AMD V INTEL

go back to /v/

>>59271076
>>>/kys/

>>59271120
go back to /v/

Wait for Zen+

If you're a gamer then there is no need to wait. Just buy an i7-7700k and you won't be limited by CPU in gaming for the next 4+ years.

>>59271260
thanks for the hot gaming tip ;~)

>>59271260
>gaming as my only use
Honestly dude gaming is overhated on /g/.
It is pretty comfy, but you can't be serious about choosing a 7700k over an 6850k or 6900k. There are so many benefits with having extra cores, that I don't even know where to start

>>59271334
thanks for the hot gaming tip ;~)

>hurrduurr gaming

Pretty ironic that AMD survived thanks to pandering to the gaming industry.

Many people here suffer from cognitive dissonance.

>>59271372
go back to /v/

>>59271355
>>59271274
>>59271260
samefag poster

>>59271394
go back to /v/

File: Screenshot from 06-03-2017 20:48:46.png (66KB, 700x555px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 700x555px

>>59271372
Far from it, you underage and clueless /v/ermin.

>>59271071
Don't wait at all, just get a fucking Kaby Lake right now

Waiting is for idiots, there is always new shit right around the corner

>>59272062
go back to /v/

File: ryzen-photoshop.png (112KB, 722x554px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 722x554px

>>59271334
Are you retarded? The actual benefits of those chips are few and farbetween and they are way slower than the 7700K in so many situations.

They are also ridiculously expensive.

Get a 7700k, it is way better.

>>59272092
go back to /v/

>>59272092
Scurry back to /v/.

https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/g/image/jNaTRoL2c6DUOZmQbbakOg

>>59271260
Enjoy your stuttering and lower minimums in select games
T. 4770k @ 4.6

>>59272141
go back to /v/

File: intelpostryzen.png (243KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 800x612px

>>59272158
Y-you proved me wrong so go back to /v/!!
Cuck
How's that Intel buyers remorse

>>59272139
I wonder if he does it for free.

File: notcrying.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>>59272186

>>59272186
go back to /v/

File: 1488664232472.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>59272222
y-yeah

g-go b-back to /v/

All of you go back to /v/

File: 1488408867093.png (91KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 653x726px

>>59272236

>>59272222
>t. 4770k and don't plan on buying Intel but recognize it as being a great upgrade path
>>59272225
Not an argument

>>59272221
>>59272222
>>59272236
go back to /v/

>>59272258
Don't plan on buying ryzen oops*
>>59272259
Go back to /v/

Du-te înapoi la / v /.

I'm not making an epic new meme you retards, take your console wars back to the video games board

>>59272301
>CPUs aren't technology

File: 1466370347003.jpg (202KB, 625x416px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 625x416px

Gaymers should just wait for the Ryzen 1500 cpus, since the 1700s are too expensive for them.

>>59271071
Why don't you wait for Amd's RAVEN RIDGE? It's releasing at the end of spring.

http://wccftech.com/amd-raven-ridge-apu-vega-zen-hbm-2017/

>>59272301
Stfu faggot go back to /v/
Adults are trying to discuss things here

>>59272309
Go back to /v/ too

>>59272309
>>59272334
>>59272338
go back to /v/

>>59272338
>wcftech
Also it won't be Zen Vega
Zen apu are for around autumn
We don't even know if it will have Vega in it

>>59272361
Makes more sense to include vega since Polaris was a stopgap

>>59272338
waiting so i can be disappointed again? no thanks

File: let-down.png (609KB, 854x640px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 854x640px

>>59272338
>waiting for AMD

>>59272387
Lots of things make sense but it takes time to act upon those things

x86 is for cuckfags
POWER9 is where it's at boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

>>59272414
>480 let down
>even nvidiots on the nvidia leddit recommended the 480 > 1060
>470 is probably one of the best price per performance cards released in years
Your meme may have held up on release but a few driver updates later nvidia was btfo

>>59272391
>>59272387
>>59272356
>>59272361
>>59272347
>>59272338
>>59272334
>>59272309
>>59272301
>>59272288
>>59272272
>>59272259
>>59272258
>>59272249
>>59272242
>>59272236
>>59272225
>>59272222
>>59272221
>>59272186
>>59272158
>>59272141
>>59272139
>>59272102
>>59272092
>>59272075
>>59272062
>>59271445
>>59271419
>>59271394
>>59271377
>>59271372
>>59271355
>>59271334
>>59271274
>>59271260
>>59271153
>>59271134
>>59271120
>>59271071
Go back to ------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>>>>/v/catalog

>>59272458
Go back to /ck/

>>59272458
>sending to the catalog instead of the board index

Get back to /v/.

>>59272470
>caring about the catalog/index of a /v/ermin board
Go back to:
>>>/v/
>>>/v/catalog
>>>/vg/

>don't have any other choices
?

There are hundreds of cpus on the market. if you just absolutely have to have the one that reviewers are saying is the best of the best, then yes you shouldn't be surprised that it got narrowed down to one option

if you call that a monopoly, the fact that only one of two competing companies makes the better product, than you are kind of dumb OP

That 6 core Broadwell-E was a very popular chip, wonder what happened to it after Ryzen

>>59271071
Intel are the waitfags now.

>>59272552
Nobody should wait, it's fucking stupid

Get the best CPU out right now which is basically anything Kaby Lake

>>59272653
Nobody sane would get a 7700k over a 6900k
Heck, even the 6800k

>>59272706
They would if they wanted 5% IPC and to delid for 600MHz higher overclocks.

