interactions are so high, yet their conversion rate is so low.

This essentially has companies paying cost-per-click rates for cost-per-impression adverts - with a 0% conversion rate. And I'd wager you'd struggle to find a business that wasn't gigantic that would be able to sustain that sort of marketing budget for long.

What I expect you'll see is a particular cross-section of sites with a technical orientation reduce or lose third party adverts as a result of these tactics, if ad-nauseum becomes even remotely popular as ublock has.

File: tricked.jpg (61KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 400x400px

>installing something that LOADS ADS

>>62231843
you mean ABP? no i didnt install it

File: puff-daddy-taking-a-whiff.jpg (56KB, 634x477px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 634x477px

Running the 3t9r045q script every day. Pic related

>>62231620
lemme give you a quick overview of how guglol makes money (at least their main income)

>ads
>companies that want to advertise their products pay google
>gogogle then displays these ads on websites
>gooogle pays a certain percentage of given shekels to these websites and keeps the rest

now, how does this werk

>users click on ads, now two things happen
>google gets paid even more (much more than just for the user viewing the ad)
>user buys the product (usually) and the company which has paid googel makes profit
>profit
>these companies need to make more money than they pay to google, otherwise advertising their products becomes useless

now, what does ad nauseam do ?

>clicks on ads
> = ad company pays guggel
>BUT you won't buy the product
>ad companies pay for nothing
>ad nauseam does this many, many times over
>ad companies lose more shekels than they gain
>ad companies get mad and withdraw their ads away from googul
>geggol loses shekels in the long term
>guggol suffers

Why is everyone replying to goolag pajeets? Just report them and move on. There is already a tl;dr pic itt

>>62232128
because I want to convert them to SJWs

>>62232066
>ad companies pay for nothing
No.

http://fortune.com/2017/08/27/google-ad-fraud-bots/

Google refunds bots/adnauseum clicks

Furthermore, they wouldn't withdraw ads, just heavily lower the amount they're willing to pay for their ads to be seen

>>62232156
they refund a part of it, 10% afaik and that still leaves a lot of space for distrust

>Furthermore, they wouldn't withdraw ads, just heavily lower the amount they're willing to pay for their ads to be seen

It's not much different from withdrawing completely. Goolag suffers and that's the point.

Okay, niggas, post screenshots of your ads. Just make sure to zoom in the banners, I wanna watch them closely

If advertisers already have a "profile" for me (although I run Ublock and block all social media embeddings), would running adnauseum for an extended period of time would be enough to decrease the quality of my hypothetical profile ?

And what would be a sufficient ammount of time ?

File: google-refunds.jpg (944KB, 1451x1415px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1451x1415px

>"you're wasting your time /g/"

OP keep making these threads, it's nice to see it pinned in the catalog for easy access.

>>62232528
Even in our inaction we can disrupt the advertising market.

Guy we need a foss decentralyzed Adnauseum leaderboard so we can compete!

Who will be the one to land the blow on the internets final boss?

GOLIATHS /ALPHA/BET

Can you post a screenshot with banners zoomed in?

>>62232571
I'll design the logo for the leaderboard

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-03 18-22-17.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62232621

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-03 18-22-50.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62232621
Children, don't look

>>62216771
>Threads like these just show that we need MUCH more strict moderation around here.
I agree, it's a disgrace that you haven't been banned yet.

>>62213023
>literally breaks every streaming site
yeah no

>>62232902
post example

>>62232571
set up a zeronet site
you can also use it as a mirror

side note: Coincidence Detector is hosted on Zeronet too. (((They))) cannot shut it down.

>>62213023
Childish, short sighted bullshit.
Also illegal. Download it if you want to eventually click on some malware or get sued by google and be used to scare the shit out of everyone.

File: nu.png (18KB, 447x459px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 447x459px

so do you guys know of somebody who actually got fucked over for running scripts like OP related or ad nauseam ?

>>62233214
Of course not.

>>62213023
>install click bot

no thanks, i'm content with simply blocking ad content.

