NoScript

So, is OP really ignorant or is this another thinly veiled uBlock/uMatrix shill thread?

>>58057908
>hours upon hours
No, you fucking moron.
Delete everything in the whitelist, and allow websites as you go when you need to.

>>58057908
I would recommend uMatrix instead.
Much easier with the point-and-click interface.

It's usually easier to understand which domain you need to unblock in order to "unbreak" a site too because it shows what type of connections they were trying to make and how many.

With NoScript you often just have to blindly allow shit at random until the site works, which completely defeats the purpose of it.

It's literally about 20 seconds per site. If configuring it properly takes "hours upon hours" you should get some help.

File: sd.png (52KB, 368x969px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 368x969px

>>58057962
>>58057927
>>58057921

but websites each have a huge ass list of requests. how the fuck am i supposed to know which ones to allow?

>>58057951
uMatrix is great because I can block adblocker-blockers with it.

NoScript/uMatrix might be a bitch to configure but it's the price to pay for security.

>>58057992
See: >>58057951
To be honest, every time I see something like that on website, I just close the tab. Not worth my time.

>>58057908
Not really. It's pretty easy to set up, only taking a minute or two per site. I use it in conjuction with Flash Control, Ublock Origin, Self destructing cookies, BetterPrivacy, Random Agent Spoofer, Decentraleyes, Disconnect, DNSSEC/TLSA Validator, and HTTPS Everywhere without issue.

File: amazon noscript.png (12KB, 235x221px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 235x221px

>>58057992
I wouldn't allow such a site. You could test a site like that out going back and forth on what to allow, but a site with a list that long would just lose my business in favor of a website that keeps it simple.

>>58057908
I don't use NoScript for the same reason I didn't use Adblock Plus. Because both put significant strain on the CPU and make the web browser slower and heavier despite blocking content.

μblock Origin does everything I need and makes the browser faster and lighter on CPU and RAM. Before that I used ghostery (it's shit now but back in the day before μBlock Origin it was as good as Adblock Plus only much lighter)

I don't know if these days NoScript is lighter but I don't care because μBlock Origin does everything I need.

Besides Firefox will be dead soon.

>>58058015
>>58058092

well i need sites like this. so nocript fucking sucks.

>>58058111
>Besides Firefox will be dead soon
What makes you think that?

>>58058129
>I need a hammer, so a screwdriver fucking sucks
Different tool for different purpose.

>>58058129
>well i need sites like this.
Sure you do. Better bite the bullet, then.

>>58058129
Ok. It sucks for you. Uninstall it. No skin off my nose.

>>58057908
It requires some effort when you start to use it, but it is worth it, Most of us have been using for a long time so we already have a comfy setup. After the first two weeks it was like second nature to me.

Of course from time to time you find abominations like >>58057992

My recommendation: Think it two times: Do I really need to read this garbage click bait article?.

Also ignore this retard >>58058111
He is just shilling his garbage add-on and spreading FUD, NoScript makes websites load faster (not to mention the security benefits) because it precisely blocks all the unnecessary malicious JavaScript code.

Anyone who is retarded enough to use and add-on like Ghostery, owned by an ad company who sells your data to other advertisement companies. Shouldn't be tacked seriously.

>>58058132
The messages they display on the about:home and the fact that they are pulling an wikipedia and ask for more money.

I know you can change the home page but they didn't pull shit like that in the past. I understand they may be strapped for cash (since Google no longer needs them and probably doesn't give them as much money) but due to the way they behave the last few years it's not an organization I trust to donate.

Maybe an independent group of developer should pull another phoenix outside the control of mozilla and make firefox great again.

Firefox is still the best browser out there though.

>>58058233
>Firefox is still the best browser out there.
I agree. I honestly do not understand why people trust Google with literally everything. They get my youtube history, and that's it.

>>58058129
>so nocript fucking sucks.
Triggered. The software is doing its job so well it is rendering the modern web unusable. If anything, this should tell you that the software doesn't suck, the modern web does.

>>58057908
>Does every single person using it spend hours upon hours configuring it to not fuck up their favorite sites?
If two clicks takes you hours, it's time to stop using a computer, gramps.

>>58058379
ahem... yes... well, i can delete noscript. however i can't delete the modern web.

>>58058233
Mozilla is a fucking retarded company that's digging its own grave with every fucking terrible decision they make

I'm all for the free web and all but Mozilla is just not providing what they set out to do anymore. Somebody needs to step up and take their place so they can at least die with some tiny shred of dignity remaining.

>>58058129
>nocript fucking sucks
No, the websites you are visiting suck.

Most sites only need one or two things unblocked to work properly and it's generally the host domain and a cdn.

>>58058393
You can also stop browsing a board meant for technologically competent people, not normies who've managed to find the “addons” button in their browser

>>58058111
You should try μMatrix; it's what NoScript tried to be but better.

>>58057908
Well, if every site you go to is a porn site, you've got an uphill battle

>>58058418
Tbh I find umatrix kind of annoying. Say I want to allow scripts from ajax.google.com no matter which site i'm on. There's no button for this. Super fucking annoying desu.

>>58058411
>says the guy that can't write a fucking proof but is an expert at if/and statements and other cs101 bullshit

>>58058393
>all lowercase
>... .... .... ...
If you don't like it, just don't fucking use it. Nobody has forced you to use it, right?

>>58058439
There's an option in the settings, faggot. I haven't even used uMa that much and I know this.

>>58058411
>"normies"
Why the fuck are you people using this shitty word? Normalfag is good enough.

>>58058455
>There's an option in the settings, faggot. I haven't even used uMa that much and I know this.
You mean going and writing in a rule whitelisting it?
That's a huge pain in the ass bruh

>>58058152
>>58058155
how the hell am i supposed to order a folding table or a skirt and thigh highs and have it delivered in 4 hours without using amazon.com

>>58058484
Whitelist said website?

No script is now considered harmful

>>58058439
>Say I want to allow scripts from ajax.google.com no matter which site i'm on. There's no button for this. Super fucking annoying desu.
Yes there is, just because you're fucking retarded doesn't mean it isn't possible.

>>58058484
Amazon.com has precisely two scripts to white-list. I am pretty sure you can figure it out. See: >>58058092

>>58058441
There's essentially no difference between proving mathematical theorems and programming.

File: am.png (46KB, 412x432px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 412x432px

>>58058484
???
Works on my machine.

>>58058500
>Yes there is, just because you're fucking retarded doesn't mean it isn't possible.
Screencap it fgt

>>58058478
>bruh
No, there's a dashboard you can pull up from the icon so you can do this all with a shiny GUI you unironic CIA nigger shitstain

>>58058507
>>58058502
>>58058493
thanks, yeah i havent used noscript in years but im considering getting back into it

>>58058509
wew turns out i am retarded nvm

ITT: A simple NoScript question unexpectedly triggers hundreds of people

>>58058522
16, looking at the page stats, and not too many people were triggered.