Basically idiots.

>>59272653
I'd rather get the r7 1700 with the stock aftermarket-like cooler and overclock it to beat Intel with only losing a few frames in gaems.
Plus Ryzen is more future-proof and evident by consoles such as the PS4/Xbone multi-core is gonna likely to be a thing with PC gaems.
Productivity is pretty great with Ryzen against Intel atm.

What the fuck is happening itt?!

>>59272735
Only problem is that X99 is a dead socket.

>>59272759
You mean LGA 2011-3, while I agree, the LGA1151 one is dead as well, consider your only upgrade on it is a dieshrink of Skylake.

>>59272749
/v/ cannot be dissuaded from arguing about video games on every board they spill over onto

>>59272706
Holy fuck are you dumb

the 7700k is $340 and the 6900k is $1000

The 7700k beats it in the vast majority of tests too

7700k is way better

>>59272759
All sockets are dead sockets. By the time a CPU comes out that is worth upgrading to, it is invariably on a new socket. Nobody will upgrade their Skylake systems to Coffee Lake to get the same IPC and slightly better Intel graphics.

File: media-creation-ryzen.png (22KB, 650x200px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 650x200px

>>59272742
1. Overclocked Intel CPU for the same price is 20% faster

2. Ryzen is not going to get any better

3. Productivity is not better, in fact it is way better on Intel in the vast majority of cases

>>59272812
Skylake 2 is base consumer garbage.

>>59272821
AMD sockets aren't dead :^)

>>59272845
>I buy multi-core CPUs that cost 3x as much to get worse performance

>>59272880
Base consumer garbage, can't even run more than 1 VM without shitting the bed on the host OS

Fuck it, I have money and I might as well jump on the 16 thread son of a bitch and up my gentoo compilation speed tenfold.

>>59272891
Speaking of that, did Intel issue a microcode fix for Skylake crashing under heavy loads or was a new revision/stepping needed?

>>59272891
Autism is one hell of a disease

>>59272835
It really fucking isn't. Take your shitty cherry-picked single threaded benchmarks elsewhere, shill.

>>59272946
I'm not impressed, /v/.

>>59272955
>it's not because I said so

AMDtards really are the worst

>>59272835
1.R7 1800x is the "worst" value chip of the three, R7 1700 is the best for its price. Comparing a $1000 chip to a $299 1700 seems pretty illogical, and the i7 7700k is better due to its optimization.
Here is a little info about Ryzen and its future:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sciuiEcrnzg&t=1159s
2. Upcoming optimizations and bios state otherwise, Ryzen is not optimized by developers now and that will be taken into account since AMD didn't really have any worthwhile chip against Intel.
3. You are correct on a degree, Ryzen is not the best chip but the more reasonable productivity chip. I won't buy an I7 7700k for $339 and a $150 mobo + $30 CPU cooler if I could get an 8 core r7 1700 for $299 + stock/aftermarket cooler level and a $100 mobo.
More cores for $100 bucks less is a pretty good deal my friend.

>>59273029
8 cores aren't needed, the only real use for CPU is gaming, anyone needing more cores can be done by the GPU

>>59273048
If you bought an i7 for just "gaems" you should get out of this board.
Ryzen is at i5 tier but that is due to lack of optimization and updates.
Read the part where gaming on PC will most-likely evolve to multi-core due to consoles.

>>59273048
>Tesla market revenue per quarter $150M
>x86 CPU datacenter market revenue $4.7 billion

Right, why don't you call up Cray, IBM, Amazon, Alibaba, and tell them they can replace their CPUs with GPUs and tell them their entire KVM/ESXi rollouts can be done on GPUs.

Retarded /v/ermin

>>59273048
This must be trolling. There's no way someone can be this stupid unironically.

>>59271071
>Would it be stupid to wait for Skylake X?
Yes, its going to be overpriced piece of shit as any Intel CPU in the last 5 years.

>>59273122
There is and it's probably the same guy posting the same 'productivity' photoshop benchmark for the last 3 days.

>>59273048
how new are you
I remember people saying i7s arent needed the only real use for CPU is gaming, anyone needing more cores can be done by the GPU

>>59273048
GPU computing is limited.

>>59271260
i7-7700k is already a bottleneck in certain games you dumb intel shill

>>59273048
GPUs are SIMD, Itanium is SIMD trying to do the same thing you're talking about, look how that turned out.

>>59273154
EVERYTHING WORTH DOING CAN BE DONE ON DOS

>>59273183
Itanium isn't SIMD.

>>59273210
Right, it's VLIW.

That didn't do it many favors though.

>>59273029
>2

Cool then I'll wait for Zen 2 for my main pc. If they can get some more perf out of a render chip, great. It's still a chip not viable for 99% of users.

>>59273262
Still, most productivity tests show Ryzen on the up-side against Intel in performance even with no direct optimization.
Yeah. I'm gonna wait for r5 and see which one is the best for me atm (building a new PC, old one crapping out).

>>59273244
It's EPIC and from experience it's rather good at server workloads.

>>59273262
More like firstly mobo vendors and Microsoft need to get their shit sorted before game developers start optimizing.

Who the fuck can optimize when Windows thinks each THREAD(not core) on Ryzen has 11MB of cache.
What the fuck is MS doing

>>59273321
>what is MS doing

Listening to Intel, AMD posted fixes for Zen a month ago Linux, what's Microsoft's excuse for not releasing it?