>>62233242
just as I thought
so what's all this panic and fear of using ad nauseam ? google does not have time to deal with each one of anons anyway

>>62233261
no one is scared of using it, its just shill trying to damage control

>>62233261
there is no fear,if you're that much of an idiot that you think installing a program which will click on every fucking ad you come across, ads which could very well have malware, which once click could possibly run shit on your computer then you lack a functioning frontal cortex used for typical human thought. It's far better to straight up not even interact with ad content by blocking it than even giving it the chance to collect metadata generated with every click, not to mention the security risks with clicking on every ad to begin with. Use it if you want though, imo it's an asinine concept.

>>62233261
There's like 3 posts about that now.

>>62233072
Do something productive for once in your life.

>>62233354
my config is win10, sandboxed FF (sandboxie) w/ adnau, eset, protonvpn

I don't think that I have something to worry about with this config. Malware won't know my IP and 99% of it won't even get close to getting through. The rest will be obliterated by eset. I hope, actually.

>>62233421
Whatever works for you man, I just think interacting with ads in any way vice blocking ad content is an asinine concept is all.

>>62232528
Letting that news get out was an odd mistake.

They've emboldened people who likely would have given up after the fad ran its course. Amateur mistake.

Post more of your banners. Don't forget to zoom in.

>>62222948
you've never seen this meme before have ya little fella?

>>62232968
Why not a Tor node because of the popularity and anonymity?

>>62228588
>Other ad networks get equally fucked
>Google doesn't lose marked share

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-03 at 19.31.33.png (492KB, 1439x705px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 1439x705px

>>62233585
Why do you need this?

>>62233808
having 100% market share means shit when you have 100 customers lmao, back to school kiddo

>>62233830
You realize that a lot of websites rely on ad revenue and will stop existing or wil start to charge money if they don't have ads?
We'll need to make Google less attractive as others.

>>62233923
well guess what, i dont give a fuck about other websites, they are all cancer. if you think your website is worth paying for than post it here, we will judge it

>>62233923
>You realize that a lot of websites rely on ad revenue and will stop existing or wil start to charge money if they don't have ads?
That's the general idea. Good websites are either maintained by hobbyists or can find alternative sources of revenue.

>>62222479
Same, except I'm doing it on Breitbart.

>>62213023
What's even up with the recent hate on google? Just block all ads and only use the shit you want to use like everybody else. Chrome is the most convenient browser, Android is the superior OS, Gmail is the best free e-mail hassle-free client, Google Home is the best voice assistant etc, but i'm still gonna disable search history and install ghostery and adblocker and anti-adblock killer cuz ads are annoying. What you're doing is probably not gonna do shit, but in worst case scenario you're gonna end up hurting everyone.

>>62234059
nice try shill

>>62213309
>SJW culture
oh it makes sense now
back to /pol/ sweetie

>>62234074
but what i said above is fact, google isn't perfect but it didn't do anything that wrong lately, all of it's competitors are much worse

File: Screenshot_2017-08-31-09-27-15.png (202KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1440x2560px

>>62234059
It's because Google fired an employee for saying something bad about women. /pol loved sucking the dude's cock so much, and as it turns out /g/ is infested with /pol/ migrants.

>>62214720
You think ad clicks are the only thing they collect and sell?

>>62234129
>google fires someone for being sexist, disrespectful and thus disrupting to their reputation and workflow (and by extension, cashflow)
>this is somehow a surprise
/pol/ really needs to go outside more

>>62213309
>SJW
>>>/pol/
>>>/out/

>>62234106
Ah, yes. In contrast to /pol/, every other board on this site is a liberal heaven for all races and genders. God bless my girlfriend's gender neutral strap-on.

File: g and pol.png (14KB, 660x479px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 660x479px

>>62234129
Here's a more up to date image.

>>62222479
Why are you financially supporting CNN?

>>62234240
no, in contrast to /pol/, every other board wants to keep politics off every other board and contained at /pol/ because that's why /pol/ exists. And if they want actual political discussion they go to /news/. /pol/ is lost to normalfags who flooded it during gamergate and rise of /r/the_donald
And for your knowledge, newfag, 4chan has always been a far-left website, advocating for freedums on the internet and advocating that the government should fuck off and leave us and our lolis alone.

>>62222479
this is so pathetic, do you have nothing better to do or something?

