Did we ever find out what caused the note 7 to be so explody?

I think it's just bad design. The galaxy name has been destroyed.

Do you really want to know, or do you just want to post niggresses?

>>57033947
>the galaxy name has been destroyed
Not really

>>57033955
Yeah, just posted that to get guaranteed bumps until someone replies

>>57033972
>Not really

Samsung has already confirmed that this is the end of the Galaxy line

http://www.pahomepage.com/news/these-loyalists-will-stick-with-galaxy-note-7-to-the-bitter-end

Bad design

>>57033947
>>57034131
>Bad design

That's like saying a car accident was caused by bad driving.

Very informative......

>>57033858
nigger

>>57033858
Battery and
TOUCHJIZZ

>>57033858
Same material used in GoldenEye objects.

>>57034059
Where does it say that in your article? Fucking idiot

>Did we ever find out what caused the note 7 to be so explody?

poor QC by the li-on manufacturer

>>57033858
nobody knows and nobody will know until samsung come forward when they pinpoint the problem.

Well considering they're scrapping the phone entirely it was either a very significant design flaw or Samsung figured at this point the name "Note 7" is ruined.

>>57033858
>Thinking of picking one up off eBay from some scared poofta for cheap. Or did samsung recall it again?
>mfw they're still >$1000 on eBay
what the fuck is wrong with these people

>>57034384
I think it's just the name. Since they were able to fix it by limiting battery to 60%, pretty sure if I root and use battery life extender then it'll work great with like 80% ish

File: 1452912148188.jpg (122KB, 713x951px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 713x951px

>>57033955
gtfo

>>57033858
Must
Resist
Temptation
Of
Miscegenation

>>57034160

WTF else is it? Bad design can cause car accidents too. You often have cars being recalled.

>>57033947
inb4 galaxy rebrands to supernova

>>57033858
>>>/b/

I heard it wasn't to do with the battery cells but how they were put together, Samsung had this done by a third party so they must be shitting bricks about getting their asses sued into oblivion

>>57033858
Probably something wrong with either the chemistry of the battery cells or the design of the battery controller or their charging firmware. Charging a battery isn't as simple as throwing some electricity at it, you have to vary the power input in response to heat and stuff like that. It has to be done in software.

>>57033858
The batteries must be bad. There's no way the phone can generate the heat necessary to make anything combust. Chemicals are probably mixing in the batteries and Samsung can't fix it in a timely manner so they're just killing the phone.

>>57036537
Battery bursting might not be from combustion, it might just be gas buildup in the battery. This can be caused by high temperature-- either from the environment, or from improper charging, or from defective battery cells, or some combination. That temperature could be way less than combustion temperature.

Hackers of /g/, is there a way to mask my note as another phone so my VR thing work?

>>57037256
>turn on vr
>phone explodes in your face

>>57034735
>supernova

kek

>>57033858
I think it was the batteries. Didn't they fix it in an update by limiting the charge to 60%?

File: 1353441752348.png (680KB, 1445x1000px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 1445x1000px

>>57033858

Faulty battery controller OP.

>>57034059
>end of the galaxy line
>note 7 dies
>samsung dies
not really dickhead
>note 7 explodes
>samsung's pr is dead
>stocks are at an all time high

>>57034160
>design car
>put no brakes on it
BAD DESIGN DOESN"T EXIST LMAO WAT?

>>57036500

Pretty sure it was the battery controller was charging the battery faster than its rated value and causing it to damage the battery

>>57033858
Is anybody actually selling note 7s? Every retailer is taking them back for full refunds

>>57034639
>can't see rest of her body
>probably hairy fucking ape
>mfw CNN is shilling hard for "Burkini Babes"

>>57034533

Terrorists in a hurry are driving prices up.

File: CofIhQWIAIwQai.jpg (9KB, 256x371px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x371px

>>57034203

Even Samsung doesn't know what the problem with the batteries was. They thought they'd found a battery defect, but that obviously wasn't it. I bet the Note 8, if there is one, will be the most QC'd phone ever.

>>57033858
never even found if the percentage of damaged phones was really unusual.

kinda dissapointed with the "technology" journalists: nothing but sensationalism and shitty opinions without any scientific basis whatsoever.

>>57034160
... It's more like saying the petrol tank on a car exploding is a result of bad design

>>57034160
>car accident was caused by bad driving.

they literally all are.

>>57033955

it's like the softcore version of those black-on-white spam threads that get posted to /b/ like clockwork

>>57037948
Those are almost completely different
>you jealous I cuck your wife with my big black dick you white betas

Does this look anything like that?

>>57033858
I have a theory

So right when these things started exploding Samsung pushed out a broken update for the Oculus Samsung Gear VR which caused all of their phones to suffer from extreme battery drain and to get extremely hot.

The Note 7 probably couldn't withstand this kind of abuse and fucked the battery to the point of extreme failure.

The reason that app caused this in the first place was it would get stuck in an install loop and there was no simple way to kill the process.

>>57038084

Wrong theory

>>57038038

they aren't different, it's the same weird type of post, just tailored for /g/ instead of /b/

>>57038275
Lol okay buddy

>>57038275

well, how do you explain them?

>>57038306
He can't :^)

>>57033858
It would probably be the charger ic or something in charge of the battery

>>57033858
Tech journalism isn't good enough to research that for consumers.
Duh.

>>57036500
Doesn't have to be implemented in software. There are plenty of IC's that handle charging batteries that just need proper circuitry around them.

Would probably be cheaper and use less power too.

>>57034160
Samshit shills

only gooks buy galaxy notes anyway, who cares

>Buy one cheap off ebay.
>Take advantage of the trade in program that mobile companies are providing.
>Get iphone 7

Will this work?

>>57044339
According to economics, no. The minimum price should be equivalent to an iphone 7. But maybe you'll get lucky and find a greater fool.

>>57044339
No because everyone who bought one will get more money by returning it than selling on ebay

>>57033858
Not having a removable battery. I hope they have learned from their ifag wannabe autism.

>>57033858

Samsung forced too much current onto their batteries just for the sake and quick charging them and that broke the batteries, they made a mistake in the Kernel and pushed it too far,.

The rerelease and subsequent destruction of the note 7 line proves that this was a design flaw not a battery issue.

Note 7 was re-issued with batteries supplied by the Chinese company Amperex Technology Limited (who also serves as the main battery supplier for the iPhone line)