apt-get vs aptitude

emerge

wget && make install

>>60894859
pacman -S

>>60894859
apt-get and the other assorted utilities like apt-whatever and dpkg.

Aptitude is a front-end. I just avoid it and I have tons of experience with Debian/Ubuntu.

>>60894859
fuk the police, dnf life

whenever i update my repos i never not want to know if there are any updates so aptitude

aptitude is just an ncurses apt-get/dpkg interface you dumbass

File: 17na1ct2pivy.jpg (224KB, 960x606px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 960x606px

Yum
Dnf
Git

>>60894859
apt update && apt upgrade && apt autoremove
why do you faggots complicate everything

>>60895377
dis

Xbps-install

just apt

>>60894859
apt-get is a dpkg frontend, aptitude is an apt-get frontend. KISS.

make install

>>60894887
>not git clone
shit taste

>>60896356
>git
Not everyone has such new and advanced technology.

>>60895377
This but

apt update; apt dist-upgrade -y

.

>>60895377
>>60896462
apt is Ubuntu thing, right? Sound like another useless invention.

>>60896471
It's on debian as well.

yum

>>60894872
FIRST POST
BEST FUCKING POST.

slackpkg install

>>60894859
>no distro
>no version distro
>no version of softwares
>>>/g/flgt

Normally:
"APT" is just for simple things.
Aptitude is front-end to apt. The best option for a everyday use.
"apt" is a complex front-end to dpkg. Just use if you know how to use it.

>>60894897
This isn't a humor thread, anon

>>60896591
The OP did a stupid question so deserve a stupid answer.

>>60896436

wget https://github.com/git/git/archive/v2.13.1.zip -O git.zip
unzip git.zip
cd git-*
make configure
./configure --prefix=/usr
make all doc info
sudo make install install-doc install-html install-info

and then to incest things up you can update git by using the source from the git repository you downloaded using git

git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git

File: 1496704820096.jpg (24KB, 500x455px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x455px

>>60894897

File: 1494579437939.jpg (16KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 400x400px

>>60896471
Apt is a Debian thing and was one of the most useful inventions in Linux history.

Fucking Christ, why do they let 16 year olds post here?

portage

>>60895377
/thread

>>60896462
if you use

&&

instead of ; the second argument executes only if the first one succeeded. wouldnt that be better?

>>60897016
MODS

>>60897019
Yes, almost always

>>60897019
It does not really matter. Typing ; is faster than typing && so there's that.

>>60896826
what if your program doesnt have a git repository?

>>60897266
What if you're a faggot?

File: 3549431.jpg (15KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x300px

>>60897042
>Typing

get into aliases please

alias sysupdate='sudo sh -c "apt update && apt dist-upgrade -y "'

>>60894859
To this day I'm not sure what the core difference is supposed to be, but sometimes one can resolve some tricky situation that the other can't, so I sometimes try aptitude when apt-get doesn't get something right.

>>60897398
why is a seperate shell necessary here?

>>60896898
What retarded packages are you niggers downloading so as to completely break your system on an upgrade?

I prefer pkgtools. Really transparent in how they work, you can use tar, ash and vi instead and they're written in quality POSIX sh.

Aptitude's interface makes no sense to me idk

>>60897657
calling sudo twice sucks