I'll start with pic related. Also umatrix
might as well post it right off the bat
>>57162530
ur mum
>>57162585
Fpbp
>>57162530
Fuck off, retard. NoScript's a godsend.
Ubuntu
>>57162608
A godsend if you want to spend 10 minutes clicking "allow" until ebay or amazon work, yes.
>>57162608
Why, so I have to keep making exceptions for every page I visit?
>>57162608
Why? Node.js is pretty widely used and noscript blocks it.
>>57162530
This. Why not just use uBlock origin and HTTPS Everywhere/Privacy Badger from the Electronic Frontier Foundation?
>>57162625
>>57162623
The bad thing isn't that you have to spend time allowing certain scripts to get a page to work right, it's that there's even scripts that are required at all.
>>57162623
>10 minutes
you do it once, anon, are you a literal retard?
>>57162623
After using it for a few days all of your sites are configured. You don't need to reenable scripts every time you visit the same site, you fucking moron.
>>57162642
Makes low end machines usable, blocks tracking scripts like Facebook and Google analytics, etc.
>>57162653
yes, every website should just be a static .html page with "under construction" gifs like in the old days.
>>57162643
I don't know much about Iridium, but presumably because the performance will be much better due to it being compiled rather than interpreted like JavaScript.
>>57162653
>Poor people on welfare
>"WHY GIVE THEM WELFARE? POVERTY SHOULDN'T EVEN EXIST!!"
>Thirsty
>"WHY DRINK WATER, THE BODY SHOULDN'T NEED TO NEED H2O!"
>Tired
>"DON'T SLEEP YOU FAGGOT, THE BODY SHOULDN'T NEED TO SLEEP!"
>>57162666
>After using it for a few days all of your sites are configured.
But I like to visit new sites?
>>57162687
But that's wrong. Scripts are the fault, script blockers are the solution.
>>57162530
Mr Robot, this is FBI
>>57162585
The only true thing ITT.
I guess you could include anime-modded programs too (ie. WinRAR with all the icons changed to anime girls, there are people that actually do shit like this)
I've never really understood how anime and autism go so well together, but it really is a beautiful thing
>>57162715
The deprivation of drinking water does not make water needless.
>>57162715
>Scripts are the fault
How did the evil evil scripts hurt you, anon?
>>57162666
But low end machines can benefit from its anonymous functions. It helps with threading.
>>57162701
So do I. After the first time you visit a new site you're set for every time you visit it afterwards. If you're too lazy to find the proper scripts you can always just click temporarily allow all this page.
>>57162732
>But low end machines can benefit from its anonymous functions
What? I never said they wouldn't.
>>57162681
Aren't we at the point where our hardware can compensate for extensions taking web performance down a couple percent?
>>57162744
So why should I run noscript than. Also have you tried using react instead of noscript? It's pretty effective at preventing JavaScript from running.
>>57162744
>If you're too lazy to find the proper scripts you can always just click temporarily allow all this page.
Or I could just not use it at all, because "muh evil scriptz" is a boogeyman paraded around by 'tards who call everything a "botnet".
>>57162782
>So why should I run noscript than
See >>57162666
>Also have you tried using react instead of noscript?
I've never really used either
>>57162796
Hey man, it's totally your choice to be a fucking retard. No one's stopping you.
When did /g/ get so shitty that it started actually DEFENDING JavaScript?
>>57162815
Feel free to tell me how showing up in google analytics has a negative impact on my life.
computers
>>57162831
This. Real men use macs
>>57162823
Feel free to tell me why it's okay for a site to have 100 scripts running just to load some text and a few images.
>>57162821
When the people arguing against it have no idea what basic frameworks like react are. JavaScript has a ton of problems but the people who rail hardest have no understanding of how technology works
>>57162839
You don't have to visit the site if you don't want it, breh.
Also: Because they can. And modern, fast browsers like chrome have no problem processing all those harmless scripts.
>>57162839
Because web 3.0 you fucking luddite.
>>57162865
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
>>57162865
>>57162876
I'm now thoroughly convinced that this is a troll thread.
>>>/b/
>>57162887
Yes, so be less of a cheating scumbag and stop visiting gawker and buzzfeed altogether
>allowing bloated third-party javascript from potentially compromised or otherwise malicious domains to execute
nah man
>>57162750
Of course we are, I was just trying to come up with a reason why you would possibly use it.
>>57162585
I'm using this for a web server. Am I autistic?
hey op got some js i want you to test
>>57162530
Request Policy
I've used that + NoScript before uMatrix came along.
/thread