>tfw eveyone fell for the AMD hype train AGAIN Jesus christ

Intel does what AMDon't.

See: >>59205681

>>59206484
Yup, I'm a retard, I should be doing what the enlightened 14 year olds from /v/ do and base my purchase for a workstation CPU on video game benchmarks, and not benchmarks that actually represents what I'm going to use it for

www.anandtech.com/show/11170/the-amd-zen-and-ryzen-7-review-a-deep-dive-on-1800x-1700x-and-1700/18

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11170/the-amd-zen-and-ryzen-7-review-a-deep-dive-on-1800x-1700x-and-1700/20

Gee whiz, only CPUs that cost twice as much as the Ryzen beats it! I'm such a retard for going with Ryzen!

>>59206621
Name me a workstation task that isn't hardware accelerated.

>>59206665
Running benchmark suites, duh

File: RYZEN7-1800X-33.jpg (101KB, 614x387px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 614x387px

How can Intel ever recover?

>>59206665
>workstation task that isn't hardware accelerated.
What

File: 1486508875819.jpg (14KB, 460x416px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 460x416px

>>59206725
Wow, perfect for my Linux hard drive chock full of CP!

>>59206621
Are you poor?
Lmao

Do you not play games?
Lmao

http://m.hardocp.com/article/2017/03/02/amd_ryzen_1700x_cpu_review/

I like what I'm seeing, even w/ vr which is the only /v/ I get up to anymore

>>59206727
Basically every computationally intensive task nowadays is hardware accelerated, meaning that it can be processed by a specialty piece of hardware like a GPU rather than the general purpose CPU. Stuff like video rendering for example can be done on your video card much faster than it can be done on any CPU.

>>59206741
Why would I base what I buy a CPU on based on what will give me 1 or 2 more FPS in video games? If video games was the only thing I cared about then I'd buy a quad core and put the rest of the money towards a better GPU. My PC I built in 2013 still plays every game I want to play.

>>59206787
>mobile version of hardocp

>>59206844

Absolutely fucking not.

Compiling code? Nope.
Optimal encodes? Nope.
High-quality renders? Nope - only the preview is GPU-accel'd.

And that's just consumer shit. The HPC jobs I run as a physicist all run on CPUs. GPUs aren't a silver bullet.

>>59206484
>PC GAMER
/v/igger cattle.

>>59206484
Shit's hilarious desu

$500 Ryzen chip getting beat by $160 Intel chip

People actually pre-ordered this crap, just lmao.

Did you remember to contact intel before posting this review? I see you did nice work.

>>59207017
ummm this completely?

there's no fucking rendering you'd ever want to do on a fucking gpu unless you want garbage quality