What extensions will you miss, when Mozilla releases Firefox

None, I haven't used Fx in almost a decade

Won't the developers who maintain those extensions update the files to port them? whatever happens, it doesn't affect me because I haven't updated since FF 46 which runs perfectly with all the extensions I need.

>>61424351
I believe you, because back then they were really pushing people to use "Fx" as a shorthand for Firefox.

File: Screenshot (8).png (119KB, 1280x800px)

119KB, 1280x800px

>>61424312

what if i use waterfox

>>61424312
none i don't into extensions
can't wait for 57 looks comfy
and the reader button is text and easy to press

>>61425089
oh actually just one
toggledocumentcolors_

I just won't upgrade

Just use palemoon

Why is no one picking up VimFX? Is there a similar extension which will work?

>>61424312
I will miss "tab groups" extension...
any alternative for managing tabs?

>>61424917
>4 browsers
>that resolution
>win10
>tree style tabs with only 5 tabs
>br
>titanfall
>exhentai easy
Kill yourself meu irmão.

>>61424924
dis mu nigga

tree style tabs and self-destructing cookies
others will be ported or alternatives will be developed

>not using chromium

fucking plebs

>>61425190
what's the problem?
i found this notebook dusted in my place and i was in need of a notebook for college. (HP Compaq 6515b).
4:3 resolution isnt that bad if you're just browsing internet. (1280x800).
Im too dumb to figure out how to acess sadpanda without that, i've aways been using that and it just werks, im not gonna lose my time to find another solution or do it myself.
3 sessions stored here with 29 tabs.
I was just looking at that game, i was really waiting for MGR Revengeance.
Yeah, i'm a hue.

Kys too.

None, because I won't downgrade.

>>61425190
>he fell for /g/ memes
Just kill yourself already.

>>61425615
>4:3 resolution isnt that bad if you're just browsing internet. (1280x800).
1280x800 is 16:10.

>>61425633
The only (almost) meme in that post is win10.

>>61424417
Addons are not exactly one-liners and mozilla's 3 sdks (the middle one they deprecated again before it even hit mainstream) are wildly different. All that shit doesn't port itself you know. The abilities offered by the sdks don't map 1:1 either, a lot of stuff has become impossible.

I ported mine to jetpack when it came around, and I'm not sure actually what they are right now. Mozilla has been incredibly vague and using weird-ass names for everything, I've no fucking clue anymore what my addons are built on now or what all their other shit even is or means. They just make up some new furfag-named project every week and demand everyone accomodate it.

I gave up on firefox because of mozilla's never-ending bullshit and started porting all of my addons to chrome the same day I switched to it. Now the chrome versions are my main things and the firefox ones are legacy. The day they break is the day I stop caring about them. They're on github so people are free to submit patches if they want to.

>>61425716
tl:dr yeah I'm pissed. Mozilla basically pulled every developer's leg for years, fucked over their users with every new firefox release, and did everything they possibly could to just fuck us over. I'm not playing their lose-lose game anymore.

>>61425136
This

>>61424312
kys chrome shill

>>61424312
I won't miss anything as long as I don't upgrade.

I've gone without upgrading for ages before, and lasted a few years before I felt the need to upgrade again. And some people still use palemoon to this day.

File: Pale Moon.png (842KB, 905x904px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 905x904px

none senpai

File: 1491445366359.png (6KB, 253x199px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 253x199px

>>61424917
>He uses an extension to get on sadpanda

>>61425688
Oh well, i dont exactly have time to tweak and find out how linux works nor the time to do it. So i'll stick on windows because it's much easier to use as a daily driver.
>>61425664
Oh, nvm, i said that because it adjustment looked like a 4:3 CRT Monitor for me. ( opening two windows - one in each side makes content very hard to see).
>>61426052
Can you tell me another way then? I use this since when i was a newfag here. And i had no problems.

>>61424312
I'm using Opera, Firefox is bloated as fuck

File: 1495306049703.jpg (75KB, 779x708px)

75KB, 779x708px

>>61424312
none because I use Vivaldi instead

File: 1489557094280.jpg (125KB, 1000x1000px)

125KB, 1000x1000px

>>61426108
>make e-hentai account
>login to it
>clear cookies
>go to exhentai
>login
It's that simple

>>61424917
>Video DownloadHelper

my nigga

Any good alternatives? i was thinking about chromium but i dont know if it is a good botnet or not

ï only use ublock so i dont care

Only faggots use anything more than an adblocker.

There will never be a good browser.

What's stopping extensions from updating and supporting 57?

>>61426448
simpleton pls go

>>61426561
Base API changed (and lack a lot of features).

>>61426561
Effort to update, no longer supported, spite.

