/falg/ - Friendly Arch Linux General

>>57616398
damaged.

File: hq1.jpg (64KB, 1200x600px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1200x600px

>>57616398
Also:
1, Do you use any kind of Arch installers?
Why (not)?

2, If yes, which one is your favourite (and why)?

>>57616413
>damaged.

Why?

File: dgrz434.png (409KB, 735x431px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 735x431px

>>57607653
>Use antergos instead of Manjaro.

this
I tried Manjaro and it was a disaster: slow, bloated and outdated.

Manjaro is a mess. Manjaro is a WASTE.

>>57616509
Manjaro needs to be shot, hanged, drawn and quartered. They took everything that's great about arch and buttfucked it with a king Kong dildo.

File: sfsr43.jpg (85KB, 1800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1800x1000px

>>57616670
We will build a great distro and we will make Manjaro pay for that distro.
Mark my words.

>>57616509
You can describe it as "stable" and boring. The AUR is the same anyway.
>>57616670
Not an argument.

>>57616811
>You can describe it as "stable" and boring.

I can only talk about my experiences.
Manjaro was slow and buggy on my machine, while Antergos, for example, worked flawlessly.

Also Manjaro couldn't even handle simple installing procedures.
It broke many times.

>>57616753
>posting about a new /g/ project with a trump image, and talking about trump's wall
Is this the new form of shitposting?

>>57617029
They have their own repo. They promised to release security updates instantly, but i think they are still on the "waterfall" model no matter how important is the update. The installer works well for me.

>>57617095
So basically if Antergos is the Ubuntu of Arch, then Manjaro is its Linux Mint?

>>57617307
Close enough.

>>57616436
arch anywhere,
works mostly fine.
if you want to install LVM + LUKS you somehow need 5-6 tries until it werks.

Architect

Always and forever

File: harley-quinn-margot-robbie.jpg (52KB, 650x403px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 650x403px

>>57617360
>arch anywhere,
>>57617375
>Architect

Which one is better for beginners?

>>57616398
At what point is my system broken?
In the year I've been using Arch I haven't had to chroot to fix anything.
Though SDDM recently stopped working for some reason.

>>57617428
I never tried Arch anywhere, but if you did a minimal install on Debian f.ex., then the Architect installer should feel very similar.

File: 1468321035460.jpg (519KB, 2170x1070px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 2170x1070px

>>57617428
If you are a beginner you should take an afternoon and install manually. You will end up learning a lot about your system. I use pic related as a rough guide whenever I need a new install for whatever reason.

Is this the most cuck distro there is?

>>57617646
Define "cuck".

>>57617496
How about Manjaro?

Arch's gonna freak!

Just one time. And SURPRISE! It was an nvidia driver issue. Debian, Fedora, and all other distros packaging official nvidia driver was affected.

File: rghdaw.gif (2MB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x400px

>>57618826
>Arch's gonna freak!

I kek'd.

>>57619169
Fuck Nvidia.

Funny thing is, my laptop is so shitty that I've never encountered any graphic card related problems with it.
Sometimes the less is more.