Comfy Browser

File: vivaldi.jpg (18KB, 843x632px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 843x632px

>>58978446
Vivaldi.
It's slick comfy, deletes all the cookies and history if I close it and its gui is top notch in my opinion.
And works great on linux.

>GNU/linux

>various reasons
What reasons exactly? What made you choose WaterFox over Chrome, as well as any other browser out there?

>>58978486
literally kill yourself

>>58978504
k pal, enlighten me what should I be using

>>58978527
Not Vivaldi

>>58978446
I'm using WaterFox as well. Pretty comfy

>>58978504

Literally calm down, it's not healthy for you to be so unnecessarily savage.

>>58978446
everyone is shilling vivaldi and waterfox. I do like waterfox tho but the vivaldi shilling is actually starting to get shitty.

Waterfox is literally just Firefox

What the fuck does Waterfox have over Firefox?

first of all, >>58960099

second of all, Firefox Nightly with IceCat as a backup master race

File: Scan_Me.png (5KB, 305x305px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 305x305px

>>58978606
Better Ram usage (Negligable but still there.)
64 bit version maintained by a community outside of Mozilla.
Decent response times with tabs compared to Firefox.

That is just as far as I know.
And this is OP

>>58978446
I'm using waterfox as well. I'm enjoying it.

>>58978446
Nightly firefox. I don't get the water/cyber-fox meme. What benefits do these have?

>>58978672
Firefox had 64bit for years already.

File: 1484605260603.gif (1MB, 326x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 326x300px

>>58978446
I like nightly. It runs a lot better than firefox/waterfox/cyberfox (noticeable more on my surface pro 1 than my desktop.)

>>58978486
I'd like to try out Vivaldi, I screwed around with it when it was a new thing but that was a while ago.

>>58978672
>>58978672
Waterfox also respects your privacy, they remove all the data collection and telemetry shit.

>>58978672
>>58979956
Sounds good. Does it have all the regular extensions?

>>58980285
Yes it has compatibility with most if not all extensions.

>>58980418
Cool

>>58978446
chrome

Internet Explorer

File: 1476044307048.jpg (46KB, 438x720px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 438x720px

I'm still using Pale Moon and yes I realize that puts me in the same spot as the fucktards that were clinging to Internet Explorer back in like 2007

I've truly stopped giving a shit.

>>58983203
I'm using it too. Modern firefox is too much of a bloat compared to Pale Moon.
The only downside to it is that it doesn't support a lot of new addons forcing you to use those ported specifically for Pale Moon.

>>58979956
Proof?

Convert me to waterfox or 64 bit firefox as a longtime chrome/chromium user.

I use lastpass, authy, ublock and 4chan x, that's about it.

I watch 1080p netflix on IE for fucks sake.

If I found a browser that did an omnibar as well as chrome I'd use it. But I haven't yet.

LOL this browser is a monument to compromise. I cant use ANYTHING that requires flash without downloading adobe flash shit player tracks your every move.

>>58978486
this. i can't live without stacked tabs and the integrated screenshots anymore. shitposting was never so comfy.

>>58978672
what about nightly?

>>58978493
Addons

>>58978446
>>58978486
>>58978535
>>58978720
>>58979956
10 rupees have been deposited to your account

Enjoy your outdated placebo

Chrome is comfy af.

am using opera since 2010 i think, back then i loved the feature that u can group taps to one tab, this feature was abandoned after the engine swap.

i have all my bookmarks in it and am too lazy to change.

is there any browser that can bring back my favorite feature?

I'm also using Waterfox as well ;),man firefox sure has quite a lot of forks

>>58984829
Not Firefox since the add-on developer that made a pretty nifty tab group extension has jumped ship from that garbage browser.

File: unnamed.png (31KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x300px

This is the ideal browser. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

>>58985054
Despite more RAM Usage. Open spying, It being an absolute botnet browser.

File: Reee.gif (2MB, 389x324px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 389x324px

>>58984669
Sure the Open Source browser is going to be shilled by a pajeet. Not chrome or Edge. Fucking Please

File: radical islam.gif (2MB, 345x181px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 345x181px

>>58985369
UI is so cash though
>>58978446
I'd like to switch from firefox to something similar but with better performance and less bloated.
Do I go Waterfox or Pale Moon?

>>58985457
Firefox has a better UI desu.

>>58978504
>>58978534
what the wrong with vivaldi, huh? :P

>>58978446
>comfy
Fucking puke!

>>58985054
y

>>58984637
Nightly is shit. Breaks addons all the time when I tried it. Only downside I have with Waterfox is the shitty icon. Fixed it on the taskbar but still baked in.

File: 1486817818780.jpg (47KB, 580x346px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 580x346px

>>58988851
>Nightly is shit
spotted the chrome-browser developer

>>58978446
just use raw xwidget-webkit in emacs and write plugins in elisp as you please

>>58988851
>Breaks addons all the time when I tried it

In what? 2010?

I haven't had that happen in years... granted I don't use 50 addons.

>>58985628
Simply fuck off.

>>58985054

Google is watching you Fap