Hahahahahahahahaaaaa!!!! http://www.amazon.com/Gigabyte-GeF

Mein sides!

http://www.laptopsdirect.co.uk/zotac-geforce-gtx-1060-zt-p10600b-10m/version.asp

>>55645656
/g/ called me a retard just a couple days ago for daring to suggest that these would be more than $300.

File: 71l-y4+ZQaL._SL1280_[1].jpg (155KB, 1280x963px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1280x963px

Oh my lord!

http://www.amazon.com/MSI-GeForce-GTX-1060-GAMING/dp/B01IEKYD5U/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1468912873&sr=8-2&keywords=%22GTX+1060%22

is it just me or is this very expensive

>>55645694
Better cough up +50% more for your 15% over a 480 Nvidicucks.

>>55645656

>Only 3 in stock


5 units stock confirmed from Gigabyte in USA during all July

File: 1468912899094.jpg (87KB, 789x595px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 789x595px

Oh my fuck I am laughing so hard right now.

Well fuck. 1060 prices reach almost fury x levels, and the sapphire rx 480 is pushes put until at least august 5. Fml

Nvidiots on suicide watch

>>55645656
Are these scalper prices? I still can't find an asus gtx 1080 for the msrp of 670. On Amazon it's always ~900

>>55645686
this post confirms how retarded you really are, and like i said, going back to basic economics and business class will benefit you.

no company can survive by selling a product at over $100 more than their nearest competitor who also has a similar performing product. it's plain stupid that you even consider that. the 1060 will be priced competitively whether you like it or not, and for the simple reason of market competition. nvidia will not allow their cards to sell at a starting price of $300 when amd's similar performing cards start at $200. this is because nvidia are actually competing with amd in this price segment which is totally different to the 1070/80 which currently have no competition in the market. the 1060 and 1070/80 situations cannot be compared. i can guarantee that once vega comes out we'll start seeing many more 1070/80's selling at msrp than we are now and again that's due to the simple fact of competition.

>>55645801
Whoa, the product isn't even available yet and you're on full damage control.

File: wYQx4TU.jpg (331KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 960x1280px

I can't believe I waited for this. Fuck me I got memed by nvidia-gigamemers yet again.

AMD BTFO

>>55645801
At least until AMD goes bankrupt and nvidia can just start charging whatever the hell they want

>>55645801
How did you get all the way down to find that comment and still don't see all the links and pics provided that clearly tell a different story?

>>55645800
Yes they are scalpers.

File: Capture.png (230KB, 1321x886px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1321x886px

>Amazon prices

>>55645841

fucking DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW

File: 1466523335137.jpg (155KB, 923x957px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 923x957px

>>55645841

>>55645801
>this damage control
Hehe...hehehehehe....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>55645841
The difference here is these are launch prices versus a GPU that is now out of stock. Get bent Nvidicuck.

>>55645841

How do these sellers expect so move their inventory when their prices are so retarded?

Are there really people out there who will spend $400 on a $200 GPU when they could have bought an 980ti for the same amount of money instead?

I don't get it.

>>55645869
The rx 480 was that high and higher on launch too. Even before launch idiots were pre-ordering them for absurd prices.

>>55645874
You're underestimating human stupidity. Most people are impulsive and stupid, thinking that new cards are always better than old ones, or rather "IS NEW MUST GET EXPENSIVE MEANS GOOD"

>>55645887
I bought my RX 480 for 250$ on Newegg 2 weeks ago what are you on about

I don't get it can someone explain

>>55645925
Its ok when AMD does it.

>>55645937
does what? suck cocks? yeah we kinda knew that already.

File: Untitled.png (51KB, 718x1276px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 718x1276px

>>55645906

>>55645952
i guess scalpers gonna scalpe then, these people truely are cancer.
what makes it worse is when people sell a 1080 for a grand on ebay and people are so impatient they'll still buy it.

>>55645874
>hoard all the cards
>you can only get it at this price on amazon

That's how.

>>55645952
Please have the proper GPU name on the graph because right now that could be any product at all.

>>55645925
>I don't get it can someone explain
They are currently rather pricey compared to the $249 MSRP Nvidia promised. These are scalpers though, so we have to wait and see if prices settle back down to reasonable levels soon.

Question:
Why don't people just BUY AMD instead of posting "hahahahahahaha" on anonymous imageboard? Do AMD users actually use their GPUs? Because it seems like all they do is either shitpost or benchmark ashes of singularity. Must be depressing that no good games work on your product

>>55645987
Agreed.

>>55645987
>No fun allowed

>>55645963
A fool and his money.

There is no reason people buying that shit couldn't wait a week or two.

People seem to have forgotten what it was like when bitcoin shit was huge and AMD cards were out of stock or $1000+ for several months.

>>55645987
I'm doing both.

File: 1468897117182.gif (1MB, 326x256px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 326x256px

Voidoits on xoopy wach :∆)

>>55645983
https://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=370

source

>>55645987

Have you played Doom lately?

Might want to google "Vulkan"

>>55645937
What the fuck are you talking about? This thread is about laughing at retards who are so fucking stupid that basic pattern recognition eludes them, and they kept babbling about a $250 GTX 1060 even after the 1080, 1070, AND 480 all took it full in the ass from scalpers. AMD is not an exception here and everyone knows it. The point is that the 1060 was never going to be one either.

>>55645656
>>55645687
But /g/ told me that these would be just $229 and beat the 480!

>>55645801
and yet, here we are

>>55645986
it happens like every other GPU release by both amd and nvidia plus it's 1060 so it's poorfag-tier anyways so who cares? just buy whatever you like amd intel nvidia who the fuck cares? I mean if you are a re-seller then you probably do but if you are gaming or whatever just do it. product is the same hell even fucking output picture is identical why do you care what is inside your (mediocre) desktop?
imagine coming to your best friends house and starting a fight because turns out he uses amd ggu or intel cpu etc. do people even realize how retarded that is? it's a choice just like a color of short you are wearing. if you put too much thought into it you have problems. these threads never fail to amaze me

>>55646027
The 480 was bang on what they said the price would be. Well until they went out of stock that is. Let's just wait and see what Best Buy, Microcenter and official Amazon pricing is (not sellers).

>>55645987
>being surprised that people spend more time bitching one another out on a message board than partaking in the actual subject of discussion
You are a person who has literally never used the internet before, ever.