File: selection.jpg (2MB, 4144x4168px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4144x4168px

None because I use a superior browser.

>>61426148
Why though? Just hit F12 on any page and search for "mp4" in the source code and there is your video files. It's retarded to use an add on fir this.

>>61426979
wth is that disgusting rez, you can't watch anything on that shiet

>>61427365
you just jelly because you cant afford an iMac eh?

i dont require addons because i like my firefox minimal and secure

every addon extends your attack surface and requires you to stay updated with every individual one

the majority of features implemented these days are already present in nightly

all addons do is modify the about:config which you can apply yourselves

the most used applications or active devs are porting their applications over and the majority are already on the hybrid AI
which allows legacy applications to use multi process

just git gud and have fun

>>61427392
>iMac
>literally the worst of the lineup
my dood...

>>61426979
>Why are cocks so erotic r9k?
kek

>>61427454
hybrid API*

>>61425089
why do you use firefox? chrome is faster hands down, extensions are the only reason I keep using firefox and I would keep using it until can't install them

>>61427454
>all addons do is modify the about:config which you can apply yourselves

yeah sure, then tell me how to block trackers and ads without some kind of automation and without wasting 5 minutes before connecting to a new website to check if everything is ok.

>>61426561
>>61426592
nothing is stopping them
sept abandoned projects and lazy devs

theres a hybrid API in place seperate from the new API that allows legacy extentions/addons to work in 57+

>>61424312
I switched to Chromium ages ago. Hopefully this will speed up the death of SJWfox.

File: MY EYES.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>61426979
>bright style

>>61427498
disable tables or images

also define "tracker"

also are you implying that noscript or ublock or something of the sort isnt going to work?

>>61427483

>faster hands down

change the script, cubicle nigger.

svchost CONNECTS TO GOOGLE IP everytime using Chorme/Chromium/unGOOGLED Chromium

>>61427523
>implying google isnt the ultraSJW

you are ignorant as fuck

>>61427556
>implying Chromium is Google Chrome

Firecucks everybody.

File: desktop-4M.jpg (3MB, 7680x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 7680x4320px

Forgot my screenshot

>>61427365
It's 8k. You mad?

>>61427527
I don't understand why /g/ is so fucking stupid. Turn a light on and dim your screen. Not to mention all the practical reasons why a dark CSS on 4chan is stupid

>Rest of the UI is dark on light
>Going from light on dark 4chan to basically every website in existence would be annoyingly bright just by comparison
>dark on light is OBJECTIVELY superior for comfort and readability
see
>However, most studies have shown that dark characters on a light background are superior to light characters on a dark background (when the refresh rate is fairly high). For example, Bauer and Cavonius (1980) found that participants were 26% more accurate in reading text when they read it with dark characters on a light background.

>Reference: Bauer, D., & Cavonius, C., R. (1980). Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal. In E. Grandjean, E. Vigliani (Eds.), Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminals (pp. 137-142). London: Taylor & Francis

>>61427479
The meme about mac owners being faggots is true.

>>61427578
>implying your whole code base doesnt rely on the backs of SJWs

back to /v/ child

>>61427541
>also define "tracker"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_tracking
I don't want to connect to these domains.

>also are you implying that noscript or ublock or something of the sort isnt going to work?
wut? I want them to do the work for me.

>It's 8k. You mad?
u got me there buddy, I'm totally jealous of that big ass screen estate.

>I don't understand why /g/ is so fucking stupid. Turn a light on and dim your screen. Not to mention all the practical reasons why a dark CSS on 4chan is stupid
agree, dark background is retarded.

>>61427637
>I don't want to connect to these domains.
>hosts file is
block adsense
block facebook/twitter/ like buttons
its better to block at router level tho

>wut? I want them to do the work for me.
these are some of the most used addons and they will be ported

they already are working on the hybrid API meaning they work on nightly and will work 57+

>>61427587
>a quote from almost 40 years ago
Classic mactoddler

>>61427627
Enjoy your dying browser while you can, Firecuck. When you're ready to join the winning team, let us know.

>>61427756
ill enjoy my refreshed base with improved security and performance thanks

enjoy your botnet ridden software

>inb4 chromium isnt the same as chromecuck

>he doesnt know chromium is still a botnet and ungoogled isnt even properly maintained

firefox can actually be forked and have security and freedom

ie TOR browser and icecat

enjoy not having true freedom and customization cuck ;)

about:config all day

>>61426108
>>61426145
what also works is
>clear cookies
>log in to e-hentai
>go to exhentai
if you don't clear your cookies after logging in to e-hentai you can get into sadpanda anytime

>>61427308
because i'm a lazy ass, i usually use jdownloader to do this though.