>>58058509
>>58058516
The icon dashboard as a dropdown menu at the top left to choose what “source domain” you want to change the rules for

For example for this thread I see ‘*’, ‘4chan.org’ and ‘boards.4chan.org’ as options.

Depending on which setting I have, the rule changes I make to the matrix will affect any site, just 4chan.org or just boards.4chan.org

>>58058532
Maybe you don't understand 2016/2017 4chan.
>If you reply, you're triggered
>If you read the thread, you're triggered
>If you ignore the thread, you're triggered
You're fucking triggered, son.

>>58058544
Btw, you can essentially use this to easily control the defaults, e.g. allowing 1st-party images and css for *, which is what I do. (Because 1st-party images and css aren't doing any damage that hasn't already been done)

>>58058552
>trigger trigger triggered
thanks, triggered. please put a trigger warning on your shit posts next time

>>58058552
Oh. Ok.

>>58058544
Yeah I found it. Thanks for pointing that out.
>wtf i love umatrix now

>>58058441
Yeah, so why don't you learn how to fucking do it???

>>58058506
Yeah, then learn how to do it.

Shit /g/ doesn't do:
ocaml
coq
idris

shit /g/ pretends it knows how to do:
haskell
clojure
scala

shit /g/ has no fucking clue how to do:
proofs

>>58058690
I'm a Haskell expert and know both Idris and Agda. I haven't worked with Coq, but I have a good understanding of its basic principles.

So why don't you off yourself.

File: 1481166622087.png (683KB, 561x653px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 561x653px

>>58058707
>I have a good understanding of its basic principles.

>>58058765
I honestly don't understand why people on this board post useless shit like this. What's the point? Does it make you feel better? Do you think it's funny?

Genuinely curious.

>>58058707
I helped write Quipper. Suck my fucking cock

>>58058792
Well, I'm drunk as fuck and I posted some shit about how nobody here really has a clue about type theory. Then, some other guy was like, nuh uh, I'm like a fucking haskell expert and I know idris and agda. Then a third party posted this picture, which chuckled me. So dude number two brought a chuckle to drunk guy number one, you're someone else, but really life is subjective, right? Meanwhile nobody here knows a fucking thing about atelier b.

>>58058872
if you want to get technical about it, you can call me drunk dude #2.

was the pic perfect? no. did it get the point across that measuring e-peen will not be rewarded? i think we both know the answer to that.

>>58058765
nice meme

what I mean is that I understand the calculus of constructions upon which coq is based, and I've read a few introductory coq books, but I've never actually used it

>>58058872
>Well, I'm drunk as fuck and I posted some shit about how nobody here really has a clue about type theory.
Pet theory: The only reason /g/ seems to be full of clueless morons is because everybody assumes /g/ is full of clueless morons, which both

(a) brings in clueless morons who think they're in good company
(b) drives out people with actual knowledge who are tired of being associated with clueless morons all the time
(c) makes people who actually know what they're saying shitpost and pretend they're clueless morons for giggles because they think it's the norm

>>58058955
>(a) brings in clueless morons who think they're in good company
>(b) drives out people with actual knowledge who are tired of being associated with clueless morons all the time
>(c) makes people who actually know what they're saying shitpost and pretend they're clueless morons for giggles because they think it's the norm

i bet you wish you could sticky on /g/ and it just kills you that you lack the power to do so.

>>58058972
No, I believe that stickies are a waste of space because nobody reads them anyway. All it does is reduce the number of threads I can see on the index by one

I'm using noscript+request policy
does umatrix replace both or NS+RP are better?

>>58058955
>both
>a, b, c
fucking up your tuples, dude

c is sorta spot on though but like that's been 4chan for the past ten years

>>58059008
I replaced NoScript+RequestPolicy+Self-destructive Cookies by uMatrix

>>58059064
by = with?

>>58059279
fuck off chink / autist

Seriously is there a little guide out there like /g/ sticky for NoScript?


Some basic stuff to get people started, I remember trying using it couple years ago and it was frustrating condiguring it for every website individually.

>forbid <IFRAME>
>forbid <FRAME>
>forbid WebGL

do I need any of these?

>>58059382
>Seriously is there a little guide out there like /g/ sticky for NoScript?

i wish. but /g/ is too smug to help

>>58057908
>Does every single person using it spend hours upon hours configuring it to not fuck up their favorite sites?

Yes. And no it's not worth it.

>>58059756

that's what i figured. i mean you just end up manually enabling everything that was enabled by default without noscript

>>58059756
nah, it's more like 30-60 seconds per website

and a surprising amount of the web works fine with everything or almost everything disabled. Well, assuming you want to read things and not watch some retard on twitch whine about how you need to give him money on patreon, at least.

>>58059804
just don't try to do any shopping online

>>58059745
all three

File: ss+(2016-12-18+at+10.31.29).png (24KB, 516x416px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 516x416px

>>58059382
>wow it's so hard to click a bunch of boxes
go read the manual, adhd ridden mong

>>58059817
I shop and bank online with uMatrix enabled.
>allow site to run scripts
>allow anything that looks like a CDN or a financial institution to run scripts
>leave the usual advertising garbage blocked
Some places need cross-site requests enabled. which is rather bad practice on their part, but easy to allow only for that instance with uMatrix.

set it up once and its done. Besides you don't buy anything from anywhere that isn't Amazon or Newegg anyway, do you anon? Don't lie.

>>58059785
I used it for a year or two and there's actually a lot that went disabled. It's just that I eventually concluded that NoScript is complete overkill for security and privacy with normal browsing. There's already so few exploits you have to worry about that's even further reduced by blocking ads. If you have a permanent whitelist and one of the sites you whitelisted gets hacked then you're fucked regardless.

Simply not worth the effort.

Also the developer is shady and unethical himself. NoScript's website advertisements are hand-picked snakeoil that make it difficult to stay blocked by adblocker lists. Also in the past he had his addon add his own websites to the ABP whitelist.

File: mono.jpg (7KB, 196x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 196x180px

>>58059855

most recent shopping sites:

1. Kmart
2. Sears
3. Amazon
4. Walmart
5. Staples

And I use befrugal/ebates to get cash back on these sites. Also use Slickdeals to find good deals.

>>58059907
>shopping on sites that collect sales taxes
why

>>58059895
so its best to just have abp installed with my custom whitelist?

>>58059923
If by ABP you mean µBlock Origin then yes.

>>58059923
>ABP
that's not how you spell uBlock Origin

File: 1481196170986.png (112KB, 1874x643px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1874x643px

If you're using noscript, get rid of it. If you're using umatrix, consider using the umatrix-lite built into ublock unless you really need extreme granular control. Pic related.