>>55645820
Amd is already done in the gaming market, they just provide for miners

File: 1451872298019.gif (500KB, 500x494px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 500x494px

>>55645656
>amazon.scalpers.com
I don't expect to see aftermarket cards for less than $280 on real prices. If the 1070 and 1080 are of indication, then it will still be a shitfest in pricing. Nvidia really fucked up with their stock.

>>55646049
I'm guessing they'll still be around $300. Nvidia already said the FE would be $299, so it's not like the non-reference boards are gonna be cheaper than that. Who knows though, hopefully Nvidia doesn't pull this dumbshit "Founders Edition' stunt next time.

>>55646084
It's not Nvidia stock, that's not how this works.

>>55646054
nope I'm a person who has 70 hours in past two weeks in steam gametime so I actually use my gpu
>>55646025
played it on release, fun but ending was disappointing, game didn't use vulkan back then but as far as I can see it still looks identical no mater what render it uses

>>55646058

AMD had the low cost gaming market cornered with the R9 series. Nvidia was retarded and literally didn't have a single product available between the $329 970 and the $549 980, and AMD fucking cleaned house on gamers who either didn't want to spend $329 on a GPU or didn't want to spend over $500 on a GPU and weren't going to buy a 970 because it was the meme card

Nvidia literally would have have even bothered with the 1060 at $250 if AMD hadn't been eating their lunch at the sub-$300 pricepoint and the 1060 would have been $349 at a minimum if the 480 hadn't have launched at $200

>>55646106
nice delusion

>>55646102

>it still looks identical no mater what render it uses

Looks aren't the point, it's framerate. Vulkan has increased the performance significantly on AMD cards compared to OpenGL.

File: watrem.jpg (364KB, 700x990px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 700x990px

>caring about poorfag cards
If you're not going for 1080ti or Titan P, you should kill yourselves, poorfags.

File: ss+(2016-07-19+at+03.11.47).png (15KB, 296x205px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 296x205px

>>55646001
>implying i needed to wait a week

>>55646116
Yeah, well done them, but if you start off slow and then get to to were you should have already been it's not very impressive.

File: 1466890668830.png (23KB, 500x480px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x480px

>>55646118
no

>>55646087
Despite people claiming the partner boards would be cheaper, i've noticed most of them being the same price or more expensive than the founders edition.

>>55646116
I'm happy for AMD users (I'm not I don't care nor I post about nvidia or amd) but I have only 120hz old 2011 benq screen so I'm kinda satisfied with 120 FPS in singleplayer game

>>55646106
Pity the 970 is the most popular GPU on steam, making up like 15% of total GPUs right?

the R9 series collectively makes up about 2%

>>55646116
Obviously. Amd opengl drivers are so bad it makes me want to puke.

>>55646118
I don't want to be a poorfag so i budget my money, unlike fags like you that waste their money on gaymen computers to watch tentacle chink toons

>>55646136
this is because Founder's Edition is another way of saying Real MSRP.

Why would you charge anything less than what people have already proven they will pay for the card?

>>55646133

Well, any intelligent person would prefer getting better with time than getting gimped :)

>>55646116
because amd OGL drivers were always utter shit unlike nvidias

>>55646147
Steam hardware survey is hardly an objective way of telling who has what hardware.

File: Fuck this, I'm out - Clock.gif (703KB, 427x240px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 427x240px

>>55646118
You're wrong. You should be saying this to the idiots that jumped to 980Ti performance now or bought the 1080. Titan P/1080Ti will finally deliver UHD 60fps which in turns means high refresh 1440p, the better choice right now. Vega will deliver as well and the HBM2 will be delicious and expensive.

>>55646147

>there's more of a card that's been around for 2 years than one released 1 month ago

Why thank you for your genius input

>>55646180
he said R9 series.

>>55646154
>being this much of a poorfag that $3k is something for him
lmao

>>55646149

> Drivers

Is that why the 4GB RX 480 beat SLI'd GTX 980s in benchmarks?

Maybe it's because Nvidia can't into Vulkan (and, by extension, DX12)?

>>55646172
People who use dgpus are gamers, gamers tend to use steam.

Unless you are referring to your little pirate empire of gamers who refuse to use steam, i guess poorfags like you naturally use AMD.

>>55646164
it's like comparing a person in wheelchair that has to learn to like and get to places again (AMD) and a guy who happened to break his leg (say gtx970)
guy in a wheelchair is still in a wheelchair even if you tow him with bugatti

>>55646172
150+ million users aren't objective I agree. AMD is clearly winning that's why we have this thread and this discussion

File: 1414553525500.jpg (233KB, 1920x2160px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1920x2160px

>>55646192

> AMD designs Mantle around async compute
> They try to get Nvidia involved and even make Mantle open source
> Nvidia laughs and tells them to go fuck themselves
> Microsoft thinks async compute is going to be a big deal, designs DX12 around it
> Vulkan comes out, based on Mantle
> Nvidia cards get btfo in Vulkan and DX12
> Nvidia is no longer laughing

>>55645952
https://www.nowinstock.net/computers/videocards/amd/rx480/

my friend bought his rx 480 for 4GB at microcenter and flashed to 8GB. Does that mean rx480 is the better deal? Obviously

>>55646133
>get to where you should have been
So November 2013's $700 flagship should have been getting cucked by March 2012's $250 midrage with an overclock this entire time?

You're an idiot.

>>55646172

hahahahah holy shit are you fucking serious

>>55646229
Khronos were already developing low level api. AMD saw nobody will use their api and gave the code to khronos.

>>55646155
Exactly. This generation they've advertised all the cards at a lower price point, to catch headlines (how many threads have we seen already where people were touting the 1060 as the AMD-killer at $250, or the 1070 as the best price/performance card ever at $379) then they release the Founders Edition to artificially raise the minimum price of the card. ON TOP of the usual scalper/early adopter fee.

They've 100% gotten away with it too, I mean as much as I like to complain I bought a 1070 like a good goy, and so did a lot of other people. So they're sure as hell going to do it again for the 11xx series.

>>55646147
Okay, looks like this guy is fudging the numbers a little but is essentially right.

the 970 is 5.05% of GPUs followed by the 960 at 3.42%, and the 980/980ti make up 1% each. Oddly enough they do collectively refer to the R9 series rather than individual cards at 1.30%

Though the bias towards Nvidia might not just be individual purchases but the fact that most gaming pre-builds have 960 or 970 Nvidia GPUs

File: doom_1920_v.jpg (144KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 548x629px

>>55646237
It might help if I include the image demonstrating what I'm talking about when I call someone else out for idiocy.

