Has Intel's stock gone negative yet?

>ray tracing with CPU
''no''

>>59972354
not even an intel shill, but where are the i7s on that picture? come on, man

>3/10 made me reply

File: 1485547839830.png (36KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 650x337px

>>59972383
>whoa come on I'm not shilling, why aren't you comparing a $250 CPU to a $500 one?

>>59972354
Where is the i7 7700k

Stupid bait.

>>59972354
>>59972382
>>59972400
>>59972416
7700k isnt on any of these

File: 1487848414861[1].jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59972400
>>59972404

File: 1477682715069.png (37KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 650x337px

>>59972437
>STOP COMPARING CPUS WITH THE SAME PRICEPOINT

>>59972354
Kill yourself capitalistic slave owning.pig.

File: 1471818793905.png (33KB, 756x643px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 756x643px

>w-w-why a-a-aren't you comparing it with the 7700k heh heh?

File: 1488693519789.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

STUPID AMDRONES CORONA AND 7ZIP ARE AMD SPONSORED GAMES

File: 1484200145328.png (32KB, 756x643px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 756x643px

>t-t-the 7700k has it totally beat for only $70 more! heh no lie

File: muh $1700.png (54KB, 448x836px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 448x836px

The last thing you can complain about is Ryzen's multithreading capabilities.

File: delidding intensifies.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>59972539
>>59972556
>Multithreaded performance
Get on my level fags, my 5.1 GHz OCed delidded watercooled i7-7700K can totally load shitty bloated javascript websites faster than whatever crap you've got running. What are you doing over there, video encoding and rendering? What a waste of time. I've got 10 extra FPS in poorly optimized games with shit engines. Suck on that, AMDummies!

>>59972628
Winrar got fixed, by the way.

>not using 7zip

File: 1419634154238.jpg (1MB, 1845x1923px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1845x1923px

>>59972354
Wait for the 99% server marketshare to erode then we'll see some juicy action from intel

File: 1492538087870.png (263KB, 723x890px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 723x890px

>>59972354
Never ever.

>>59972354

A $500 CPU beats a $242 CPU?

No way.

>>59972376

You really know nothing of 3D rendering, do you?

CPU only rendering is the industry standard for final production. GPU rendering in any form is considered nothing more than progress renders or final set up and too inaccurate for any produced work. Hence why GPU render options are often bundled into CPU rendering packages as fast preview options (V-Ray RT, Corona Preview, etc)

This is the whole point of the entire Redshift marketing campaign, to end that idea of CPU is the only way for final output and producing a GPU renderer that compete with it.

>>59973449
I'm seeing a $190 one demolishing a $242 one though.

>>59972685
>not using 7zip

WinRAR v5 has better compression ratios and it is way faster than 7zip.

Literally 0 reason to use 7zip anymore.

File: 1399869108331s.jpg (2KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x125px

>>59973494
>4 cores 4 threads is "demolished" by 4 cores 8 threads
>Ryzen is literally newer technology whereas Kaby Lake is nothing more than a Skylake refresh with an added built-in hardware decoder
>people are somehow supposed to be surprised by this

>>59973667
Considering Skylake is the best Intel can do until Ice Lake(2019), doesn't that just mean Intel is shit?

>>59972354
>comparing r7 to i5
Amd btfoing itself.

>>59973486
no you fucking retard the only limitation with GPU rendering is that it relies on VRAM

>>59973667
If anything is surprising it's that Intel allowed this to happen and let things get this bad. And like >>59973684 said, they have nothing to fight back with for years.

>>59974181
I want you to go to >>>/3/ and post that right now.

>>59972400
Your graph has a $500 cpu.

>>59973449
>a 6900k costs $242

>>59973509
It's free

>>59973667
You do realize LAKE CPUs are already at their limit while Ryzen will only continue to get better
So, two more years of "INCREASE THE CLOCKS, FUCK THE HEAT." And Intel can't even add more cores to the consumer line unless they wan't to pull back speeds due to the added heat.

Meanwhile, It's been stated from AMD themselves that they had to cut out some pretty obvious performance enhancements for the sake of time with Ryzen that they'll be going after with Ryzen+.
And until Intel finally releases a new arch, there's no telling what it'll be capable of. Hell, we don't even have a code name for it yet.

AMD may just pull a fast one over on Intel with the timing of Ryzen and Zeppelin.

File: Star_of_David.svg.png (48KB, 1200x1385px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1200x1385px

>>59973722
>ignoring the cheaper R5 btfo of the i5

File: 1492627390129.png (37KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 650x337px

>>59972400
>>59973449
>ignoring the obvious because it doesn't fit your narrative

File: 1479498308247.jpg (27KB, 508x524px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 508x524px

>its another pointless cpuwars episode

File: muh nihilism.png (34KB, 732x606px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 732x606px

>>59975830

File: 1483740607846.png (22KB, 804x743px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 804x743px

>>59975872
>he willingly argues with shills about something he already made his mind up about

File: question.png (251KB, 540x675px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 540x675px

>>59976012
>opinions are static, insusceptible to change

>>59974181

you have no idea what you are talking about

Intel are fucking horrid.

