2017 Browser Battle

Confirmed OP uses Vivaldi and used to use Opera.

File: hmmmm.png (7KB, 112x112px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 112x112px

>>59001135
>closed source
>"no privacy issues"

lmao opera has now a facebook chat client inbuilt

>>59001135

I installed it, customized it and uninstalled it in less than 1 minute.

Enemy of your freedom tier: Vivaldi, Opera, Chrome

What about Yandex? I personally love it

Pale Meme is not a placebo, it's actually faster.

>>59001247
russian botnet

>>59001135
>is another vivaldi shill thread

>>59001186
>open source
>no privacy issues

As if anyone bothers to sift though open sores code on a regular basis

>>59001250
Yeah maybe faster than firefox, which is to say it's still slower than all the *mium based browsers and even edge.

>>59001135
When you think the Vivaldi shills have finally left /g/...

File: Browsers.png (155KB, 760x820px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 760x820px

>>59001135
This is the real chart, /pol/tard.

>>59001390
I'm pretty sure there is only one, anon.

>>59001135
>pic
>no god tier GNU Icecat

>>59001403
That image was true in 2013 my friend, get with the times

>>59001472
i didn't know edge was out in 2013

>>59001403
>palemoon
>icecat
>seamonkey

these should be in placebo tier

>>59001515
Or Iridium

>>59001135
Qutebrowser > all other browsers

>>59001518
SeaMonkey performs better than firefox.

>>59001135
I'll stick with firefox.

>>59001378
>A implying B implies not A implying not B
>failing basic logic
Step up your game

>>59001135
>used vivaldi before first stable was ever released
>it was okish
>problems stacking tabs when tabs on the side
>switch to good ol' Firefox
>decide to try vivaldi again
>download latest stable
>browse wsg
>looks good
>go to youtube
>watch video
>press f for fullscreen
>vivaldi crashes
it's garbage man

also
>no privacy issues
>based on chromium
pick one

File: w4riF.jpg (32KB, 640x512px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x512px

This entire thread

File: 1485058691784.png (415KB, 984x1862px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 984x1862px

>>59001403
no this is the real chart

>>59002070
Outdated

>>59001378
>Implying that no one out of the millions of people who uses <insert popular open source software here> has not ever once checked to see if there's a backdoor

>>59002125
>millions of people
>FOSS
>implying anyone checks

File: Captura de pantalla 2017-02-18 a las 16.39.38.png (19KB, 96x146px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 96x146px

>>59001135
This nigger

File: 1487431902538-1.png (1MB, 984x1862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 984x1862px

>>59002101
now its not

>>59002143
>Firefox
>chrome/ium
>WebKit
>linux
>vlc
>android
>tons of other software

>not millions

>On the top we have Vivaldi, Chromium, (source code released, but not free) with no improvements, just a theme.

>On the excellent tier, we have Opera and Chromium
>Opera:
>Closed source, abandoned Presto rendering engine, became ANOTHER Chrome re-skin

>Chromium:
While fast, it is not very customizable, and it has some privacy issues

>Autism tier:
>Palemoon
This is just bullshit. Pale Moon is a wonderful browser by all means.

>Developer wants to remove the (unused) telemetry code from the base
>FOSS
>gets security upgrades
>works with almost every Firefox addon, including Jetpack/SDK provided you're on the latest version and use Moon Testing Tool

>very customizable, XUL extensions work, and so do most themes, including Arc, Arc Dark, PMChrome (if you like chrome's ui) Opresto (if you like classic Opera) plus themes that make it look like Maxathon

>>59001403
Good chart. Waterfox / Cyberfox / Comodo / Icedragon are placebos, I don't know if it's fair to call Vivaldi a "placebo", though.

>>59001518
Pale Moon has differentiated itself from Firefox. IceCat is the GNU project's build of Firefox with many security and privacy enhanced features, and SeaMonkey includes a Mail, IRC, and newsgroup client. They're all very different from their original product (Firefox) and deserve to be recognized.

>>59002284
>heartbleed existed for years

>>59002070
>>59002250
>icecat
>cutting edge
I literally want to punch you both in the face.