>>55646244
>Khronos were already developing low level api
[citation needed]

>>55646198
>>55646212
>>55646240
11M active users on a daily basis.
30% of those are probably bots/dupes.

So 8M people being surveyed is an objective benchmark of the probably close to 200M (minimum) people using a PC today?

How about no?

>more than $300
>this gpu will be minimum 400€ in Europe
>the 1070 is 490€ minimum

So basically nvidia got nothing to compete with AMD gpus that cost 260€.

>>55646266
>30% of those are probably bots/dupes.

so even the bots are smart enough to buy Nvidia

modern artificial intelligence is amazing!

File: bs10.jpg (60KB, 638x472px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 638x472px

>>55646253

You can tell just by the numbers that real gamers choose intel HD Graphics 4000. With a total steam userbase percentage of 22.5%, it is the most power graphics card chip ever released. I know because the majority of gamers on steam wouldn't use Intel Graphics 4000 unless it wasn't the best performance ever!

>>55646255

> Placing the Rx 480 behind the 980/980 SLI even though it has a higher average framerate

> Placing the Fury X lower than the 980ti even though it has a higher average framerate

Nvidia shills

>>55646179
>Vega will deliver
I don't trust AMD since faildozer. Polaris is another failure. Vega will be next.

>>55646266
Sure, theres untold millions using AMD cards. Truth is most of those PCs are sitting in offices powered by intel integrated GPUs

So sure, if you were talking about raw usage and "popularity" of a GPU....

OMG, INTEL THE MASTER, KING, PC MASTER. RACE. AMD AND NVIDIA BLEW OUT, MILLIONS OF SALES. HAHAHAHAHA. FUCK YOU NVIDIKEKS AND AMDKEKS INTEL IS WINNING THE WAR, FUUUUUUCK YOU BABBIES.

INTEL WINS 4 LYFE, INTEL GRAPHICS >>>>>>>>>>>>> NVIDIA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AMD

>>55646229
interesting but why AMD can't beat 1070 or 1080? and that's not even proper full-size pascal.
or are you one of those retarded that think that AMD async shaders = async compute? because async shaders aren't part of dx12 or vulkan api. nvidia wins simply but having more fps and more performance who the fuck cares how the gpu actually does it. amd brute-forced through games half of their gpu life spans and no one cared but when amd pajeets said that they finally come up with their own async shaders every freetard lost their mind about how cool amd are. except there isn't anything so show in real world scenarios. 1080 wins. wait for vega or whatever it is called! nope I want best performance here and now. does AMD offer it? nope. when was the last time they had it? like 6790 times or something I may be wrong

File: UwwTYo1[1].png (17KB, 440x420px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 440x420px

>>55646266

you have to AGREE to send your information. hence hardware SURVEY. there is no bot data in the SURVEY.

>>55646257
>thinks he's entitled to links
Do you really think khronos decided to make low level api because of amd? LMAO

WHY TO FUCK EVERY LAUNCH THIS YEAR IS JUST ON PAPER. A FUCKING 480RX COSTS MORE THAN $300 IN UK.

>>55646312
>can't provide source
lol
>Do you really think khronos decided to make low level api because of amd?
that's exactly why ms released dx12

>>55646311
Yes, that is why I excluded them from the numbers.

In fact, more should be excluded since not everyone would be sending their system information.

>>55646266
better begin the uprising of those voiceless amd masses. million of them are going to join you

File: 1442348243553.png (131KB, 408x531px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 408x531px

>>55646255
Holy shit my 7850 curb stomps a fucking 780Ti?

I wonder what the score would be (with my CPU) at this clock and power setting.

File: Untitled.png (29KB, 944x472px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 944x472px

>>55646292
actually it's 970 the famous AWFUL UGLY STUPID USELESS LAME meme card
why does everyone use it? it's SOOOOOOOOOO bad! so so bad. tsk tsk tsk...

>>55646294
980ti over FuryX makes sense because it has a higher minimum. I was going to say the same of the 980 and 480, but they actually have the same minimum. So the 480 should be higher due to better averages at that point. That really is stupid.

>>55646294
The graph is supposed to be ordered by minimums, which are more important than the average. They just fucked up with the 480.

>>55646344

Nvidia intentionally gimped Kepler cards to get good goys to go out and buy new GPUs.

>>55646335
>he thinks a survey of ~4% of hardware in use is objective
k.

>>55646297
>Polaris is another failure
not according the vulkan and DX12 benchmarks.
And we just had the reference card so far.
On top of this, nvidia doesn't seems to have a GPU to compete with it this time when you see those prices...

>>55646357
>new
>2 year old card made with technology from 2008 (28nm)
if it was for people like you we'd be still using candles

>>55646255
you guys do realise that doom still doesn't support SLI even with vulkan, right?

>>55646367
>be game dev
>see this >>55646347
>make game run perfect for the average user
>amd tards bitch on the internet
k.

If the board is on sale already does that mean reviews should be coming out soon?

>>55646367
no one cares about your bitcoin-mining friends though

>>55646371
you can thank videocardz for providing us the reviewers guide
videocardz com/62138/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-reviewers-guide-leaked
we have seen already youtubers using it like this one here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-W8cALNlx0

>>55646347
>34% of steam users are on 1GB of VRAM, almost half are using a dual core CPU

>>55646374
Please explain how a formerly massively inferior 7850 can outperform a card which was tossing 290Xs into the trash for over a year.

>>55646374

The 780ti is still powerful enough that it should be getting higher scores.

Meanwhile, on the AMD side, Vulkan supports GPUs as old as the HD7730.

>>55645987
AMD """"""""""users"""""""""" can't afford PSUs and motherboard good enough to not get fried by the rx480

>>55645694
>amazon
No shit.

>>55645656
Has to be a reseller. Thos CAN NOT be MSRP/ If so then it better be a WHOLE lot better then a 480

>>55646412
Speaking of, are H series motherboards okay, or do you need to go for a Z to be safe with the 480?

>>55645656
Ships from and sold by antonline.

>>55646412
My gold rated 750w Seasonic and 16-phase, 3 pci-e slot x58 board say otherwise.

>>55646424
Quality components are quality components, it depends not only on just the maker but the model of board. H and Z only differ in features (and overclocking?), technically.

>>55646423
It is a reseller.