>>58057908
>options
>allow all sites opened through bookmarks
>done

This assuming you don't bookmark shit sites, faggot.

>>58059937
>>58059939

does /g/ have ublock shills or is it legit better?

>>58059958
oh, i bookmark some shit sites.

>>58059961
a.) UBO is faster and uses less memory
b.) The company that makes ABP accepts money to whitelist ads, and turns that whitelist on by default. UBO doesn't have this conflict of interest.

I say that's "legit better"

>>58059961
It uses considerably less CPU and memory resources while having more features and no acceptable ads scheme. So yes I'd say it is legit better.

>>58059986
Hey go to another thread to earn your rupees. I'm >>58059990 shilling here.

>>58057921
What is wrong with umatrix?

>>58059940
>gstatic
>Google apis
>enabled
Kys

>>58057908
You don't know true autism until you have that enabled and request policy

>>58060107
I used to have NoScript, RequestPolicy and a cookie controller addon. I had nothing to do in my life except make browsing websites more interesting.

>>58060102
Necessary for the full experience on news.google.com.

>>58057908
Only reason why noscript is still used is because tor browser uses it. Anyone else migrated to umatrix because it's better in every way.

>>58060167
>using Google
>at all
Jesus christ.

>>58060173
Even fucking snowden uses noscript, that shows how much of a mong he is.
Doubt Tor browser will change anytime soon.

File: usa-security-snowden-anime.jpg (67KB, 750x1097px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 750x1097px

>>58060233
>Even fucking snowden uses noscript, that shows how much of a mong he is

pls

File: NSA headquarters.jpg (79KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 600x400px

>>58060322
>his nipples

I'm running both umatrix and noscript together.

Am I just being a retard? It is nice though that I have to allow it first on no script then see what the scripts want to do on umatrix.

>>58060456
>I'm running both umatrix and noscript together.
Yeah don't, there will be conflicts. Pick one or the other.

>>58060456
noscript is a pile of trash and will override what you tell umatrix to do, just use umatrix

>>58060456
Now you just need Norton and you're all set.

>>58057908
I use it on Tor in order to view my CP safely.

>>58060456
run neither. both are a waste of time and resources.

After a few days of taking 5 seconds to configure each new site I visited after the install I had all my regular websites working, couldn't've taken more than 5 minutes and now I'm set. Oh no, the occasional site breaks and I have to spend 5 seconds fixing it all for an overall superior computing experience, how ever will I live!?

>>58058484
Step one is stop being retarded. I'm guessing the thread'll die well before you're ready for step two so I'm not even going to bother continuing the instructions.

>>58058051
I love bloated browsers too!

>>58060456
Run NoScript with all scripts enabled and use uMatrix for blocking scripts

>>58060649
but seriously... i need instructions

>>58060758
It's pretty much common sense and educated guesses

>>58060723
this, noscript does other things than just blocking scripts

>>58060723
>Run NoScript with all scripts enabled

why even run it?

>>58060920
Because it protects from XSS attacks and possibly other stuff I don't know about

>>58060954
i don't even know what XSS is. I want something that just works.

>>58060972
Do you not know what Google is either?

>>58057908
I install it, allow javascript globally and use it not to block javascript but for it's other powers. I'm satisfied. No more crossscript faggotry.

>>58060972
that literally what it does though, you enable all scripts and leave it there

>>58060981
please explain using OC in paragraph form.

>>58061001
>allowing javascript globally


why not just slit your wrists right now?

>>58057908
Been using it for several years now. You just get to learn to live with it, and frankly, besides adblock for the ads, this too is a giant "fuck you and your dumb jewish design bullshit lol"

>be somekind of nu male programmer
>think you can make some fancy websites with some artwork and other liberal garbage and "classy styles that I put a lot of heart and effort into!"

and then I come along, break your shit website, try to get into the directories of whatever there is on your website through broken, blue links that appear all over the place.

why? Because fuck you lol.

>>58061025
that why you install umatrix on top of it, l2read

>>58061015
no

>>58061025
You're dumb.

File: CorpusChristi_Gilby.jpg (120KB, 745x497px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 745x497px

>>58061076
anon had a nerve touched and is very sensitive about it

>>58061109
The fuck are you on about?

>>58061134
>The fuck are you on about?
stop being this british

>>58061168
Stop replying till you have a retort. Also I'm not British.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (127KB, 823x361px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 823x361px

>>58057992
uhm...

>>58061054
Why would you run NoScript & uMatrix? Is this actually recommended? Seems redundant.

>>58061280
that looks even more complicated than noscript

>>58061311
That IS NoScript on the right.

>>58057927
this sounds nice and everthing but one clean install and it's everything over again
speaking as someone who once had noscript and liked it but having to go through it again was too much
>>58057962
>about 20 seconds per site
pretty much but there's a lot of sites on the internet

>>58061344
>one clean install and it's everything over again
Or export your config like a well-adjusted adult.

>pretty much but there's a lot of sites on the internet
You can't visit every site at once, man. Just do your thing as and when.

>>58061309
Read the thread, the answer was just posted a little bit ago.

>>58061371
>You can't visit every site at once, man. Just do your thing as and when.
I wish I could do it at once. Having to deal with it EVERY DAY when I just want to browse some internet gets tiring. I guess I'm a dumb pleb xD but I'm happy browsing with disconnect + ublock that require absolutely zero effort after installing and I might as well forget that they exist. I don't want to be the guy to say "I have nothing to hide" but really the only things I have on my computer are school projects and porn anyway so struggling every day to give a tiny bit of extra protetction to something no one cares about just doesn't seem worth it.

Also, what looks complicated about that? The matrix layout makes it way more useable than the huge ass list seen here >>58057992

The point of the post was that >>58057992 isn't set up right at all. Just look at the number of entries there compared to this >>58061280

Also, if you use a site a lot it is worth setting stuff up right. If a site is trustworthy, or it's critically important that no plugins interferes, or the nature of the interaction is very private, there's nothing wrong with turning NoScript of uMatrix off for a moment.

>>58057908
It brakes the pages no matter how many features you disable.
I uninstalled long time ago.

This >>58061468 is a reply to >>58061311
Fuck

>>58061309
tdlr: noscript does 2 things - 1) blocks scripts 2) some other protection
you block scripts with umatrix and let noscript deal with nr 2

>>58061464
>guess I'm a dumb pleb xD but I'm happy browsing with disconnect + ublock
That's fine. Nobody is asking you to anything you don't want to do.

>>58061344
>20 seconds per site
>20 seconds
>to move a mouse and click
do you have trisomy 21?

>>58061490
wow you wasted a lot of keystrokes. bummer. hope you don't kys

>>58061516
>some other protection
meme, if you want XSS protection just block XHRs globally on umatrix and be done with it

>>58061559
>to move a mouse and click
well that's if the way you use it is "this site doesn't work - allow all". if I go through the trouble of using noscript I at least want to look through the stuff that's asking permission and only allow necessary. if you just allow everything any time there's a problem the whole thing becomes not pointless but close

>>58061582
Nobody said umatrix doesn't have XSS protection, they're saying NoScript's is better.