Glad to see them squirming after releasing i7 9xx series CPUs for over 8 years with minor tweaks.

Finally a new AMD CPU came along and btfo.

Ryzen 2md gen hopefully will have higher clocks and even more performance once ddr5 and ddr4 4000+ comes out

File: amada_99_1024x768a.jpg (77KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1024x768px

>>59975658
Intel's arch = Old and busted
AMD's arch = New hotness

File: 1492532827239.png (251KB, 1190x906px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1190x906px

>>59974181
Holy fuck HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
pic related is your reward bud, you earned it!

>>59976112
Welcome to /g/!

File: 1490211263196.png (381KB, 2018x1230px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 2018x1230px

>>59976086
>he thinks he can change pajeet's opinion more than the 0.02 rupees that deposit into his account

>>59972463
The 1800x is on there you fucking nigger. Weak bait, fuck off.

>>59972451
Second one wasn't even an AMD shill, try harder next time, bud.

File: aj16cxH.png (445KB, 704x528px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 704x528px

>>59976363
>he's still going
I know it's a cliche to ask this, but why exclusively facebook frogs?

File: 20170420_014515.png (477KB, 698x712px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 698x712px

>>59972647
>Rendering Utoob videos no one will watch isn't a waste of time

File: S T O P.png (39KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 650x337px

>>59976373
>he can't extrapolate information from a set of data because of the 1800x
happy?

File: c9c.jpg (42KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x376px

>>59975245
>WinRar is not free
>NOT USING ARK
>Comparing CPUs based on how fast they'll decompress incest porn torrents

>>59976443
delid this sir

>>59972354
>i5
>rendering

it has better per core performance. which is all that matters for its intended purpose
AMD have had garbage per core until ryzen. hence the FX result and why no one trusts their artificial benches

>>59972686
(((Just wait)))

>>59976441

>I didn't put the 7700k on there because (((too exbensive))), even though it's theost popular CPU on the market
>I totally didn't leave it out because it would shatter my narrative
>I put the absurdely overpriced 1800x on there though, because it makes AMD look good when comparing 7zip and rendering Minecraft Lets Plays, if you ignore the fact that the 7700k actually has better price/performance than any AyyyyMD CPU

5 poos have been dropped in your loo

File: CIRCUM.jpg (25KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 480x360px

>>59976506
>its intended purpose
Its intended purpose is to make a shit ton of shekels of goyim

>>59975245
>It's free

So is WinRAR.

File: 1488059530739.jpg (217KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 800x1000px

>>59976506
This. All these multithread benchmarks don't change the fact that Ryzen is utter fucking shit at games and a failure of a gaming cpu. It's literally bulldozer all over again.

File: DSCF2579 re.jpg (2MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1920px

>>59976471
>delid this sir

done.

File: 1492645651008.png (37KB, 650x337px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 650x337px

>>59976508
>7700k
Okay, now its a graph about 250 dollar CPUs and below
Happy now shill?

Also, >>59972556
>>59972539
>he thinks an i7 is going to make Intel suddenly not overpriced

>>59976528
99% of the AMDrones shilling the "muh rendering" meme are sub par minecraft lets players at best. None of them would need the "muh rendering power" ryzen offers. If you're actually a professional, fair game, but most of theae fags are just in denial about what they'll actually use their PC for.

File: d0b.png (40KB, 362x362px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 362x362px

>>59976570
>Intel pays these shills
YES GOYIM, PAY MORE FOR LESS PERFORMANCE!

>>59976567
>Cinememe
>6700k
>3D Particle Bench

Step up your fucking shilling game, pajeet and stop acting like you'll actually need to render or compile anything significant enough to warrant the Rypoo.

Also: >>59976570

>>59976570
Fuck you. I'm getting a Ryzen for running VM's and programming. I don't fucking care about Memory speed, I care about memory size. I'm going to do a 4 x 16 System at slow ram speed.

File: oy vey.png (486KB, 675x482px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 675x482px

>>59976200
Amada is for cute
Why does the greedy Intel lack a cute?

>>59976592
I'd get a Ryzen, but I nees:

-Working RAM
-A working mainboard
-A mainboard in General
-iommu groupings that aren't utter garbage
-Significant OC potential
-stability
-niggerfree hardware

>>59976592
Give me 5 actual fucking reasons why I should get a ryzen 5/7 over a 7600k/7700k?
>inb4 muh video rendering and multitasking
I don't give a shit about those, I literally only care about vidya.

File: disbelief.jpg (87KB, 325x284px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 325x284px

>>59976607
>ONLY THE THINGS I WANT TO MATTER CAN MATTER
No, you are the shill here

>>59976622
LOL,

>Implying only Ryzen will allow a lot of memory
>Implying you'll need Ryzen to compile your currynigger-tier java scipts
>Implying Ryzen's memory usage and uefi in general aren't total clusterfucks

Ryzen is shit for VMs. Have you even looked at the iommu groups, kid ?

>>59976635
Can you give me five reasons to get an i5/i7 over an R5/R7 that doesn't revolve around
>muh vidya gaymemes
?

