>>55670549
super mario brothers any day of the fucking year fampaitachi
also
>>>/v/eddit
Super Mario Brothers and Need For Speed are good games, but why would you want to compare them? Never heard of GFS2, maybe some old obscure game?
>>55670573
>>55670585
kill yourselves
>>55670549
SMB for Windows
NFS for Unix
GFS2 for no fucking idea
>>55670655
You can emulate SMB on Unix easily nowadays. NFS doesn't run well on Unix in comparison, even the older racing games run better on Windows
>>55670679
>he's still going
>>55670679
You know, I'm a storage guy, every time someone mounts CIFS share on a Unix host, and then WANT ME TO TROUBLESHOOT POOR PERFORMANCE, I want to scream.
SMB/CIFS obviously.
>>55670718
>>55670770
now kiss
I use NFS with the soft mount option because zero fucks given.
>>55670549
NFS. Super easy to setup. SFTP has enough security as well
>>55670977
have you actually gotten encrypted nfs to work?
kerberos is fucking insane
>>55670718
>TROUBLESHOOT POOR PERFORMANCE
>CIFS
Is such a thing even possible? I just want my pornos on my tablet without it buffering 24/7.
I use NFS.
My only issue is the complete lack of security (IP based authentication lol), and that it will completely fuck a client up if the server goes down, often making them have to forcibly shut down their computer.
You can use Kerberos with NFS for password-authentication, but goddamn is Kerberos difficult to setup. It's a huge complex beast when all I want is password authentication for NFS...
Never even heard of GFS2 until now.
I just use SMB nowadays, SFTP and the like for anything internet-facing.
sshfs?
>>55671074
This.
Nfs is harder to setup than fucking samba is
>>55671157
NFS is much easier to setup than samba.
NFS + Kerberos is much harder to setup than a normal samba share.
Samba.
>>55671186
Proof?