>>58061642
It isn't

>>58061648
That's some nice proof you've got there.

>>58061663
you're the one who said it was better, the burden of proof is on you

>>58061672
Get the fuck out of here with your shitty reddit meme bullshit. I don't need proof, I'm right.

>>58061689
>i'm right
>still no proof
hahahhahaha

>>58061702
Like I said, I don't need proof because I'm right. Go be wrong somewhere else.

>>58061743
>still no proof
>being this lame
hahahahha

>>58061743
>Like I said, I don't need proof because I'm right.
That's the opposite of how arguing works, anon.

>>58057908
Three things:
A. your a faggot OP
2. right-click
D. if your using firefox there is a button you can get on your toolbar thingy to temporary allow all on current page
3. >hours upon hours yeah right you got something wrong with you

>>58061772
>keeps whining about how the guy who's right hasn't provided any proof (I don't have to anyway since I'm right, I don't know how I could be any more clear on that)
>hasn't even attempted to post any proof of his own

>>58061629
>well that's if the way you use it is "this site doesn't work - allow all". if I go through the trouble of using noscript I at least want to look through the stuff that's asking permission and only allow necessary.
But it's obviousy what you need to enable, isn't it? Enable first party scripts, if it still doesn't work, enable the CDN.

Boom, 5 second spent max

>>58057908
pretty much; but once it's done, it's lovely

>>58061822
Keep telling yourself that.

>>58059940
Pic: should use noop (gray) rules, not allow (green) rules.

>>58061918
>the earth is flat
>but I don't need to prove anything because I'm right

I'm sorry that you're such an idiot.

>>58061972
I'm sorry, what was that? I can't hear you over the sound of how wrong you are.

File: ss+(2016-12-18+at+01.44.06).png (218KB, 1193x584px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1193x584px

noscript is a pile of shit, literally hijacks firefox to override whatever you block on umatrix and allows it like the whitelisted ad script on it's site

>>58061993
>>>/b/

>>58062074
Why're you linking me to your containment board?

>>58057992
The longer the list, the less you should use that website

>>58062162
Because you're clearly too stupid for /g/ if you don't even understand how arguments work.

>>58061967
Thanks, I didn't even realize there was a 3rd/better option.

>Enter site
>click on "temporarily allow all this site"
oh man, that took hours.

File: 1480944681036.jpg (1MB, 2468x2337px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2468x2337px

>>58062277
>temporarily expose myself to every vulnerability on this site

>>58062250
But I do, you just won't shut up about how wrong you are.

>>58062328
If you did, you'd either shut up, provide some proof or admit you're wrong.

>>58062337
I do, which is why I'm not providing any proof. I'm right, so I don't need to.

>>58062387
>I'm wrong, so I can't
Thanks for clearing that up.

>>58057908
Temporarily allow button brah

>>58062210
>>58062210
but that website saves me thousands of dollars a year

>>58059961

the shills will tell you that it is legit better

the game of who to trust never ends

File: 1477086178591.jpg (13KB, 460x266px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 460x266px

>>58057908
It's not even hard to use, you fucking retard. Just look at what's being blocked. If you're on ebay, allow ebay.com. If there's another site called rajeeshchitrakartaadvertkingdom42.com, don't enable it. If a site forces you to enable pajeet scripts or is using more than 10, don't use that site because it's shady as fuck.

>>58060102
you need to enable google.com and gstatic.com to be able to post on 4chan without a pass

>>58057908
Doesn't take me hours, but yes. I've been using NoScript for years, so it's really not much of a hassle to me. Small price to pay to prevent all the bloated garbage most sites try to laod.

>>58062736
So your freedom is worth less than a couple thousand bucks?

Daily reminder that noscript used to be malware:

https://adblockplus.org/blog/attention-noscript-users

File: large.jpg (93KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 450x450px

>>58058111
>Besides Firefox will be dead soon.
IRL knife fight me now!

I hope to god you are not a chrom fag and are shilling for lynx or some shit.

After a while when you start to notice the same domains being blocked across several sites. Typically only unique domains will be useful to you with a few exceptions like jquery or captcha sites.

>>58062967
it still is just like ironically abp is as well

File: DKqdxRO.jpg (81KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1366x768px

>>58062210
or you could just use uMatrix with some hosts files to blacklist urls that NEVER need to be allowed

>>58058233
>>58062988

Oh my bad.
I was assuming you are a chrom fanboy.
Mozila is a SJW hive fest of failure.

This is what happens when your CEO is not homophobic.
however they are still the lesser evil.

WE need to have someone take the code and redeploy it in a different browser like it was with open office to libre office.

>>58057927
This.

>>58057962
Not even 20 seconds most of the time. Main site allowed and perhaps some AWS backend for video or whatever if that.

>>58062257
Allow(Green) is probably the option that has the least practical use. If you need to override both dynamic and static filters that probably means the site you're using is doing some fishy shit behind the scenes. It's typically only used to make a site work when all else fails but it also leaves you vulnerable to the sites that were allowed.

>>58063012
kids these days.
>There is a app for this
>Check out this plug-in

Back in my day we simply modified the hosts file so it pointed to your own computer (effective fire wall the entire computer will contact itself instead of the web server since you have overwritten the DNS list with your own).

Learn some god dame computer skills you facebook babies!

If you use noscript you should be aware that you can actually hide sites from the dropdown menu so you don't even have to look at them.

Mark a site as untrusted to hide it from the dropdown. It also preserves the setting when you visit other sites so as you continue to mark sites as untrusted the number of sites that are shown in the dropdown will continue to get smaller

>>58058264
>I honestly do not understand why people trust Google with literally everything
Yea no idea considering these kids should be more tech savvy. I run all my "cloud" services from home with nextcloud. Hell even Plex Media Server syncs photos and videos too if needed. I can stream music from home like spotify/google music and I don't have limitations. My cars all have USB with MP3 tag support anyways (even the cheap piece of kia's do this). Easier to just load up a cheap usb thumb drive with your library. I've even gone so far as to host family members with nextcloud it's that fucking easy.

>tfw script blocking idort

>>58062949
uh yeah.... i'm a poor NEET

>>58063126
but that's not necessary and ruins the point. if you use a host file with umatrix it hides all unnecessary domains from the list, so you only see domains that you need to allow

File: Linux_command-line._Bash._GNOME_Terminal._screenshot.png (106KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1024x768px

>>58063136
>Yea no idea considering these kids should be more tech savvy
No they are idiots who only can click
>Buy app
Back in the day computer class was something, they thought you to use the command line, and operating a computer really took skill.