>>62234129
>>62234250
Dude, are you that one person crying about /pol/ in every thread every day? I can see your hurting butt from the other side of the planet. Why don't you just go to /leftypol/? This is a serious advice since you are on 4chan here and it won't get better for you.

>>62234159
The manifesto said nothing wrong or even offensive to people with normal, healthy sensibilities. Google is wrong.

>>62222479
Get a job, loser

>>62234314
Obamacare will never be repealed, stay mad cuck.

>>62234285
>advocating for freedums on the internet and advocating that the government should fuck off and leave us and our lolis alone.

That's libertarian, not far-left you literal fucking mong. Far-left is just as authoritarian as the far-right, not less. If anything, the brand of anarchism you're looking for is centrist, not Bakunist.

>>62234285
yes, in the end we all voted for gay marriages rtc, i bet >>62216771 is you

>>62234349
the definitions change every year based on what web content is currently popular among teenagers

This really is the most passive aggressive bullshit method I've ever seen. This is something a primary school kid comes up with. Wanna see something hilarious from `Date.getYear();`?

https://twitter.com/slpng_giants

What a bunch of fucking losers.

>>62233416
How is installing malware doing osmething productive?
Double idiot points for those who install this shit on their main OS/bare metal instead of a VM. Lmao.

>>62234317
>one controversial decision
>hurr durr the company needs to go out of business
the hivemind is real.

>create a traditional advertising network
>create (((adblocker))) that aggressively clicks on ads behind the scenes instead of blocking them
>spread it around for people that feel the need to fight the patriarchy and who are 14 year old scriptkiddo's
>people who previously had adblockers are now running your (((adblocker))) and generate you money instead
>rake in that free advertisement money

You kiddo's got dun goofed by (((them))) again

>>62234317
well i have no idea, i was simply going off by
>fired an employee for saying something bad about women.
which would make perfect sense, this isn't the 1800s anymore, you can say what you want at home and exercise your free speech as much as you want but you do it in a public place (irl or internetz) and it becomes hate speech, and no company wants some fucker with a big mouth insulting potential customers.
Besides, i'm sure
>people with normal, healthy sensibilities.
refers to /pol/s retarded idea of how the world works, you people are about as further as we can get from "normal" or "healthy" or even just "people"

>>62234314
>dude why are you complaining about politics on a technology board
>just go to a different thread on the politics board
>4chan won't get better for you
Nobody gives a shit about your ideology, go fight your holywar with your autist "leftypol" friends somewhere else.
4chan will cleanse itself in shit as soon as a new wave of normalfags pours in to replace /r/the_donald redditors who haven't been on this site for more than a year and spam every board with politics outside of their dedicated edgy manchild board. Stay mad, kid.
>>62234349
>muh libertarian maymay
this is how to spot the modern twitter "intellectual" fellow anons, hiding behind that meaningless buzzword won't do you shit. Left isn't authoritarian, liberals are called liberals for a reason, they want everyone to get along, live and let live, but since the right doesn't want that, they have to attack the right and in turn be more authoritarian because a liberal state in itself assumes that nobody threatens the freedums people have, and since right now that's not the case with drumpf's administration they adapt the right wing's set of tools, propaganda, fake news and even Antifa, being very much like any terrorist group which the right had under it's wing for years, white supremacy and nazis for example, i mean, potus is too scared to even call them out. They're friends.

>>62234383
>>62234285

>For Bakunin is the central figure in the development of modern anarchist activism and ideas. He emphasized the importance of collectivism, mass insurrection, revolution and involvement in the militant labour movement as the means of creating a free, classless society. Moreover, he repudiated Proudhon's sexism and added patriarchy to the list of social evils anarchism opposes. Bakunin also emphasized the social nature of humanity and individuality, rejecting the abstract individualism of liberalism as a denial of freedom.

>Oh, yes. The collectivist, militant labourist Anonymous movement of yore. Fighting against sexism and the patriarchy since 2004.
>Nevermind telling women to show tits or fuck off, calling blacks nigger-faggots, etc

Found the poz-boy.

