>AMD not even on a the graph
AHAHAHA
What the fuck is Louis Vuitton
>>60824266
Neither is nvidia, your point?
>IMG_XXX
>>60824266
>AT&T almost as valuable as Samsung
I call bullshit
>>60824298
Don't worry about it, you're probably too poor anyway.
>>60824317
>Intel
>>60824298
$1000 for women shoes
This isn't technology. Kill yourself back to >>>/biz/
>>60824266
AMD not on chart yet they are kicking x299s ass and threadripper is not even out yet. Nvidia is not even in the news.
>>60824327
You fucking know nothing.
They are not just a cellular provider
>>60824266
meanwhile, Intel worth 32b claiming everything
>>60824331
You're so smart anon
>Fad tech brands
>More valuable than Coca Cola
>>60824391
Im not from USA, I don't know AT&T for nothing.
>>60824425
Go argue with Forbes.
>>60824447
Coca Cola has been selling flavored sugar water that doesn't even win in blind taste tests against other flavored sugar water for over 100 years and will continue doing so for another 100 years. It's a license to print money.
Apple, Google, MS or Facebook could be dead in 10 years if they don't have the latest and greatest products.
>intel below IBM
>>60824562
Coca Cola will be dead after the American nuclear holocaust.
>>60824266
>AMD not even on a the graph
Yet
Let's discuss this one year later, shall we?
>>60824685
>implying Intel won't increase its lead even further.
>brand value
i.e. imaginary
>>60824266
Shouldn't wallmart be ontop
>>60824266
And STILL they manage to compete.
>>60824322
underrated post !
>>60824612
Wrong.
>>60824298
are you for real?
>>60824317
>>60824331
this is even worse because amd competes on the cpu and the gpu market combined and not even this way it shows on the graph
The fuck is "Brand Value" and how do I calculate it.
>>60824298
Aspirational brand selling items to middle class people trying to look moneyed.
>>60826493
it's entirely made up.