>>55646410
so? it's more powerful in 99.9% of cases but even if it was losing to amd no one cares if because are both getting good fps and one game isn't going to change anything no matter how bad you want it. but it's the future. dx12! vulkan! future is now. >now amd sucks honestly

File: Untitled.png (265KB, 660x479px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 660x479px

The the best value card I can buy is still the 390x

File: 192.jpg (22KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x360px

>>55645656
>>55645687

For that money I can easily buy a 390x in my country...

>>55646190
if it's nothing to you give it to me. or are you too much of a jew to do it?

>>55646450
That lady looks very distressed and it makes me worry for her.

>>55646435
if you are so smart and can afford good components why do you use amd?

>>55646457
Don't worry m8, it's just an Abo.

>>55646452
do it bro don't post about it do it.

>>55646450
did she bought a 1060 thinking it can do async?

>>55646466
Nahh, I'm broke nigga. I bought a MSI 390 instead. Around the same performance as a 480 Reference, while being cheaper than a non-reference 480

>>55646424
Literally anything that doesn't have PCIe 1.0 will be fine. People overblew the 480's power draw """problem""" way out of proportion.

>>55646459
cause amd gives you a chip that actually works on anything and actually has 8 gb of ram

>>55646475
>I'm broke
>nigga
I rest my case

>>55646478
so it's like a slower version of 1070/80? interesting.

>>55646480
Sorry, got raised on my brothers Hip Hop music.

I don't even know why I talk like that

>>55646477
It's the first and only card doing this shit. Kill yourself amdrone.

>>55646497
Sorry you had to take a lighter to your motherboard to try and get some recompense for being a retard.

:^)

>>55646467
>another imbecile fell for amd async meme
google async shaders and async compute

but I better shut up I need idiots to buy amd for nvidia to have some sort of competition

>Nitro 480RX costs £260 in UK
>1060 gtx will cost at least £320
>390x is utter shit and still costs £320 - You can get it for £280 if you're lucky
>970 gtx is 2 years old, doesn't support Vulkan/DX12 too well and probably will be gimped in few next months. It's also the cheapest GPU priced at £199.

Why 2016 is such a shit show for European buyers?

>>55646459
Because I care about price/performance with a respect for quality. My $200 board supports an $80 6-core CPU that rivals a 4790K and beats it in fully threaded applications. Would have cost more to get an X97 setup+CPU. AMD consistently beats Nvidia in price/performance, with 3rd party builders offering superb quality.
>>55646461
m8 I know, I'm a /pol/tard. Abo or not everyone has real emotions.

>>55646491
lel the fact that on dx12 its actually near 980ti aka 1070 for 150 bucks less its just a shame for nvidia
but then again we forgot dx12 and vulkan is just a benchmark
kek

>>55646497
Also the first and only card to get such a joocy price/performance ratio

>>55646507
kek async shaders is the term amd use for async compute moron
you know the same term 3dmark said yesterday they use but instead they actually are using the only way nvidia can do it
kek

>>55646509
>in fully threaded applications
so not in games? and in professional photo they only use intel because it's simply faster
so where? in cinebench? nice!

>>55646523
>>55646510
you're embarrassing yourself please stop posting

Holy shit you people can be absolutely retarded.

Why would anyone with even half a brain left think that the prices of literal nobodies on amazon reflect the price of actual retailers? You can find third party sellers on amazon selling GTX 770 for $770. Not even joking.

There's desperation, and there's utter stupidity. You people fall in the latter camp.

File: lol15.jpg (33KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 640x480px

>>55646509
>$200 board for $80 underperforming cpu
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
AMDRONES

>>55646525
Did you happen to forget the post where I stated I was running an x58 platform? 12 threads with the proc running at 4.5Ghz is no joke, no matter it being 15-25$ slower per core than a 4790.

>>55646536
Post some real prices then. Pre-order/out of stock will do.

>>55646534
obviously i forgot its 4 chan the place all the tech guys are known to be knowledgeable

>>55646542
based benchmark knight

>>55646508
Buy a 390. I went for MSI instead of waiting for the non Reference 480 (Which will be more expensive than the 390)

File: vOBOjOb.png (256KB, 800x386px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 800x386px

>mfw paid 300 eurobucks for a RX 480
>mfw americucks won't stop complaining about their prices

Which 1060 should I buy lads.

I was thinking the strix.

>>55646508

A 390x murders all of those cards.

>>55646557
390 is a literal downgrade from my 970 gtx. No thanks.

File: 1429625248221.jpg (94KB, 775x719px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 775x719px

>>55646508

>UK
>Europe

File: perfrel_1920_1080.png (41KB, 500x1130px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x1130px

>>55646581

>downgrade

Its not - a 390 is the faster card. Not fast enough to warrant an upgrade, but it is faster.

>>55646581
If you have a 970, the only real upgrades are fury and 1070/80. Maybe 390x if you want to spend money for tiny gains.

>>55646596
yeah new pakistan is more fitting

>>55646562
I'm going to buy anything that's in stock.

>>55646598
>Literally 2%
>Doesn't account for OCing and actual AAA games that I play where 970 gtx is 10 fps ahead cuz of gimpworks

Nah, sorry, 390 isn't an improvement in any sense. I need a card with 980 performance level for UW1080p, was really hyped for 1060 but obviously that isn't going to happen.

tfw waiting on 1080 hybrid but might as well get a 480 for now and wait for 1080ti hybrid. Forever waitfag

File: Tomb raider 1440p patch 7 DX12.jpg (99KB, 614x374px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 614x374px

>>55646617

>Doesn't account for OCing and actual AAA games that I play where 970 gtx is 10 fps ahead cuz of gimpworks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtry-A-t7Qk

>>55646508
right now on ebuyer RX 480 is £173.99 and R9 390X is £251.99, both with free shipping. you, sir, are literally chatting shit.

>>55645686
Same

>>55646550
You do understand that DX12 and Vulkan are inherently capable of leveraging all the CPU cores in a system, right? That compared to a 4790k my CPU has about 25% better performance to offer, right? That this puts it on par with a 6700K, right?

>>55646508
Because you ruined your economy and currency with Brexit for muh sovereignty?

>>55646626
>970 gtx is 5-10 fps ahead across the board and that's without OCing the card except for the Ashes of Benchmarks meme

Thanks for proving my point?
How about this?
http://www.ebuyer.com/735148-sapphire-nitro-r9-390x-tri-x-oc-8gb-gddr5-dvi-d-hdmi-3x-displayport-11241-04-20g

i predicted it to be 325 a week ago. get fucked shills

>>55646637
You do understand that emulators and any CPU single thread intensive program doesn't care about MOAR COARS, right?