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-17 18-43-41.png (103KB, 831x348px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 831x348px

>>61426052
>>61426108
>>61428123
You only need to delete that one "yay" cookie on exhentai then login to e-hentai and refresh the exhentai page.

>>61424312
None, extensions are for plebs. Only thing I need is ublock and https.

>>61427756
kys botnet lover

>>61428123
This is the easiest way. And if you don't want to clear your cookies first just open an incognito window

>>61426979
how do you center the thread?

I'm getting high spikes of CPU usage in Firefox, what gives? Doesn't seem to be extensions since even keeping to bare minimum of uBlock Origin, uMatrix, and Greasemonkey it happens.
inb4 werks on my machine

File: 1475773963243.jpg (82KB, 720x644px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 720x644px

Keep using what I have now until I'm happy with the state of the new API and the gimped extensions that go with it.

>>61427470
>worst
Nah, the new laptops have atrocious keyboards, the Mac Pro's four years old and wasn't good on release, and AIOs are pretty great.

>>61427483
>chrome is faster hands down
yea right. i don't buy that catch phrase, it's a browser, it's still being worked on actively, it works

anyway i use instead of crome because i can change shit. not using extensions does not mean i use default firefox

>>61427483
Shoo Shill! I said Shoo!

>>61431775
He's right, though.

>>61424312
APB, uBlock, Video DownloadHelper, Forecastfox

Honestly i'll miss Forecastfox the most...

>>61432693
really?

>>61432799
Yeah, really.

>>61432810
really really?

>>61432816
No, not really.

>>61432824
Got ya!

>>61432828
>i can't really argue with a criticism levied against something i have an inexplicable personal investment in
>better start funposting to make it look like i didn't "lose" a non-argument
Why do people do this?

>>61432841
>lying on the internet
Why do people do this?

>>61432868
Yeah, I guess you could call it lying. Why not just admit that another poster was right, even if it makes your browser of choice look poor? Just be honest about it. Not everything has to devolve into embarassed funposting.

>>61432879
>admitting defeat
This is America. We don't do that here.

>>61432841
I only said "Got ya!" And the original comment about you being a shill

>>61424312
foxyproxy. the only reason i can be here and not killing myself.

>>61432905
I'm not the guy you called a shill. I was just pointing out that he was right.

>>61432914
ah, firefox sacrifices a bit of speed for non-botnet and high customizability, if you prefer just a browser thats fast go chrome if youre a ricer or dislike botnets firefox is your way to go

>>61432879
>another poster was right
he was?

>>61433004
>time for more embarrassed funposting
You're not a Mozilla dev. You have no stake in the software or the company. Just let it be.

>>61424417
The problem is that a LOT of the required things for most of the useful addons will be just be plain be not accessible with WebExtensions.

Take DownThemAll! for example; it needs certain things like a file writing API (among other things) to be able to be an actual fully-fledged downloader within Firefox that can do the things it currently does like have target folders for batches of downloads, segmented downloading and the like.

Have you had a look at the "download managers" for chrome lately? that's all Fx57+ (aka, Firecuck) will be capable of, which is basically be a wrapper for the built-in file downloading of Firecuck.

The worst part is Mozilla tells people to let them know what APIs they want to have in Firecuck WebExtensions, but are completely ignoring every request except for the ones that chrome already has, which they were going to do in the first place because their stated goal was feature parity with Chrome extensions.

It's all one massive wagon of bullshit

>>61433012
im just curious

>>61433029
You're just defensive. Over something you shouldn't be.

>>61433044
i think thats you desu

>>61433029
notice this was my 4th post and still no proof just claims repeated over and over and over again until you plebs accept it as truth

>>61433051
>no u
Whatever. I'm sure your stock in Mozilla is well-protected by shitposting in 4chan threads.

File: addison-round-mirror-o.jpg (43KB, 710x639px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 710x639px

>>61433068

>>61424417
it's just like recompiling them for the new addon engine
most will need almost entire overhauls

>>61424312
I'll just use a fork, again

>>61433066
What exactly is it that you want proven?

>>61424917
All of those are actually either portable to WebExtensions or have already been ported to WebExtensions, with the exception being GM and TST.

Though, Greasemonkey has alternatives like Tampermonkey and Violentmonkey and it's rather easy to migrate your scripts and its settings to another userscript engine (4chX and OC has export settings functions)

>>61433080
can't you follow the thread?

>>61433090
Can't you just plainly explain what you want?

>>61433097
P R O O F
R
O
O
F

>>61433110
Of what, exactly? Feel free to give details as needed.