>>59976648

"If you are a professional Ryzen is fair game"

learn how to read Tyrone. I'm arguing that buzzword spouting AMDrones generally won't be rendering videos like they're so desperately trying to make themselves believe.

>>59976666
Unless your doing passtrough, iommu doesn't matter too much

If Intel is the jew of the cpu world then AMD is the nigger

Kek, AMD supporters are mentally challenged people, and they are not even joking.

>>59976670
>RAM support
>better clock per clock
>vfio support
>Better in muh 144hz gaymen
>better mainboards

These are my reasons. If I'd be rendering video/compiling kernels on a regular basis, I'd go for Ryzen.

>>59974181
>>>/v/

>>59976720
I'm vfio masterce, but you definitely won't be telling me you'll get ryzen to run some garbage virtual box VMs, don't you ?

File: lenny.gif (1MB, 389x286px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 389x286px

>>59976670
Netflix 4k

>>59976732
>rendering video
even the 7700k is better in that regard with premiere and after effects

>>59976506
>>59976508
>>59976528
>>59976570
>>59976607
>>59976666
>>59976700
>>59976730
>>59976792
Good goys.

>>59976871
>>59976775
>>59976744
>>59976670
>>59976648
>>59976633
>>59975658

Good Niggers

>>59976732
>ram support
It's not march 3rd anymore
>better clock per clock
An actual lie
>Better in muh 144hz gaymen
Great reading comprehension
>better mainboards
And you say this why exactly? What leads you to BELIEVE this?

>>59976792
>testing a CPU which is stronger in multi-threading based on programs which see very little benefit from more cores.
It's like you aren't aware of how much of a shill you are.

File: LTT.jpg (687KB, 1914x1077px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1914x1077px

>>59976902
>He said, suckling at the tip of the Jews cock

>>59976570
Yes goy, you'll never use all those cores! Now buy this nice shiny Skylake refresh of a refresh of a refresh of a refresh of a .. you get the idea.

>>59976871
This thread was relatively quiet, then suddenly like 20 shills out of nowhere. Guess the IDF got wind of some bad business.

File: 20170420_023838.jpg (3MB, 2120x2593px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2120x2593px

>>59976951

>>59976951
>500$ CPU vs 250$ CPU

You're right, you're not a shill. You're just retarded

File: 720p.png (55KB, 764x954px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 764x954px

>>59977050
>BUT MUH SHEKELS
>Intel
What are you, poor?
Lets go this route if that's how you feel

File: WOWF.jpg (18KB, 190x208px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 190x208px

>>59977050
>Paying half the cost for half the minimums
Okay

>>59976700
How is that a fault of the CPU itself though?
Why would you bring that up?

>>59977119

Still avoiding 7700k vs 1700, huh bub? 6900 is not a gaymen chip and was never marketed as one, 1800x on the other hand ...

Ugggghhh its battle of the fanboys again

DO ANY OF YOU EVER HAVE A BREAK.
I HATE faN BOY THREADS reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

t. i7 6700k owner.

>>59977156
I wasn't saying that ? Are you getting offended at the idea of someone buying different than you ?

File: other.png (129KB, 354x504px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 354x504px

>>59976951
Oy vey! please remove those min fps show 1% 0.1 instead

File: dumb fags.png (21KB, 900x350px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 900x350px

>>59977160
>he's such a shill that he thinks AMD marketed the 1800x as a mainly gaming CPU
no
>1700 vs 7700k
Are you retarded? the 1700 comes with a decent stock cooler, is cheaper (Micro-center has and never will count), and can overclock within 100 MHz of the 1800x.

Also, enjoy your housefire CPU which you'll either have to delid or buy an $80 CPU cooler for

>>59977176
>Are you getting offended
No, why would you assume that?
I'm just curios as to what relevancy the statement had to the conversation about CPU performance

>>59976635
>I'm just not going to shut up to justify being duped to buying my i5 7600k
This is most of the shitposters. They're not 7700k customers, they're people who got memed to buying an i5 justifying their purchases. The real i7 7700k users are already gaming, not being insecure about other people.

File: herp derp.jpg (32KB, 243x312px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 243x312px

>>59977351
>7600k
>not a better purchase than Ryzen 5

File: smug (2).jpg (475KB, 2000x2667px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 2000x2667px

>>59977220
>not enjoying your stutterlake
T-t-thanks G-g-goy-im

>>59977413
>250 dollars for a 4c/4t in this day and age
CURRENT_YEAR

>>59974181
Hahaha best kek of the day. Tanks, anon.

>>59977521
>make more cores xD
4 cores is literally all you need in this day and age.

>>59977596

is literally

>>59977351

>>59977596
>you only need 4 threads
Enjoy the stutter

File: good goy.png (604KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 800x523px

>>59977413
>12 threads? what do you need 8 threads for?

>>59976926
That's not shilling though
the man said video rendering and I said that the 7700k still performs better so Ryzen isn't for that.
It's not like I used that as a selling point I literally don't give a shit about companies I just buy whatever I need

File: FaceApp_1492118270620.jpg (267KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1280x1280px

>>59972354
>stock goes negative
>Intel literally pays every person on Earth to hold their stocks

Would be cool desu