So uh, if I still have a 670 what do I do here? Wanna play ultra 1440p and have a second screen on the side for shitposting.

>>55646653
>emulators
Runs PS2 just fine. PCSX2 utilizes three+ cores anyways
>single thread intensive programs
Like games that are so old they are legit from 8-10 years ago? Games where the single thread difference doesn't matter at all?

>>55646508
Personally i think £300 is a fair budget for a GPU, so right now i'm waiting on 1060 benchmarks, and if theres news of a 490..

But ultimately i'll probably just go for a 480.

>>55646667
>Runs PS2 just fine.
Run something like sotc with OC EE @60fps and come back.

>>55646689
overclocked emotion engine? Do you mean the PCSX2 settings where you change the cycle rate stealing?

Only idiots mess with that setting. It's not accurate emulation by any means and can really fuck up games that rely on the processor talking to the VUs through timing.

File: 1467654831276.jpg (184KB, 1282x724px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1282x724px

>>55646648

>970 gtx is 5-10 fps ahead across the board

I would get an eye test anon.

When does the NDA lift?

>>55646668
mate, the 390X is literally £30 more

File: fc,550x550,black.u1.jpg (31KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 550x550px

>>55646648
>mfw is the R9 390 is above the 970 and 980 in DX12/Vulkan titles

Enjoy your meme card desu

>>55646746
4 hours and 34 minutes

>>55646642
>valuing shekels over sovereignty
Smh senpai

>>55646767
4 hours and 30 minutes until AMD execs commit ritual suicide then?

>>55646793
It would be amazing to see Nvidia cannibalize their high-end margins by releasing a product that performs so closely to their 1070. Amazing in the sense of just how bad a tactic this is. 1060 is half a 1080 on a totally different die, while 1070 is 75%+ a 1080. That 1280 shaders on a smaller bus can come so close to 1920 on a larger is also very fucking interesting.

File: nSnmb1c.png (268KB, 1924x1083px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1924x1083px

>>55646793
I don't know anon, the GTX 1060 need to be close to the 1070 to worth anything, You can buy a fucking Fury X for 360-370 euro in my country

>>55646833
Leaked benches put the 1060 about 25% ahead of the 480 right?

File: Twittercom+missangerist+with+replies+gt+had+enough+of+people+_7cd68fd68a320801a994e81f501a4eed.jpg (9KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x200px

>>55646852
>Leaked benchmarks by Nvidia

File: nvidia-wake-up-alarm.gif (1MB, 298x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 298x300px

>$300+
>No stock
Top fucking kek

>>55646865
dont forget
http://videocardz.com/62138/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-reviewers-guide-leaked
a lot of idiots will use them

>>55646792
>sovereignty
Jews still own you. Probably the only country that matters with true sovereignity is China.

>>55646865
Even the Nvidia specs only predicted a 15% boost over a 480, a 1060 being near 980 levels. Even then you can find used 980s for 300$~. 1060 is a flop until it's sub $250, and even then the fucking 960 was less awful.

>>55646106
>cleaned house
>market share constantly dropping
Top jek AMDrones everyone.

This is what happens when there are so many "I only buy Nvidia" kids. They are literally everywhere.

>>55645841

Delete this FUCKING POST before you get hurt.

>>55646025
>Might want to google "Vulkan"

Why? So I can see an API that will crash and burn and be in 10 games over the next 10 years?

File: 1203622889390.jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

>>55645656

>480 8GB scalper launch price was $259 and increasing to $299 now
>1060 6GB scalper launch price is $340

Abandon hope?

No seriously, I doubt these price will be back to normal in the next two months.

>>55646877
Nothing wrong with having guidelines for amateur reviewers to follow. Then they can deliver more professional results.

It's totally industry standard, can't help that AMD has trouble following standards as opposed to Nvidia.

File: ff1.gif (112KB, 255x231px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 255x231px

>>55646918
I cannot wait to your "I was only pretending to be a retard" post

>>55645656
Scalpers sure suck, in a couple of months the 1060 will be down to it's MSRP of $229

So seriously, don't bother getting a 480 it's not worth it, this isn't a controversy this is just resellers being dicks. Just wait a couple of months and all this 1060 goodness will be yours for a totally reasonable price.

>>55646852
>this 192 bit bus memory card is better than the one with the 256 bit bus memory and the 8 gigs of VRAM

(:

leave /g/ pls

>>55646882
Babysteps m8

File: v-v-vulkan doesn't count.png (16KB, 524x175px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 524x175px

>>55646933

>>55646943
The Fury has 4096bit bus
The 1080 has 256...

Which one is better?

>>55646943
Typical AMDpologist. Muh ghz don't matter, muh abstract performance, not these raw numbers.

And the one time you have a numerical advantage, you flaunt it. Maybe. Just maybe the 1060 is doing far far more with that 192 bus and 6gb of memory than the 480 ever could with its 256/8.

Fucking hypocrites.

>>55646942
>1060 will be down to it's MSRP of $229

Wut?

>>55646928
kek the time that article came up we already saw that the numbers are off
sad thing is those who actually did a test of a 480 before 1060 will gonna have a hard time explaining those numbers if they use them kek unless someone is actually believing that 480 suddenly lost 30% of its perf and 960 gained 60%

>>55646942
>MSRP 229?

Source?

File: lGiX9Fr.png (17KB, 626x624px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 626x624px

>>55646950
>>55646933
>DX11>Vulkan

File: Hitman-PC-DirectX-12-Benchmarks_2.jpg (166KB, 737x711px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 737x711px

>>55646848
Daily Reminder.

>RX480 is around 300€ here
>1060 looks like it's going to be at least 350€

Man, I might as well buy an R9 Nano for 350€ with these kind of prices.

>>55646943
Does bit bus memory actually make much of any difference? My old XFX DD r9 290 has a 512bus but it's tough to find modern cards with a bus that big, so really, does it matter? Serious question.

File: tmp_4569-1468685573150903112848.jpg (31KB, 597x361px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 597x361px

>buying """"""mid""""""range cards
>ever

That being said, if I had to, I'd get the 1060 because its speed is not quite as pathetic.

>>55646976
>R9 Nano for 350€

Where?

>>55646965

Daily reminder that Hitman got lower fps than DX11 once it used DX12 on all cards?