>>59002361
>https://hdm.io/tools/debian-openssl/
My fav when talking about flagrant bug in FOSS

Atleast Chrome is the fastest. What privacy concerns you may have, performance is the most important factor there is.

I'm using Chrome now. Should I switch to Chromium? Which version should I get?

>>59002418
>I'm using chromium with a skin
>should I switch to chromium with a skin?
anon pls

>>59002418
Get vivaldi for the customization and less hardware consumption

>>59002519
>less hardware consumption
>on chromium
kek

File: brave-logo.jpg (18KB, 670x503px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 670x503px

What about Brave /g/?

>>59001247
Go fuck yourself, mongoloid.

>>59002536
Shit tier.

File: 1486478961923.jpg (59KB, 500x362px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x362px

poor bait is poor

>>59001403
i just installed iridium to test it out and when i searched it searched with some shady search engine pls explain

>>59002394
But it isn't. This was exactly the reason I switched to Firefox.

>>59002790
>shady search engine
Since when is anything that's not Google "shady". They're removing any Google defaults and other tracking elements from chromium, that's the browser's point.

>>59002394
Nightly firefox has amazing performance though. It's as fast as chrome.

Don't care much for plugins, eyecandy and shit.

I just want the most lightweight (but still functional and sane) browser.

>>59001526
Or Brave.

File: Updated Browsers Chart.png (2MB, 1681x3237px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1681x3237px

>>59001135

>>59001135
>bloated shit
>god tier

What's your browser history?
As far as I remember, starting somewhere in early 2000s
>IE6
>Firefox
>Opera
>Chrome
>Firefox
>Vivaldi

>2097
>not using uc browser pc<

>calls himself a power user
>uses firefox or chrome
the only option, based on your needs, is either vivaldi or nightly chromium.

>>59001186
But it is OSS?

Someone tell me what's wrong with chrome.

>>59003384
Only partly, which is the same as nothing.

>>59003397
For just browsing facebook, nothing.
It's like saying that a bicycle will get you to work and back. True, but using a car is much more comfortable.

>>59001403
>>59002070
so the webkit nightly/safari tech preview is god tier, but once it becomes a stable release it's shit tier?

>>59003410
Yeah but like, is it actually a botnet? Is there proof of that claim?

File: somefuckery.png (144KB, 1880x974px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1880x974px

Buy new computer. Install opera. See this, can't change it back to the old speed dial.

What do I switch to and why?

>>59001403
You forget to add the amazing IPT Browser.
In scam tier of course.

>>59003473
Vivaldi is the new Opera, or trying to become. It is by most of the old Opera devs and CEO.

It is however still missing a lot of basic things. But keep your eyes on it.

>>59003124
Firefox dev detected

>>59003468
It's made by a company whose main source of revenue is targeted advertisement. Go figure...

>>59003292
>IE
>Firefox
>Opera
>Firefox
>Opera
>chrome, Torch and Iron (used them for a week each before dumping them)
>Firefox
>Opera
>Firefox
>Nightly Firefox

>>59003464
Yes.

>>59003528
Yeah but if companies dont show advertisement to the correct target audiences, that advertisement doesnt pay for itself. It's more logical if anything.

>>59003473
Vivaldi because you can customize everything about it.

vivaldi is not a good browser in any way shape or form if you ever choose to skip an update it launches slower and slower till you update anyway

>>59003683
Can't customize the UI layout.
Can't customize what results pop up in the address bar (Can't hide bookmarks, history, etc)

>>59001403
ie and edge not in botnet tier?

>>59003747
source?

>>59003822
me using it for a few months skipping an updating and then soon enough to took almost a full minute to launch every time

>>59003292
I have tried just about all browsers, even very niche ones at some point, but the main browsers:

IE6
Firefox
Chrome and still Firefox at the same time.

As for other browsers I have at least tried, it's easier to just go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers and then remove like a handful. But Chrome and Firefox just works.

>>59003908
ah cool so no proof at all

>>59003124
shit list mate

>>59003908
Is there a way for you to replicate and record the results? If what you say is true then maybe it would make sense that the results would show if you revert to a previous version.

>>59001378
I do.