>>61433117
>i am this retarded and lazy

>>61433134
>i'm shitposting in the hopes of getting a mod to poof this furfox bashing thread

>>61433137
>still no proof
>nomnomnom all this side tracking

>>61433151
>still hasn't said what he wants proof of
>probably because it's easily provided

>>61433158
>im so lazy to click back a few times
>ill just accuse others of shitposting

>>61433172
>i'm so lazy to just say what i want
>when is a mod going to get here? i've been reporting everything!

>>61424417
I forget, has there been one or two zero day exploits found between then and now?

>>61433180
>all this sidetracking
CLICK BACK NIGGER

>>61433201
>all this sidetracking
JUST SAY WHAT YOU WANT
THE MODS AREN'T COMING TO DELETE YOUR ASSHURT THREAD

>>61433212
CLICK BACK NIGGER

>>61433023
I really hope this destroys mozilla and something better rises from the ashes

>>61433217
CLICK BACK TO WHAT?

Did Tab Tree break everything for anyone else last FF update, relatedly?

>>61433225
to that which you are defending. did you get so caught up in you bs that you forgot

>>61433240
What exactly am I defending?

>>61433244
click back

>>61433252
Yeah, that's what I thought. You're not even sure what you're trying to argue.

>>61433259
uhm no
thats you >>61433244

>>61433264
>no u

>>61433270
He's right tho.

>>61433279
About what?

>>61433288
yes?

>>61433290
no?

>>61433288
About how stupid you are.

>>61433305
There aren't any carrots left.

>>61433188
Most of the updates since FF38-40 are only aesthetic crap to copy Chrome or additions of useless bloats, like hello, the all-in-one button on the right and the other shit, also the removal of the addon bar happened somewhere around FF42 iirc.

>>61433303
>still no proof

File: wut.png (217KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 600x512px

>>61433314

>>61433374
And we creep ever closer to the 57 release. With the vast majority of extensions biting the dust when this happens, what motivation does anyone have to stick with Firefox? I'm all for a streamlined, fast browser build with privacy in mind, I just wish there was some guarantee that's what we'll be getting once the dust settles.

>>61433389
Of what?

>>61433396
>Of what?
click back

>>61433408
What?

>>61433412
did you forget your posts

>>61433420
What?

>>61433423
>no
>proof
>r
>o
>o
>f

>>61433428
What?

>>61433430
Kill yourself.

>>61433435
What?

>>61433440
Kill yourself.

>>61433447
What?

>>61433449
>>>/biz/

>>61433478
>>>/y/

>>61433485
What?

>>61433496
Kill yourself.

File: 19884428_890365087782591_2304377855146643366_n.jpg (45KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x480px

>>61424312
i am on fF50. i updated once to 51 and reverted back after my extentions stopped working ( i have a speed dial extention like olde opera)

>>61433500
no u

>>61433514
What?

>>61433518
like i said in the beginning no proof just repeats

>>61433534
Proof of what?

>>61425716
Link?

>>61433542
>still no proof

>>61433558
Of what?

>>61424312
>even using sjwfox to begin with
I'd rather use chrome with every spying feature enabled than support these faggots.

>>61433566
of what you first replied to

every time i see one of these threads i know its a insecure chromecuk

why are you guys so threatened by firefox?

poor babies ;)

>>61433585
And that would be?

>>61433608
Firefox isn't even competition to chrome by this point. I bet more people use edge than Firefox.

>>61433612
What?

>>61433619
What?

>REEEE ITS NOT ACTUALLY A CHROME COPY AFTER ALL

>REEE THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENT IM SCARED

you fags always complain its the same thing and now that they change you whine again

i cant wait till 57 happens so all you fags stfu

meanwhile im sitting comfy on nightly with my performance gains

>>61433634
>moving toward chrome feature parity
What did they mean by this?

>>61433618
yet all we see is countless firefox crybabies who cant into about:config


>>61433641
>REEE THEY CHANGING THEIR CORE AND EXTENTION/ADDON API

>REEE THEY GOT ELECTROLYSIS AND SERVO

>REEEEE THEY ARE DIFFERENT AND IT SCARES MEEEEE

>>61433651
What?

>>61433663
>i r dumb

>>61433674
Kill yourself.

>>61433677
>REEE I HAVE NO ARGUMENT HOLD MY HAND MOM

enjoy googles ass fuck

>>61433694
What?

>>61427483
Basically every modern browser, including fucking Edge is really fast. Just because Chrome may potentially be 200ms faster when loading is not a reason to switch. They are all fast enough that you won't feel a difference.

>>61434001
>Chrome may potentially be 200ms faster
Shh. The Firecucks are going to go full blown embarrassed shitposting mode again. They can't handle anything that even remotely sounds like criticism.

