What went wrong?

>>57382635
>the model for all OS'es that came after

nothing

>>57382635
they started mimicking mobile tracking and including advertising directly in the OS

>>57382645
Topkek, how was your 18th birthday?

>>57382635
memes aside
window 95 was a mix of 32bit and 16bit code and a messy one at that which lead to frequent crashes

>>57382716
Windows 95 wasn't an OS at all

>>57382727
it was a DOS shell

>>57382727
>>57382743
what does the OS in DOS stand for, hmm?

>>57382779
It stands for shut the fuck up.
DOS is an OS, WIndows 95 is a shell.

>>57382779
I was talking exclusively about Windows, not DOS.

>>57382795
lost

>>57382795
kek

>>57382645
>literary one of the youngest operating systems
>one of the last ones to get a actual GUI
>model for all others
wut

>>57382831
you see any modern OS that look like fucking amiga, os2 or next? no. They all look like windows 95

>>57382674
I think that Ubuntu just barely beat them to it.

>>57382854
they all look like mac os
including 95 itself

>>57382854
Yes, macOS and Loonix DE's look exactly like those old OS's with their menu bars and window controls.
Only Windows looks like Windows.

You are also shallow for only considering at looks.

>>57382868
yeah the Amazon shit was pretty shady, but they're not downloading Candy Crush Saga with your system updates

>>57382882
>Windows looks like any other OS that came decades before it only with a taskbar*

FTFY

>>57382893
>implying the "taskbar" was an Windows thing
Kek, it's scary how clueless /g/ sometimes is

>>57382883
Most likely only because Canonical didn't get paid for it.

>>57382908
true

>>57382904
Taskbar was the thing Windows at least popularized.
Source: DEs before and after Windows 95.

>>57383190
>popularized
Unless you where a office drone you knew exactly how to make anything to your liking before Windows became popular and forced everything on people
Tasking is not a Windows invention, keep dreaming

>>57383209
>Tasking
taskbar*
autocorrect

>>57383209
You'd better show what exactly DE had taskbar the first. Swearing at anons isn't nice behavior.

>>57383281
>Swearing at anons isn't nice behavior.
wat, triggered much?

>>57383281
>You'd better show what exactly DE had taskbar the first.
There where several simple add ons for loads of systems.
Also stop calling them DEs, they weren't like todays Linux DEs.

>>57383281
Apple's Lisa had a taskbar way before Windows did.
Apple Lisa was released in 1983:
https://youtu.be/JcOifOFZgE0

>>57383281
NeXTSTEP opened dynamic icons in its dock for every new program opened
MacOS had an program to make the task switcher a window that you could snap to the corner of the screen
Workbench had programs that had a dock or just a window with active windows listed and clicking to bright them to front
UNIX workstations had DE addons that displayed a list of running programs you could switch, that's not a new thing

mostly at the time there where far better alternatives for a taskbar because of the way you used the system

>>57383353
>>57383415
>had an program
>had programs
>had DE addons
woah it's fucking nothing
Windows 95 was the first shell to make this behavior default and available from the first start.

>>57383631
But nobody asked for it, people know how to customize their desktop for their liking, Windows just picked one way and forced it.

File: IMG_0851.jpg (68KB, 497x850px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 497x850px

>>57383648
>people know how to use computers

>>57383893
Yes, son, back in the late 80's people who used computers actually knew how to use them.
Unless you where a office drone, the exact audience Windows targeted.

>>57382635
Windows 8, then 8.1 and then 10.

>>57384638
8.1 was OK
10 is perfect 7 replacement

Unless you're a stupid illiterate and don't know how to utilize it

>>57384667
hahah, lol >>57383329

>2016
>still apologizing for windows 95

>>57384696
>unironically using Edge
>unironically even having Edge on your system
Not my fault.

>>57384696
>Unless you're a stupid illiterate and don't know how to utilize it

File: 1475178858996.png (1MB, 2098x1311px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2098x1311px

>>57384733
>>57384751
nice try pajeet, but no. your piece of shit is broken from the very first screen that you se when you boot your pc.