File: 1.4.png (207KB, 1200x1500px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1200x1500px

>>59001135

>>59004352
this will always be up to date. You cant avoid the botnet in 2017

>>59004672
You can with TempleOS

>>59004717
and what do you do with your isp and router?

>>59004738
Throw it to the bin. TempleOS does not support any kind of networking

File: 1463690107921.jpg (28KB, 480x611px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 480x611px

>moved to chromium
>tfw blazing fast ui and loading time unlike the firefucks piece of shit that I've tried to factory reset but didn't fix the lag

Nightly should be in placebo autism tier. It's just as slow as Firefox

I use Opera developer, adblock and a VPN come with it, works pretty well imo.

>>59004792
I posted it again XD

>>59004310
>>59002125
>

>>59004766
confirmed. I just opened my chromium after forgetting about it for awhile and using firefox for no reason. Just compared both back to back, chromium 10x faster and doesn't look like shit. thanks for the reminder anon

>>59004944
Let nightly is faster may may XDDDD

>>59004766
only cancerous thing is you can't drop and move a tab from one window to another.

File: 1486865770558.jpg (66KB, 583x349px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 583x349px

From what I read, it seems that Chromium has binary BLOBs. What are they for? Are they planning to replace them with open source components?

>>59005073
And the fact you can't drag and drop images directly into photoshop.

>>59005060
It doesn't have to be faster if it's just as fast as any browser. Chromium being faster is a meme.

>>59005304
Chromium is faster and Nightly is just as fast as Firefox.

>>59001403
>K-Meleon
Last time I used K-meleon was probably around 2012. Is this really still a thing?

>>59006185
*2002

I'd rather use Netscape than Vivaldi.

Just use the browser you feel comfortable with.

>>59001378
It also implies there isn't a small army of people out there reverse engineering every single closed source piece of software in existence. There really is no such thing as unknown backdoors anymore, and every second Chinaman has reversed Vivaldi in order to learn it's secrets and rewrite their own clone.

>>59006298
Hurr Durr

>>59003908
Dang dude that anecdotalism was a real nice story

Does anyone ever use webkit nightly on windows or linux? hod does it even look like? How does it perform?

>people in this thread vouching for Icecat and Seamonkey
>not knowing they are essentially deprecated atm
>Seamonkey's devs even wanted to merge their project with Pale Moon due to lack of progress
kek

>>59006100
False

>>59001135
>using any closed source browser

I'm using Seamonkey for the first time.
It's pretty alright, I like the interface, but every time I open a new tab it looks like it opens it in a new window and it bothers my autism. Is there any way to stop it from doing so?

This Opera Neon shit is fucking weird.

File: 800px-Yandex_logo_en.svg.png (23KB, 800x314px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 800x314px

It's a shame it's a proprietary Russian botnet but I like it more than Vivaldi.

>>59007781
>looks like it opens it in a new window
How so? Tabs should be located somewhere on the bottom left of the panel.

Vivaldi is garbage
fucking thing is always freezing or crashing

>>59008182
Work on my i7 machine overcooked at 5Ghz, 8gb ddr4 and 1tb of storage ;)

>>59002070
How do I change Pale Moon to use Waterfox's icons? Waterfox is far sexier (though your chart uses an ugly outdated icon)

>>59002070
Thanks to pajeetscript, I can't browse this chinksite with lynx, infuriating.

>>59008182
It literally never does those things for me.

Otter browser is good and Min browser is also great

TRY LUNASCAPE AND YOU'LL NEVER CHANGE BACK

Put IceCat in elder god tier if you are going to put that shit called vivaldi in god tier.

>>59008182
Protip your computer sucks mega asshole

>>59001135
>lynx not in god tier
>>>/out/

>>59003124
Most accurate ITT, still needs some rework.

>>59003473
>Install opera
Fucking why? Someone on 4chan told you to? No!

>>59003508
>Firefox Dev
>Would touch 4chan with a bargepole
no

>>59004766
have fun being listened to by the nsa

>>59001403
>WebKit Nightly/Preview in god tier
>Firefox near the top
>IE doesn't have its own dedicated bottom tier

Its time to stop posting.

>>59009437
Underrated post, kek

so what do we use bratans

>>59001378
>>59002143
>>59002361
>>59002388
Kill yourself pajeet you stupid indian.