>>61434263
>potentially
desu it was you that was shitposting and ran out of gas

>>61434337
And here he is again, trying to get the shitposting back up and running. How about no?

>>61434344
>playing the victim
nice troll bro

>>61434359
The victim? All I did was point out that it takes basically nothing to get the Firecucks spamming a thread again. And I was right, apparently. ;^)

>>61434374
all i did was point out a key word you accidentally forgot in your quote

>>61434380
Hey, I'm just pointing out that the average Firecuck is a pathetic, feeble little techlet who can't handle even the slightest amount of critique levied against their social justice browser. If that makes you mad enough to start spamming the thread again that's not my fault or my problem. That's on you.

>>61434344
and like i said it was you shitposting the bread and you never provided the "easy" proof
i wonder why

>>61424312
They keep releasing updates like it's the CIA's official email client or some shit, and every update breaks something or has compatibility issues, why would you need to update a fucking browser so fucking much?

It's also getting uglier and more bloated as the numbers go up.

I'd use 3.6 but it's incompatible with most add ons now and I'm afraid of getting hax0red, and 52 is the last version that doesn't fuck up my IDM integration so I'll stop there too.

If another freedom respecting browser with good add on compatibility appears I'd ditch Fireshit and never look back.

/rant

>>61424312
I may go back to Chromium... I don't know and I don't understand why they do that...

>>61434399
Except I'm not. I'm just here to point out that Firecucks are easily triggered into spamming threads. Also, I figured at least one of the shitposters would still be assblasted enough to still be obsessively monitoring the thread. Looks like I'm right again, huh? ;^)

>>61424417
>Won't the developers who maintain those extensions update the files to port them?

Pretty much all those developers stopped using shitty Firefox years ago which is why like 90% of extensions will stop working and not be ported, ever. The people left using/shilling firefox aren't smart enough to create replacement extensions so they will probably end up finding a way to make chrome extensions work in firecuck.

tab groups. I think the rest of mine will convert.

>>61434389
you sound like a nasty person desu
name calling and projecting because you can't sause your initial reply
and i never saw any critique anywhere
and it actually is your problem because YOU were the one spamming the thread. how pathetic can you be for lying and shifting blame

>>61434427
you live in you own world desu
i was laughing though the whole thing except the two nigger posts but that was short and was kinda disappointed the fun was over when you ran out of material because you are too stupid

>>61434444
Good. A reset on the extensions ecosystem will probably work out for the best in both the short and long terms. It's just going to suck for those of us who have extensions that are most likely going to not be ported or have issues when the switchover finally happens. (i.e. uBO)

>>61434452
>>61434484
Nigga, I'm reading the reply chain right now. You ain't bullshittin' nobody, son. There were at least two of you (possibly three) going back and forth like retards for the better part of an hour. That kind of asshurt doesn't just go away, and at least one of you was still going to be here desperately hoping to get your "revenge" on who you hope is the faggot who hurt your feefees. Didn't take much to bait you out. ;^)

>>61434499
>That kind of asshurt doesn't just go away, and at least one of you was still going to be here desperately hoping to get your "revenge" on who you hope is the faggot who hurt your feefees. Didn't take much to bait you out. ;^)
im telling you you're just projecting
for the most part it was just me
either way top troll mate your bating sliding and twisting is top notch kinda reminds of me a jew convo tactics

>>61434539
Oh, so you were just samefagging? My bad, I guess it was just one upset Firecuck. I gotta ask, though. How the fuck did you manage to trigger yourself?

>>61434544
damn nigga you're either really good or really need help

>>61434588
I'm not the one getting triggered by my own replies. I really do want to know how that works.

>>61434598
>triggered by my own replies
i wasnt. you're just imagining things like you want them to be

>>61434620
You just got done explaining how you were samefagging.

vimperator
Switched to qute because of this.

>>61434625
i wasn't. you yourself assumed that. read the post you just quoted

I used to use quite a few extensions, but now it's down to just Lastpass and uBlock Origin. I'm sure those two will get new extensions.

>>61434637
>for the most part it was just me
>but i wasn't samefagging
lolwut?

>>61434650
Yeah, I'm not so sure about uBO. This is the only think that has me worried. Gorhill has temporarily stopped development on the WebExtension version until such a time as Mozilla finally gets things finalized in such a way that it stops breaking all of his updates. It's probably me being paranoid, as uBO works in Chrome now, but I'm still hoping it gets ported over without issue.

File: wew.webm (857KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 1024x768px

JIT spray

Video related.

File: 1sobod.jpg (35KB, 450x373px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 450x373px

>>61434670
>lolwut?
well yes? i was replying to somebody i guess it was you

>>61434697
No, it wasn't. Apparently it was you. Anyway, since it looks like there's now potential for actual discussion here, and I got what I wanted out of you several posts ago, I'll leave you to your samefagging.

