YouTube helps its creators get political

>>56386000
Link -> https://twitter.com/SusanWojcicki/status/771589217436573697

>>56386000
Hi

YouTube listen to money

People give money for YouTube

YouTube then listen to People

YouTube no give money for YouTube

If YouTube give $100,000 for YouTube then YouTube give for YouTube $100,000

Mean if YouTube give also take

Mean YouTube money more is 0

But people give money for YouTube YouTube money more is more

Thanks

>>56386000
>e-celebs
>>>/v/eddit

>>56386000
>youtube ad provider get mad that their ads are randomly spammed in a wide variety of video which gives the flak from association.

>whaaaaaaaa my video wont make me money!!! cause it might make the corporations who pays me,and youtube for ad placement does not wanna be associated with my political views,or comments that might go against their corporations views,or their targeted markets


even tho we are in a new age where people saying fag outloud will get the same reaction as nigger it is still nice to see the end of youtube e-celebs

>>56386000
>controversial or sensitive subjects and events, including subject related to war, political conflicts, [...]
why is this allowed?

For how long will people whine about it, effectively doing nothing, and then forget?
I give them 2 weeks.

>>56387904
>it is still nice to see the end of youtube e-celebs
I concur.

>>56386000
>youtube

normies leave NAO

YouTube was a lot better before they gave people the option to monetise their videos in the first place.

>>56387741
Youtube really doesn't need money from ads because of youtube red. Eventually youtube will just be a premium service.

>>56386000
>Don't put tags of things that advertisers don't want
>Automated bot doesn't flag your video as violating the rules
>Get money while violating every rule

>>56386000
Voting for Donald Trump to make america great again to spite these liberal shitheads

File: 1470864714384.gif (63KB, 632x200px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 632x200px

>>56389475
>yep, it was definitely the liberals again!
Try neoliberals, AKA neoconservatives in burgerclap terminology.

>>56389497
That cartoon really made me think.

File: 1349547612.jpg (2KB, 94x94px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 94x94px

>>56386000
what does it mean for jollie ollie?

>>56389497
No, liberalism is a mental disorder.

>>56389550
Then why don't you move to Afghanistan or Africa where you can live with people that share a similar ideology?

>>56389497
really makes you think

I think I'm #MentallyHill now

>>56389526
>>56389578
>implying Hillary isn't a neoliberal/ neocon too
You guys see everything in black and white, don't you?

Oh right. It's because you're edgy middle schoolers.

>>56389567

American conservatism != Islamism.

>>56389621
Conservatives and Republicans are retarded, but they're a better pick than liberals.

>>56387925

It makes sense to not want your product associated with politics. There are people so misinformed about how youtube works that they believe the advertiser is directly sponsoring the video content.

File: philip_deFranco.jpg (137KB, 480x400px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 480x400px

What would our founding fathers have thought about h3h3, pewdiepie and all the other """content creators"""?

>>56386000
That's like every music video ever. So do we start reporting every Taylor Swift video?

>>56389475

How do you see them say "Content that is not considered 'not advertiser-friendly'..." and come to the conclusion that liberals are the cause?

The culprits are right there in the first line.

Viewers are YouTube's products.
Advertisers are YouTube's customers.
YouTube sells the product to the customer.
YouTube sells the viewers to the advertisers.

The customer is king.

Advertisers are king.

You are nothing but products.

>>56389621
Tripfags != People

>>56386000
who cares, I find more and more porn and tv series on youtube nowadays than ever

only the search and the related vids became more shitty

>>56389721
Yeah, but if they actually enforce these rules they're just going to cripple:
-Every news channel, EVER.
-People who are against anything, literally
-Most music videos (Well that one's not gonna leave a mark)
-People with tourette's
-Any kind of people talking about politics
-Anyone drinking alcohol or smoking on-video
-Literally the outside world

And just that includes at least 30 of the top 100 youtube channels currently

How much cash are they losing over this?

Also recaptcha please stop asking me about store fronts

>>56389451
Hi

YouTube no say take money

People give money quiet

YouTube listen

YouTube quiet

If YouTube say take money look bad

If people say give money look bad

YouTube quiet very

People quiet very

Thanks

>>56389844
>-Every news channel, EVER.
PBS
NPR
Democracy Now
Russia Today
even Alex Jones, if you call that news
The Washington Post
The New York Times
... are all independent of YouTube.

>alcohol
>smoking
Degenerate.

>How much cash are they losing over this?
That's for YouTube to decide and worry about.

>>56389882
Write a haiku of this

>>56389844

>How much cash are they losing over this?
Probably none because advertisers will give them more money for enforcing these rules.

>>56389932
What kind of idiot would pay more for less exposure?

ITT we pretend to be business managers at YouTube and decide what makes us the most money :^)

>>56389954
MAKING YOU TUBE FREE SOFTWARE

>>56389947
The same idiots who clearly aren't content with the current exposure youtube gives them as it were before.

>>56389954
>We must imediately stop any channel with creators who show their faces or talk, because that could be triggering for people that are xenophobic :^)

>>56386000
There's no conflict of interests here. You don't HAVE to make money from videos you upload to Jewtube. It can be done for your own gratification. The internet doesn't owe you a fucking living. Get a real job and spout your tedious political bullshit in your free time. That's what everybody else does.

>>56390013
>Go get a real job, become a wageslave and get cucked by NEETs

>>56390127
Run your own business if that's more to your liking. It's not hard, at all.
Well, maybe it is, compared to getting advertisement money from YouTube for 3rd rate """content""". Boohoo.

>>56390127
>Waah, why can't I have free money for saying Trump sucks? I'm entitled to it!!!

>Hate the welfare state and/or Socialism
>Feel entitled to YouTube giving me money

>>56390156
I'm voting for trump

>>56386010
>(((Wojcicki)))
every time

>>56390172
>Implying there is anything wrong with welfare
Found the butthurt wageslave

>>56390213
I run my own business, and like YouTube,
I optimize the product for my customers.

>>56389451
this.
content creator who can't have adds will turn to youtube red.
eventually youtube will be a premium service...

>>56389721
>You are nothing but products.
I dont see what the problem with this is...
I get to watch funny and interesting videos for free

>>56387904
>youtube ad provider get mad
>Youtube = Google
>DoubleClick = Google
>YouTube gets mad at itself

>>56386000
anyone who monetizes an internet video is a cunt who doesn't deserve money