>>59003292
>Netscape
>IE
>Avant Browser
>Firefox
>Opera
>Firefox when Opera died
>Waterfox for x64
>Cyberfox for x64 that gets updated
>Firefox Dev Edition for x64 and the Dev Theme

>>59001135
>using absolutely ANYTHING besides Firefox Nightly with GNU Icecat as a backup

File: 1487477873416.jpg (42KB, 539x539px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 539x539px

I only use firefox for the bookmarks/history sidebars

Shit's usable. Other shit's not. 99.9% of the websites I visit are no more complex than 4chan so the specifics of browser quality don't matter to me.

>>59005038
>chromium
>doesn't look like shit
lel

IE
Firefox
Chrome
Chromium
Canary
Iridum

Firefox Nightly, bitches.

>>59001403
>edge
>not god tier
lafmao thanks for installing malware third party browser pleb. Patrician Windows Users stick with tried and true Microsoft products built by professionals instead of transgender OSS trolls.

File: 1431280252037.png (103KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 400x400px

Where do I get .crx files? The chrome webstore is not working on my ungoogled chromium

>>59003292

IE
Opera 6 - 12.17
Vivaldi
Opera Beta

Of course I used all sorts of other browsers but just for testing shit I wrote (dev here)

>>59001403
why is chromium 500 MB?
explain

I'd love to get off of Firefox, but is there a decent alternative to NoScript for Chrome?

>>59001403
Funny how ie and edge are on the same level.

>>59001135
opera user here. It's simply the best.

>inb4 chinese botnet

as long as it's not the NSA I'm good

I use chrome with my gmail account signed in

I just want a browser that's not based on WebKit and that's light weight and good. I want it to run anything and everything that any other browser can.

Is this so much to ask for?

>>59012144
we know

t.NSA

>>59007890
I dont mind the Russian botnet

The Russians wont give my info to my government

>>59012185
why haven't I been arrested yet?

Which mobile browser is good? I don't want to use UC browser or Dolphin anymore.

ive been seeing a lot of people recommend using the nightly release of the webkit engine as a browser, and it interests me. how would that work? can you use it as a functional browser, just on its own?

>>59012309
IceCat Mobile

What the fuck is Iridium? Never heard of it and now all the sudden you fucks are all saying it's good.

File: 1487431902538.png (1MB, 982x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 982x1800px

>>59002250
allow me to make a suggestion

Qupzilla?

>>59001403
I had been using Firefox for 8 years now, and I feel this is worst version. Even the ESR sucks.

>install Nightly
>none of my addons work

Back to Firefox I go...

I use on a daily basis on my mac Chrome with a shitload of extensions, Firefox with 5+ extensions and Opera and Vivaldi with a few extensions.
For mobile I use Chrome, FF and when I have a weird search to do I just go with the Tor Based browser Krypton.
I use Chrome for the mainstream stuff and the rest is on the other browsers. Also use VPN.
Synchronize everything with Xmarks and LastPass.
So far so good, hope it wont splash in my face someday. Always looking for other options

Opera lol
chinner botnet

Chrome is just branded Chromium

>>59012452
Nightly is a meme, it's consistently the worst performing version of firefox compared to regular 32-bit and 64-bit, neither of which set a very high bar anyway. It's the definition of a "placebo browser."

Just use Chromium.

>>59012015
Yes. Umatrix has been shilled on /g/ for years now and rightfully so.

>>59012374
german botnet
shilling

File: screenshot.png (80KB, 1310x723px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1310x723px

What about nightly Servo builds :^)

>>59001135

What about Brave and Tor Browser?

Is there a good alternative to tor for deepwebing ?

>>59010630
You use the internet too. Have fun being listened to by the nsa.

For all the people saying waterfox is just a placebo it runs MUCH faster on my p8400 than firefox

>>59013899
I would also like to know what is wrong with Waterfox. So far I have had zero issues with it.

>emerge -s iridium
0 result
>emerge -s palemoon
0 result

how about NO.

>>59001233
/thread

Also
>Closed source botnet
>Privacy
hahahahahaha

>>59011767
Look at the FAQ.

>>59012309
I second IceCatMobile. I get bookmarks and an adblocker, can't beat that.