Now its all baby toys with build in spay-ware/bottnet that cost money in app stores.
These kids are to stupid to even know any alternatives or can not even navigate the app store to get diffident app's outside the main 5.

Give it a decade and navigating the web will be on the same level like using the CMD, and kids will look at you like you are some evil hacker for knowing how to find and download torrents.

>>58063188
Apply for autismbux like everyone else and stop being exploited by megacorps

>>58062967
Daily reminder that ABP is a extortion racket bottnet and nothing more.

>>58063239
both are, noscript has advertiser paid whitelists as well

>>58062410
Why are you quoting yourself? Have you gotten confused? You're the wrong one.

>>58063252
>both are
I never disputed this.

>>58063221
>kids will look at you like you are some evil hacker for knowing how to find and download torrents
Shit this hits the mark so perfectly. I have family in their twenties and in college who collectively lose their shit when a torrent site like KAT goes down. They're fucking clueless. Usenet? Never heard of it. IRC? Same thing. These are folks who went to college for computer science or for the dumb ones took cert courses and tried to get into some shitty call center or IT maintenance job. Two of them I swear failed at installing Ubuntu and Linux Mint. How the fuck do you fail this bad? They eventually had me install Windows 10 and 7 for them because even that was apparently too technical. FFS I hope millennials get purged.

File: hosts.png (53KB, 1046x563px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1046x563px

>>58063217
>>58063126
as in seeing left vs right

>>58063126
Back in your day, blocking a domain was sufficient to get rid of ads and malware

But this is 2016 and not your day, so please kindly take your hosts file and fuck off

>>58063296
>Not modifying the hosts file in VI
Why are you even on this website?

File: scrot-1482085978.png (34KB, 571x158px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 571x158px

>>58063323
what makes you think I'm NOT modifying my hosts file with VI? I have just added it to uMatrix to make the list cleaner.

>>58063126
1. Hosts file is trivial to bypass
2. Hosts file won't block first-party JavaScript, iframes, etc.
3. Hosts file won't block let you control cookies
4. Hosts file won't hide inline ads, text ads, and first-party ads
5. Hosts file won't let you block based on URL matching
6. Hosts file won't let you apply cosmetic filters to hide ad leftovers
7. Hosts file won't protect you from malicious first-party attack sites
8. Hosts file won't protect you from stuff like local-net iframes or websocket attacks
9. Hosts file will barely block a tiny fraction of the ads on the internet

Maybe YOU should learn the basics about the technology you are suggesting is supposed to be a “replacement” to a real ad/script blocker

>>58063308
hosts file is a superior way of black listing a website.
It dose not enslave you to some big corporation and its app that can change from moment to moment.

It works across browsers and even other applications since it is a system wide fire wall.

All you need to do is to copy the sames of all of these domains into the hosts file to have forever a system wide ban without all the fun of.
>Hey we are ABP/utorrent/NoScript
>our new version will do bullshit X from now on!
>Try to move all your stings to a different NoScript alternative fagot!

>>58057921
>not using all 3
Am I doing it wrong?

>>58063378
>It dose not enslave you to some big corporation and its app that can change from moment to moment.
Nice meme. I use free software like privoxy. I don't give a shit about your corporation “app” bogeyman argument.

>It works across browsers and even other applications since it is a system wide fire wall.
So does privoxy, since it's essentially just a HTTP proxy.

>All you need to do is to copy the sames of all of these domains into the hosts file to have forever a system wide ban without all the fun of.
Yes, and miss out on blocking 90% of the malware and ads on the internet. Good job.

I hope all of you realize that ABP/NoScript and all the shit is nothing more then a web tracker that you yourself install on your computer and it sends all the websites you visited to its database.

>>58063378
black listing a website, sure. but that's not at all what this thread is about. what are you gonna do about first party scripts?

>>58063378
>hosts file is a superior way of black listing a website.
If it doesn't support ABP filter syntax and let you use upstream EasyList etc., it's a worthless joke as far as blocking ads goes.

Privoxy does, does your stupid hosts file?

>>58063406
>blocking ads
This is a whole different discussion.
A discussion that you don't want to have.

So lets go back to blocking tracking.

The irony is noscript is that the more time you have to spend whitelisting stuff on a website, the less time you should spend on that website.

File: second.jpg (10KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 259x194px

>>58058015

>>58063436
but hosts files only block third party trackers, most of the tracking is done on the same domain you visit nowdays. the information is shared with other trackers on the server side.

>>58063436
>A discussion that I don't want to have.
ftfy

>>58063474
And there is absolutely nothing you can do about it.
The original server knows your IP and it can in principle even now start contacting uber w big brother sand shout to him
>HEY I'm pornking.com
>IP 1.1.1.1 contacted me and requested
>pornking.com/porn/necro-sex.html

And before you say
>b-b-b-b-b-b muh VPN
Your VPN is 99.999999% together in bead with these people and even updates in real time these requests sending your real IP so that they know who actually requested it.

>>58063566
but having just an IP is much less reliable than having your canvas fingerprint, list of addons, screen size, load times, timezone, mouse activity and all other information you have access to with scripts.

>>58063615
Its tracking and I will go back to your points in a second.

However however you twist it its constant tracking you can not shut off.
And you have no way of knowing if its going on, its the perfect solution.

>>58063566
>And there is absolutely nothing you can do about it.
hurrrrrrr headers hurrrrrr IP

learn what client fingerprinting is and come back

>>58063436
>So lets go back to blocking tracking.
Oh yes, because the only reason people use NoScript etc. is to block tracking, rather than removing crapware, exploits, ads, and other shit you don't want

>>58063646
I bet big brother loves to leave this soft tracking of cookies and all the bullshit so saps like you can spend years trying to patch their browser and block all the cookies.

Since in the end the hard tracking is what really is important and all you do is pointless.

>>58063733
>I got anally annihilated with facts and I'm to but hurt to admit it.
the post.

No explain to me professor INTERNET how you can block a server from contacting secretly another server.
Pro tip you simply can not.

>>58063781
>""""""""facts""""""""
See >>58063615

>>58063293
TBF senpai this is more that most normies are shit at doing things, they're just more likely to have internet-capable things now.

>>58063788
This is starting to get sad.
You need to be really desperate at this point
FACT!
Any server can contact every other server on the Internet!
FACT!
Other servers don't know it!

Try to refute these FACTS.
This is hard tracking, the thing you can not install crap ware to get rid of.

And all the
>b-b-b-b-b its less convenient
>b-b-b-b-b it dose not show how much of a parkinson I have with my muse movement.

Are relevant, they know your IP and knowing the time can track it back to your real IP and real name and identity.

>>58063867
>boohoo they're putting your IP in a database
and this helps them bypass VPNs, deanonymize tor users, install malware on your PC, spy on your other browsing habits and link your devices together how?