>>61428815
Thanks for the headsup, I'll teach my bot to do that and farm the website.

File: projecting.jpg (6KB, 150x100px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 150x100px

>>61434710
>No, it wasn't. Apparently it was you.
wut?

>I'll leave you to your samefagging.
again. pic related

>I got what I wanted out of you
concern for your health?

and you never gave proof
i wonder why

>>61434719
Yeah, I'd make sure that actually works before I turn a bot loose on the site.

File: 1492999486883.jpg (9KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x250px

>>61434693

>>61434710
>samefagging
it's amazing how you push your lie as fact and that is just one example but desu you forget about the post timer limit. now im for sure convinced you are a jew

>>61434743
>and you never gave proof
Proof of what? You've been spamming the thread for hours with this shit.

>>61434824
of some claims obviously
idk if you're the one who started it and i don't care anymore go to top of the thread or follow the chain fuck you

>>61434840
Alright, well good luck with that.

>>61426979

Then why don't you just fuck off because this is a thread for users of Firefox?

>>61427308
>t.someone who doesn't know what he is talking about

>>61434879
It's called freedom of expression, dipshit.

Are the furries still mad?

>>61434885
>a tripfag who thinks he knows everything

Faggot.

>>61428815
Hah, I never noticed that before
Based exhentai admin
I wonder how many people here get the reference

File: coach_hines.gif (1MB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x188px

>>61434903
>he doesn't filter all trips

>>61434846
With what?

>>61430498

Streaming high fidelity porn is expensive.

>>61434929
Idiot.

>>61434903
never said i knew everything
you can't find a direct link by pressing F12 and searching the source you fucking moron.
youtube-dl ,v downloadhelper and such have to generate the link first,other streaming services send the content in fragments that need to be concatenated into a single file. also youtube can deliber separate audio and video streams that need to be selected and merged first.

just don't update

t. windows xp user

File: 1471868116819.png (274KB, 381x351px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 381x351px

>>61435062
>inb4 he still has telnet installed

File: 1497053594050.jpg (57KB, 400x505px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 400x505px

>>61434710

>>61435133
There is literally nothing wrong with having Telnet installed.

Mozilla Archive Format or UnMHT
There's literally zero alternatives. Don't even bother with Save Page WE, it's shit.

And FlashGot

File: maxresdefault.jpg (105KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1280x720px

>>61435145
>he doesn't know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyrMTk48bMw

why is mozilla doing everything they can to force people to use chrome/chromium?

>>61424312
they just can't stop fucking things up
shitzilla more or less
all the good the diversity in hiring, whatever that means, did them

The amount of asshurt in this thread is almost palpable.

File: 1461154078423.jpg (47KB, 400x323px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 400x323px

>>61435192
https://github.com/mozilla/addons-frontend/issues/1107#issuecomment-314754318
>as you would prefer we do not use Google Analytics at all, many Mozilla Staff and users are either happy we do or ambivilant

I wonder how much Google paid for this.

>>61435227
I wonder how much of this constant push to "Chromize" Firefox is a desperate attempts to get Google, and their money, back.

>>61434693
I don't get it.

File: 1495173338299.png (381KB, 829x720px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 829x720px

>>61435234
Mozilla being dependent on Google was the mistake in the first place. There's no way the botnet would indefinitely support a project that as objective has (had*) customization and privacy preservation.

In a year Mozilla will announce their merge with the Chromium project and FF will be abandoned completely, screencap this.

>>61435283
Wouldn't that just make Mozilla once again dependent on Google?

File: ext.jpg (101KB, 1448x560px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1448x560px

I dont even know if i must be concerned

>>61425150
No. Pentadactyl and vimperator won't work after ff57 either.

>>61424312
I don't use legacy attentions because I am not clinically retarded.

>>61425349
>being this dumb

>>61434889
You know you're free to fuck off and go and express yourself somewhere else, right?

>>61435429
PAY DENBTS MARIO

File: firefox_2017-07-18_14-29-45.png (15KB, 630x224px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 630x224px

>don't worry your extensions won't be affected!!

fuck you

I'm just not going to upgrade.

>>61435500
>phoneposter
>not clinically retarded

>>61435633
Oh i do, trust me.

>>61424312
i just use adblock so none probably.

>>61427689
The other guy deleted his post so I don't know what kind of stupid he posted. But 40 years ago and toddler don't really work together as insults.