>>59012452
Use IceCat, they are compatible with regular Fierefox and they give actual reviews of which ones to trust https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/addons.html

So memes aside what is the state of Opera now?

>>59001403
>no firefox esr
>open source brave in botnet tier
>closed source edge is not in botnet tier

>>59002070
>>59012387
>opera; chromium based chinese double botnet in excellent tier
>edge not in botnet tier

>>59015272
freE VPN!!!!1

>>59014830
Their source code is on their website you literal nigger. Stop pushing this meme.

>>59011767
I use this : https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx?response=redirect&prodversion=38.0&x=id%3D[EXTENSION_ID]%26installsource%3Dondemand%26uc

Just replace [EXTENSION_ID] by the app ID

>>59015411
You forgot to mention that the "App ID" is the garbled part of the URL.

>>59001540
>can't enter text because everything is a keyboard shortcut
other than that it's great

>>59001403
How is it that Epic is a scam and Iridium God Tier?

>>59015537
>epic
>closed source, while being based on an open source browser
>unavailable on Linux
>their website looks like a generic 2000s scam site
>runs in background from startup, by default
>owned by a private company in US
Gee, I wonder why it's a scam. It's obviously a shitty honeypot. You're more secure running chromium.

Is there a chromium that auto updates?

I'm not a neet loser so I don't have time to check for updates daily.

File: Screenshot (119).png (453KB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 3200x1800px

im working on a tier list
feel free to r8 and ill modify it accordingly if your concerns are valid

>>59015648
Yes

>>59004352
>votnet
AHEUAHUEAHEUAHUEHUEHUEAHUE

>>59015651
IMO Pale Moon should go into the Stable tier. Compared to Firefox, it's slightly less bloated, no longer phones home to Cuntzilla, and removes the shitty Australis interface.

Where is the best place to download chromium?

>>59015815
https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

>>59015830
Thank you!

File: Tor.png (68KB, 1280x774px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1280x774px

few questions
A.how does tor size up
B. is there a more modern equivelant
C. should I continue using it

>>59015986
A: It's fucking slow
B: Nope
C: Unless you regularly browse the Deep Web, no

>>59015986
big guy cia gonna take you for a plane ride

>>59016123
thats kind of funny actually considering the CIA originally made it

>>59001135
I love the retards who think Chromium is superior to Chrome. It's the same codebase, and literally makes the same botnet calls home that Chrome does (I still have to filter its connections with my firewall on the first few runs)

>>59016059
my friends and i created exit nodes all around Balkan region and all of my traffic goes trough tor, and now it runs fine (25mbps)

>>59016304
>my friends and i created exit nodes all around Balkan region
Doesn't mean everyone else can do that.

>>59004352
votnet>Botnet

also as always: if it's free, you're the product.
ALL browsers (except stuff made for plaintext by autists) is botnent. The only question is how much they cooperate with the NSA and if their commercial data gets anonymized or not.

>>59010830
Have you tried lunascape?? Best browser ever
No other browser can be so perfect
Ty Japan for developing the best browser ever made

>>59001135
>chromium
>stable

>>59016521
aint it slower then chrome and firefox?

>>59002125
>Implying most of the coder-monkeys would notice a backdoor.

>>59017510
It's basically Chrome+Firefox+IE, so yeah

>>59017791
That doesn't even make sense.

>>59002519

IT USES NO RAM!

>>59013465
using chromium is just giving in though

File: android-logo.png (80KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1600x1600px

While we're on the topic, which *lightweight* browser does /g/ recommend for Android? I want multiple sessions but not Chrome's incognito.

>>59007348
>>Seamonkey's devs even wanted to merge their project with Pale Moon due to lack of progress
Source? If true, that's pretty sad. I used SeaMonkey for a bit, all it needed was a more costumizable GUI and more add-on support.

>>59018593
Privacy Browser

Easy toggling of 1st/3rd party cookies + JS. I used to run Naked Browser but PB takes the cake.

>>59018593
Stoutner's Privacy Browser to be exact.

File: 1469412209798.png (98KB, 400x526px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 400x526px

This is 100% fact.

>>59002329
I have 27.1 and Jetpack doesn't work for me. Help?