>>57384774
Works on my machine, please fuck off if you're too stupid, this isn't a place for tech illiterate people.

>>57384774
>aero
welp

>>57384802
You can be sure as hell the botnet part of it works flawlessly.

>>57384830
The guest OS is the problem. The host does not have anything to do with what's inside the VM.

>>57382635
>Pajeets

>>57384846
Sure thing, Microsoft is going bankrupt because all the big corporations using LTSB are sueing them for the botnet in it.

Oh wait, it's not.

>>57384027

you Linuxfags are more concerned with being autistically "correct" than actually doing any real analysis of the world, which is exactly why the year of the Linux desktop is postponed indefinitely

>>57385023
Not into Linux.
Also Linux didn't exist back then.

>>57382635
Steve Ballmer happened.

>>57382675
u mad Bro?

>>57385175
>topkek
>mad
not him, but stale memes from ages ago are the only mad thing in this thread

>>57385138
You didn't like motherfucking awesome REVERSI?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sforhbLiwLA

>>57382635
What ever went right? Microsoft has been nothing but faggotry and cancer since day one.

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oq9d2CADas

>>57385253
DEVELOPERSOROPRESO

>>57384986
That's LTSB 2016 x86 in the screenshot.

>>57385253
How could Steve Jobs compete!?

>>57385307
>meanwhile in the adult world
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SIgYp3XTMk

>>57385482
>10 years later
>meanwhile

>>57385482
>meanwhile
>delusions

>>57385347
>LTSB 2016 x86
>2016
>x86

>>>/out/

>>57385347
not him, but ltsb with that login screen?
are you using some pirated crapversion?

>>57385536
>2016
Same issue is present on 2015 as well.

>>57385536
>x86
It's a VM. I don't need it to have more than 2GB of RAM. And everything else that an x64 OS can offer is not going to be of any use anyway.

>>57385598
No, it's the official iso file. That's the default logon screen picture.

>>57385627
>No, it's the official iso file.
sure thing, ltsb does not have the blue window background while logging in
I bet it's some merged iso file with other updates

>>57385627
Is that legit version? I wanna install ltsb n edition but not sure how to activate it,

>>57385499
What? Those 2 videos cover the ads made during roughly the same exact time period.

>>57385611
>Same issue is present on 2015 as well.
Not on my machine, if you're too stupid and pick shitty builds it's not my fault.

>>57385666
Oh well, there was just iMac as as a thumbnail.

>>57385662
the editions you install on many machines are usually preactivated
I made a copy of an official disc my relative got from work

File: Untitled.png (262KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 1600x900px

>>57385654
You truly are retarded.

>>57385662
Yes. Don't use the N version, it lacks codecs and the only difference is the WMP. Every piece of crap is still in there. Use Microsoft Toolkit for activation: https://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/28669-Microsoft-Toolkit-Official-KMS-Solution-for-Microsoft-Products

>>57385737
>preactivated
Lo no.

>>57385761
>You truly are retarded.
>torrent
thanks for confirming my thoughts, keep being a clueless faggot

>>57385768
noice, I like how you have to mess with ltsb at work every day
oh wait, you don't you just torrent

>>57385779
Those are from MSDN idiot, the torrent files are made by me and uploaded.

>>57385761
But it also lacks store, apps, cortana and other ms bullshit

>>57385803
Keep acting like a retard.. You truly are proving me wrong.

>>57382635
Ads in the start menu and pushing that cortana whore with notifications.

>>57385805
Sure thing fella, whatever helps you sleep at night

>>57385819
Normal LTSB lacks those too

File: 1468440780273.png (19KB, 361x331px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 361x331px

>>57385819
Yes those are not present anymore. However, telemetry is still there and can't be disabled completely via GPedit (text attatched). Also Cortana is still there, just disabled.

>>57385831
Hurts that much?

>>57385825
>You truly are proving me wrong.
Don't need to, people who know this shit already laugh at you

>>57385893
Yes, those who have a clue and know how to check a hash surely think you showed me.

File: image.jpg (481KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1600x1200px

What went wrong?

>>57385962
Who are they all?

>>57385962
2000-tan does funny things to my peepee