What the FUCK is his problem?

>Using uHide
>Not using Adblock Plus

I also keep seeing ads all the time, and its built-ni anti-adblock killer seems to be failing to do its job

I've been getting ads on 4chan (mostly /a/) that show up in the middle of the fucking page between threads.

>>59868433
>>59868443
I think his autism is either flaring up, or waning atm. Either way, he's not doing his job.

>>59868391
I just may switch. Is it much better? How about resource-wise?

>>59868391
>spreading uHide meme
kys
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Does-uBlock-block-ads-or-just-hide-them%3F

mot getting anything out of the ordinary here but i've got some adblocking at the router level to.

>>59868391
>>59868481
>2015+2 of our lord not blocking everything before it reaches your computer

retards.

>>59868585
>2+0+1+7
>using internet
get >>>/out/

File: 1472288109211.jpg (8KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 200x200px

>>59868382
everyone has a price

>>59868382
I think the only time it's failed me is when my browser resizes a castamp embed it has a small chance of turning off because the player refreshes when it resizes and thus it can fail to recognize castamp popping up again, but that's a really specific case and it's more a problem with castamp being flash-based instead of html.

>>59868382
Works on firefox nightly.

I'm using adguard. Works fine.

>>59868382
QUESTION FOR OP:
Your using Ublock Origin, not Ublock right?

I made the mistake of getting "normal" Ublock and ad's were fucking everywhere.

>>59868382
Using Ublock Origin. Not a single add is displayed.

You are doing it wrong, goyim.

File: hosts.png (91KB, 716x799px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 716x799px

>not blocking ads through the hosts file
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

>>59869304
Yes, Ublock Origin

if you're willing to try out an non-free solution, Adguard's AdBlocker is very good botnet-alternative.

>>59869394

only a retard would clog the host file like that

no wonder you use nano, why don't you just `sudo gedit /etc/hosts` while you're at it

>>59869556
lol okay faggot enjoy your ads I bet you watch ads on your phone like a good goy

>>59869575
>there's retards that don't use origin on their phone
owow

File: 1475999418714.png (3KB, 244x226px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 244x226px

>>59868382
>Firefox

>>59869598
good luck blocking ads in apps

>>59868462
>resource wise
what's the point of falling for the 16GB meme and buying 7700k?

>>59869633
My daily driver is Core2Duo 2GB RAM. It matter to me lol

>>59868382
Huh, I don't get any ads at all, Chrome of Firefox. Did you leave the third-party filters to their defaults, if so, that isn't enough. Try enabling all of them then disable from there and see what works for you.

>>59868481
>that passive-aggressive shit
i fucking hate µblock now

>>59869972
There is nothing passive-aggressive about presenting facts and debunking myths.

>>59869972
It's only natural you get mad when people spread lies about your software.

>>59868481
If it doesn't just hide them, why are there times where you will see an element you have filtered for a split second before it disappears?

>>59870449
Because filters come in two varieties, Element hiding rules (see: Block Element) and Host blocking
You can't block an element from loading that is given by the page's own HTML cunt.

Element blocking rule example: allmusic.com#@#.advertising
Host blocking rule example:
||104.198.198.188^

Do research before you shitpost so hard, you can at least look inside EasyList (used by basically every content blocker) to figure this out.

>>59870490
Funny, because if I hide the same element with ABP I never see it, not even for a split second. Just saying.

>>59869627
NetGuard/AFWall+. Blocks apps from connecting to internet completely. NetGuard can even import hosts to block domains.

uMatrix and noscript.
You niggers.

>>59868382
Nice thread, adblock shill

>>59868391
>Not using both

>>59868382
The problem is that you aren't updating your lists so new ads can creep through.

>>59868481
HOW WILL APB EVER RECOVER??

>>59868391
>not using a combo of uBlock+uMatrix+Adblock Plus+Ghostery
get out of my /g/

>2 uHide ads on 1 page
disgusting

File: 1491989987213.png (378KB, 386x720px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 386x720px

>>59868382
>>59868391
>this shit again
I swear ABP shills are the most pointlessly annoying shill I've ever seen.

>>59870693
>Adblock Plus
>>59870693
>Ghostery

FUCK YOU BOTNET

>>59870849
>Muh botnet

You're probably posting this from an android phone

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 1776x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1776x1152px

>>59868382
Even without any content blocker, I still don't get any ads. Wtf are you tech illiterate idiots doing?

>>59868382
The fuk are u on about|?

I have the same but no ads....

>>59869627
AdAway / MinMinGuard

You have root / xposed on your Android, don't you?

>>59870560
>NetGuard can even import hosts to block domains.
Why isn't that version on Fdroid?

>>59871435
It is.

>>59868594
>We are living in year 10
Yeah, don't think so

>>59870449
Idiot Tripfag being idiot

File: 1488820928515.jpg (122KB, 1278x1181px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1278x1181px

>>59868594
=10....

>using Firefox

>>59868382
Not trying to spread shitpost, but it actually happen a lot now.
I've seen a lot of pop-up from some sites, i notice them using strange string of random numericals and alphabets as their url names.
Is this the reason why they can bypass the block?
Already updating and reinstall my ublock, still happening.

Help.

>not using W10+Edge+experimental uO build
I see nothing but relevant content

>>59868382
blame the filter list administrators

>>59873822
Are your whitelists working?