>mfw reviewbrah gets banned from youtube because of this
>mfw /pol/tards rage against the machine when their retarded extension is what triggered the flag
t. triggered co/ck/.

File: (194).png (8KB, 615x90px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 615x90px

>>62234354
nice try, quit samefagging /pol/
>>62234513
>Nevermind telling women to show tits or fuck off, calling blacks nigger-faggots, etc
You really think anybody seriously gave a shit about that though? I mean that was just people being idiots because it's fun, like starting a bar fight for the sake of a bar fight. Are you one of the idiots who saw people on this website pretend to be idiots and thought you'd fit in? I think you are, and you are why 4chan is pretty much doomed to become a /pol/ police zone filled with politics at every turn instead of being fun like it used to be.

>>62213023
>HURR ADS ARE EVUL

no, there is nothing wrong with an ad-supported internet. I just want the plebs to experience it, not me. I can do that easily with ublock/umatrix without having to opt-in to some useless botnet. why wouldn't you want plebs to pay for all your shit? if anything we should be encouraging normies to click on more ads.

>b-but leegin is going to free the sheeple web 1.0 for evar

nah, fuck em.

>>62234542
your bra was banned because he didnt have any ISIS related videos in his favorites

File: 1481741820583.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>62234571
forgot my avatar

>>62234559
No one gave a shit, you're right. I don't understand what problem you have with my post, I just oppose the modern model for anarcho-collectivism that passes itself for liberalism. I don't understand how /pol/ comes into the picture in any of what I've said.

>>62234571
>I just want the plebs to experience it, not me. [...] if anything we should be encouraging normies to click on more ads.
the ultimate R E D P I L L

>>62227675
What are you selling, kind merchant?

>banned on chrome
>banned on palemoon https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=16504

Powerful software is powerful.

>>62213023
>>run script in separate browser
Why?

Post more screen shots with banners zoomed in.

>>62236766
so you can be logged in your gmail or whatever without risk of being banned

>>62237314
I don't have gmail other than just a throwaway for android. No big deal they'll delete that, I can make a new one. But thanks for the warning.

>>62237183
Cool

>>62213034
This will result in less people wanting to do business with google and even if google blocks you, that's one less customer in the end for advertizers. Google can't win in the end, only lose.

Can someone develop an extension that would do the same ad nauseous. I don't trust these jews

>>62234059
Google is a privacy nightmare.
They will neuter any service to collect data and serve ads like YouTube and Gmail.
It doesn't help that they that they like the closed ecosystem approach where all the services you use are interconnected in some way.

90% of the hate is from fucking up YouTube tho
esp the content ID and monetization rights system.

also fuck botnet captcha

>>62237532
Go read the source code and tell us if you find anything suspicious.

>>62233923
>a lot of websites rely on ad revenue and will stop existing or wil start to charge money if they don't have ads
That's what I'm hoping for.
You think people would pay for shit like Buzzfeed or 9Fag? No, they would shut that shit down and the world would be a better place.

Post some banners zoomed in. Not text ads.

>>62237983
Show me yours and I'll show you mine.

File: screenshot_104.png (4MB, 1893x1745px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1893x1745px

>>62238408

>>62238508
Lie

Post screenshots of your graphic banners zoomed in.

>>62238508
But that's wrong

>>62238508
>it's malware
hi google shill

Anyone has graphic banners?

>>62238735
Why do you keep asking?

>>62238741
I wanna see the banners

File: 1459030699647.jpg (87KB, 953x960px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 953x960px

>>62213036
>>62213034
>one ad click is worth $50 because 1 person clicks it per hour
>everyone installs adnauseam
>one ad click is worth $0.5 because 100 people click it per hour
the kicker is it drives down ad value while not making us look at the parasites

>>62238955
Post your graphic banners

File: 1504204381162.png (193KB, 500x735px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 500x735px

>>62214144
>>62214498
>reddit spacing
>t_d formatting
found the newfag guys

>>62213215
>a new era of underground porn and torrents

good, we need this to filter the casuals.

ad nauseam senpai ma nigga

>>62222948
Being this new

bump for victory, at 4k today on my home computer and just set up a pi for 24/7 adnauseum. its been on for about 20minutes now and has clicked over 500 bucks.