Be more specific anon.

>>55646965
>hitman
You should post ashes of memegularity played by 100ppl while you're at it. Btw wc3tft has 7k+ players on EU server alone.

Cucked by nvidia again, lads.

>>55646741
>heres this one and only game where a 390 outperforms a 970
woow, its fucking nothing

File: xBgSksM.jpg (18KB, 340x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 340x260px

>>55646962

>>55646989
Finland

Looking around the Nano seems to be >500€ on basically every other store so this 350€ is some seriously discounted offer. I'm very tempted to pull the trigger on this right away.

How does nvidia keep doing it lads

Non stop high quality high performing products every single time.


This is it for AMD rip.

>>55647008
>Nvidia claimed to have full (even better) DX12 support than AMD
>Turns out not

Thanks for the keks

>>55647005
you mean all the games that arent gameworks and plus dx12 games and vulkan games? right...

gonna get use to it that a 2013 card is still relevant

File: 1441128127931.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5312x2988px

>>55647017

Its odd how most of /g/ suddenly forgot all the shitposting here about maxwell having "full" DX12 support and how GCN is stuck with FL 12_0 and how DX12 in general will allow Nvidia to crush AMD. Naturally this all got thrown into question the second ashes of the singularity released (though star swarm was going along with the Nvidia > AMD theory) and now with GCN murdering its equivalent card from Nvidia in DX12 nobody here remembers the claim at all.

Now the current shitposting technique is to claim nobody will use DX12 and DX11 is the only thing that matters (which if we follow that logic DX11 is irrelevant as DX9 is still considerably more popular).

>>55647018
390 loses when both cards are getting OCed. Also let's be honest. DX12 is a meme, so far 390X LOST performance in both Hitman and Tomb Raider in dx12.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCzYD8nqva8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkMc2xZUXiQ

>>55647012

Well then, I'll bet it's prohibitive shipping to Portugal anyway. Oh well, let's keep waiting to see what pops up.

>>55647054

>implying

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9cKZiJw6Pk

>>55647054
>DX12 is a meme

Something that makes multi-cores/threads matter more is a meme?

Wheres the reviews fer fook sake jacki boy

>>55647054
are you actually this shill that you used a 4 months old benchmark and not a recent one with async on?
kek

>>55647074
Just bought the R9 390. Feels good man

File: Hitman-PC-DirectX-12-CPU-Scaling.jpg (48KB, 738x226px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 738x226px

>>55647078

Well it certainly shocks people when they find out their i7 really isn't worth much over an i5 in DX11.

File: 1451444160187.jpg (54KB, 500x329px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x329px

Can't wait for next year where people will claim that DX12 or Vulkan is a meme while posting benchmark from March 2016 from an old AAA game that was the first test ground of DX12 and fail for it.

>>55647096
Its only bad if it works with AMD and not with Intel/Nvidia.

Honestly AMD was lucky with this made their 5 year old CPU all bit more relevant. I still prefer intel tho

>>55646450
390x here it is the card goes hard

File: 1257372750306s.jpg (4KB, 122x126px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 122x126px

>tfw bought R9 390 this early year.
>tfw Vulkan and Directx12 will boost my performance.
>tfw will upgrade for when the next generation X or Ti version came out next year.


Almost fell for the meme card because of /g/, did I do good?

File: Command-Buffer-DirectX-121.png (167KB, 959x541px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 959x541px

>>55647131

>Honestly AMD was lucky with this made their 5 year old CPU all bit more relevant. I still prefer intel tho

Regardless of whether you prefer AMD or Intel you really should want this. Since cpu advancement has slowed to a crawl going wide (i.e more threads) is the only real way to increase performance and DX11 simply cannot into cores. DX12 makes it possible to scale much more and this benefits everyone.

>>55647169
U did good

390s over clock good too

>>55647169
You did good, babygirl. You did good.

File: ZOTAC-ZT-P10600A-10L-GeForce-GTX-1060-Graphics-Card-SabrePC.com_.png (265KB, 1026x1190px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1026x1190px

>>55646545

File: amd dx12.png (2MB, 1450x3400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1450x3400px

>mfw dx12

>>55647131
it's fine to like Intel over AMD, but this will make HT 10 times more efficient

DX12 is good for both AMD and Intel.

>tfw bought an RX 480 4GB for 219€ on release day
>Cheap as fuck and turns out it's actually 8GB

>>55647226
mfw stuttering..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxnFv8cnjZA

>>55647186

>AMD was busy to improved shitty advancement of CPU performance since Sandybridge era.
>Nvidia still busy with goyworks.

I still can't get it why people blatantly hates AMD.

>they bought all the nvidia FUD

>>55647254
Because it's for 'poorfags'. Nevermind AMD's products keep the others in line and make the barrier of entry for builds lower. Meanwhile Intel gets +5% each gen and Nvidia is doing FE shit.

>>55647248
Already fixed ;^)

>>55647291

Its still doesn't explain the hates.
Its not like AMD ever try to stab AMD or intel in the back with these improvement.

So far I only see the hates are only for the sake of hating.

>>55647373

>Nvidia or Intel

>>55647373
Most people who hate on AMD simply got shafted by one of their inferior products which was overheating, dying, had no drivers or simply ran like shit.

>inb4 it works for me :^)

Good for you.

>>55645987
Are you implying Nvidia users aren't doing the same?

File: recettear loli jew.jpg (53KB, 455x511px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 455x511px

>>55645686
Well Reference RX 480 is priced at $308 in my country GTX 1060 is at $327

I dunno are these even faster than Gtx 970 aftermarket which is priced at $273

Should we wait 1 more month for price drops?

>>55647421

Both make the the 970 look old. 1060 is slightly closer to 980 levels. Keep waitan.

>>55647402

But all of these also happen for both companies, why Nvidia got exception on this?
Nvidia drivers and hardware also got it share of its problem in my whole experience, in the last 4 years Nvidia got their most strikes in their faulty drivers.

I'm not trying to stir some heat, since I literally owned cards from both company since the Geforce MX200 era.

File: pic_disp.php.jpg (49KB, 631x446px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 631x446px

>>55647495
It happens more to one than the other.

>>55647514
Nvidia had 100% failure rate in 7xxx and 8xxx series, because they didn't solder their chips to the board properly.

>>55647514
>2% fails in field
This it getting nitpicky. The test rates only matter to miners at best.

