>because its open source it means that goooogle cannot spie

>>61384611
I don't have to get it. Because open source.

>>61384689
>Don't get it
In otherwords, Don't understand.

>>61384694
Right. We're on the same page. Open sores.

>>61384611
Nobody thinks that. Literally everyone knows that even chromium is botnet. You'd have to be very misinformed not to know that.

>>61384766
I've seen multiple threads where it was
>Chrome is shit
>Lists a few reasons
>Anon replies ' i use chromium '

Welcome to open source software, everyone just assumes that because its open source then it's not botnet because "surely someone else would have noticed it!!", but of course this falls apart when everybody just expects that somebody else will have audited the source.

>>61384885
And I'm sure you just assume that Google is spying on you through Chrome and Chromium.

Google doesn't need a web browser to spy on you.

Privacy is done. Google only cares about using the botnet to make money off you. The people that might use your data to control you, like NSA or what have you, will get it from whoever's on top, because they have to be willing to play ball to stay on top. That's why your hardware is cucked, your software is cucked, and your life is cucked. It's over anon, unless there's a revolution, in which case you'll die, because you're on a Chinese shitposting board screaming about web browsers instead of living out in the woods learning how to build a bomb.

but i use ungoogled chromium

File: Untitled.jpg (110KB, 897x308px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 897x308px

>>61384611
You don't get it, retard.

>>61385922
>and also being open source it takes up less wam on my computer
>and and and being open source im not connected to bo..botnet whatever that is

Those points are still correct.

>niggers don't know what iptables are
>niggers don't know how the network interface works

Sad!

>>61386282
Open source equals safe though.

>they don't use a custom hostfile so they can use whatever distro they want

cucks

>>61384611
Joke's on you, I use Iridium
:^)

>>61386337
That slows down your whole internet.

>>61386361

no it doesn't you dumb nog

>>61386359
German botnet.

>>61386361
bitrot only sets in when you block microsofts IPs, because they have a failswitch on your hard disk.

>>61386372
Yeah it does that's why a program called Hostsman has a trim option to reduce the size of the hosts file in an attempt to reduce the impact a large hosts file has on your internet speed.

>>61386375
that's illegal in germany tho

>>61386406
People break rules all the time.

>>61386421
they would get sued tho

>>61386470
Also Iridium is based on a fuck old version of Chromium and hardly gets updated.

>>61384766
>>61382788
It's literally on the board right now.

>>61385922
I used that shit and it still grabs a google analytics cookie at start up. Iridium is also german botnet. If you really wanna use the pile of garbage that is chromium then at least use ungoogled chromium.

ITT: firecuck shills and windows babies

>Google Chrome

Colorful logo
>Reports crashes only if turned on. Please include symbolized backtraces in bug reports if you don't have crash reporting turned on.
>User metrics only if turned on
Video and Audio codecs (may vary by distro)
AAC, H.264, MP3, Opus, Theora, Vorbis, VP8, VP9, and WAV
>Sandboxed PPAPI (non-free) Flash plugin included in release
Code is tested by Chrome developers
>Sandbox is always on
Single deb/rpm package
Profile is kept in ~/.config/google-chrome
Cache is kept in ~/.cache/google-chrome
New releases are tested before being sent to users
>Google API keys are added by Google


>Chromium

Blue logo
>Does not ever report crashes. Please include symbolized backtraces in bug reports.
>User metrics are never reported.
Video and Audio codecs (may vary by distro)
Opus, Theora, Vorbis, VP8, VP9, and WAV by default
>Supports NPAPI (unsandboxed) Flash plugins, including the one from Adobe in Chrome 34 and below
>Code may be modified by distributions
>Sandbox depends on the distribution (navigate to about:sandbox to confirm)
Packaging depends on the distribution
Profile is kept in ~/.config/chromium
Cache is kept in ~/.cache/chromium
>New release testing depends on the distribution

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/lkcr/docs/chromium_browser_vs_google_chrome.md

>>61384611
Show me the part where Chromium spies on me or is a "botnet"
You make fun of ignorant people but I'm sure you're also ignorant yourself

>>61384915
Yes, when it comes to software the developer is guilty until proven innocent.

firecucks sucks

Is Debian Chromium any good?

>>61390278
It should be similar to ungoogled chromium without some iridium and inox patches.