>>58063293
>IRC
Can you give me any tips on getting into the IRC piracy?
Honest question.

>>58063924
>bypass VPNs
I see you have no reading comprehension, another brainwashed child who slurps up all the propaganda the lifehacker websites are giving.

I quote myself:
>>58063566
>And before you say
>>b-b-b-b-b-b muh VPN
>Your VPN is 99.999999% together in bead with these people and even updates in real time these requests sending your real IP so that they know who actually requested

>>58063925
>sunxdcc.com
>search for what you want
>join listed server
>message listed bot

File: index.png (12KB, 244x206px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 244x206px

>>58063974
Thanks have 10 internets.

>>58063971
Nice ”b-but muh ebil global conspiracy” tinfoil theory you have going on there, anon

>ctrl+f
>kids
>6 results

Mozilla children detected

>>58057908
>hours upon hours
only if you took the short bus to school

File: 200.png (357KB, 630x458px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 630x458px

>>58064008
>muh ebil global conspiracy
You realize that this is beyond self parody?
You are the paranoid one using plug-ins to deactivate cookies and other tracking.
And I'm the paranoid one?

Did it even occurred to you that the same people you are deactivating cookies from are the same people who would be interested in getting you IP and they can get it with hard tracking?

You are officially a walking self contradiction.

File: 300'.png (365KB, 630x458px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 630x458px

>>58064008
>>58064205
Remember hidemyass (the VPN) giving the logs for its users and busting some hackers?

Good times good times.

>>58064205
>You are the paranoid one using plug-ins to deactivate cookies and other tracking.
I see you're just uninformed. Go watch some DEFCON, CCC etc. talks about how e.g. tor users were deanonymized in the real world.

The FBI injected malicious scripts into sites like the hidden wiki to deanonymize users (via a combination of local router attacks, client fingerprinting / side channel leaks acessible via JavaShit, and these days also WebRTC and STUN etc.)

>>58064205
are you seriously this stupid or are you just pretending? In the age of public Wi-Fi and mobile connections IP means absolutely nothing, especially when all browsers have scripts enabled by default.
Why would anyone bother with such a complicated conspiracy network of sharing their users IP-addresses, when it wouldn't benefit them in any way?

>>58064254
>hidemyass
Using hidemyass as proof that VPNs are in bed with the government is like using Dateline NBC as proof that all children on the internet are cops

>>58064284
>In the age of public Wi-Fi
Remember to smile into the camera that is installed next to your public Wi-Fi point.

They know you where in this location, they have cameras there, your cell phone is sending signals that geo locate you with your public identity.

You know we need to have a base scenario tell me how exactly you stay anonymous on the Internet because before it was
>I install this plug-in so I'm 100% anonymous!

>>58064372
>I install this plug-in so I'm 100% anonymous!
Who are you quoting?

>>58064284
>when it wouldn't benefit them in any way?
Seriously now?
>Why would anyone bother with such a complicated conspiracy network
Why would anyone bother with such a complicated conspiracy of cookie tracking?
Like why?

You can answer this yourself.
You are a walking self contradiction.

>>58064433
>Why would anyone bother with such a complicated conspiracy of cookie tracking?
You're aware that tracking cookies are the 99.9% dominant method of tracking browsing habits that's ACTUALLY USED IN PRACTICE, right?

>>58064429
Its a generalization of the attitudes displayed ITT where people think NoScript solves all of their problems.

Now this anon/anons is trying to back paddle since he realized how absurd his position is.

>>58064451
>Its a generalization of the attitudes displayed ITT where people think NoScript solves all of their problems.
In other words, it's a baseless straw man argument based on a mythical “noscript is magic” antagonist that you conjured out of thin air

>>58064441
Based on the statistic pulled out of your ass?
Or the statistics spoon fed to you by lifehacker?

If you are not in the know you have no way of even estimating what the statistics are.
Maybe you need another snowmen to tell you
>ZOMG facebook and the government are in bead together.

>>58064479
>>58064433
But you can literally view the source of any script run on your computer. The websites who sell these analytics are also very open about their methods, which includes cookie and canvas fingerprint tracking. it's very much a reality.
I have seen zero proof of this IP sharing network you are describing. It would also be very inefficient due to the massive amount of false positives.

>>58064254
>Remember hidemyass (the VPN) giving the logs for its users and busting some hackers?
>hidemyass
>company based in the fucking UK, land of CCTV and GCHQ
>no warrant canary
>website OPENLY CLAIMS to follow all local laws and log connection details etc.

Yes, what a fantastic proof of VPN providers being in bed with the evil global conspiracies. Next time go cherry-pick an example of a VPN that actually has a good review on sites like https://thatoneprivacysite.net/vpn-comparison-chart/

>>58064459
>based on a mythical
I can quote posts if you like.

They are unsubstantial nonsense that parodies itself.
Non here have told what their whole system for eliminating tracking is.

All they talk is NoScript, until these person/people actually tell how their whole system looks so we have anything to talk about other then NoScript in itself, there is nothing.

It would be a sin not to show how retarded people are if they are not posting their WHOLE system of countering tracking. If they talk only about NoScript then
>noscript is magic
Is a even a more subsistence position then the absolute nothing they have.

So will someone post their WHOLE counter tracking system or do I need to ridicule the anons who only talk about NoScript?

>>58064526
>I have seen zero proof of this IP sharing network
There is a lot of things you don't know about yet they are real.
This only proves the state of your knowledge.

>>58064479
first google result
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookie#Tracking
>Corporations exploit users' web habits by tracking cookies to collect information about buying habits. The Wall Street Journal found that America's top fifty websites installed an average of sixty-four pieces of tracking technology onto computers resulting in a total of 3,180 tracking files.[25] The data can then be collected and sold to bidding corporations.

>>58064536
>I can quote posts if you like.
then fucking do it instead of boxing with shadows you fucking smug piece of shit

File: a.jpg (75KB, 648x365px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 648x365px

>>58064563
Damn, Alex! I didn't know you browsed 4chan. How's the wife doing?

>>58064534
>hidemyass is not a VPN because I don't like them

They are a VPN and they did fork over.
Here is the secret every VPN will do it or is doing it.
If it comes to getting your ass busted or their CEO getting into prison you are going to get sacrificed.

And in what land dose your VPN provider need to be located?
USA? The land of big brother and ignoring the laws? The land of the NSA?

File: How did you know it was me.jpg (99KB, 932x1024px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 932x1024px

>>58064581

>>58064621
>all VPNs are automatically bad because this one example of a bad VPN exists
What fantastic logic you've demonstrated there

>>58064621
Try a first world country. I'd suggest one from Northern Europe.

