Iridium vs Ungoogle Chromium

they both open source, compare their sources and decide for yourself
if you cant do that
>>>/g/sqt

i would like it to be firepocks but it renders like shit.

>>59191111
reading the source code won't give away fucking jack shit, stop being such a prick

I'm asking the people who have experience with one, the other, or both

>>59191140
they are both free to install too
whats stopping you from getting your own experience?
only people here who will spoonfeed you will be shills

I prefer ungoogled chromium's approach much more than iridium's

I would like iridium more if I haven't been getting

NET::ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED

errors recently.

>>59191429
Where are you getting this error? I haven't seen this anywhere.

>>59191565
when I go to amazon and a few other sites. Apparently it's an error related to sites who use symantec certifiates. This was corrected with the latest chrome update, but iridium has not released an update.

iridium had(still has?) code that phones home to their servers, enjoy your botnetten

Ungoogled-chromium is built on top of Iridium's privacy settings

>>59191873
source?

>>59191893
>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9483118

>>59191913
> This is really great feedback. Reading this and the other comments makes clear that we need to improve documentation what and why we changed things. All the trk-xxx.iridiumbrowser.de hosts are there to find connections which we were not able to disable yet. All these end up at nothing (404 not found) and are not proxied in any way. Essentially Iridium browser should never contact them - if it does then it is a code path we have missed and a bug.

>>59191954
nice damage control, but the trust is already lost

>>59191103
Inox

>>59191103
Waterfox