File: 1484427826322.jpg (35KB, 456x537px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 456x537px

>>59019187
>chromium okay

>>59019187
Retarded how is firefox better than vivaldi or chrome

>>59018593
Lightning

>>59019866
Botnet

>>59001378
>As if anyone bothers to sift though open sores code on a regular basis

As if nobody does

File: index.jpg (9KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 259x194px

>>59019866
how is palemoon not on the bottom?

>>59020281
this

if youre not using chrome it's because youre an austismo train lover that thinks pizzagate is real

>>59020355
That's not true

>>59015411
not him but the faq says that, i tried it but i always get invalid url or something, so i use some scam site like crx4browser

>>59020374
App ID look like this : ogfcmafjalglgifnmanfmnieipoejdcf ( taking as example uMatrix )

So you should get shomething like that : https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx?response=redirect&prodversion=38.0&x=id%3Ddnbdinhggblkacgellbcnmcachnehbmo%26installsource%3Dondemand%26uc

When you enter it the crx file should be downloaded.

If it still don't work then I don't know why.

File: 5736325432436540.png (42KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1024x1024px

>2017
>not using cliqz

>>59022321
another firefox fork

How hard can it be to just make a good browser, jesus. All current browsers suck, but a chome sucks the least.
I'm still using firefox because privacy reasons

>>59022585
>How hard can it be to just make a good browser, jesus.
Why don't you give it a go and come back to us?

>>59022585
It's not the browsers that suck, it's the website developers getting lazy and bad. Half the features implemented in the last couple of years are unnecessary bloat.

Firefox eats the shit out of my toaster's cpu, and srware icon/chromium refuses to block ads despite me using adblockers and doing various reinstalls. what to use?

>>59023101
Opera or Iridium. They're chromium based and have removed lots of google's annoyances, unlike chromium and especially iron. Opera even has a built-in adblocker and a power saving mode which could reduce the strain on your CPU. Instead of using adblockers get the StevenBlack Hosts file and integrate it into your system's hosts file.
Ads may not be blocked because of following
>Chrome is built by Google, an advertising company
>Google wants you to see ads thus removing capabilities of adblockers on any of their operating systems and browsers
>Google has put an option which renders websites partially on their servers so ads are forcefully shown, you must disable this in options to even hope to block ads

I tried using GNU ICecat but compiling it killed the hard drive it was on.

I have Lunascape and Pale Meme now, and I want to carry over all my shit from Pale Meme into something that can load embedded video without shitting itself, and can handle Noscript/uMatrix. Lunascape is nice as an idea but it still crashes way too much.

>>59001135
>use chromium
>a lot of shit ends up not working unlike chrome
tricked by /g/ once again

>all these gay fags hating Brave and Based Eich
enjoy your aids

>>59023270
>muh google services

Just switched from regular Safari to Webkit Nightly.
Webkit Nightly feels like a very light-weight browser. I would definitely recommend.

I'll switch to Vivaldi/Opera as soon as either of them gets the functional of Opera 12.

Until then, I'll stick with Chrome.

>>59020281
>>59020317
t. People who have never used palemoon

>>59024378
My main complaint is it doesn't play my stupid meme media links, so Corgi Orgy is a silent mess to me.

>>59024008
Not sure I get your logic there. Both are chromium based and far closer than Chrome. So why not just switch now? Also, are you one of these people who wants a mail client in your browser for some reason? What functionality are you looking for that Vivaldi doesn't have yet?

>>59024623
>Both are chromium based and far closer than Chrome. So why not just switch now?
Because I can't be bothered to learn another Chromium-based browser unless it'll offer me the same functionality the best browser used to offer.
>Also, are you one of these people who wants a mail client in your browser for some reason?
No, I don't need mail and torrent clients.
>What functionality are you looking for that Vivaldi doesn't have yet?
I haven't seen it in a while, but last time I've checked it was unstable and could not operate 200+ sorted and grouped tabs (while eating less than 1.5 Gb of memory). Pre-caching was also eh. Give me all those and I'm sold. Is it implemented already?

wait Opera is now chink botnet?

>>59024749
>Because I can't be bothered to learn another Chromium-based browser unless it'll offer me the same functionality the best browser used to offer.