>>58064621
>And in what land dose your VPN provider need to be located?
>USA? The land of big brother and ignoring the laws? The land of the NSA
This might come as a surprise to americans but there are more than two countries in the world

Maybe you should click on that link I gave you

>>58064647
Good joke. Scandinavia being good for privacy is an utter meme. People buying VPNs just because they're in sweden or whatever (like ovpn/ipredator/mullvad/etc) are absolute idiots

File: MTQxNDkyMjM0OTA1MjAwMzc5.jpg (14KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x300px

>>58064581
>How's the wife doing?
Good, she recently visited Julian Assange since he can not levee the embassy she gave him some gift baskets with food.
We are planing to visit Snowden who was chased around the world and almost got busted for telling how the USA is actively and illegally tracking everyone.

Seriously at this point you need to be delusional not knowing how deadly whistleblowing can be.

File: Fourteen_eyes.png (91KB, 2753x1400px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 2753x1400px

>>58064647
>northern europe
try again

VPNs aren't optional these days unless you're a cuck who likes invasion of your privacy.

Just don't use PIA, CyberGhost, NordVPN.

>>58064664
It certainly is better than any alternative. There your information is protected by law, instead of companies right to have your information.

>>58064683
>what is Finland

File: kim-dotcom-controversial-hacker-businessman-singer-now-politician.jpg (468KB, 1200x878px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1200x878px

>>58064638
Its only logic based on human behavior.
Rich CEO has a lot to lose.
So he will sell you out every time.
And remember kids everyone in NATO is under the US empire.
Also Kim DotCom proves that USA can ares people even not on its territory.

>>58064709
>It certainly is better than any alternative
what is Seychelles, Hong Kong, Moldova, Panama, Romania, Cyprus, Malaysia, Belize, Singapore, Mauritius, Slovakia, Malta, Morocco; do I honestly need to go on?

>>58064653
>Maybe you should click on that link I gave you
I did non of them look good.
Who do you recommend?

>>58064749
then say "finland" and not "northern europe" if the only place in northern europe where you can actually host a respectable VPN is finland

>>58064798
None are perfect. Personally I used OVPN.se for a while, but I got annoyed by by the growing popularity of it. In general, I suggest not putting all your eggs into the same basket.

If you actually need to protect yourself against attacks of any sophistication, the most important thing is not technology but good opsec. You can be using the best privacy software and bug-free hardware in the world if you use it to log in to facebook.

The common pattern in every single example of tor etc. users getting busted is them doing stupid shit that deanonymized them (like using tor to send a bomb thread to your school while logged into the school network)

For everything else, your only requirement is to fly under the radar of those looking for low-hanging fruit. As long as your VPN provider is in the same country, you'd have to be in some serious shit for them to go after you to the level where they'd send an international investigation on your ass. And either way, your primary antagonist is not law enforcement, but corporate/website/whatever. tracking. While VPN providers might release IP logs to the FBI under enough pressure, they sure as hell won't randomly give them to websites that ask.

A dynamic IP is only a tiny part of the equation, and a VPN in no way replaces good client-side security and (again!) good opsec. True anonymity is impossible, there is only the ability to look like you're not worth somebody's time.

File: index.jpg (10KB, 196x257px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 196x257px

>>58064703
>VPNs aren't optional these days
You really need to learn to think.
Not to believe everything your crappy lifehacker websites tell you like its the word of god.

Want to bet that 20 years from now a new Snowden will tel all you saps that VPN are nothing more then a honey-pot made for the NAS?
Something about them screams
>I want to get on a government watch list
>Look at me NSA I have things to hide!

Remember that every time you connect to a VPN you are actually logging in with a account. A account that quite possibly you bought with your real life credit card that is connected to your real id.

Once again post your whole security model without the bullshit that can literally be summarized
>VPNs are magic

You are all silly thinning people are not keeping tabs on you, you are like children who think
>I payed for a VPN I'm teh hacker!
>I deactivated cookies I'm teh hacker!

You know not seeing that advertisement for this maximus ass dido if you visit amazon dose not mean you are not tracked.

>>58064960
>lifehacker
You keep using this word. What is it supposed to mean? Are you projecting?

>>58064960
>A account that quite possibly you bought with your real life credit card that is connected to your real id.
If you are actually this retarded you deserve everything you get

>>58064988
>>58064960
Cleverbridge, retards.

>>58064924
>can be using the best privacy software and bug-free hardware in the world if you use it to log in to facebook.

This is actually true.

However depends who you are and what you are doing.
Most people would be bummed out if they know I'm watching granny scat porn or shitposting on a chine's cartoon forum.

However these are not things the USA gov is interested in.
However I have no delusions and know that they are actively collecting what gray scat videos I watched.

Everything you do on the Internet is to be always assumed to be recorded.
Everyone who is not retarded knows to separate their identities, so you have
>Scat MAN
The gray scat watching 4chan shit poster
And
>Jo Shmo
The boring dude from work.

If you don't want to have ads or recommendations for anal dildos if you are browsing the web next to your mother use a VM.

You create a VM for your Scat-MAN personality and never mix it with your muggle accounts.

It dose not matter if you get cookies form bestassdildos.com or maxgranyporn.com if they are on the Scat-MAN VM you can erase the VM if you don't like it and start over.

No mixing of identities.

So I'm really puzzled by the paranoid idiots who think I'm paranoid and they are wasting their life on NoScript and clicking on disallowed shit.
When its fucken pointless if you can have multiple personalities inside with a VM.

From who are you hiding?
The GOV? Forget it they have you logged.
The advertisers from bestdildos.com? Use a VM you idiot!

>>58064975
Yet 99% of "tech experts" parrot everything they get in their magazines like its the truth.

>>58057992
You don't. Blockers like noscript and umatrix are for autists such as myself. A lot of the times the webpages with a shitton of scripts from many many places are 'news' sites so instead of fucking with umatrix I'll just use archive.is.

>>58065153
Wouldn't that be pointless if you're using the same IP?

>>58064988
>If you are actually this retarded you deserve everything you get
Care to share you WHOLE security system?

I'm asking this over and over and over yet non of you respond to it.
Detail every step you took.
Otherwise I have to amuse you did mistakes and are unaware of them.

>>58062795
>the shills will tell you that it is legit better
>the game of who to trust never ends
true and it shits up the place hard. and coming from a just past normie level of tech literacy tho i can say both will do the job with some work,if you arent a tard of course, but neither of them are the end all be all of browser add ons for security

>>58065153
>So I'm really puzzled by the paranoid idiots who think I'm paranoid and they are wasting their life on NoScript and clicking on disallowed shit.
You say this like installing a browser addon takes more than 10 seconds

Sure wasted my life on something that makes the web more bearable to use

>>58065183
[citation needed]

>>58065203
Bought bitcoins, passed them through multiple coin tumbling services and used a tails laptop in a public wifi hotspot to connect to the bitcoin network for the final payment step

>>58065203
There's a difference between minor flaws in opsec and being an absolute total fucking retard

>>58065196
True.
This is why I don't use the same IP.