>>59873822
You can:
- custom filter those URLs yourself (= headache)
- wait for host file admins to update their lists (= headache)
- (In ascending order of site breakage) at the least (1) global block 3rd party frames [not likely to do much], (2) 3rd party scripts, or (3) 3rd party and then local noop or individually noop from the log until the website is functional. One level further is to global block 1st party scripts and then local noop or individually noop from the log until the website is functional (~OK)
- umatrix + ublock: umatrix offers a more elegant solution to the previous suggestion, but may require your patience to learn to use it.

File: works on my machine.png (30KB, 200x193px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 200x193px

>>59868382

>>59868382
Adjust your filter list.

File: 1478411815374.jpg (105KB, 629x473px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 629x473px

>>59868382
Install gentoo

>>59868382
UPDATE YOUR FILTERS YOU DUMB BITCH

>>59874911
Read the OP stupid, all my filters are updated.

>>59870942
There is more to the web than youtube. It still blocks youtube ads, but others slip through. For instance, while watching porn the pages look like they don't have an adblocker at all, and most pop-ups get through

>>59875264
Well I don't get any ads

>>59875264
Porn sites are very aware of adblockers and route their advertisements through their own server, meaning you'd need to use uMatrix (something you should be using anyways) to specifically block that 1st-party connection, and then use the cosmetic filter to remove that part of the page.

Otherwise it's being "seen" as just a regular image you'd want to actually see.

>>59875315
You're wrong!
Porn sites don't have the money for that.
What they do is use a service for pics and shit and route their images through that and if you block their image service the porn site will look like crap.
Good thing is they use the ads in placeholders that you can hide with cosmetic filters.

>>59868382
Yeah, gelbooru somehow makes adds appear when ublock origin is active and removes them when it is disabled. Some kind of weeb trickery.

>>59868382
ublock more like uhide. i mean there is no denying it at this point the only thing that is being blocked by this extension are the pictures. inb4 abp shill.i dont even know how people can use a "blocker"(read as hider) that is literally worse than not using an adblocker.

>>59873357
>>59873733
retards

>>59868382
>>59869455
>>59873822
>>59873971
>>59874121
>>59875264
>>59875399
>>59875315
>>59875458
Ublock Origin plus Reek's Anti AdBlock Killer

https://github.com/reek/anti-adblock-killer

Read the Github Page for Reek's Anti Adblock Killer.

Checking the box in Ublock Origin isn't enough, you have to install another extension like Greasemonkey on Firefox for example if you want the Anti Adblock Killer to work.

Just read the github page.

As for ads managing to get through, that isn't Gorhill's fault.

Try to message or make a forum post on the sites responsible for the filter lists and tell them that ads are somehow managing to get through.

>>59877593
No, Ublock Origin has been falling behind lately compared to Adblock Plus.

>>59873696
>shilling this hard

File: 1476557581413.png (860KB, 841x720px) Image search: [Google]

860KB, 841x720px

>>59870838
Funny since uBlock is the thing that came out of nowhere with an army of shills.

>>59877593
>do this
>ads on 4chin show up

File: what_the_fuck.gif (3MB, 200x134px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 200x134px

>>59870859
>b-b-b-b-but he's gapps free !

File: 666.jpg (106KB, 849x720px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 849x720px

>>59878750
t. newfag
kill yourself

>>59880234
>$0.02 has been deposited in your account

>>59868382
>On Firefox
>The one browser that is enforcing no adblocking
>the one browser that also has delayed updates so it's never latest anyway

Use opera, use the built in blocking and ublock and everything will be fine

>>59870542
It sounds like ABP is blocking it before it renders, which most likely means ABP is artificially slowing down/blocking the rendering to do its work. I'm guessing uBlock works asynchronously, so sometimes the rendering process gets to an element before uBlock does.

tl;dr ABP is intentionally slowing down page rendering.

I just installed uMatrix to help with scripts and it handles ads just fine. You only have to do a little extra clicking the first time you visit a site to clean up any misses.

>>59878656
Gorhill doesn't maintain the block lists.

Not having a whole-home ad blocking DHCP /DNS server

>>59868391
Not an argument

>>59869394
You can't use a host file to block websites from another file to make updating it easy.

>>59870693
>uMatrix
My nig. Just found this a few weeks ago. It's good shit.

I noticed it a couple months ago. ublock is letting a lot of ads through now. I had to get rid of it and reinstall ABP.

>>59882445
>shilling this hard

There is no discernible difference in the speed of the page loading, but there is a noticeable difference in element blocking. UBO shows it long enough for it to be noticeable and distracting then hides it, while ABP simply blocks it from ever showing at all.

I could not care less about what goes on behind the scenes or who does what. I only care about the actual end results.

>>59871246
>AdAway
that don't work with the newest version of Android and has not for months now

Why don't you use a local proxy to edit the ads out of the code?

>>59870693
Ghostery is shit though.

>>59870449
this.
uCuck allows botnet scripts to run for a jiffy which is enough to:
>inject and read data in html5 storage
>cookie shit
>js session shit
>>59870490
uCucks on suicide watch
If you're blocking hosts then better do it on the kernel level or router/busybox level m8. Browser add-ons aren't reliable or failsafe.
>blocking domain name

>>59868382
>not using default deny

dumbass.

filterlists aren't good enough these days.