Dude, what, there's barely anything to learn. It's just another fucking web browser based on Chrome.


>Because I can't be bothered to learn another Chromium-based browser unless it'll offer me the same functionality the best browser used to offer.

Vivaldi has been stable for nearly a year now. Probably around 1.2.

>and grouped tabs (while eating less than 1.5 Gb of memory).

Has tab groups now and also lets you view multiple tabs at the same time inside the same window. As for RAM just like Chrome it shits itself with that many tabs. Though I will never understand why this is an issue in the first place. Use bookmarks. That's what they're for.

So i installed Pale Moon and it's neat. It needs a bit of tweaking out of the box. I hope it's properly advertised in November that Pale Moon is the official fork for people who don't want to use Googzilla Chromefox

File: breakfast.gif (1018KB, 300x167px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 300x167px

>>59001247
Mongoloid detected

>>59026777
>trips of spook
Yandex if you live in the US.
Google if you live in Russia.
Never use the browser of your own overlords.

>>59001186
>implying the devs aren't trusted
>implying Norway's IP laws are the exact same as the rest of the western world
>implying "open source" means the same thing legally as it does in the United States

>>59002060
Chromium is only a stop gap until the devs can build a new engine.

hows epiphany fags?

>>59026837

Ruskies are now well aware of my masturbatory habits

Google on the other hand knows my real life.

And I am not sure which is worse.

>>59001135
One of the things that makes Vivaldi unique is that it is built on modern web technologies. We use JavaScript and React to create the user interface with the help of Node.js and a long list of NPM modules. Vivaldi is the web built with the web.

>Every time KEK

>>59027521
wtf is Russia going to do to you?

>>59027521
Darling, you are irrelevant.
No one cares about you.
Literally no one.
Not a single person.

File: 1382934830037.jpg (28KB, 500x362px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x362px

>vivaldi
>putting any video fullscreen takes like 30 minutes

>>59027532
probe your anal cavities

>>59027705
>Projecting this hard
wew lad

>>59027724
>p-projecting
I'm not the one who cares about "privacy" - stop your pathetic sobbing and grow some balls.

>>59027763
>still projecting
m8, it's time to stop.

>>59027829
>m8, it's time to stop.
So stop already.

iridium is true kino

File: chrom.png (158KB, 988x704px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 988x704px

>Blink-based browsers can't into antialiased Japanese text

>>59001135
>for those too dump to replace them
>firefox, chrome

Isn't that usually the description for safari/ie/edge, since they come bundled with the OS?

>>59028179
This moon browser claims to antialiase.

http://www.fenrir-inc.com/jp/sleipnir/

File: artworks-000162542951-qmrxoi-t500x500.jpg (25KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x500px

palemoon is the only acceptable choice in that pic.

>>59020101
As if anyone does.

I've been thinking the past few weeks that 4chan seems to be dominated by paid shills, this post has helped to solidify it

>b-but who wants to shill to edgy virgin teenagers?
A company that sees that 4chan is in the top 100 websites, and allows people to post things anonymously, with no way to check peoples history etc?

>>59028717
>dominated by paid shills
I want to be a paid shill.

>>59016304
how do you do that?

>>59026837
how bout a browser that's owned by neither

>>59001378
Do you know what open source means?

I built a pretty Quiet computer with noise dampening material inside and noctua fans... on an i5 7600k with 16gb of ram and for some reason Chrome will randomly use 100% of the CPU while browsing. having my computer go from Silent to Wind Tunnel in short bursts.

wat do?

File: iridium.jpg (28KB, 676x378px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 676x378px

>>59001135
How come you didn't include Iridium?

>>59030154

#DumpTheChrome

>>59030278
does chromium work with chromes addons?

>>59030311

every browser based on chrome has addons

even Vivaldi

Chrome 57 will permanently enable DRM, Firefox is shite for dropping support on popular addons. Fuck this shit.

>>59003683
Vivaldi's bookmarks organisation using a clickable tree is beyond shit so shit tier is the best it can be classified as.

>>59002536
I use it, but for my phone. It works well.

Firefox for my desktop.