>>55647514

Interesting, you got any source of that?
Google only link me to /g/ thread,

>>55647334
how? did they released a async enable driver? kek

>>55647514
>It happens more to one than the other.
>Doesn't post the link of source for "the other"

Okay, shill.

>>55647054
>DX12 is a meme
rorudo

>>55647535
Interesting. I have working 7300GT and my friend got 8600GTS that works as well. I also got 9800GT that I overclocked like crazy. Still works.

>>55647550
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/
RMA rates from hardware.fr also consistently put AMD cards at higher RMA rates than equivalent nvidia cards.

A lot of hate for AMD probably also comes from their obnoxious fanboys. Just look at this thread.

>>55647595
Suuure you do, mr. paid shill.

File: pic_disp.php nvidia.jpg (49KB, 631x446px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 631x446px

>>55647579
AMDbabby requires a little spoonfeeding, eh?

>>55647495
I've been on Nvidia's side for last 4 years with an exception of owning a 290x. Except for one shitty Nvidia driver that was causing crashes I had no issues w/e, on the other hand I had to sell 290x after 6 months cuz I had nothing but problems with drivers that constantly were crashing games to desktop. Now I know what you gonna say, I'm just a shill, Nvidia has same issues, blah blah. I think it's just funny that somehow people who got shafted by AMD are a larger group than the people who got shafted by Nvidia. Yes it's just a personal experience and opinion, it's just that so many people had bad personal experiences with AMD, not Nvidia.

I am going to wait and see what the 1060 is priced like at local retailers.

I can pick up a 970 for 33000yen or an rx480 (reference though) for 35000yen. If the 1060 comes in under 40000yen (especially if not reference) then I will probably go for that.

>>55647599
do you even read your own links?
>We've received some questions about what brands and models of card we used. We primarily use Asus DirectCU cards whenever possible, and the basic Asus models when there are not DirectCU versions available
kek being this bias that is using only one vendor for amd
i mean its stupid beyond comprehension

>>55647618
>It is possible that the high failure rates are limited to Asus cards, but we have used Asus as our primary supplier for video cards for a long time now. This includes NVIDIA cards as well as the Radeon HD 7xxx and Radeon HD 6xxx cards which have a much lower failure rate than the Radeon R7/R9 cards. This is a clear indication to us that Asus is not the problem, but rather something fundamental to the R7/R9 cards themselves.

AMDrone's selective reading at work.

>>55647609
>I'm going to post half the information I'm referring to and act like a retard when people point out that I do

Whoever's paying you really should reconsider doing so

>>55647625
you really dont know how to read do you know...
he literally says he uses asus for evething
and then goes and says its amd fault that one vendor is fucked up
kek

>>55646596
The UK is still in Europe and will be even when we leave the Euro union you dumb fucking child

Sitting on a 760 and I'm so tired of fucking waiting that I'm ready to pull the trigger on a 1070, only problem is I can't afford a monitor that would do it justice

>>55647653
That doesn't mean you're a good representation of European prices, you weren't even when you still were in the union.

No need to get so upset about that though

>>55647666
He posted implying the UK was in Europe. Thats what I pointed out. Nowhere did my post nor his reference currency or exchange rates
Whos upset?

>>55647611

I never said anything about AMD being a perfect card or Nvidia card got most failure rate than AMD in the last 4 years because clearly I got no source to back up this for each vendors hardwares.
My last AMD card was HD 4850 with the latest problem was mostly the glitch mouse cursor and was very well known for driver problem, and then someone said something about that people attacking AMD was came from AMD user because of "no drivers", while clearly Nvidia got more news about driver problems in the last couple years, some I heard also cousing a literally burning problem and this doesn't happen only once.

I mean, not even in ATI era with more driver problem I've seen more bias compare to the last couple years despite Nvdia did also got some problem.
The 8800GT era was the golden age of Nvidia, no one tried to go witch hunt on ATI in those whole years.

>>55647653
>leaving e.u
thinking they will have the same treatment as with the one market
kek

>>55647611

As a rule people - especially /g/ - are in denial about how severe some of Nvidia's fuckups have been.

http://modcrash.com/nvidia-display-driver-damaging-gpus/

http://www.zdnet.com/article/warning-nvidia-196-75-drivers-can-kill-your-graphics-card/

http://gadgets.ndtv.com/laptops/news/windows-10-is-killing-nvidia-graphics-cards-720443

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-geforce-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/

>>55647651
I know it's hard to face data that contradicts your own beliefs, but you just gotta deal with it.

I did give you another source too, but it seems like you're not interested in actually learning anything. You have your silly beliefs, loyalty for a company of all things, and anything that contradicts your beliefs you just rationalize away. Consider actually thinking rationally for once. Might do you some good.

File: 24d[1].png (2KB, 157x62px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 157x62px

What the fuck am I reading

File: 1424715856582.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>55647705

>>55647697
one random site claims failure rate
one random site claims it has failure rates about test cards
being using torture tests for 5 mins as a realistic way to measuring a failure rate
using only ONE VENDOR for amd and multiple for nvidia

its like apple that says we have the best IOS device
because surely they do have a lot of iphone models out there

>>55647681
He implied that using UK pricing as a reference point for complaining about ''European prices'' isn't sensible, especially since you don't use the same currency.

As for 'who's upset', I'm gonna have to assume the person who replied to a 2 hour old post with the sole intention of throwing petty insults at it fits that title best.

>>55647724
You still in this thread 2 hours later? wow yep we know the sad one.
Also this is still on the catalog so guess others threads arent active either

Also he didnt imply (or you didnt) the pricing at all he put
>Europe
>UK

wheres the pricing reference in there?

>>55646172
People say all the time that the Steam hardware survey isn't accurate because it is entirely voluntary. But here's the thing, It doesn't matter if somebody uses AMD, NVIDIA, or Intel integrated graphics. The chance a person will agree to do the Steam hardware survey when that window pops up is most likely not related to if they have a good or bad GPU.

>>55647697
>https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/
>Matt Bach Mod : Right now, the total failure rate by brand for AMD Radeon R7/R9 cards is:
>Asus - 22.86%
>Visiontek - 25%
>XFX - 12.9%

Asus, kek.

>>55647748
>you still in this thread 2 hours later
No, that post wasn't from me. Which I'd assume you know since you refer to the other poster as ''him'' when replying to me.