I use a modified Chromium without the botnet, suck it SJW the browser

>>61424312
>What extensions will you miss, when Mozilla releases Firefox 57 in November of this year, effectively eliminating nearly 90% of all extensions currently available for Firefox?
I won't miss any because i use waterfox

Is that weird foreign kid who got his butt blasted over a claim that Chrome was faster than Firefox still here?

>>61427308
>"mp4 is the only video extension"

>>61424312
how do you know what extensions are not going to work?
I use:
noscript
ublock origin
video download helper
and some persona thing to change the colors of shit

>>61433224
Just use a fork

What are you cucks switching to though?
Im thinking waterfox

>>61433222
I bet they don't release a version before the change just to fuck people up. Firefox devs have been trying to make yo stop using FF and switch to Chrome for a long time. This won't be different.

>>61437105
whatever ends up staying forever on 56

>>61437240
so debian?

>>61426979
the ugliest GUI i ever seen kys

>>61435191
lel stone age packet flood
just delete that screen and KYS

>>61435958
IF Tab Mix Plus is even ported to support webextensions, it'll probably lose 90% of it's currently functionality. So it'.. basically be a Firefox addon in name only, not functionality.

>>61435283
Mozilla made most its money from Google, can't blame them for taking that GoogiCash.

It's how they spent that money and the direction they took that's absolutely refuckingtarded.

File: Capture.png (118KB, 1095x854px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1095x854px

>>61424312

DTA downloadthemall is the literal only reason i use FF

if they cut that off then i can use single threaded download managers in chrome

hopefully Chrono devs finally fucking get their MT download feature enabled which they been having on the back burner since 2012

All I need is Ublock, Greasemonkey, Flash Blocker and Self Destructing Cookies

>>61438284
I am on the same boat, if fucking google makes resuming downloads possible on Chrome that would be enough for me, fucking Netscape did that shit more than 15 years ago how the fuck Chrome still can't do that.

>>61438613

resumable isnt the feature i care about, its the multi threaded aspect

thats the thing that cucks shitty video hosting sites that throttle the connection to either barely fast enough to not buffer, or impossible to watch without buffering

>>61424312
>What extensions will you miss
none, firefox is done. i surrendered to the botnet that is chrome until a solid contender emerges

File: 1500341954621.jpg (22KB, 1000x501px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1000x501px

Only thing I use is ublock origin

Doesn't mean I'm happy with sjwfox. Hopefully Netrunner actually turns into something usable because Chrome isn't an option, and Opera/Vivaldi decided to not be 100% open source so whatever.

Is it possible to use a firewall like iptables to block ads from a list like how ublock does?

>>61438757
Sure or use a custom hosts file. Or a pi-hole device.

File: laughinggirls.png (398KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 449x401px

>>61438738
>Hopefully Netrunner actually turns into something usable
Modern webbrowsers are in the area of 15 million lines of code, you're not getting a modern standards-compliant browser out of a few neckbeards on /g/.

>>61438791
>implying I want half the bullshit in Mozilla's ancient Netscape Navigator redux or Jewgle's botnet

Give me a GUI for qutebrowser and I'd be happy

I stopped using FF after 3.5

>>61435394
Indeed, to begin with they never had any intention to leave Google behind, they follow the money and Google has a lot of it.
The developer will simply be hired at Google, while pretending to just join the programming efforts with Chromium and discarding FF completely.

>>61438233
They deserve to get cucked by Google in the worst possible way, I hope their next projects fail miserably.

>>61424312
Still using Cyberfox. I'll probably just switch to Vivaldi. Or maybe I'll try Waterfox again

>>61426052
>giving sadpanda your fucking email so they can sell it to advertisers
for shame

>>61424312
noscript , adblock plus and downthemall

>>61438807
Wait, qutebrowser *does* have a GUI?!

>>61438844
Been giving vivaldi a shot lately. It's breddy gud. Only issue with it is its not 100% open source and I'm still used to firefox.

>>61438738
>a fuckin banana

>>61439339
I liked it while trying it out, but sometimes it would crash on youtube. But I'm using smplayer now, so that's not much of a problem now. The only thing I'd really miss would be my intricate tabmixplus setup.

File: vivaldi.png (35KB, 346x346px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 346x346px

>>61439404
It seems to handle youtube fine for me. I'm on Linux though. There "might" be a slight speed reduction versus FF 54 but that might be a placebo. Idk.

The tab management and split screen tabs are fucking great. If they'd just fucking open source the thing it would take off.