>>59003292
>whatever version of IE was out around ~2000
>firefox
>opera
>firefox
>iceweasel
>firefox

>https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html
tl;dr version: everybody has to use free software *autistic screeching*

Thank god I didn't download icecat

>>59031141
>Brave better than Vivaldi
>Firefox Dev at top because it has dev in the name
>Firefox Nightly at top because it has nightly in the name
>Firefox ESR above Firefox because it sounds like it has a turbo engine
>Firefox acceptable yet Opera is at very bottom
>Chromium (ungoogled?) at very bottom with standard Chrome
>"As of March 2017" as if you're going to fucking update this every month and totally not LARP about sooper sekret SJWfox turboengine spy builds

Holy FUCK you're retarded delete your image or your life

is vivaldi a new botnet?

>>59030885
>>whatever version of IE was out around ~2000
probably IE5 - IE6 with all the activeX fun

Do you think IceCat is going to support regular addons a couple years more than Firefox? I am really liking IceCat.

>>59031872
IceCat is a rebranded FF ESR. It will support XUL addons for as long as FF ESR does.

>>59031897
Isn't there rumors of them breaking with Mozilla and working on their own thou?

>>59031784
https://vivaldi.com/source/

If people would look through this they'd stop pushing the botnet meme for vivaldi

what browser should install on window ex pee senpai
leaning towards china botnet or chromium

just tried vivaldi, it's bad as it doesn't have tree style tabs
I can never go back to normal tabs

>>59001403
Where is chrome canary

>>59001135
>close source chrome fork with sub par performance
>god tier
haha ok

>>59032007
I've got Vivaldi running on Windows XP.
Hasn't crashed, but I don't use it for anything heavy such as viewing video/ YouTube

>>59032761
ever tried opera per chance?

which browser should i use on my android 6.0 phone ?

File: EudhFzO.gif (1MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x2048px

>>59001186

>>59032190
Whats's chrome canary?

>>59034862
It's like Chrome's nightly, the experimental build

>>59031897
>IceCat is a rebranded FF ESR
why pick one over the other then?
i know what the nigthly does but what makes esr so "special/good?

When is old Opera coming back? Chropera is bad

>>59003292
IE
Chrome
Firefox
Iridium

>>59003503
not the devs who actually developped opera. these are tards who worked on minor shit when opera was already mostly finished. if they were the guys who worked on presto, we'd have a new engine and browser by now.

>>59037234
Source code to 12.15 got leaked, so something might come out of that.

Vivaldi hasn't been around as long as Chropera but it's way better. Still not ideal, but they've made great strides.

>>59002536
i downloaded it yesterday on my laptop. seems pretty quick, but i'm having issues with saving files, specifically images and webm's. anyone else have this issue?

>>59001403
>>59002329
>Cyberfox
>placebo
But it runs so damn smoothly on my CPU. All I want is a good debloated version of Firefox. I've tried a few and so far Cyberfox just werks.

>>59027532
Make me king.

>>59001403
>>59002070
>>59002148
>>59002250
How does Safari Preview/WebKit Nightly fly, but then stable versions don't?

>>59001378
You think people won't reject malicious commits?

>>59002070
>icecat
>cutting edge
I don't even need to say it.

>>59002536
Hipster tier shit. Just because Eich made it doesn't mean it's automatically great.

>>59003124
>cURL
>Lonely Manchild Tier
I use curl from time to time just to grab shit over HTTP but I don't know anything who's at rms-level autism to browse the web with curl.

>>59003473
Why would you do that? If you're looking for Opera nostalgia, grab Opera 12, but it's heavily outdated. You can also grab whatever Vivaldi shit people are shilling for nowadays I guess.

Opera now is only literally a Chinese botnet. They used to have a feature called Opera Turbo which would route your shit through their servers, and they would compress media on their end and whatever. From a privacy POV, it was pretty shady then and now it's a complete no-go, since Opera has been bought out by random Chinese people.

>>59020281
this

>>59041947
>How does Safari Preview/WebKit Nightly fly, but then stable versions don't?
Same reason Firefox is below nightly. It's months behind in updates.

>>59041986
It's also available on Linux and is FOSS. Safari is botnet. Just like comparing chromium to chrome.