RX 480 BTFO

>>55644230
Those really look like official benchmarks senpai. In b4 lots of Nvidiots claiming the 480 is destroyed etc

File: pls.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>55644230
DELETE

>>55644230
I wonder what "program" he is using to measure FPS.

Also thank you based digital foundry for inventing this new and improved form of cancer.

>amd defense force incoming

AMD FANS BTFO

>>55644230
Lets hope this inst real, in the unfortunate case that it is:


AYYMD BTFO
AMD BANKRUPT AND FINISHED
AMD ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>55644230

That channel gives me cancer.
How hard just to post info about 1060 card.

N/v/idiots are in full damage control tonight.
AMD will win in the long term like always happens.


Go back to your containment board nvidiots
>>/v/

>>55644230
next vulcan patch should fix that bug on nvidia side

File: amdumb.jpg (543KB, 1100x1002px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1100x1002px

>>55644360
>DAMAGE CONTROL

>>55644348
POO IN THE LOO PAJEET

Kind of sad to see AMD bomb two gens in a row this hard, lets hope their flagships have something to show off.

>>55644360
>will win

WAIT™

- AMD

>>55644407
AMD is finished for real, I give them 4 years, maybe 5, before they're bankrupt or sold off

File: 2Fnx7nJ.jpg (68KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 675x900px

>>55644407

>>55644438
I hope not, we're already seeing flagships going up in price this gen, I would really like to see an AMD alternative that'll push the 1080 down to more of a $500 price tag.

Just built a new rig and took one of my 980 Ti's out of main system to put in it til either 1080s are decent, an AMD solution that doesnt suck is out, or maybe just til the 1080Ti.

File: 1308079089001.png (218KB, 600x579px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 600x579px

490 when?

>>55644534
When AMD figures out how to actually offer Nvidia level of performance without running at 3x the wattage or claiming '95c is acceptable!'

>>55644534
Next year :^)

>>55644407

If AMD bombs you idiots will regret it when Nvidia starts cranking the prices of their cards through the roof because there will be literally zero competition.

They'll be gimping their old cards as soon as the new ones are released and you'll have to pay $1,000 a year just to play new releases.

how much the gtx 1060 costs

File: african made devices.jpg (217KB, 1449x1229px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1449x1229px

>>55644559
Just wait :^)

>>55644554
>Never.

>>55644582
Monopoly laws will force Nvidia to break up, so then we'll have two mini Nvidias fighting each other, finally some real competition because AMD can't do shit.

>>55644554
actually nvidia was the first one who said that 95c was perfectly acceptable (Fermi).

Only a lot later that AMD decided to say the exact same thing.

>>55644620

Monopoly laws won't force shit.

Remember that when you're trying to decide between Comcast and Comcast for your next ISP.

>>55644534
Wccftech think it's a dual gpu because the rx480 is the biggest polaris chip. Confirmed by AMD...

>>55644634
You mean Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, Dish, and a bunch of other little guys

>>55644643
That's pretty sad if the 490 is just two 480s put together

>>55644230
d-d-do you mean a $250 card works better than a $200 card...?

>>55644312
>Also thank you based digital foundry for inventing this new and improved form of cancer.
??????????

>>55644706
That's a $240 480

>>55644230
AH HA HA HA HA HA OPs video GTX960 runs better than a GTX970 go suck a dick OP

File: 1405770385733.jpg (43KB, 250x290px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 250x290px

>exact same movements for all three videos
How is this real?

File: 1452512414973.jpg (12KB, 264x242px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 264x242px

>>55644755

>Abkr Tech3 hours ago
>+Ninni99
> yes the other are reference
>and if you looking for 480 get reference one and install liquid cooler
>you will get amazing oc performance near 1070 with one gpu

reviewer sounds legit

>>55644758
cutscene?