There's a good chance that anon isn't in the thread anymore though, which makes it all the more retarded you'd go and try to insult him

>I have no sense of abstract reading

Back to summer school then bud

>>55646309
t. retard
Screen capped this

File: 300ture.png (302KB, 1102x627px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1102x627px

Guys Guys should I order the 1060s for $340 or the AMD FURY for $300?

File: 1468928017589.jpg (63KB, 393x468px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 393x468px

hehh hehehheheh hHHAAHAHAHAHAHA

>>55647846
The Fury will beat a 1060 in DX11 (given it comfortably beats a 980) and blow it away in DX12/Vulkan. The Nitro is the best one too.

>>55647514
I remember the GTX 280's having way higher failure rates than the 4870's

>>55647908
Fuck it, I ordered the Gigabyte. Considering PCCG has ref 480s going for $380-$450 I'd expect them to do custom 480s for close to $500 so fuck it. And Newegg is way cheaper but they get cleaned the fuck out immediately and also international shipping.

I'm really scrambling to justify my purchase here.

>>55645745
Being sold by random third party on Amazon. Thinks it is the actual listing price. God you are stupid.

>>55645801
>no company can survive by selling a product at over $100 more than their nearest competitor who also has a similar performing product.

because they aren't. the 480 is a de-facto $350 card currently. AMD hasn't shipped any new cards since launch either, so the price is already starting to creep up (some places even selling for >$500 now).

>i can guarantee that once vega comes out we'll start seeing many more 1070/80's selling at msrp than we are now and again that's due to the simple fact of competition.

vega officially isn't even launching until 2017 meanwhile the titan p is launching in august. AMD has no response to the 1070/1080/titan p until then at the earliest, so i think we will see FE price gouges across the board until then.

>>55647991
see
>>55647846

File: 077869176a618e55786c3475f43bb21063e63f6f.png (1MB, 850x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 850x1200px

>>55647991

>Fuck it, I ordered

lmfao

>>55648028
eh those are US prices, it's $450AUD w/ shipping

File: 2OA4.jpg (82KB, 432x768px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 432x768px

>>55648014
480 Launch morning every where had them for $200/$250 Nvidia launch morning all five 1060 sold out!

>>55647846

buying a 28nm card with no OC headroom and only 4GB of vram is completely retarded. will be obsolete in less than a year, even for 1080p gaymen.

>>55647950
>(given it comfortably beats a 980)

you mean a reference 980. an OCed 980 reliable beats the non-x fury. they're both soon to be obsolete cards however.

>>55648061
>every where had them for $200/$250

you sure about that pajeet? https://www.amazon.com/XFX-DirectX-RX-480M8BBA6-256-bit-Express/dp/B01HOF7ZF6

>>55648032
i'll let you know how the 5.5GB green meme machine works out

I just want an affordable upgrade to my 7970 damn it

>>55646942
>just wait bro
>keep waiting
>wait until your dead

>>55645800
always wait 4-6 weeks.

i know it's hard.

File: Kiv7n2K.jpg (224KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 900x1200px

>>55648083
Yea I'm sure. Don't be angry.

>>55648127

no point in not waiting. the 480 is currently price gouged to levels more expensive than a FE 1070, but even if it was MSRP it still wouldn't be worth buying since it was designed by H1B indians and chinks.

not to mention the fact that if you're buying AMD trash you need to wait for AIB cards anyway, because AMD hasn't shipped any more reference cards ever since the motherboard killing power delivery defect/gimping was exposed.

>>55648181

kek, i sure hope you returned that considering the terrible performance and potential for killing your motherboard.

either way, it's likely you paid a gouge price unless you went full nigmode and stole the thing.

>>55648184
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=%22gtx+1070%22
im sure you can find a rx 480 for 450 right?

File: 2Fnx7nJ.jpg (68KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 675x900px

>>55648208
meme controlllllllll

>>55648209
>im sure you can find a rx 480 for 450 right?

https://jet.com/product/detail/fd46ed3aff4044e0b16a297e4648ddee

$500. higher price than the FE 1070 price gouges, despite the 480 both consuming more power than a 1070 and being half the raw performance.

>>55646309
>why AMD can't beat 1070 or 1080?
Because they released a mid-ranged chip that is half the fucking size.

File: NYure.png (125KB, 742x830px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 742x830px

>>55648209
You can't find it right now, but there were a lot on launch day and Newegg and Micro Center would get about 10 in stock per store ever 3 to 4 days.

File: 480ture.png (88KB, 765x498px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 765x498px

>>55648209
>>55648281

>>55648281
if you are looking for the highest prices for the 480 that is. here in germany you can buy them for 270€ which is pretty much MSRP (256€)

File: ;_;.png (146KB, 711x381px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 711x381px

>>55645656
AYY LMAO

File: ss (2016-07-19 at 10.24.49).jpg (123KB, 1178x397px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1178x397px

should I buy this? $100 off.

Considering the RX 480 8gb in Australia will cost $440 ish.

>>55648298
>>55648319

>microcenter

not sure if shill or bait, nobody is going to drive >6 hours just to buy a GPU. i could make enough money to buy two price gouged 1080s in that time alone.

>nvidia gpu priced higher than expected
>people are surprised

>>55648399
people wait 2 fucking days out of an apple store to buy a 2016 phone with 2012 spec
and you think they wont drive so far to buy a card that will last for a year?

>First review is out
>http://www.hkepc.com/14257/%E5%85%A8%E6%96%B0GP106%E7%B9%AA%E5%9C%96%E6%A0%B8%E5%BF%83_NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_1060%E7%99%BB%E5%A0%B4/page/7#view

>Hype as fk
>Check prices

Welp. Fuck you Nvidia.

File: mcure.png (559KB, 876x698px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 876x698px

>>55648399
I love being me!

>>55648449

you enjoy living in an area with >50% niggers? have fun being robbed or raped by homeless baboons after buying your price gouged AMD housefire.

>>55648398
Get the FURY, it's going to be faster than the 1060 in DX11 and 12 A lot of Fury price drops today.

File: 1467141825540.jpg (50KB, 750x754px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 750x754px

>>55648466
Trying to insult a New Yorker AHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

>CURRYTECH 1060 leak from yesterday
>$149
>See this thread

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_1060_review,1.html

>>55648757
>http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_1060_review,1.html

So the 480 is better in dx12 games

File: 1464408522503.gif (301KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 400x399px

I'm planning on changing my video card since it's old (my first video card anyway). Should I go for
a Redeon 480? My processor is an AMD FX eight core.