CDE thread? Now that there are Debian packages available, let us celebrate the best UNIX desktop for Solaris UNIX.
File manager.
>>59868635
Serif fonts does not look good for menus. Is that tbe font it used in the 90s?
>>59868681
Font settings.
Does it have thumbnails in the file picker?
>>59868693
That only adjust the size.
>>59868694
No sorry.
Screensaver settings.
>>59868736
Forgot pic like a noob. BTW, this is the Sparky Linux distro. Just install it and run sudo apt update, then sudo apt install cde-desktop. Easy, then you can see what it feels like to use.
>>59868693
>>59868701
https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/wiki/ImprovingFonts/
They seemed to be working on choosing a new default though https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/mailman/message/29893241/
Help viewer.
Using CDE on an actual Solaris SPARC box was comfy af.
>>59868723
That's a file manager, not a file picker.
>>59868753
Screensavers haven't been a thing since CRT screens stopped existing. What is even this shit?
>>59868635
Where do I find these packages?
>>59868753
>that wallpaper
>the screensaver
A E S T H E T I C
>>59869018
DEs like this haven't been a thing since technology became capable of running nicer looking shit
the screensaver is there for the same reason that CDE itself is
>>59869073
In the Sparky Linux repos.
Why is CDE almost never seen in the rice threads?
It looks like the best retro DE.
>>59873515
because it's ugly outdated shit
>>59869018
Image retention is still a thing with LCDs, but you can just set it to power off after a while.
>>59868792
Post wallpaper pls
>>59868635
just in time, now that unity is about to fade away.
>>59873783
It's just small backdrops tiled across the whole screen.
Anyway, I've extracted them from source and uploaded them:
https://a.cocaine.ninja/dnwqhq.tar.xz
>>59873515
Somewhat broken, unavailable on most repos, has quite some CVE's and most GTK and Qt stuff has problems
Also, small userbase thus little support
>>59874277
Apart from the CVEs, all of that can easily be offset by autism, which is the bread and butter of rice threads.
>>59868723
>shows the file manager
that's even worse
>>59874344
The only CVEs worth a shit I've seen can be autistically mitigated using a firewall, or just running Solaris 10.
How do I open a file with a program from the file manager? I want to open a picture with feh.
>>59875792
>he fell for it
>>59875792
/usr/dt/appconfig/types/C/datatypes.dt
>>59875792
>>59876528
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19455-01/806-1361/6jaldfjkh/index.html
Why would anyone use this? If it's still installed somewhere - fine. The terminal emulator is probably the most usable program. But why would anyone still care about this desktop?
>>59876674
>Why would anyone use this?
Why would anyone not use this?
>>59876674
for a e s t h e t i c s
= for fun
Is this the reason they were rejecting commits?
>It may seem odd that for a project licensed under the GNU LGPL we ask for contributions under a different license.
>It is hoped in the future to dual license CDE under both the GNU LGPL and a less restrictive license such as the BSD or MIT license.
https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/wiki/WhyMIT/
>>59868635
post screenfetch and this thread in browser
>>59876674
It's better than Gnome 3 at least
>>59868775
Can you change the clock down there in the dock to a digital one?
>>59874277
It's honestly a really shitty DE, but it's unfortunately the only retro one that sorta works on modern hardware. I wish that AmiWM had continued being developed.
>>59873581
You need better taste.
>>59876674
>Why would anyone use this?
Have you seen how great it looks?
>>59878120
Well there's Fvwm and Window Maker
>>59877899
Just noticed that the top bar of windows 3.11 is a copy of CDE's top bar
>>59878463
misquoted 2bh
>>59868635
Used to use CDE on a system that was running HP-UX back while I was in the military, a couple years ago.
>>59878537
Quit typing like a twelve year old, you piece of shit.
>still no prebuilt packages
Come on
>>59869018
>What is even this shit?
A unix desktop from the early 1990s made run latest linux
>>59878586
make me 2bh
How do GTK and QT programs look?
>not using black and white mode for 80s terminal aestheics
>>59879215
Not black and green?
>>59879116
Just like on any other minimal window manager
descended losers >>>/out/
>>59879246
Technically it's black and "on."
Some screens were even amber because it was better for your eyes*
*cheaper.
Sorry, I had to sleep. Here is uname and current thread in FF.
Hello.
>>59870109
cute
Even has a calender.
File picker.
Trying to make a chromium icon on my own but its looking fugly with this palette.
Is there a Fedora repo for it?
>not running CDE on the comfiest distro
Plebs.
>still using X.org
>celebrating a X.org DE
>who depends of a X.org Toolkit
>that will not be ported to Wayland or Mir
>keeping some of the awful design decitions that creator had to make because their lack of design training and/or computer limitations of that era
>still using X.org
I mentioned still using X.org?
>>59881438
Wayland is a meme, we'll all still be using X in 40 years.
>>59881438
I thought Wayland supports X applications?
>>59881438
>keeping some of the awful design decitions that creator had to make because their lack of design training
>implying the current KDE and GNOME hobbyist devs know better than people who made a standard desktop for most UNIX systems
>>59881464
Not Windows managers or the bars.
>>59881477
>it's a standard, it must be good
x86 it's also a standard. Keep in mind that.
>>59881501
>x86 it's also a standard. Keep in mind that.
So? Inb4 muh stupid design decisions, they are irrelevant for almost everyone
>>59881564
I think that explains by itself.
>>59879560
it's real
when will someone fork it and not make it a bitch to compile?
>>59882538
Just install mwm
>>59882665
might as well just use FVWM at that point
though that's pretty crap
>>59882695
What's wrong with Fvwm? I keep going back and forth between it and Window Maker.
>>59882695
dtwm (the window manager CDE uses) is based on it http://cdesktopenv.sourceforge.net/man1/dtwm.html
The rest of CDE are the dock and other programs.
>>59879302
>implying that faggot's macos desktop is any good
Kys faggot
>>59882973
bullying isn't aloud on this web sight
>>59882983
Yes it is, faggot.