>>55644654

> In 80+% of the country

Nope

>>55644620
just like how microsoft broke up during its anti-trust case for being a monopoly?

oh wait

>>55644582
I never said I didn't want AMD to succeed, cool your fanboyism down a bit there buddy. Unfortunately some of us live in the real world where our hopes and dreams don't make a company put out a successful product.

We're already seeing flagships climb in price because Nvidia knows AMD doesn't have shit on them. It's not a good thing, never said it was.

>>55644758
They are far over the 24.3 FPS point
The eccess is not recognized by your eyes

>>55644783
The part where she is sliding around is gameplay though.

>>55644793
I thought MS got in trouble for their browser though.

>sent from Google Chrome

I want to see actual gameplay benchmarks not in game cutscenes which are beyond useless

>>55644805
Didn't even watch the video, but yeahh you are right. also what >>55644820
said

>>55644230
I'm doubting this is a reference 1060 because that would put it far too close (within 15%) to 1070 reference performance. That or Nvidia is restructuring their tiers this generation.

>>55644842
Video guy says it's reference

File: thedicksknow.png (35KB, 595x505px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 595x505px

to be fair mirrors edge in most reivews showed to favor nvidia.

look at pic related. from hothardware. a 970 beats a 390x.

its a newish title and be a bit for amd to fix its dx11 performance for it. there are rumors a dx12 patch will come out for it though.

>>55644858
If this is reference I'm removing the 1070 from my eggcart right now

>>55644809
it was primary for that but also other things. IE was going to be split from the company since they were found guilty for being a monopoly but appeals court overruled the original ruling and kept microsoft together. instead just charging them a few million.

it was the EU that made microsoft break off IE from the OS (which is why you can "uninstall" IE) and slapped them with another fine.

but they never had to break up into separate entities.

File: miirornvidia.jpg (168KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 548x629px

>>55644873
here's gamegpu bench.

similar again showing nvidia doing well and amd not so much. 290x tie with a 970.

though it does highlight nvidia forgetting about keplar once more again. 780 ti matching a 290. pretty sad. keplar titan only 2fps higher than a 280x.

>>55644876
Might be a good idea for 1080p. Looks like the 1060 will max it out pretty damn well.

>>55644454
Is that a jonsbo case you have? Can you show the whole thing?

>>55644858
Aware of that, but the test has no information on setup or graphics settings, which don't even get mentioned. It's dubious at best and not very similar to other leaked results for the 1060. Anyone reasonable should be expecting the 1060 performance to be good, just not that good.

>>55644949

This "channel" has like six videos, and the guy can't even type in English.

This is complete bullshit and you retards are falling for it.

Jesus I thought /g/ was smarter than this?

>>55644274
Pretty sure "official" benchmarks are the ones you don't trust m8

>>55644230
>gimpworks meme
show us a benchmark on a modern game using a modern api, not a half decade old one.

>>55645018
>brand new game isn't brand new enough for me REEEEEEE
kek kys

>>55644922
holy fuck look at those 380X/7970 destroy the GTX 680. Gimping is very real

>>55645018
Oh you want an AMD sponsored game instead?

>tfw you sell your 970 for $216
just nice

File: 1468543982546.png (102KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 250x250px

How does he get exact same movements and jumps when he starts actually running around and playing?

>$250 they said.

>>55645656

Get fucked Nvidiots.

File: 1468451733811.gif (740KB, 300x242px)

740KB, 300x242px

>>55645705
THE JIG IS UP

>>55645705
Autoit.

Also known as macros.

The more expensive card performs better

wow

>>55645621
He wants the high unrepresentative vulkan or DX12 game.
Can't use plurals here!

>>55645766
>more expensive
Nah the aftermarket AIB 480s with LEET OC powers to 1350mhz cost about the same

>>55645766
>>55645656

>>55645763
I honestly doubt this benchmark from a dude who is a no-name, also seeing prices start to pop up if it's 300 dollars for a custom cooler I'm just gonna buy a RX 480 instead.