File: BigMac_Tonite.jpg (140KB, 640x634px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 640x634px

>>61439389
>he doesn't know Mac Tonight

File: SMH.gif (59KB, 182x249px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 182x249px

>>61438937
>/g/entooman that doesn't know you can have a spam -email adress or even use 10 min e-mail

>>61439389
That's moon man you nigger

>>61435040
not OP but works on PornHub for all I care

>>61425136
>just use the inferior ripoff that supports 5% of firefox extensions
good idea

Provided I still have about:config for various hardening, I'll be fine.

wtf happened to gmail in firefox? lately when i have it opened for 5+ mins it gets laggy as fuck, even though cpu/ram usage is not higher than normal

File: cries.png (156KB, 810x880px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 810x880px

>>61424312
Good times ahead.

>>61424351
This

>>61424312

Wait, there are still people who use Firefox?

>>61424351
/thread

I thought more of you would be using Qutebrowser or Qupzilla by now

Already a thing on Nightly

>>61426979
>"Dog knots my ass"

Kek

None, because I already saw the light of Vivaldi.

File: 1480749621359.jpg (111KB, 516x729px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 516x729px

>>61427600
>It's 8k. You mad?
jesus christ... I just jizzed in my pants a little.
mac really is the best

I've been worrying about this for a very long time now, but it seems it won't be such a problem after all. Almost all of my add-ons have been or will be ported to webextensions until 57 drops, or already have a webextension alternative.

Open with and DtA are probably dead for good, though, which is very unfortunate. Doesn't seem like their functionalities will ever be available on the new API, which is a shame, but I guess I can understand their reasoning. That's why I'll probably keep a portable 52ESR version forever with just those 2 add-ons for occasional use.

>>61424917

UMA DELICIA

>>61435429
Fire Gestures won't work, there's a replacement but much worse

>>61450544
fuck, i need that one to save images quickly.

>>61451649
This is the alternative I tried and I only had issues with it

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/foxy-gestures/

>>61424312
None, everything I use works ;)

>>61435481

I can't believe such a high-profile extension will just die.
Having to go back to my shitty mouse (don't want to buy a new one) is going to be hell.

This is a farce and you know it. You can enable legacy add-ons with 1 simple change.

I am going to jump to some fork because I cant live without Treestyle tabs

>>61452755
When november comes that won't be possible, they already won't accept non webextensions in the store.

Interesting

>>61424312
none, all the extensions I use have been already ported or are being ported

>>61438176
Why the fuck would it?
It's a fucking tab manager.
100% of it can be replicated in shitty HTML, JS and CSS.

There's plenty of tab managers for Chrome as well.
Of course, because that shit cunt Ben, Chrome has no sidebar, so it limits them hugely to either those shit temporary drop-down bubble menus or a semi-permanent pop-up window.

The only sort of things that will die off are those that interact directly with the OS in some way, like file and download managers.

>>61443026
>everything has been disabled because, we, Mozilla, are dumb fucking cunts that can't code for shit

Seriously some of the worst developers in modern software dev.
Those cunts are the reason we also have JS as well, remember.
No fucking surprise there.
Idiots need to go learn what an API is and what its advantages are.
Protip: one of them is transparently changing back-ends so 3rd parties do not need to care about any of those changes breaking things.
It's fucking trivial to keep APIs transparent even with major changes. It's called using defaults values, cunts.

>>61454028
so clueless, adorable

>>61454048
Fuck off cunt, I am a developer.
Mozilla are legit mongs of the developer world.
There's better work out of fucking colleges with the retards coming out of there.

It's not hard to make a new, say, theme, then automatically give default values to the API for add-ons that have no support for it yet.
Same goes for multithreading. It is possible to make a handler for this that makes concurrency transparent to all add-ons.
There's fucking shit block-programming apps on Android that do this shit for crying out loud. It isn't hard.

>>61432947
Is there any fix for youtube/jewgle gimping firefox?

Used to be able to stop autoplay on firefox too but I can;t get youtube vids to stop autoplaying on firefox.

>>61434499
>reset on the extensions ecosystem will probably work out for the best in both the short and long terms
Except the scope of what the new extensions will be capable off is just the same shit Chrome extensions can do.

The primary reason for Firefox even being around was the fact the extensions can actually do things to the browser itself, not just to the contents of the pages.

Why do you think, after all these years, things like DownThemAll! is still impossible on Chrome?
It's actually a fully-fledged download manager that has a level of integration with Firefox that no other download manager can even remotely touch.

The "Download Managers" on Chrome are just wrappers for the built in downloader and can't actually do things like targeted destination folders for batches of downloads, segmented downloads, an extensive and sortable download queue, etc.

And that's just one example.

>>61453971
Because Mozilla isn't letting extensions change things about the browser itself anymore, UI elements are off-limits.

There is only a very limited number of things that WebExtensions are allowed to access

>>61456287
>Because Mozilla isn't letting extensions change things about the browser itself anymore, UI elements are off-limits.
Guess I'm not updating then.