On the other hand.
What is my goal?
Hiding from the USA GOV?
Or from ads of bestdildo.com?

If I don't want to have porn in my history when my family tries to look on my screen its perfect, even if I used the same IP.

Besides this is the counter to the
>teh IP is irelevant!
>cokies
>Screan resolutions!
>Font tracking!

Idiots, they are idiots for using NoScript if a simple VM who will have a different screen and stock fonts from your fav distro so no fingerprinting.
And its less trouble, and more convenient to use.

you really need to think
>From who am I hiding?

>>58065153
>>58065297
>goes to the effort of setting up, maintaining, booting a fucking vm
>calls out people who use a browser addon for wasting their t ime

>>58065243
If series, you're either a terrorist, right-wing extremist, child molester/pedophile, paranoid drug buyer/seller, into real rape/snuff videos, already wanted by authorities/criminal.

I personally don't use a VPN because it's 100% way of showing anyone that you have something to hide or because what you're doing while connected to a VPN is criminal and not tolerated by authorities.

One of my friends uses a VPN I found out when I seen the little icon in the tray, now I can't look at him the same because I don't know what he is hiding but the fact that I know he is means I'm suspicious of him.

Also what >>58064960 said has some valid points.

>>58065297
Cant ad companies track users based on their IP though? Or at least shady ad companies?

>>58065243
Thank you for your explanation.

First question from who are you hiding?
The GOV? Or some on line advertisers? maybe trying to hide your on-line activity from the family?

>public wifi hotspot
Where is it?
McDonalds? The park?
They have cameras there.

Do you have your cell phone with you if you are doing it?

You only posted how you pay for something.
Is it the VPN?
How do you access the web in your secure model?
This is more interesting.

Since if (this is a IF you did not explain it!) you then go and access the VPN at home with your home ISP then the VPN has the IP of your ISP who knows your real ID.

And from who are you hiding?
The USA GOV? Or on-line adds for scat porno?

>>58065342
In practice the only person snooping in on your connections is your ISP. They're literally the man in the middle. Go watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj3PN5-n108

And personally, I'd a billion times rather my ISP know that I'm using a VPN than having my ISP know every single detail of my life. Anyway, the biggest reason I use a VPN is so I can torrent shit without giving a fuck.

My adversary here is not some mythical NSA tracking conspiracy but very real patent trolls who harvest IPs from the swarm. If all they're seeing is “VPN in seychelles” they're not going to do fuck-all about it because they don't have the resources or the connections.

>>58065329
This level of retarded.
Using a VM is like starting a web browser.
I did say your security is:
1) Weak
A VM is better, stronger
2) Wast of time
You need to click on what cookies to allowanced all the bullshit.
While I:
>Start Scat-MAN VM
>Get sick deviant scat porn

They can plant all the cookies they like on the VM it has nothing of my real identity.
While you are dicking around with allowed cookies and not, wasting time you can spend on fapping to scat.

Now re read your post and see hoe 100% my viewpoint is consistent and can be summarized in:
>calls out people who use a browser addon for wasting their t ime

>>58065451
Ar ye ready for black sails lad in jan?

>>58065476
>Using a VM is like starting a web browser.
good joke

>>58065342
Thank you sir, you are a voice of reason.

>>58065451
>In practice the only person snooping in on your connections is your ISP
True.
This is why I did say that
>Everything on the internee is recorded

And no plug-in or VPN or other bullshit will change it.
Somewhere, someone is recording you.

>>58063293
>millennials

So you were born before 1983 then?

>>58057908
>see site I trust not working
>right click
> "noscript >"
>allow scripts from ...
>never worry about this site again

maybe Im just numb to it now, since Ive been using it for alot of years.. buts its really not a problem.

>>58057992
cloudfront is usally needed,

facebood
amazon (((ADSYSTEM)))) is NOT
_FUCK_ doubleclick
why would you ever allow something called "slick deal"
I see quantserve all the time, cant remember if they are a legit content delivery service or ad bullshits..
just use your brain and youll figure out the pattern.

Most sites with videos have two urls that need enabled, like porn hub has pornhub.com and prnhb.com or some shit. The second one is for the actual videos, the first is for the site to load up and make a call to the video url.
Amazon has amazon.com, then amazon-static-images, and a third one, ebay has a couple too, its usally similar to the original name.

>>58062210
also this.

and once you use noscript long enough, the more youll see webfags going "hurr sites are expensive to run" as retards that are just incompetent.
>dont rice the fuck out of your site
>you wont have a huge as fuck bill

>>58066713
you can enable cloudfront and google ajax on umatrix then install decentraleyess which stores those scripts locally so you're free from the cdn botnet as well

>>58062321
youll only get infected temporarily that way ;)

>>58066813
crazy.. I dont know what the fuck you just said.. but I think I like it.

>>58066713
phcdn.com

File: 1481166372129.png (51KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 657x527px

>>58066881
>neo-/g/

>>58057992
>slickdealscdn.com
enable

if it still doesn't work, enable that cloudfront domain

done

>>58066996
I didn't know wtf umatrix and decentraleyess was you fucking faggot. Im still in 2006

>>58066963
close enough

>>58067166
being new is okay, just go learn some shit. its best not to speak if you dont know anything unless you are asking a question, but if its basic bitch shit then you need to use the internet to find out bc this is not a tech support forum
start here
http://www.ghacks.net/2015/11/23/decentraleyes-for-firefox-loads-cdn-resources-locally/

>>58067240
You need to calm your shit. I didnt ask anything. Youre the one that came in here talking shit.

overall? yeah. at once? no

I'm just used to allowing a bunch of shit every time I go to a new site now pretty much

who knows how much good it actually does me with all that I allow through. on the other hand, without it I wouldn't be blocking any of that stuff, so it must help somewhat

File: sike.jpg (45KB, 448x346px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 448x346px

>>58067327
>I didnt ask anything.
>I didn't know wtf umatrix and decentraleyess was you fucking faggot. Im still in 2006
>crazy.. I dont know what the fuck you just said.. but I think I like it.
its like you believe we want to hear your non-contributing contributions

>>58067405
you browse /g/.. you obviously do.

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-18 at 5.21.29 PM.jpg (69KB, 312x458px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 312x458px

>>58067444
>you browse /g/.. you obviously do.
you got me

>>58067493
thanks for the link btw, Ill read it later.

>>58067527
np. check out
http://www.ghacks.net/overview-firefox-aboutconfig-security-privacy-preferences/
if you use firefox its a good crash course to get somewhat up to speed/entry level shit. i dont do more then that bc i dont understand much past that point.

and for fun/understand some recent history see steve raumbam

for a laymen explanation of what is at the very least readily available for the type of tracking that is done on internet users
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaYn_PkrfvQ