>>55645779
After or before the motherboard replacement?

>>55645705
It's called a macro, son.
You record your inputs while playing the game, and then play back these inputs while benchmarking for consistent results.

>>55645779
Nope!

>>55645656

>>55645786
Yup!

>>55645779
Is that OC aftermarket 480 the one being tested here?

>>55645795
No, but only a retard would buy a reference 480 mobo destroyer edition

>>55644230
Next time...
More async
Minus Tesselation

AMD forever

>>55645828
Oh right you believe the mobo destroyer meme

>>55645833
>it's ok when AMD does it

>>55645835
nah I believe in the laws of physics and heat destroying powers of overcurrenting electronics.

>>55645766
240$ vs 250$
What kind of Jew are you

>>55644582
I'd love for Amd to succeed, but their products are bad.

>>55644758

there's no difference in frames, only in the frame counters. even if the video is rendered at only 30fps or 23.9fps, you would see some sort of difference in performance due to frame-loss.

Basically what I'm trying to say is the video is obviously fake as shit.

>>55644582
>If AMD bombs you idiots will regret it when Nvidia starts cranking the prices of their cards through the roof because there will be literally zero competition.

It's not our responsibility to keep AMD from bombing, it's their responsibility to provide us with products that make us want to buy them more than Nvidia.

Anyway I think they did a pretty good job this time around. Yes the 480 doesn't perform as well as the 1060, but it's also a less expensive card, potentially much less expensive if the current Amazon prices of the 1060 don't drop really quick.

>>55646064
Where are you seeing 1060s going for $250? I'm genuinely asking here because if you have a link I'm going to buy one instead of waiting for the Sapphire nitro 480.

File: avatarZGVQDLDT.jpg (3KB, 96x96px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 96x96px

>>55646144 (you)
>>55646134 (you)

This is a great way to increase views to my youtube channel :P

>>55644230
let me guess : same story of the GTX 970 not actually running in ultra ?

>>55646064
Founder's Edition AKA Real MSRP is 300$ for 1060.

>>55646064
Pretty sure you mean 240$ vs 310$
Since prices has been confirmed
RX480 8GB version is 320€ whilst GTX1060 is 400€ in Europe, so that's the prices that I will be using for comparison.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01IEA1IMQ?keywords=%26%2334%3BGTX%201060%26%2334%3B&pc_redir=T1&qid=1468909547&sr=8-1

>>55644230
kek
no settings shown
nothing actually was shown..
literally similiar perfomance with a 970 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm5ZCJah-FY
which nvidia was forcing a key setting on the game
kek

File: 98797987987.png (8KB, 363x364px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 363x364px

>>55644230
>Mirrors Edge

It's okay when Nvidia does it :^)

File: amd.jpg (138KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 653x726px

>>55644230
PLS DELETE

AMD in full damage control.
>gtx 1060 faster
>no RX480 OCed @1400 let alone 1500 like they were dreaming
>RX490 will be 2 RX480s stuck together
>Zen and Vega far, far away

>>55647491
>faster
>>55647055
kek

>>55647578
in ALL the pic the 1060 is faster

http://www.hkepc.com/14257/%E5%85%A8%E6%96%B0GP106%E7%B9%AA%E5%9C%96%E6%A0%B8%E5%BF%83_NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_1060%E7%99%BB%E5%A0%B4/page/7#view

>>55647491
>>55646440
>>55648022
>>>/v/
go back spillage

doesn't surprise me. the 480 was a complete failure of a card even for AMD, masters of squandering every opportunity they have.

it was the performance of a ref 970 and perf/watt of a 970, and only $50 less than a decent AIB 970 by the time it came out. not a very good product at all, especially since 1440p/4k/vr/etc all have shown how weak 970-tier performance really is.

