Identifying chokepoints in processing power

>>61517558
processor is shit

>>61517558
Your CPU is only 6 cores and really inefficient small cores at that. Your biggest upgrade would be to get a Ryzen CPU. The r7-1700 would do you fine. That and possibly getting 32GB of ram

>>61517558
>Fx-6300

Welp, there you go.

>>61517558
move to the Ryzen R7 1700 and 32GB of DDR4-3000+.

What exactly is your GPU OP?
It lists the r9 200 series, not the actual card.

>>61517629
If it's 4gb it's probably an r9-290

>>61517638
probably but apparently some 270 models have that too

>>61517629
R9 290 factory clock

To be transparent the reason alot of my stuff is AMD is because this was all put together when I was on the lower end of the salary scale and it was the cheapest option

>>61517670

have you tried monitoring cpu/gpu usage while rending and seen what bottlenecks first?

>>61517670
You basically need to toss your Mobo+cpu+ram in the trash and get a ryzen setup or laby lake Intel setup. You can get the best fx processor and it'll still be weaker than the cheapest ryzen out

File: asdawas.jpg (147KB, 430x411px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 430x411px

>>61517751
Haven't monitored GPU but I've done CPU at 1080p and 4k

1080p is 65-75%
4K is up to 99% every frame, pic related is in a trough where it goes down to 25~%

File: epi.jpg (324KB, 630x787px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 630x787px

>>61517842
GPU doesn't seem to use much at all while the CPU is absolutely chugging

Figures are from 4K render

>>61517558
>>61517670

CPU:
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-FX-6300/3647vs1555

GPU:
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1070-vs-AMD-R9-290/3609vs2171

You might be able to hang onto that GPU for a little while longer, but a CPU upgrade is sorely needed.

>>61517912
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-vs-AMD-FX-6300/3915vs1555

i concur

>>61517558
GPU is fine. Replace CPU with an R7 1700. You'll need an AM4 mobo and DDR4 RAM too.

File: c2e62c230f53e7fd27b133df25197d445e4cd259578eac111288e91a86cc9b84.png (190KB, 535x479px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 535x479px

>>61517558
>Identifying chokepoints in processing power
>Windows 10
There's your answer.

>>61517558
It seems that AE never supported rendering the output on a GPU besides raytraycing.so you'll need new processor to fix your performance.

You wil get best bang for the buck with something like Ryzen 7 1700. Go to PCBG for more information.

>>/pcbg/
>>>/g/pcbg
(testing catalog linking)

>>61517938
Just an FYI, the 1700 is the same chip as the 1800x, so if you overclock them both to 4GHz+ you'll get the same performance.

>>61517992
Not every 1700 goes up to 4GHz and surely not at the samepower output.

>>61517938
>>61517968
>>61517605
>All this AMD shilling in a thread that shows how weak they are

>>61518077
>bulldozer was shit so ryzen m-must be shit!!!

So desperate.

>>61517558
Get yourself an SSD for one, HDD write times with rendering programs are notoriously bad

>>61518077
This guy is asking for help on a new system that needs to be able to run 4k video rendering.

Given the current market, of course you'd advice a R7 processor. You can literally build an entire system sans GPU based on the Ryzen platform for the same amount of money you'd have to spend on only a i9 cpu. And they would preform about the same.

no one said hard drive. could go with SSD for faster results