>>55644654
>cable
>cell
>dsl
>satellite
totally the same thing

Cheapest RX 480 in Europe is 219€
http://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/4096MB-PowerColor-Radeon-RX-480-Aktiv-PCIe-3-0--Retail-_1111163.html
Cheapest GTX 1060 in Europe is 320€
http://www.upg.de/index.html?disp=42&pp=583&dat1=VGAGAI017


That is almost a 50% price difference.

Hope you guys who bought AMD stock prior to 480 got out in time.

>>55648202
I hope you die of a terminal illness nvidia shill
>>>/v/

>>55645716
Resellers gonna resell. I don't see how this is different from the $350+ stock 480s.

>>55648173
>That is almost a 50% price difference.

probably has something to do with the fact that the 480 paper launched 2 months ago, officially shipped 4 weeks ago and the 1060 shipped 11 minutes ago.

>>55648220
Hey, you've always got Zen to wait for if you want to recoup your losses.

>>55648226
480 paper launched?

last time i checked 480 came on stores the day the reviews where out........

>>55648260
>>>/v/

>>55648265
>480 paper launched?

yes, the 480 launched during AMD's event in macau.

>last time i checked 480 came on stores the day the reviews where out........

there was 4 full weeks from launch to availability, which is worse than most paper launches in recent history (only beaten by the fury x's disastrous launch where AMD couldn't get it out for a full 3 months unless you paid $1000).

>>55648303
Now why would I want to go there when you're giving me all this delicious butthurt?

>>55648265
its a nvidia shill
ignore it

>>55644230
>black background on fps display
>letter align on different places for different cards
you fucking nvidiots are grasping for straws arent you?

>>55648314
because retarded children like you belong on /v/
>>>/v/

>>55648311
480 launched on a NDA EVENT?
hahahahahHAHAHAHHAHHAHhahahahah
no
please try again

File: 1464001955277.jpg (78KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x640px

>>55648315

>don't think or express thoughts that don't agree with my favorite companies agenda and public image

>>55648334
>Show genuine concern in a thread where people often claim they make money off stocks
>GET BACK TO /V/ YOU RETARDED CHILD

Yeah how about no. Good luck with your portfolio.

File: nvidia fanboy.jpg (105KB, 796x805px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 796x805px

>>55648327
DELET THIS

>>55644360
>trying to justify a card that's been useless for 2 years.

>>55648373
AMD stock went up since the 480 retarded child
now off to /v/ with you
>>>/v/

>>55648518
And it's going to plummet when the competition put a better product at the same price on the market.

when do the real reviews come out dammit

File: 1467395120000.png (248KB, 1132x1000px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1132x1000px

Welp AMD is finished. Samsung buyout when?

>>55648532
No its not you dumb cuck you have literally no idea how the stock market works you retarded child now go back to /v/, /g/ isn't for your kind.
>>>/v/

>>55648563
when you go back to /v/ dumb frogposter
>>>/v/

>He fell for thr AMD meme

>>55648585
stop shilling panjeet

File: 1467022277119.png (370KB, 798x333px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 798x333px

>>55648595
t. Sanjeet

>1060 out performs RX 480 while consuming less power
Damn how does nvidia do it.

>>55648734
It costs more

>>55646144
>It's not our responsibility to keep AMD from bombing, it's their responsibility to provide us with products that make us want to buy them more than Nvidia.

This.

AMD needs to get their act together or they're fucked.

>>55648734
by paying people to say it does

File: gpu-failure-rate.jpg (139KB, 1404x579px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1404x579px

>>55648734
Nvidia just has way better engineering than AMD. Their cards also fail way less often, pic related.

>>55648734
the video is fake numbnuts.
they changed the fps counter values on, at least, the 1060. check >>55648327
its typical nfagya bait&switch behavior, the flock will take it for sure

>>55648901
It's 100% real, the benchmarks are coming in from other sites and they show the same.

>>55648896
still going strong on every thread lol

>>55644230
DELET DELET DELEEEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!